Видео

Definitely a blast 😃

Whoops! Updated the description altered.ajordat.com/en/decks/17526/

Love it - we all had a great time at our pre-release

The Auraq videos will continue until morale is improved. (Not really, Atsadi next week!)

The English Translation was very helpful.

Love to hear it - it's been my most played deck for a reason.

Disagree! 😀

litterally deck defining card

Sure kadigir they wont see it coming and orb their remove all

I'm glad you enjoy! I watch card game videos the same way, so happy that it's enjoyable by others like this.

How did you manage turn 2?

@@emergentellio My opponents started day 2 playing a Kitsune. :D'

Correct - so you will win even if your opponent would also have advanced during (the later) dusk.

@@emergentellio so it doesn't matter if opponent's both hero and companion just need 1 step away from either side and both of their expedition is wining, and you use SSGL to advance, its still your win?

Yes

I win games even in this video where they immediately remove the first kadgir :)

Boardgame arena

You will not advance, that is the whole deal- everything cares only about water while kraken is out

I looked at the last ten games I played. Average game time was 20.8 minutes, with a max of 26 minutes. The time I took, as the Akesha player was avg 7.5 minutes, max 10. Is this too long? What time limits would you set that any of these would meet?

For context, eyeballing, my average game takes around 15 minutes, period. So these are longer, for sure - but not excruciatingly so; just by 5 minutes.

I can only speak of the games I have seen with this deck... perhaps I am way off and those players had an inability to end the game, or just wanted to keep casting Celebration Day 'for fun'. I am personally not that bothered about it as I tend to play decks that have an answer to this kind of thing in the way of permanent removal, but I'm not convinced it's a strategy that is healthy for the game.

@@emergentellio There is usually a big difference in time taken between casual games and event games. Bigger stakes = bigger time taken for each game action. You will see a lot more games get closer to time even with more midrange decks. Ive even seen aggro decks get close to tie breaks in events. And this deck, more often than not, will crumple to a tiebreak as its style is lose early then use celebration loops to lockdown the opponent and win. So opponents are almost incentivised to take their time and correctly think through each action with maximum scrutiny. making sure they get as many steps ahead as possible. Because tie breaks favour them. Most events run a 30 minute round timer which already feels tight on time some games. You are also playing digitally which speeds up game actions phenomenally. So a paper deck in a stakes event where thinking time is needed you're almost begging for a tie break finish with this deck.

I don't think 30 minutes per game is a barrier for this for single games, but 2/3 50 minute could be, and I think your point on tiebreak is great! I think one of the flaws of the deck is that you are victim to your *opponents* thinking and stalling; so even if you are quick, in a competitive paper meta, you can fall victim to your opponent taking 20 minutes of time for your 10 minutes.

Also any reason why only 12 rares instead of 15?

They said are def 15 rares! The 2 bastion is a good question. I could see argument for 3 so you could put early one into mana. The main thing from me is that it's very expensive, and it doesn't do anything by itself. If you draw celebration day late without tower, you at least can cast the celebration and get another turn. Tower without a celebration day can be a dud draw if you're in a rough spot, even if it is the most important cards in the deck.

Sorry for being the bad guy ♥️

This one for sure! For replacing uniques, I'd probably go with something like 2 Alice and an additional Sakarabru

​@@emergentellio Thanks a lot!! I'll try to get the last cards I need (conjuring seal, 1 bastion and 1 celebration day), because there's a Christmas Tournament here and I want to give my best with akesha! Thanks for your hard work!!!

@@giuliorazzano474 I've tried my best with the no unique, 2 Alice and 1 Saka deck and went 4-1 so far. I think it works nicely without uniques, so good luck! :D

​@@noriim55 thanks! I'll try it too then!

What would you suggest replacing?

May be kadigir Alchemist

I'm wary of skald for the same reason I'm wary of spycraft - I really don't want a key Kadigir or similar to end up vulnerable in resupply.

@@emergentellio just dont use her effect lol, she is there for the support ability to get out kadgir a turn sooner

More coming soon - there will be more altered content!

I would definitely run it in many treyst builds - at the time of making this I did not own the rare versions, which is part of why I went with this build. If you go for a heavier lean on Rare ada lovelace, you can also lower the landmark count in the deck.