Видео

Camera FOV might deceiv you. But the road where atleast 2 cars wide.

@@cruisechill2000 its a reason for speed limits, take it easy my friend

It is 80 Km/h outside towns in Norway and he have km/h not miles on the speedometer! But to drive in 104 km/h where it is 60 km/h limit is a bit bad and you lose your driving license if police get you!!

Its part of a series where I ride in NOrway, too lazy to alter the title.

Its a Garmin Zumo XT, with Touratech gps holder

@@cruisechill2000 thanks you

Its the Givi D2119ST www.givi.co.uk/my-motorcycle/product/yamaha/xt1200ze-super-tnr-14--20/screen/d2119st

Sort of. It add to the looks. and the sound is only noticeable in tunnels. Most of the sound I hear is comming from the intake.

@@cruisechill2000 Thanks

It's done 40k km. It's due to a valve check service.

@@cruisechill2000 mine is at 51k. Valve service in march or april. Curious about it 😄

GT Gen 2 not Gen 3

And its has bether tft than gen3

@@zalujevi Gen 3 has 2 screens. Some people like it some not

Hi. I am satisfied with the windscreen MRA Touring Screen. I had previously PUIG Touring screen. Comparing those two I will say: PUIG screen give less wind noise but more buffeting. While the MRA Touring screen gives more windnoise but alot less buffeting. More smooth wind, if you know what I mean.

Ty on info

A2 is as you say good for spirited riding. And A3 is abit bouncy and loose on rebound, you could just firm it up on the settings, making it more firm if you feel less comfortable at stock settings. I have the A3 stock as my daily rider mode, there are bits of road were the tarmac is not good. Yamaha was nice to us, to give us 6 suspension slots to play around with.

Thanks. I'll play around with the settings again on the next ride 🤙

I have left mode A and B in stock. Mode C is my daily ride mode, with the suspension adjusted to A3, the mode D I have adjusted the suspension to manual, with the front in the beginning 20's and rear on late teens.

Norway, south-west region of it.

did you end up doing the shorty as well, did you have to retune it after swapping the stock end can?

In term of sound volume. You better of with a decat link and an ECU tune, and leave it like that. The stock end-can looks pretty clean to, without the heat shield on.

There is no dbkiller in it, the screw inside is for mounting the optional dB-killer, when you decat the bike.

I haven't compared against the older gen side by side yet, and can not tell. However, most of the sound I hear is from the induction. I can only hear the exhaust sound in the tunnels.

Compared to manual throttle controll? It is surprisingly smooth. I don't sense the on/off sensation, if that what you are asking for. I wouldnt recommend riding 60kmh on 4th gear, as it seems the bike struggle abit, with or without CC.

Have you ridden any other bikes? How does it compare?

@@ridewithjamal3356 Hi. The MT10SP feels premium. But I haven't ridden Ducatti, BMW nor Triumph yet, so I can't compare against them. The suspension is nice, electronic controlled makes adjusting damping and rebound easy for a novice rider like me. I can have smooth or sporty ride at the switch with my thumb. I also have the Tracer 900 GT which have the CP3 engine. Where as the old CP3 engine didn't really pull before 7000 rpm. and act like more of a used ketchup bottle. The MT10 depending on the throttle settings, feels like you have a brand new unopen ketchup bottle, if that make any sense. Ridden the standard MT10, before the SP. the suspension was setup abit stiff for me, compared to the SP version.

Yes, I have ridden both version. The Standard version was setup as stiff for me, and I had no clue how to adjust the rear suspension, and you need tools to adjust it too. With the SP version, I can adjust the suspension on the fly for my liking, and have a real smooth riding. This might be a controversial opinion: but if you are pro and use it mainly for trackdays. You should have the knowledge to adjust the suspension manualy and accordingly, standard version is the way to go. If you are a novice like me using the bike on the street, with variable road condition, there will be a greater use for comfy settings, SP make alot of sense.

@@cruisechill2000 Thanks a lot. I bought the standard version yesterday. The suspension is stiff for me as well. Regret not got the SP now...

No I haven't ridden previous ones. I have only ridden standard and SP version, of this new generation.

@@cruisechill2000 thx for the reply. I was just curious about how the new ergonomics and tank shape felt. Im sure ill be super happy with it tho. I heard somebody else say the new gen feels more like you're sitting in it vs sitting on it, which sounds good to me

I've ridden both and found the new generation is more comfortable and more refined. The shifting feels smoother and the suspension is superior imo. Although minor improvements, it is noticeable.

At 6th. gear, at lowest 4,6l/100km, but the average is around 5l/100km. Both in 5th and 6th gear in those speed.

@@cruisechill2000 Thank you so much. I've watched some press videos throwing 7.5-8 l/100 doing the reviews. But i guess in 'sport mode on' 🤣

@@angelvega3838 My "average" fuel consumption is 7l/100km still in the break in period. I imagine I will also get those numbers, once I go in "Sport mode" so, I don't think they are lying