Видео

I’m blown away by how much I learned in this podcast.

I learned so much from this conversation between Haier and Kukina. Neuroscience has so many layers!

Thank you for this !

There is solution for every problem in this universe 🌌 but if once our hair will grey, can't be reversed to naturally black 🐈‍⬛🖤😢

The tension in this episode is real.

Great conversation.

What a brilliant podcast❤️

Jack Barsky’s experience with the FBI and KGB is chilling. Great podcast!

What an incredible conversation.

This was such an interesting interview!

Fascinating character and great interview

Like, leave a comment and subscribe for more similar content 👍

Hii

This podcast episode gave me chills, Barsky’s KGB spy story is fascinating.

This podcast is one of the best things on the internet.

This podcast was intense and thought provoking.

Like, subscribe, and leave a comment for more similar content 👍

Incredible insights from a former spy.

Your content stands out in the crypto space-thank you! A slight deviation, I wanted to ask: my OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (blood frost vague mom crop midnight innocent avoid human spin grace hurdle). How should I go about transferring them to ByBit?

Awesome video! I have a question: I keep USDT on BitGet, and I have the seed phrase (bar buffalo stone electric maze limb oil match obtain rice above asset). How can I move it to Binance?

Kerr to Schwarzschild to white transition during the thermal death.

guys, i think dark matter matters.

Thanks for the forecast! A bit off-topic, but I wanted to ask: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). What's the best way to send them to Binance?

Timestamp would a big improvement. For instance, I want to listen a particular section of the vide about certain topics.

Great interview. I'm glad Bostrom is not afraid to take his ideas to their limit, even when they start to push into areas that scientists usually avoid out of fear of being seen as irrational. The western scientific view has almost completely ignored the implications and significance of consciousness. As a result it is missing at least half the picture of reality. Once we have the technology, we will begin to truly explore our own minds and go far beyond our current limits.

However, light energy or photon is maximum super position for matters

This will never happen. This assumes the reductionist view of the mind and consciousness, why is incorrect.

The hand sign for three is what led to the saloon shootout in inglorious bastards

we can do the transhumanist idea of mind _reconstruction_ right now...what Kurzweil calls "replicants"

Really enjoyed the conversation. Would be awesome if you could get your podcast on overcast. Thanks!

This was so educational!! Thank you for letting Scott expound on these subjects!

we love him that much

Good luck nailing down Conscious as an epiphenomena of the brain.

Like, leave a comment, and subscribe for more similar content 👍

It is not a risk, it is a necessity. You are trying to mislead the world. Humans are over. That's a fact.

Homie is pro effective world government - bottom line, it's evil and delusional.

The viXra entry #3948 under Relativity and Cosmology already solves the dark matter problem. Physicists doubted the possibility but all of it actually is neutrinos after all, and dark matter shows plenty signs of annihilating, too.

A very important subject!!! Thanks.

Timestamps pls

Like, leave a comment, and subscribe for more similar content 👍

Just think - this interview will be analyzed by future potential ASI in its training data, maybe helping to shape and form its self-assessments and self-knowledge.

Do we live in a computer simulation? Yes. We live in an AI level 7 computer simulation that runs our lives inside the eye of a small little black Kitty that is tasting milk over a plate for the first time.

Like, leave a comment, and subscribe for more similar content 👍

Dark matter is dilated mass. Dilation is the phenomenon our high school teachers were talking about when they said "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". This doesn't mean mass increases, it means mass becomes spread throughout spacetime relative to an outside observer. Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation. Even mass that exists at 75% light speed is partially dilated. It occurs wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass. This includes the centers of very high mass stars and the overwhelming majority of galaxy centers. The mass at the center of our own galaxy is dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. In other words that mass is all around us. Sound familiar? This is the explanation for dark matter/galaxy rotation curves. The "missing mass" is dilated mass. Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has been confirmed in 6 ultra diffuse galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have no dark matter. In other words they have normal rotation rates.

1:11:06 Computational Irreducibility and Free Will; Will We give AI Free Will? - Humans are lazy, following AI suggestions could lead to reverting to the mean: AI as the ultimate Sheepdog shepherding Humanity, as human sheep are just lazy. Well: what’s wrong with a bit of shepherding? As long there are greener pastures ahead? There‘ll be room for some Psalm 23 comfort / consolation coming with it? - Maybe we get stuck on some local optimum, instead of discovering the next hillside, but maybe there will still be a way down the road? 23 The Lord is my shepherd; I shall not want. 2 He maketh me to lie down in green pastures: he leadeth me beside the still waters. 3 He restoreth my soul: he leadeth me in the paths of righteousness for his name's sake. 4 Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou art with me; thy rod and thy staff they comfort me. 5 Thou preparest a table before me in the presence of mine enemies: thou anointest my head with oil; my cup runneth over. 6 Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life: and I will dwell in the house of the Lord for ever.

Mmhmm

I am a physicist and I explain why current physics leaves not room for the possibility that brain processes can be a sufficient condition for the existence of consciousness. The hypothesis that consciousness emerges from, or can be identified with physical, chemical or biological processes is incompatible with current physics. It is a scientifically established fact that a mental experience is associated with numerous distinct microscopic physical processes that occur at different points; there is no physical entity that connects all these distinct microscopic processes, therefore the existence of mental experience requires an element of connection that is not described by current physics. This missing element of connection can be identified with what we traditionally refer to as the soul (in my youtube channel you can find a video with more detailed explanations). Emergent properties are often thought of as arising from complex systems (like the brain). However, I argue that these properties are subjective cognitive constructs that depend on the level of abstraction we choose to analyze and describe the system. Since these descriptions are mind-dependent, consciousness, being implied by these cognitive contructs, cannot itself be an emergent property. Preliminary considerations: the concept of set refers to something that has an intrinsically conceptual and subjective nature and implies the arbitrary choice of determining which elements are to be included in the set; what can exist objectively are only the individual elements. Defining a set is like drawing an imaginary line to separate some elements from others. This line doesn't exist physically; it’s a mental construct. The same applies to sequences of processes-they are abstract concepts created by our minds. Mental experiences are necessary for the existence of subjectivity/arbitrariness and cognitive constructs; Therefore, mental experience itself cannot be just a cognitive construct. Obviously we can conceive the concept of consciousness, but the concept of consciousness is not actual consciousness; We can talk about consciousness or about pain, but merely talking about it isn’t the same as experiencing it. (With the word consciousness I do not refer to self-awareness, but to the property of being conscious= having a mental experiences such as sensations, emotions, thoughts, memories and even dreams) From the above considerations it follows that only indivisible elements may exist objectively and independently of consciousness, and consequently the only logically coherent and significant statement is that consciousness exists as a property of an indivisible element. Furthermore, this indivisible entity must interact globally with brain processes because there is a well-known correlation between brain processes and consciousness. However, this indivisible entity cannot be physical, since according to the laws of physics, there is no physical entity with such properties. The soul is the missing element that interprets globally the distinct elementary physical processes occurring at separate points in the brain as a unified mental experience. Clarifications The brain itself doesn't exist objectively as a mind-independent entity. The concept of the brain is based on separating a group of quantum particles from everything else, which is a subjective process, not dictated purely by the laws of physics. Actually there is a continuous exchange of molecules with the blood and when and how such molecules start and stop being part of the brain is decided arbitrarily. An example may clarify this point: the concept of nation. Nation is not a physical entity and does not refer to a mind-independent entity because it is just a set of arbitrarily chosen people. The same goes for the brain. Brain processes consist of many parallel sequences of ordinary elementary physical processes occurring at separate points. There is no direct connection between the separate points in the brain and such connections are just a subjective abstractions used to approximately describe sequences of many distinct physical processes. Indeed, considering consciousness as a property of an entire sequence of elementary processes implies the arbitrary definition of the entire sequence; the entire sequence as a whole (and therefore every function/property/capacity attributed to the brain) is a subjective abstraction that does not refer to any mind-independendent reality. Physicalism/naturalism is based on the belief that consciousness is an emergent property of the brain. However, an emergent property is defined as a property that is possessed by a set of elements that its individual components do not possess; my arguments prove that this definition implies that emergent properties are only subjective cognitive constructs and therefore, consciousness cannot be an emergent property. Actually, emergent properties are just simplified and approximate descriptions or subjective classifications of underlying physical processes or properties, which are described directly by the fundamental laws of physics alone, without involving any emergent properties (arbitrariness/subjectivity is involved when more than one option/description is possible). An approximate description is only an abstract idea, and no actual entity exists per se corresponding to that approximate description, simply because an actual entity is exactly what it is and not an approximation of itself. What physically exists are the underlying physical processes. Emergence is nothing more than a cognitive construct that is applied to physical phenomena, and cognition itself can only come from a mind; thus emergence can never explain mental experience as, by itself, it implies mental experience. Conclusions My approach is based on scientific knowledge of the brain's physical processes. My arguments show that physicalism is incompatible with the very foundations of scientific knowledge because current scientific understanding of molecular processes excludes the possibility that brain processes alone can account for the existence of consciousness. An indivisible non-physical element must exist as a necessary condition for the existence of consciousness because mental experiences are linked to many distinct physical processes occurring at different points; it is therefore necessary for all these distinct processes to be interpreted collectively by a mind-independent element, and a mind-independent element can only be intrinsically indivisible because it cannot depend on subjectivity. This indivisible element cannot be physical because the laws of physics do not describe any physical entity with the required properties. Marco Biagini

pleas stop the "I see"s and the "mhm"s it becomes so hard to listen to Stephen s talk

Interesting podcast!

This podcast really makes you think about the future of AI and consciousness.