MIR / Shuttle Interior Fly-through - Stabilized (1995/11)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 дек 2024

Комментарии • 50

  • @robmausser
    @robmausser 4 года назад +130

    "Oh this part is much nicer....oh thats the shuttle"

    • @ВиталийШубин-с7ш
      @ВиталийШубин-с7ш 3 года назад +17

      Haha, agree, Mir was very outdated when Mir-Shuttle appeared. Same thing is happening now with the first Russian ISS modules. Mir was destroyed because it was almost defunct, and the same will happen with the ISS generally.

    • @pavcueto
      @pavcueto 3 года назад +23

      Hard to compare them. The shuttle was like a bus, arranged and cleaned on earth for each new mission. The Mir was like a garage or a workshop which never had a free day in 15 years (because it was that, precisely).

    • @rentisme
      @rentisme 2 года назад +4

      @@pavcueto also it was too small
      So they just had trash and bacteria EVERYWHERE

    • @ThePixelated_kris
      @ThePixelated_kris 2 года назад +2

      @@rentisme mold was growing in the walls

    • @kargaroc386
      @kargaroc386 5 месяцев назад +1

      space-mold

  • @satyris410
    @satyris410 4 года назад +70

    Amazing contrast between Mir and the Shuttle, like night and day. It might have been compounded by moving into the sun's light but I think it's more to do with the better lighting and white reflective surfaces in the shuttle. still, incredible footage from many years ago

  • @94nolo
    @94nolo 3 года назад +20

    This is history right here.

  • @josephstevens9888
    @josephstevens9888 2 года назад +14

    The Mir and its adjoined modules were really cramped! What an interesting contrast.... the Shuttle and its compartments seemed larger and more, well lit. Good video!

    • @TingTong2568
      @TingTong2568 2 года назад +4

      Of course it is because the shuttle is space vehicle while Mir is a space station fixed into orbit

    • @SimonBauer7
      @SimonBauer7 Год назад +3

      look at the russian side of the iss. just as cramped. granted these are the mir 2 modules so they are essentially a very similar design.

    • @kargaroc386
      @kargaroc386 Год назад +1

      Both MIR and the Russian segment were/are basically a Salyut variant, with a bunch of TKS variants attached.

  • @archaicamusement3871
    @archaicamusement3871 4 года назад +15

    Looks like a hoarders house

  • @leoj2439
    @leoj2439 4 года назад +25

    Mir is just the Detroit of space

    • @Poopshit420
      @Poopshit420 Год назад +2

      Legend has it the space shuttles landing gear was replaced by cinder blocks after docking

    • @chepushila1
      @chepushila1 11 месяцев назад +1

      Shuttle was the Betamax of space.

  • @valentinotera3244
    @valentinotera3244 5 лет назад +7

    Just wow!

  • @happyvirk1
    @happyvirk1 3 года назад +12

    When progress hit the solar-panel while trying to manually re-docking, lights went out sending MIR out of control was a nightmare

    • @happyvirk1
      @happyvirk1 3 года назад +3

      @haidls back On June 25, 1997, Vasily Tsibliev took remote control of the Progress resupply vehicle and fired its rockets to propel the craft toward the Mir Space Station, which subsequently collided with Mir during a docking attempt, resulting in significant damage to the space station.

    • @happyvirk1
      @happyvirk1 3 года назад

      @haidls back No problem , your english is fine

  • @regolith1350
    @regolith1350 3 года назад +16

    Shuttle is clean and well illuminated with soft diffused light while Mir is a dystopian nightmare of Facehugger ambushes.

    • @chepushila1
      @chepushila1 11 месяцев назад +7

      Who gives a shit? Mir was the first modular space station and a resounding success in terms of design. Shuttle was an essentially failed design that was abandoned.

    • @ImieNazwiskoOK
      @ImieNazwiskoOK 9 месяцев назад +1

      @chepushila1 Mir had quite some problems including things like mold.
      On shuttle while in terms of cost it didn't work it still allowed for Hubble to be used to this day, and for ISS in it's current form.

  • @BrandonLy3993
    @BrandonLy3993 2 года назад +5

    What were all the white "hoses" for? It seems like those were added in after?

    • @RetroSpaceHD
      @RetroSpaceHD  2 года назад +4

      I guess for air circulation.

    • @cgbspender1113
      @cgbspender1113 2 года назад +4

      It's part of the old soviet era air circulation system. They could be torn by hand in an emergency, and you are correct they were added after docking.

    • @BrandonLy3993
      @BrandonLy3993 2 года назад +2

      @@cgbspender1113 Pretty neat. I see some similar "hoses" in the ISS as well in videos and photos, I assume used for the same purpose?

    • @SimonBauer7
      @SimonBauer7 Год назад

      ​@@BrandonLy3993 same thing as the iss russian modules are mostly made of the mir 2 planned modules.

  • @acooks4968
    @acooks4968 3 года назад +2

    Jesus Christ how much cables are there

  • @nasafan4943
    @nasafan4943 5 лет назад +4

    Wow!

  • @cgbreeki849
    @cgbreeki849 4 года назад +3

    Is the video slowed down?

    • @RetroSpaceHD
      @RetroSpaceHD  4 года назад +8

      A little bit. If I'm not mistaken the original was at 30fps, presented here at 25fps. Gives you a bit more time to see details and helps with stabilization.

    • @cgbreeki849
      @cgbreeki849 4 года назад

      @Retro Space HD Oh ok... although playing back at 1.75x, which is a lot faster than 30 fps, looks more like real time than if it was played back at 30... it was probably 48 or something... I don't know

  • @Aidan13547
    @Aidan13547 3 года назад +1

    Where did they sleep

    • @RetroSpaceHD
      @RetroSpaceHD  3 года назад +3

      The footage starts in one of the sleeping stations if I'm not mistaken.

  • @ottovonottsville476
    @ottovonottsville476 3 года назад +2

    Stuff of nightmares

  • @ewed418
    @ewed418 8 месяцев назад

    Watched with my mouth open

  • @alexperuna1386
    @alexperuna1386 3 года назад +10

    Mir was so much better than ISS

    • @RetroSpaceHD
      @RetroSpaceHD  3 года назад +8

      The Russian modules on ISS are mostly the same as Mir. But I agree that Mir had a special charm.

    • @Fauzanarief-n7i
      @Fauzanarief-n7i 3 года назад

      i think it's more spacious, that's why chinese use the mir design for their space station

    • @SimonBauer7
      @SimonBauer7 Год назад

      ​@@Fauzanarief-n7i iss is bigger and more spacious. compare the international modules to the russian iss modules and see.

  • @megadwipayana5544
    @megadwipayana5544 2 года назад +3

    My mother can clean it in 1 hour

  • @techtinkerin
    @techtinkerin Год назад

    Bad ass😎👍❤️

  • @monkeyhanger975
    @monkeyhanger975 2 месяца назад

    Where’s all the “no stars” and “it’s cgi” trolls now. Or do you just do it on nasa/esa/spacex videos??

  • @алексро-щ1о
    @алексро-щ1о 4 года назад +7

    Then there was nothing the USSR was the first!

    • @gabrieleriva651
      @gabrieleriva651 3 года назад +1

      Mir wasn't the first space station. The NASA Skylab and USSR's own Solyut came first.

    • @MalleusRegum
      @MalleusRegum 3 года назад +8

      @@gabrieleriva651 The first modular one.

    • @carcinogen60yearsago
      @carcinogen60yearsago 8 месяцев назад

      ​@MalleusImperiorum
      Actually, Yakub made the first modular space station 3000 years ago. He rained down on his enemies from orbit."he rained down on his enemies from orbit".
      During the phenocrian hyper war He discovered zteddick astronomy

    • @hj8750
      @hj8750 3 месяца назад

      ​@@gabrieleriva651первый был Салют 1

    • @90stroll86
      @90stroll86 Месяц назад

      ​@@gabrieleriva651haha its a space station its soviet space station its first space station world its history write what ever lie u want