Видео

I’m not sure on our end everything sounds okay 😅 idk how to fix this.

60% of Russians regret it

Correct! Which is why we should teach them accurate history about the world and combat the neoliberal propaganda they’re already being taught in school 👍

So communism is when you don’t have decor? What’s the point you’re trying to make?

@LiteraryLiberation Yeah Funko Pops are decor....Not materialist items... Sure, until they get boycotted for something stupid and you decide it's suddenly Western Propaganda...

zaddy share me some money i lowk need it since your communist pls slide me some dolla dolla so i can watch skibidi toilet movie in theatres december 25th

you can be a communist and own an iphone, after all it was the workers who made the iphone

Communism is when no iPhone.

Also: have you tried some of the more recent releases in the Goosebumps series? I know that R. L. Stine isn't exactly "hip with the kids" but he has continued releasing content that might be more modern (admittedly I haven't tried it either). I know some of his older books were very quietly edited to remove a few iffy and dated descriptions, particularly of Black characters, that did not age well. K.R. Alexander might be worth your attention depending on the age of your child. Daka Hermon I would only recommend to older elementary/middle school aged, there were some things in Hide and Seeker that gave ME chills!

@@RoselinBooksOfficial thank you so much for this you have no idea how long we spent trying to look for horror books for kids. Honestly any age range is good imo.

I wonder what system I live under hmmm

@@LiteraryLiberation all sustainable systems or systems intended to be sustainable are capitalist

have you considered reading about it? that's like the whole point of communist texts.

@@LiteraryLiberation have you considered that I have and was looking for a discussion?

@@GuestDude_HandlesAreDumbthey won’t lol just like they won’t say anything about how communist has never worked yet will somehow work this time

100 bazillion* actually

@@LiteraryLiberation and as someone with no military authority or billion dollars worth of buying power to facilitate businesses, do you think you’ll be anything other than another death figure? You won’t be in the government you’re fighting for, you’ll be their slave

Communism? Even the Russians don't believe in that crap anymore XDDDDD

is the person who doesn't know what communism is in the room with us?

@@LiteraryLiberation I think so, cuz Karl Marx was a satanist, and I doubt most people are just cool and down with that. Since you know their whole goal is to lie, manipulate, and seize power. Fun fact, most people who identify as communist have no idea Karl Marx preferred his close friends and family to call him the devil! But I’m sure you’ll tell me to go read instead of vice versa 😂

@@LiteraryLiberationjust move to a communist country if you really want your life/rights taken away that bad

If the Government allows that sort of thing lol Russians, Arabians, almost all Africans, central Asians, are all capitalists but good luck with upward mobility there (without military force)

Everyone has the same shot of being exploited.

​@@LiteraryLiberation still better than communism and socialism. Sure sime social policies are great when a nation can afford it such as healthcare and education but, you cant acheive communism in any large nation without any authoritarianism because people lie and cheat. Just cause people say they'll follow the rules doesn't mean they will. Communism only works when everybody pinky promises ti do theur job right and fast. Comoletely unviable in any large nation like America

considering the think tank that the author works at aligns itself with the Ludwig Von Mises institute, I think I will pass.

@@LiteraryLiberation It doesn't pretend not to be partisan, it's a very partisan, anti-communist book; and one that skirts the edges very deliberately to avoid saying 'I think Marx was possessed by a demon.' But I would recommend picking it up to everyone with an interest in political ideology. It's very well-researched and dense, with page-long quotes from CPUSA and other sources to back up the points the author is trying to prove. I know you'll probably never read it, but I wish you would - it's an excellent, if somewhat dry read.

And how exactly does Christianity and Communism exclude each other?

@@ajoshdoingthings541 There are three ways that immediately come to mind, all outlined in significantly greater detail in the book I've recommended above. One: philosophically. Being a consequentialist ideology, it's wholly incompatible with Christianity - who's rules are deontoligically based; having come from God Himself rather than being philosophized from an atheistic standpoint. Two: historically. Not only was Marx himself an atheist, he was outspoken in his utter hatred for religion in its entirety. As well, in Russia back when it called itself communist, they took special pleasure in destroying Christianity whenever they could. The accounts are truly heartbreaking. Three; though this is more an extension of the second one (it's distinct enough to be it's own point however). Though CPUSA has outwardly claimed that they don't have anything against religion; they've done so in a way that is consistent with their consequentialist ideology. In particular, their statement is literally 'we tolerate it as long as it furthers our goals.' I don't need to tell you that the goals of Communism - which are focused entirely on results in this world - is opposed to the goals of Christianity - which is focused entirely on results in the next. In short, there's a reason that the popes of old (though I'm no catholic), and the communists of old, had the official position that, quote, 'you cannot be a christian and a communist.'

@@obviouslykaleb7998 all your points only really apply to the interpretations of these terms in the sense of an US American extremist context - and as history displayed so many times no extreme did ever do too well and extreme opinions tend to be the cause of most societal conflicts. But nice that you try to prop up your claims with Marx' personal disliking of religion while at the same time calling things Marxism and pulling him as a guideline while he himself always had a word of disgust for any form of dogmatism not just religion and repeatedly pressed to not turn his theories into a dogma either. And as an empirically motivated and polytheistically-inclined communist I also gotta note how he also was at first of the opinion that the revolution must not be an armed one while later revising that opinion to a more realistic "It depends", so even his words written and spoken are really two things: - his reasoning behind rejecting dogmas - a reflection of why dogmas especially around people and their ideas are generally just plain dumb Also interesting how you on the one hand mention that soviet Russia "called themselves communist" while entirely disregarding the same logic to a century-old party that had it's influential peak about 90-ish years ago and has only ever been a politically and ideologically insignificant side-phenomenon in the US since the 40s, while most non-americans have never even heard about them. Weird logic and even weirder scale to take as standard for something that is inherently global and features discussing diverse opinions on how to achieve the common greater good as one of its main institutions for decision-making called "plenum" or "plenary meeting". Your entire reply is blatantly US-colored in its way of taking fetishized people and ideas as normal and as global measure. Concurrent quite well-known examples of that tendency to turn everything into some sort of cult or -ism are the "Swifties", "Trumpists", "Scientology" et cetera. Besides that the US exhibits an unique density of cults and sects unlike practically any other place on earth. Therefore it's highly inappropriate to use the US and its citizens as a measure for basically anything outside the US - too many "unique markers" to be a general example. Another one of these markers is how in practice there's effectively just two parties and political stagnation for decades and almost centuries at this point without it being an obviously authoritarian form of government. There's a reason for empirical communism to exist and although I know that anecdotal evidence is almost as bad as no evidence, I am yet to meet an empirical communist that denies the potential existence of some form of higher entity. Due to a lack of evidence we can't fully disprove such a thing but at the same time probability suggests that there's no "one and only, omniscient and omnipotent" being but at the very least more than one which is further reinforced by the logical reason of "it itself has to come from or exist somewhere" which in return implies the existence of more than one. The consequentialism you labeled communist ideas with doesn't necessitate keeping you from living with whatever belief system you feel comfortable with UNLESS practicing it is factually harmful for the majority of the people and the society as a whole. In summary: You try so hard to paint a black-and-white picture while the scene you try to depict got all sorts of shades and colors and the composition only really works with the interplay of each being present. Or in the (freely translates) words of a man way smarter than I am but whose name I forgot "If someone presents a simple answer to a complex question they are trying to something they don't want you to know too much about" and that sentence at least partially applies to your entire reply. Appendix: Thanks for taking the time to read all that, if some passages sound snarky, pompous or condescending, please note that such an undertone is not my intention but merely a product of my lingual ineptitude to phrase it differently due to English not being my first language, with that background information please imagine a nicer-sounding phrasing in the respective spots

You

Thank you ❤

A RUclips short

@@LiteraryLiberation about communist books? 💀

@@Goofyspacenerdabout anti communist books *

@@LiteraryLiberation ohh lit

So true!

I’ve read Animal Farm, it’s certainly a book.

I was bout to say that lol

Animal farm is from a person who has never visited the Soviet Union and only knew about the country from reading british newspapers which only criticized the Soviet Union. It is a bogus story based on so called "totalitarianism" in the Soviet Union which contains a lot of misinformation.