Видео

@Harzurner you can use them for whatever you want really. Whatever comfortable and works for you. I like a little extra tension for my bends. Something to fight against. But 10s are also fine. I have 11s on my acoustic too so bends on that feel pretty similar to my electrics.

💅

Thank you so much, glad you like it 😊

Thank you! Its a Fender 72' thinline tele

I'm playing it in D flat minor, I believe the original is in A flat minor.

Agreed. It's funny that some seem to think this was a serious test. I decided to try a different set to my usual and had some fun with it while changing them. I still use nickel wound if that means anything to anyone.

Daddario shows the tension in standard tuning for a 25in neck, on the packages.

I think he may have that backwards.

Actually He didn't :|

Lol...

@@grayveeacoustics how did he jump from set to set then?? facepalm

@@tiagogomes4114 no he didn't. He first used one string gauge to record all the riffs together then restrung to record with the other gauge and later edited them side by side ....so he only changed strings once Facepalm

@@chhanda5475 we got a xerlok homls here. It was sarcasm.

J Higelin I see where you are coming from, and that would be an interesting comparison I should have included. However, nobody plays guitar like that.

@@LiamMacLeanMusic The point is to eliminate as many possible sources of sonic differences as possible so that one can have an accurate comparison.

kOo1dZ thank you!

Was just about to type the same thing.

Nick Wolf I usually just hang an SM57 from the amp. There is a bit of bleed since I'm not wearing headphone but it's not that bad, I can get away with it for RUclips videos.

Great style by the way! I love the thinline!

metalqueen17 thank you! Glad you like it! The 4th chord is a Bb. That’s how I played it anyway, no idea if that’s what Steven plays!

RipperAF thank you! There was some bleed but nothing major. The amp is loud enough to overpower the speakers, and it still gives you a very good idea of how the little guy sounds.

Liam MacLean thanks man! I recently bought the fly and it is awesome! Currently looking at a proper way to record using it.

Yeah its a fantastic wee amp! I would just mic it up, although it does have an output so maybe that would work better, I've never tried it for recording although it does sound great through my speakers.

your ears can't hear above 48.000 Hz.. it's useless to record in any higher Hz. Plus, your DAW has an extra struggle with recording and it's much heavier sources 48.000 Hz is good for movies soundtracks 44.100 Hz is an default for CD and radio

Even though we can't hear above 25KHz on average as humans, recording at higher sample rates can show an increase in sympathetic resonance and harmonics that wouldn't have been heard in lower rate recordings. Downsampling conversion to 44.1KHz kinda kills the point of that, though. +Margolins, with your logic we shouldn't record at anything under 96KHz sample rate as we basically halve the sample rate to find the frequency response of the recordings. 44.1KHz works because we typically can't hear above 20KHz very well and that gets us an effective accurate frequency response (not counting hardware limitations like mics and such) up to 22.05KHz which is ample enough to cover the most important sensitivity ranges of our hearing.

@@ChangoFrett You need to read up on how digital sampling works. Anything below half the sample rate can be captured perfectly. Large-scale research has demonstrated that humans cannot differentiate between a high-resolution recording and a CD quality reproduction of it. drewdaniels.com/audible.pdf