John Paul Minda
John Paul Minda
  • Видео 163
  • Просмотров 89 313
Psychology of Thinking (3130) 2025, Lecture 3
This is the second lecture Dr. Minda' psychology of thinking course at western university. The topic is the psychology of memory and thinking
Просмотров: 131

Видео

Psychology of Thinking (3130) 2025, Lecture2
Просмотров 19114 дней назад
This is the second lecture Dr. Minda' psychology of thinking course at western university. The topic is the psychology of similarity
Psychology of Thinking (3130) 2025, Lecture1
Просмотров 20821 день назад
This is the first lecture Dr. Minda' psychology of thinking course at western university.
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 11 Expertise
Просмотров 2179 месяцев назад
Lecture recording for Dr. Minda's "Psychology of Thinking" course at Western University. This is the winter term, 2024 class.
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 10.1 Problem Solving
Просмотров 31510 месяцев назад
Lecture recording for Dr. Minda's "Psychology of Thinking" course at Western University. This is the winter term, 2024 class.
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 10.2 Creativity
Просмотров 21110 месяцев назад
Lecture recording for Dr. Minda's "Psychology of Thinking" course at Western University. This is the winter term, 2024 class.
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 9.2: Prospect Theory and Decision Making
Просмотров 28610 месяцев назад
Lecture recording for Dr. Minda's "Psychology of Thinking" course at Western University. This is the winter term, 2024 class.
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 9.1: Probability and Decision Making
Просмотров 18510 месяцев назад
Lecture recording for Dr. Minda's "Psychology of Thinking" course at Western University. This is the winter term, 2024 class.
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 8.1: Context effects on thinking
Просмотров 22810 месяцев назад
Lecture recording for Dr. Minda's "Psychology of Thinking" course at Western University. This is the winter term, 2024 class.
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 8.2: Mood effects on thinking
Просмотров 16210 месяцев назад
Lecture recording for Dr. Minda's "Psychology of Thinking" course at Western University. This is the winter term, 2024 class.
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 7.1: Causal Reasoning and Deduction
Просмотров 21610 месяцев назад
Lecture recording for Dr. Minda's "Psychology of Thinking" course at Western University. This is the winter term, 2024 class.
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 7.2: Categorical and Conditional Logic
Просмотров 17010 месяцев назад
Lecture recording for Dr. Minda's "Psychology of Thinking" course at Western University. This is the winter term, 2024 class.
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 6.2: Categorical Induction?
Просмотров 19611 месяцев назад
Lecture recording for Dr. Minda's "Psychology of Thinking" course at Western University. This is the winter term, 2024 class.
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 6.1: What is Induction?
Просмотров 35611 месяцев назад
Lecture recording for Dr. Minda's "Psychology of Thinking" course at Western University. This is the winter term, 2024 class.
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 5.1: Language And Thought
Просмотров 52311 месяцев назад
Lecture recording for Dr. Minda's "Psychology of Thinking" course at Western University. This is the winter term, 2024 class.
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 5.2: Linguistic Determinism
Просмотров 30111 месяцев назад
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 5.2: Linguistic Determinism
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 4.2:Concept Theories
Просмотров 323Год назад
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 4.2:Concept Theories
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 4.1:Concepts
Просмотров 253Год назад
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 4.1:Concepts
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 3.2: MemoryTheory
Просмотров 285Год назад
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 3.2: MemoryTheory
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 3.1: MemoryAndThinking
Просмотров 348Год назад
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 3.1: MemoryAndThinking
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 2.2: TheoriesOfSimilarity
Просмотров 267Год назад
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 2.2: TheoriesOfSimilarity
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 2.1: Defining Similarity
Просмотров 269Год назад
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 2.1: Defining Similarity
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 1.2: Challenges to Thinking
Просмотров 406Год назад
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 1.2: Challenges to Thinking
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 1.1: Introduction
Просмотров 516Год назад
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 1.1: Introduction
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 22: Review
Просмотров 284Год назад
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 22: Review
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 22: Consciousness
Просмотров 368Год назад
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 22: Consciousness
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 20: Creativity, Expertise, and Intellegence
Просмотров 387Год назад
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 20: Creativity, Expertise, and Intellegence
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 19: Problem Solving
Просмотров 706Год назад
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 19: Problem Solving
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 18: Reasoning
Просмотров 441Год назад
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 18: Reasoning
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 16: Decision Making and Probability
Просмотров 393Год назад
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 16: Decision Making and Probability

Комментарии

  • @shillout
    @shillout Месяц назад

    Thank you for allowing everyone to listen to your lectures, it helps a lot when taking online courses that only use books 👍

  • @HyperFocusMarshmallow
    @HyperFocusMarshmallow Месяц назад

    23:00 In this experiment, suppose we had a brain (this is probably not how it works) where when we remember, the whole set of remembered data is recalled as a chunk and what matters for loading time is the size of the chunk. Then suppose the step of recalling information is extremely slow compared to the work of comparing digits. Or that there is some other processing step that is always performed for all the digits. Like turning them inte some abstract representation or something like that. Then the experiment might yield results for reaction time that scale with sequence length, regardless of what the comparison algorithm is. That’s an extreme example. It might not be an issue at all. Or maybe careful experimental design could tease out different components of the process even when they have very different time scales. My point is just that there may be a great deal of care needed when drawing conclusions.

  • @XIANHAOZHAO
    @XIANHAOZHAO Месяц назад

    great lectures ! Appreciations from an econ PhD student!

  • @kiranfhh9059
    @kiranfhh9059 Месяц назад

    Thanks for the brilliant lecture sir. But is there any way that I can download your lecture slides?

  • @maddyfridaturner3703
    @maddyfridaturner3703 4 месяца назад

    Very useful!!

  • @soniaali9265
    @soniaali9265 6 месяцев назад

    Please describe short

    • @b.acuzar
      @b.acuzar 2 месяца назад

      womp womp

  • @soniaali9265
    @soniaali9265 6 месяцев назад

    Leacter is tooo long

  • @luckysingh-lh4hf
    @luckysingh-lh4hf 8 месяцев назад

    wuw u sir

  • @luckysingh-lh4hf
    @luckysingh-lh4hf 8 месяцев назад

    Love u prof. Thank you for this.

  • @sismaganda7550
    @sismaganda7550 8 месяцев назад

    Thank you Professor Paul for your informative lecture.

  • @sismaganda7550
    @sismaganda7550 9 месяцев назад

    Thank you Sir for this beneficial class.

  • @LinJohnson-kj7ng
    @LinJohnson-kj7ng 9 месяцев назад

    very helpful lectures:)

  • @sismaganda7550
    @sismaganda7550 9 месяцев назад

    Sir John Paul Minda, your book is what we use for the course Psychology of Thinking. I am going to take this course in the Spring semester. Thank you so much for uploading your lectures. This is gold! Super grateful.

    • @PaulMinda
      @PaulMinda 9 месяцев назад

      Fantastic, I am glad these lectures are helpful to you!

  • @Dragonscat-2
    @Dragonscat-2 10 месяцев назад

    Thank you so much!

  • @Dragonscat-2
    @Dragonscat-2 10 месяцев назад

    Hi Paul, in this lecture you mentioned a textbook, is it available for non-students? Where/how? Would be happy to read it along with your amazing lecture. Thank you!

    • @PaulMinda
      @PaulMinda 10 месяцев назад

      Hi, glad you are enjoying these! Yes, I'm using a textbook called "The Psychology of Thinking, 2nd edition" (I'm also the author, btw), us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/the-psychology-of-thinking/book269688/ . You can probably find "unauthorized" PDFs around for free. There are also free copies in many college and university libraries. My other book ("How To Think", www.amazon.com/How-To-Think/dp/1472143035/) is close in content, and significantly less expensive because it is not a textbook

  • @paulinemeghansntg2837
    @paulinemeghansntg2837 Год назад

    Thanks for sharing

  • @paulinemeghansntg2837
    @paulinemeghansntg2837 Год назад

    When is the next lecture please, Dr.am one of your students from uganda

  • @paulinemeghansntg2837
    @paulinemeghansntg2837 Год назад

    Am just enjoying the lecture, thanks alot

  • @h.goodwin5682
    @h.goodwin5682 Год назад

    Comedic gold at 4:26

  • @raghu_yadav_yt
    @raghu_yadav_yt Год назад

    Interesting studies!

  • @bruno_pecly
    @bruno_pecly Год назад

    Great class. Thanks for sharing

  • @shalinikg9970
    @shalinikg9970 Год назад

    42:07

  • @shalinikg9970
    @shalinikg9970 Год назад

    When we are thinking about life events and emotions come up, is it focused or unfocused?

  • @jiminhassan88
    @jiminhassan88 Год назад

    When you will upload next lecture i am wating teacher ? Thank you

  • @jiminhassan88
    @jiminhassan88 Год назад

    Thank you so much for your efforts ❤

  • @bruno_pecly
    @bruno_pecly Год назад

    I really enjoy all the classes. Thank you for uploading all the series of classes.

  • @ExistenceUniversity
    @ExistenceUniversity Год назад

    49:00 No, and neither has my dog. Even my dog knows that a big dog and a tiny dog are dogs from a mile away and without smelling. This theory is dead wrong, so no, I don't struggle with seeing some dogs as dogs because the concept of dog is not held by a prototype image.

  • @ExistenceUniversity
    @ExistenceUniversity Год назад

    44:50 Defining Game: First, what is a definition? "A definition is a statement that identifies the nature of the units subsumed under a concept. It is often said that definitions state the meaning of words. This is true, but it is not exact. A word is merely a visual-auditory symbol used to represent a concept; a word has no meaning other than that of the concept it symbolizes, and the meaning of a concept consists of its units. It is not words, but concepts that man defines-by specifying their referents. The purpose of a definition is to distinguish a concept from all other concepts and thus to keep its units differentiated from all other existents. Since the definition of a concept is formulated in terms of other concepts, it enables man, not only to identify and retain a concept, but also to establish the relationships, the hierarchy, the integration of all his concepts and thus the integration of his knowledge. Definitions preserve, not the chronological order in which a given man may have learned concepts, but the logical order of their hierarchical interdependence. With certain significant exceptions, every concept can be defined and communicated in terms of other concepts. The exceptions are concepts referring to sensations, and metaphysical axioms... "The rules of correct definition are derived from the process of concept-formation. The units of a concept were differentiated-by means of a distinguishing characteristic(s)-from other existents possessing a commensurable characteristic, a Conceptual Common Denominator. A definition follows the same principle: it specifies the distinguishing characteristic(s) of the units, and indicates the category of existents from which they were differentiated. The distinguishing characteristic(s) of the units becomes the differentia of the concept’s definition; the existents possessing a Conceptual Common Denominator become the genus. Thus a definition complies with the two essential functions of consciousness: differentiation and integration. The differentia isolates the units of a concept from all other existents; the genus indicates their connection to a wider group of existents. For instance, in the definition of table (“An item of furniture, consisting of a flat, level surface and supports, intended to support other, smaller objects”), the specified shape is the differentia, which distinguishes tables from the other entities belonging to the same genus: furniture. In the definition of man (“A rational animal”), “rational” is the differentia, “animal” is the genus... "A definition must identify the nature of the units, i.e., the essential characteristics without which the units would not be the kind of existents they are." Ayn Rand, Definitions, Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology, 40-43 Game: : a (man-made) physical or mental competition conducted according to rules with the participants in direct opposition to each other. Essential genus: a man-made physical or mental activity. Essential differentia: competition What makes a soccer game and a trivia game both games? They are activities which involve competition, i.e., a game. Game is really really easy to define if you hold that man perceives entities and has the ability to abstract by means of measurement omission

  • @ExistenceUniversity
    @ExistenceUniversity Год назад

    41:30 There is no actual concept which is based only on a definition (except for magically words like God). Even and Odd numbers are perceptual. A even number of things is one in which you can divide the objects into groups and no loner is remaining, an odd number is when grouping leaves an odd man out. We made those words to talk about this thing we see.

    • @ExistenceUniversity
      @ExistenceUniversity Год назад

      42:00 The study actually only found that most people suck at math and picked the numbers they are more familiar will and less likely to be incorrect and to avoid looking silly they went with 4. Note that 2 wasn't even a option, yet it is the prototypical.

  • @ExistenceUniversity
    @ExistenceUniversity Год назад

    Calling entities "basic" is silly. Perception perceives entities, and those entities are where we get abstractions which can be used to find genus and differentia. Philosophically this lecture is lacking

    • @ExistenceUniversity
      @ExistenceUniversity Год назад

      26:41 Oh god it only gets worse as it goes. The basic level is not "Abstract," they are the given, there are the objects that you see when you let your eyes move over the world. If Rosch thinks these are abstraction, what could she possible believe is the given?

    • @ExistenceUniversity
      @ExistenceUniversity Год назад

      29:40 Yep, it only gets worse. "A typical package-deal, used by professors of philosophy, runs as follows: to prove the assertion that there is no such thing as “necessity” in the universe, a professor declares that just as this country did not have to have fifty states, there could have been forty-eight or fifty-two-so the solar system did not have to have nine planets, there could have been seven or eleven. It is not sufficient, he declares, to prove that something is, one must also prove that it had to be-and since nothing had to be, nothing is certain and anything goes. The technique of undercutting man’s mind consists in palming off the man-made as if it were the metaphysically given, then ascribing to nature the concepts that refer only to men’s lack of knowledge, such as “chance” or “contingency,” then reversing the two elements of the package-deal. From the assertion: “Man is unpredictable, therefore nature is unpredictable,” the argument goes to: “Nature possesses volition, man does not-nature is free, man is ruled by unknowable forces-nature is not to be conquered, man is.”" “The Metaphysical Versus the Man-Made,” Philosophy: Who Needs It, 28 "As far as metaphysical reality is concerned (omitting human actions from consideration, for the moment), there are no “facts which happen to be but could have been otherwise” as against “facts which must be.” There are only: facts which are. . . . Since things are what they are, since everything that exists possesses a specific identity, nothing in reality can occur causelessly or by chance. The nature of an entity determines what it can do and, in any given set of circumstances, dictates what it will do. The Law of Causality is entailed by the Law of Identity. Entities follow certain laws of action in consequence of their identity, and have no alternative to doing so. Metaphysically, all facts are inherent in the identities of the entities that exist; i.e., all facts are “necessary.” In this sense, to be is to be “necessary.” The concept of “necessity,” in a metaphysical context, is superfluous." Leonard Peikoff, “The Analytic-Synthetic Dichotomy,” Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology, 108-109

    • @ExistenceUniversity
      @ExistenceUniversity Год назад

      47:00 Absolutely ridiculous theories

  • @guccimane8941
    @guccimane8941 Год назад

    So if cognitive psychology is about head then my girl gave me lot of cognitive psychology at night

    • @sahars.s3901
      @sahars.s3901 3 месяца назад

      😂

    • @saijeetdogra9360
      @saijeetdogra9360 2 месяца назад

      Be funnier if you said head and she woke you up at 2am to do a lecture on emotional cognition.

  • @lamaduysheeva7752
    @lamaduysheeva7752 Год назад

    Amazing lecture. Ty sm

  • @keziasejuwal7085
    @keziasejuwal7085 Год назад

    Best teacher...keep teaching

  • @patterngatherer3223
    @patterngatherer3223 Год назад

    brilliant, thanks !!!

  • @nesmamaged1770
    @nesmamaged1770 Год назад

    Thank you!

  • @raghu_yadav_yt
    @raghu_yadav_yt Год назад

    I was reading papers by Eleanor Rosh recently and being a non-native speaker it was a bit difficult to follow. But your video has brought a lot of clarity. Thank you for that. 👍🙏👍 Unfortunately though, your drawing pen is not visible in the video.

  • @Rastlov
    @Rastlov Год назад

    Awesome decision-making on avoiding angry geese on the way to the lecture.

  • @raghu_yadav_yt
    @raghu_yadav_yt Год назад

    Very helpful. 👍👍👍

  • @bruno_pecly
    @bruno_pecly 2 года назад

    Thank you for sharing

  • @charloettie
    @charloettie 2 года назад

    Actual content starts @ 17mins

  • @layane6786
    @layane6786 2 года назад

    Thank you alot

  • @villan821
    @villan821 2 года назад

    12:00

  • @sargamkaur11
    @sargamkaur11 2 года назад

    Thank you for the explanation. It was really helpful. I loved that the presentation slides were plain and simple!

  • @d3term1nation
    @d3term1nation 2 года назад

    what a peaceful voice!

  • @BAMBAMBAM495
    @BAMBAMBAM495 2 года назад

    thank you please keep posting

  • @guimamaximiano
    @guimamaximiano 2 года назад

    Thanks for posting this lecture

  • @SirEshtri
    @SirEshtri 2 года назад

    Thank you!!! super helpful to hear the explanations from a different perspective :)

  • @damolailesanmi7619
    @damolailesanmi7619 2 года назад

    Thank you for posting this here. It really helped me to figure it out.

  • @ritalopez2514
    @ritalopez2514 3 года назад

    🌸 P r o m o s m!!!

  • @eprohoda
    @eprohoda 3 года назад

    splendid masterpiece~ see ya!, Paul. 📹