Видео

What might be the reason for the absence of any comments so far?

The AI narration makes this almost impossible to listen to. Couldn’t you have spoken it yourself.

What a tragic moment, inspiring Oxfordian Alexander Waugh died 2 days ago (22.jul 24). I read in Wikipedia!

You spend a lot of time on Michael Drayton. Why do you lack such imagination that the arguments for Drayton as a pseudonym of Marlowe (the one true Shakespeare) are not sufficiently plausible and logical? ruclips.net/video/57LKIFQTkFo/видео.htmlsi=ZnMz9sSIpqNv4Iah

Malvolio is not from LLL...Not surprising that a Marlovian has zero wherewithal for the comedies and has to focus on the tragedies. LLL is likely written when Marlowe is still a child. It is much more a Lyly play than a Marlowe play. Wittenberg. Marlowe never went there. But someone else definitely went to Germany who is also from Kent. The Harvey quote is neat but out of context. Lololololol. Bastian read the Henslowe Diary. It's my most popular video, watch it if you don't want to read it yourself. Samuel Rowley makes additions to Faustus. Also I know you watched the Disintegrating Marlowe video, what didn't you understand about that video? Faustus A text is 60% Heywood. B Text has even more additions by Rowley and Bourne. The "original" Marlowe sections are only attributed by matching to Tamburlaine which has ZERO connection to Marlowe other than a forgery. You got the wrong guy. All the impending death and fake death readings are right but its not the spy from Deptford. It's the monumental genius from Penshurst. And it's not just him writing all of this stuff. There's CLEARLY multiple authors in Marlowe's canon.

'I', instead of 'Aye'?? How awful. Stand up for humanity!

'Spread out'? Wow, this is bad. It isn't even written by a human.

Oh no! Down with robots!

I'm out. Awful. Though I agree. 1 of many pen names.

Down with bots!

There are a few falsehoods or misleading statement in this documentary about De Vere. For one thing, he WAS recognized as a dramatist and accomplished poet by his inner circle of aristocrats. There are surviving letters documenting this by fellow playwrights such as Ben Jonson. Also, the idea that De Vere died too early to have written many of the plays is misleading. There's no good evidence from the Shakespeare traditionalists or anyone else that Sheakespeare/De Vere wrote the plays when they say he did. Since De Vere was born about twenty years before Will Shakspere all of those plays could have been written earlier and produced later.

F. Bacon

Not true. There are just too numerious stylistic, setting and thematic differences in their writings. This clearly shows their corpus was from two different personalities with different life interests and focus.

Most of Shakespeare’s works were completed after Marlowe died in 1593. So he faked his death too? Oh stop, that’s so silly. 😂

I sincerely apologise for your wrong name being taken. . Bastian Conrad. Thanks.

His Bastion Contradiction! Your thesis is informative because you'very compared and contrasted two great legendary authors of the same erase 'Christopher Marlowe' and 'William Shakespeare' in different ways. Thanks & regards.

The first half of this video is excellent. It explains shortly but very plausibly why it is highly likely that the part-time actor, successful businessman and producer of plays Will Shaksper from Stratfoŕd was not identical with the great poet and playwright William Shakespeare. Will Shaksper produced plays like "Romeo And Juliet", but he didn't write them - just like Mr. Goldwyn and Mr. Meyer from Hollywood's famous company with the iconic roaring lion, who financed and produced many legendary Hollywood movies. But as we all know, Mr. Goldwyn and Mr. Meyer were neither scriptwriters nor directors. And I think that the contemporary audience who visited the famous Globe Theater, also knew very well that Will Shaksper hadn't written "Romeo And Juliet" or "The Taming Of The Shrew". It's also possible that the same audience who had adored Christopher Marlowe, reckognized his style and might've suspected something. There are also no contemporary sources whatsoever which suggest that Will Shaksper was not just a play broker but also a playwright. To be fair, Mr. Shaksper himself actually never claimed to be a playwright! The equation "Will Shaksper = William Shake-Speare" was made many years after Will Shaksper's unnoticed and unheralded death in Stratford. It happened when the very first printed editions of Shake-Speare's plays became available. And since back then London's theaters had long periods of inactivity because the pest and the puritans kept them closed, future audiences simply didn’t know anymore that Will Shaksper and William Shakespeare weren't the same person and they also didn’t question the oral tradition of Christopher Marlowe's "fearful and sudden end". These things happened a long time ago after all, and there was also a long period when Shakespeare's great plays fell totally out of fashion and weren't performed. But when Shakespeare was rediscovered eventually, people took it for granted that the name "Shake-Speare" on the printed editions of the great plays and beautiful sonets was the name of the author. So far so good. I completely agree with Bastian Conrad that Will Shaksper wasn't an author. And I also believe that Christopher Marlowe wrote many of Shakes-Speare's works. He is the only candidate who makes sense, since he had the proven ability to write great plays and beautiful poetry. He is also the only candidate who had a very good reason for not using his own name. A fellow playwright who was also a good friend of Marlowe, had already been arrested and questioned, and he died later because he had been brutally tortured. Exactly the same could've happened to Marlowe, and his only option was to go AWOL for a while. It’s quite possible that he thought at first this would not be a permanent arrangement and that he might be able to return after things had coole down a bit. But once he was officially declared dead, he needed to stay dead, because his return would've gravely endangered not just himself but also his friends and helpers. I also think that Bastian Conrad is probably right when he claims that Marlowe might've used more than one false name in order to get other writings published. That's not an unreasonable assumption. But that is also slippery ground, and IMO Bastian Conrad starts to speculate wildly when he comes up with his improbably long list of other names which Marlowe might've used. According to Bastian Conrad Marlowe must've single-handedly produced most of the literary output of the Elizabethan and the Jacobean age 😉 These improbable claims reduce the overall value of Conrad's work on the authorship question, and I should add that the vast majority of us "Marlowians" don't agree with Bastian Conrad.

14:10 you said that De'Vere and Bacon were not plawrights, it is completely false, although some of their works were "court masques", which were made for special occasions and could be seen only by the court and royals, anyway, De Vere was known poet and playwright in his time, you said that he could not be Shakespeare, because he died to early, but it does not bother you, in case of Marlow, I do not get that logic

Yes Marlowe

An hour of poor, thin, misguided close readings and circular logic. Also you have the Herbert brothers' portraits mislabeled. Breton is a frontman for Dyer. Its in England's Helicon, "i am thy poor silly Coridon," Breton is also the step-son of George Gasciogne--himself likely the first big frontman of theatre. Marlowe did not write Gasciogne by the way. But Dyer might have.

If only you knew what you were talking about.

if you ask every same question about Marlowe you still get the same question/answer

Interesting case. I wish I could digest the video more, but the music was loud, long and very distracting. I don't have anything against the narration - as many here do - just the music. Everything seem to be hitched to Marlowe's fake death. I don't know if I'll hitch my star to that, but it makes for a fascinating mystery. Maybe the Earl of Oxford and Bacon helped Marlowe escape the Dutch and, as a reward for their services, they all agreed to contribute in different ways to the plays and poems. Three heads are better than one and there are almost infinite ways to edit the material and make the best so that no criticism could ever touch the works. Genius in this case would be a trinity of artists, a triumvirate against the mediocre and boring. A God like trinity to indicate that there is life after death.

It's a taboo like moon-landing conspiracies are taboo. Yeh, we'll listen politely and then walk away as quickly as good manners will allow. If you think you need a university degree to write literature then you don't know much about literature. Come to that, Marlowe didn't really PASS a degree anyway. It was handed to him for services rendered. Which puts him at precisely the same educational and social level as the man from Stratford.

The whole story in 1 minute. ruclips.net/video/_htlSsFoocI/видео.html

Marlowe Summary.- ruclips.net/video/Z7VeQ7OER14/видео.html.

Thank you Bastion. You caught on to my greatest plan of all time. Now everyone will know the truth about me. GOD DAMN YOU ♥️ 10/10 With the facts

Thought you would never ask. I suspect Bastian Conrad will be understood to been first to seen Marlowe's entire canon. Perhaps with the exception of his authorship of Sherlock Holmes. Ask Google for a picture of Marlowe's signature in the Will of his neighbor Kathryn Benkims signed while his Cambridge records prove he was home from classes. A record not yet discovered before Holmes was printed. A time traveler?

Steven , How many of the (contextual,a.o.) arguments for a survival of Marlowe have you reflected. You are aware, otherwise the Marlowe theory makes no sense whatsowever !) studio.ruclips.net/channel/UCz4QMuAf1eRRtu9QuX40MoQvideos/upload?filter=%5B%5D&sort=%7B%22columnType%22%3A%22views%22%2C%22sortOrder%22%3A%22DESCENDING%22%7D

Discussing the reason of the absolute anonymity of your searched candidate, and knowing that marlowe was forced for life saving and safety reasons to abandon name and identity, why it is so hard for you to see the perfect motif for anonymity in Marlowe alone. my thesis since long is the Multipseudonymity Thesis of Marlowe. A short contribution of theses days,perhaps of interest to you ruclips.net/video/iwuZsSgOPus/видео.html

Shakespeare's last play was "The two noble kinsmen", only Francis Bacon was alive at this time.

The Timon of Athens, Troilus and Cressida or Coriolanus represent the misanthropy that Marlowe must have felt knowing that posterity was not going to recognize his literary achievements. The peculiar plots of Marlowe are repeated in different versions of not being able to trust anyone, in the cosmic Justice of not being recognized for your merits or social hypocrisy. It is not explained why already in 1607 he did not unmask the farce and made himself known. It is also ironic that the historical Shakespeare, a man concerned only about money and with such little culture, has gone down in history like the great William Shakespeare without anyone discovering or intuiting the lie until more than two centuries later and has created theories considered conspiracy .

We don't have to take ourselves so seriously. The work remains there to be enjoyed and apprehended in depth. Those who believe in the Marlowe Theory will be able to enjoy it more, those who believe in the Stratford Theory will enrich it with another version, but the stony style, the arguments, the dialogues remain forever. This theory is a brilliant detective exercise, enriching at all levels. Hopefully the Marlowe Theory will be accepted by the academic system at once, or at least the reasonable doubt of Shakespearean authorship.

Anyone knows who is the speaker in this vid?

So many into jackasses. Thomas Paine who signed Common Sense as an Englishman had heard and read Bottom in say it in Midsummers Nights Dream. And check out the registration dates. Dream is the one where Theasues returns with or because he was given the string so he could find his way out of the mentor's cave...he returns to Athens with it's constitution under his arm..what day was it then that Athenians cellobrated their independence on (not July 4) I'll give another double hint the date isn't know but "North" who lived with the Cecil's made one up. You have to read all the way to the end of Golding's translation of Parallel Lives or maybe it's North's anyhow it's the registration date. more later

Thought you weren't going to ask me. You're on the right path Comrade. Yes Marlowe became Shakespeare June 1593 with the "first heir of (his) invention'" Venus andt Adonis". On his way to the Court of James VI of Scotland. Marlowe wasn't gay and had already fathered William Herbert for the older Lord Pembroke. James VI was so gay he failed with Anne despite all the nightly attention he got from his Knights of the Garter. Cecil had didpatched a minor English poet who Anne and James flirted with but Anne failed to be with child. Burghley knew Marlowe was more suitable andy would manage the chore what had he written about Venus/Mary Sidney? I "'I hate not thee but thy device in Love thy lendeth love to every stranger thy doesn't do it for love but to increase the gain (thrill) Hope you recall how young Adonis died? With the tusk of s wild hog in his groin. What did Venus say over his body? " In truth I might have done that myself.." or words to that meaning. Look for the Sonnet that is a hidden acrostic to Marlowe's mentor, the poet/teacher who saved Marlowe:s life in Hog' s lane: Watson Thomas. His dead shepherd when Marlowe made it into his play it becomes Dead Shepherd I going thy saw of might whoever loved not at first sight..." want the Sonnet number...or a hint? in the sonnet he says of his own craft that he mearly turns older things into newer ones in the opening of Julius Caesar he the older cobbler who works with all not awl and mends old souls...not soles. Good luck my German friend and yes he did it all. he and the Cecil's had the same dream the state government must change from kings to councils they understood that the king's were not gods if only because the gods wouldn't error by making so many jackasses John Baker

Because you, a Marlovian, along with the Stratfordians, the Oxfordians, the Baconians, and all other candidate groups do not know all of the historical facts that were carefully hidden at the time. A serious methodical decryption process has recently been achieved of the Funerary Plaque in Stratford-upon-Avon by Jacob Roberts. It turned out to be an Autobiography of Bacon, who explains the whys and the whos of what was occurring during that time period and the need for secrecy then. These discoveries have been backed up by other documents, books, maps, drawings, paintings, and even in the King James Bible. Marlowe was an alias for another very famous person, who went on to be several other very famous people. They had started with their aliases early in life, while spying for England. They even wrote letters from one alias to another in order to cement that person's identity.. When doing research of people of the period and you see words to the effect "not much is known of their early history," that is a clue that it may have been an alias. Many talents of these people were not even known to most of their contemporaries, like being sailors, master painters and engravers. That portrait of Marlowe was painted by Bacon, as encrypted in the words, numbers, and other clues. Many of the group of people involved had faked their deaths, and then took on another identities. This was often planned years in advance. Bacon planned his own death 15 years prior, and this can be clearly seen in the KJB if you know how and where to look. There is no reason to cast stones at those who don't know the truth. There are numerous surviving documents all pointing to Oak Island, Nova Scotia, as the place where Bacon hid underground all his works that he could not claim in his lifetime, proof of his royal birth and possibly several other people who were also of undisclosed royal birth, some treasures that were probably amassed from his time sailing with Sir Francis Drake, as his navigator, and perhaps even his own tomb. With the new revolutionary Muon tomography being used on the Island, which uses cosmic rays to produce a 3D image underground, the searchers can locate cavities without digging. This same technology recently discovered a new, previously unknown, 40 meters long chamber just above the Grand Gallery in the Great Pyramid. Perhaps we will have the concrete information that those who don't understand the discoveries from the decryptions may be satisfied by the truth in a different form. I will point out the absolutely brilliant way they hid these truths in plain sight in multiple locations that they hoped would survive time. I don't think they thought it would take over 400 years to work out their clues.

Very interesting! Thank you

Marlowe was an alias. Please take the information on the painting you show, and the decryption tells you the identity of the painter and the portrait sitter. It is very easy to do using the words and numbers written on it, not to mention the information provided in the design itself. I did it in just a few minutes. The powers faked the death of "Marlowe." Don't you find it interesting that the Privy Council stepped in to award his graduation certificate at Cambridge? How often was that done in history? These guys were spys!

Thanks Ron (Mr.Oxfordian) For your interest . Unfortunately, your scrutinity doesn’t convince me ..-. Whom do you mean specifically wih the “Crown”. You should from the very beginning call the child by its name.. It was of course William Cecil, Lord Burghley. He was not the kind of man to let an ovverpowering genius (the only one!!) thoughtless killed, There are abundant mighty and numerous arguments for Marlowe (some 2000) that it makes no real sense to accept a single (! zero +1) poor argument that M was killed , or Cecil wanted him killed. reflect the chain of a few 100 arguments (link) , at least, and how you would refute them ...... ruclips.net/user/bastianconradmarlowecreatedshakespearevideos?view=0&sort=p&flow=grid P.S: There could be infinitely be more to say about your argumentation but I am fully aware (also for me) , that after a certain age impregnations of beliefs are no longer easily erased. Such efforts to try to change someone’s belief are wasted time. .....it needs new generations....your image and knowledge of Marlowe ("troublesome", "unprolific", "controversial" WOW!!!) seems to be an impressive caricature of the reality. You do not seem to ever have read Dr Faustus, Edward II, Hero & Leander etc. etc....what a shame)

Well done. You have posed most of the important questions regarding the authorship question. I must take umbrage however at the final conclusion that Marlowe was the author of the plays and poems attributed to Shakspere of Stratford. While the Marlowe conspiracy theory seems plausible, it falls apart under scrutiny. Why would the Crown (or anyone else) have gone to so much trouble to keep him alive when it was simpler to have him killed or exiled far away and be done with it? It makes no sense to have put him in "witness protection" which is a concept only known in the past century. In previous eras unwanted individuals who were still valuable were shipped off to colonies far from home, yet the Marlovian conspiracy puts the playwright in Europe, which was easily accessible by a quick hop across the English Channel, where his enemies could get to him. The only people who survived such exile were people with Catholic leanings who could rely on the underground network of priests and nobles living in England to ship them to safe houses both in and out of England. Marlowe was a notorious atheist unless the contemporary records are wrong, so it would not have been possible for him to have been secreted away by Catholic sympathizers or recusant Catholics who feared for his life. Guarding such a public atheist from harm would have risked the lives of everyone who sheltered him. The entire Marlovian theory rests on the idea that somehow this atheist spy was still valuable for some unknown reason. There is nothing in the plays and poems to suggest that he was valuable other than to provide the Court and patrons of the theater with superb plays, which in those days were seen as lowly entertainment, especially when presented outside of Court. And if he had any information which could have compromised any noble or people in high posts, it would have still been easier and more efficient to have him murdered rather than leave him alive to potentially blackmail anyone of authority. The records show, however erratically, that this was what happened. The Marlowe theory rests on a paradox that someone wanted him alive but still needed him to appear dead. And there is no clear motive for anyone to have kept him alive whatsoever. Indeed, if he was kept alive, it would have been easier to keep him in some noble's estate as a hired servant under a false name, but I doubt that he would have accepted that since it appears from the record he had a huge ego. Despite several generations of scholars and researchers looking into this, nobody can offer a reason why he would have been living secretly in Europe without adding layers and layers of speculation over what could be answered clearly. From what I understand of the theory, it takes convoluted reasoning and close examination of the texts of the plays and speculation on the involvement of people like the Earl of Southampton (who was himself in trouble with Queen Elizabeth for his role in the Essex rebellion) to make the facts stick together. Spy networks back then were sophisticated, to be sure, but I seriously doubt that anyone would have wanted the troublesome, unprolific, and controversial Marlowe secretly alive for any reason. It doesn't make sense. Just my ideas on the subject.

Wait until you find out who the true author was, of Shakespeare and Marlowe. Be prepared for Jacob Robert's book to be released in about a year. It will blow you away, as does his two other books. He shows a step by step decryption of the Shakespeare funerary plaque. You are close in your theory, but it is only a small part of the Entire story!

Hey ! Bastian, If Marlowe was Shakespeare, then why university wits used to criticise Shakespeare.???

You are correct of course but for the wrong reasons!

All I know is that spies are masters of false identities and faking deaths to take on different personas elsewhere. I also know that Marlowe was a spy. As to who was Shakespeare, sadly none of us will ever know.

It is a good video, it shows that it is worked and that the author has read both poems, very instructive about Shakespeare's lyrical poems. Various criticisms have been made of the Marlowe Theory. One saying that his style was different where only the protagonist shines and his humor is lewd and exaggerated, compared to the polyphonic character full of characters with their own lives and the subtle humor of Shakespeare. Perhaps in that you can see the development of the personality of the same author. The more the Marlowe Theory is criticized, the more it convinces me.

Bacon/Neville

I am really interested in what this video had to say but the robot voice is so wrong ..mispronunciations, jumbled missing pieces of words. The music interludes are so loud, maudlin and too long..I was looking for subtitles so I could just read it and not have to listen..Please do it again..this is actually awful

Now is definitive. Christopher Marlowe was the true Shakespeare. Im completely Sure. Thank you Bastian Conrad!

I understand: you are saying: the Earl of Oxford was using Marlowe as one of his many front ! WOW !