Видео

Nailed it 🎉. Image quality is awesome

I'm going to watch the great video. You captured it well 👍

Ah man, that sucks. Hope this doesn't happen to mine.

nice job :) next step, connect a generator brushless to the motor and see if you can make more than the input voltage.

Can you re-run your “python” lol but only if you’re bored- to show results beginning with $.10 bets on a single column or dozen going 1,1,1 (break even on this 3rd-vs only 2 ones) then slight increases from there (punishing the casino)😂 to take it out to 22 or 23 spins and a $1,030 or $1,550 bankroll for example b4 the catastrophic loss? Since there are online ones with .01-40k min/max limits. Starting with 1/10 ($0.10 unit like I said for each “1” Example: 1,1,1, 2,3,5 7,11,17, 26,38,58, 87, 132, 198, 297, 450, 676, 1017, 1526, 2291, 3438, 5162 (cumulative 10,283 units = $1,028 or 15,445 units = $1,545) same resetting after wins. Only video of yours I’ve watched and forgive me if you’ve already shown something similar in another video already. I always get my ass handed to me after 14 losses and I’m out…plus I’ve seen firsthand on a simulator 18 losses in a row on dozens/columns and heard of someone seeing 21 misses in a row I believe they mentioned…not to enable degeneracy or anything and we understand not financial advice… etc etc I only ask because if I see correctly all of your examples here are stopping after the 11 spin “table limit” even with your 5M bankroll mentioned at the end

Very cool

Great drone footage and amazing aerial view. 👍👍👍 Thanks for sharing. Subbed and Liked. 👍👍👍

Any tutorial on this?

❤You captured the video beautifully. It's the best.

Cool, what drone is that ?

The sims are all a little "floaty". But lift off seems the closest to reality

Only if the table max bet would be lets say $2500 and min be $1, and you having balance of $6681 , things could be different. 6681 is relatively realistic balance to play with . And using fibonacci starting with 1,1,2,3,5… bet of 2500 will come at 18th losing streak. Chances of you losing the 18th time and losing all your money ($6681) is (2/3)^18 which in % is 0.067% which means you got 99.93% chances of winning. Mathematically once every 1492 resets (not spins) , you will lose your balance amount of $6681. I am curious in calculating the rest 1491 rounds of winning profit , if it is more than $6681 , then this strategy is actually in gambler’s advantage. @davidpride3160 please make a script to test my numbers. I am very interested to know the results.

What use?

Getting it

beautiful mountain surfing!

Is it possible to do this using the raspberry pi?

i love experimenting with ducky script on my old pc too lol

Tu estudio se aplica cuando una persona esta todo el dia apostando, pero si uno apuesta un rato y luego sales de la mesa y asi sucesivamente, vas ganando de a poco diariamente.

❤

❤

Cool flight. Would have liked to see some flying between the houses 🎉

Pleas send me the paylod

It is sad that this video only have 10000 plus views while the videos who are trying to fool people have much much more. :-( You do know what they are actually doing? Those videos with Roulette systems actually work like Casino games, in the way that most people will win short term with those systems making the channels able to continue to make money. Some will lose also short term, but the majority will win in short term and the crazyness continues... Maybe we should start one of those channels and make some money on it. 🙂

What an amazing weekend for ‘OUR Town of Luton’ with this amazing ending to the three days and this song specially written by Coldplay’s Chris Martin 🧡🎼👍🏼🎩

Love it, did you just 'delete' the soft targets 😂😂😂

Actually, i think your python code is not correct. Looking at your graphs, it clearly shows a big loss and then a win, however everytime you hit a win, it covers all the losses and provides a profit. Your graphs show a win still below the original amount. I used ChatGPT to create a python code for the exact same thing you did, and my results were far better than yours. I also gave the code a programming friend of mine to check that the code was doing what it's suppose too. Sorry, but your graphs prove your code is faulty!!!

Don't stay in as long. By your own admission, you made a profit, even if only slight, on 100 spins. Is anyone really going to hang in there for 10000 spins? If you have enough money to last 15 spins, it's extremely rare you would lose, provided you "quit while you're ahead". Quite often, people are their own worst enemy, due to being greedy. They win, but keep going. I have played a system similar to Fibonacci, with enough money to last 15 spins. Over 50 games, I only went over 10 spins 5 times. Twice was to 12 spins, once 11, once to 13, once to 14, which was scary, but NEVER to 15. That's not to say it can't happen, but if you are betting on 12 numbers, it's rare you would get pushed past 15 games, & you should have enough wins behind you that even if you do lose once evey 50 games, you are still ahead. I only play for 30 mins, occasionally for 45 mins, at a time.

If there was not a maximum bet size, Fibonacci system would print money. Casinos know that, that is why there are maximum bets.

Very good but youre doing it wrong. The arcing is a breakdown failure, and if you can mitigate that your speed will increase monumentally. Mine go about 2000rpm at twice the size of that.

Hi can you share hard and soft datas for this ?

The fibonacci betting strategy is quite arbitrary in respect to the numbers, you could simply go from 1 to 4 to 10 to 22 to 44 to 66 to 102 and the results would be the same. The numbers themselves plays no role in the game's win or loss rate. That's what people forget. The odds never change regardless of your bet.

Love this! xxox

Correct me if I'm wrong but roulette is beatable if there is no table limit, you already have an infinite amount of money, and you double your bet every time you lose. The idea being any win after a loss gets you back to even while you pocket any money generated by consecutive wins. Since tables have limits and none of us have infinite money there are not roulette games that are beatable.

Ive tested it notnwith real money and yea the fibonachi is terrible long run you can get lucky dont get me wrong and it is obviously possible to win big of it like anything else but oure more likely to lose money with it

Lol 😆 Chis you are hilarious🤣best band Coldpaly love you❤

You just need to be very patient with fibonacci betting on dozens or columns, basically you get 10 bullets b4 you hit the table limit with this system. You just have to wait until a dozen or column don’t hit for 5 or 6 times which happens very often. 99.9% you’ll hit those dozens or columns in the next 10 spins. Bloody very unlucky if you don’t. Good luck

The statement "Fibonacci will fail with unlimited bankroll and no table limit" is FALSE. Fibonacci COULD create infinite winnings, **IF** there were no limits on bankroll or table limits. Your experiment Reset on Wins and after ONLY ELEVEN steps in the Fibonacci Sequence. IF you let the Fibonacci Sequence play out UNTIL IT DOES WIN, you will wind up in profit or a LOT of profit. I can tell you from personal experience that it often goes for 15 or more spins before finally hitting. (The longest run on losing spins that I personally have seen is 23 losses, winning on the 24th spin.) THE REALITY of all this is (and I know this is what you meant) "Given House Table Limits, The Fibonacci Sequence, when applied to Dozen or Column bets, will kick your arse and leave you broke." THAT statement is 100% true and I can testify that, given my bankroll only lets me go 10 steps into The Sequence, you will have to do the Walk of Shame back to your car with empty pockets, as I have done too many times. IF someone out there IS promoting The Fibonacci Sequence as being "foolproof and a guarantee" at casinos, then I am equally upset at that false claim, too. I also appreciate you looking out for my fellow gamblers and trying to keep them away from fake gurus and misleading systems.

I love yellow

Thanks for video but I believe Your logic is wrong by just repeating the same $5 bet 5 times in the beginning of the sequence because once you start the fibonacci sequence your are already down 5 units or in your case, $25. I believe the logical way would be to put $0 bets for the first 5 values in your sequence because you aren't winning or losing during those. Maybe try starting with a lower starting bet, say $0.50. Wonder if that would make any difference. And also maybe you can add a profit tracker in your code to see what the highest amount of profit was throughout the simulation. Just some suggestions and ideas that I would be curious about. Thanks for the video and hope to see what/if those changes make a difference.

No matter what you sing is wonderful❤chris

You see a waterfall, I see free energy going to waste! 🤣

Can't believe he actually came up with this song 🤣🤣 definitely needs to do a studio version of the song or at least put it on Spotify.

COYH

Classic

Love the time an effort for the code and everything that went into this, top class

Very cool! I'm making one too😊!

😎😎💪🏼

Well, it "looks" obvious to me, play less than 100 spins, take your small profit and walk away. Problem solved.

Greed "eat" us.. We totally wish/depend on luck (but luck not 24/7 on our side 😂) Set a goal..Why not making 25 dollar per session.. Even 25 dollar per day? 10 days = 250USD.. A month; 30 days = 750USD.. Better gain 1USD than loss all, isn't? 😁✌️

No matter what system you play, the house edge will not change. For example if you play the dozens, the calculation for European Roulette is as follows: The probability of hitting a dozen is (12/37) and you win 2 units The probability of losing is (25/37) and you lose 1 unit The expected value for the player is calculated as follows: ((12/37) * 2) + ((25/37) * -1) = 0,6486 - 0,6756 = -0,027 This means in percentages that you will lose 2,7% of the 1 unit you wagered. The so called Return To Player percentage is therefore 97,3% and you will lose your money on the long run. Playing odd/even, single number, column or whatever will give you exactly the same 2,7% like David showed in the video.