Видео

Or you can read the headline which says THERMAL. 😂

@NightVisionViking There are different types of pulsar THERMALS😆

In the menu.

The LRF is not useless at all, you just put it in SCAN mode and it will tell you the distance continously.

@@3GUNDVC So in scan mode it will adjust the range through the ballistic app at the same time? with the range finder box working off to the side of the reticule..... No. So pretty useless on a moving target, too clunky and slow to aquire moving targets. Poorly thought out and not worth the price tag.

No.

No, it's even closer. There are other videos with more distance animals. I video what I can, the device has pretty good image quality.

I don't have this device.

I don't have that device.

This is fairly close. Perhaps 30 meter ish. Too dark too see haha.

Highly recommended! In the USA you can get it a Mile High: "I use a Spuhr QDP-3002 (Quick Attach) mount" www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2022/03/25/tfb-review-pulsar-digex-c50/

In a local gunshop. (EU)

I do NOT sell these, so I have no idea.

Base 1.75x is 1024, 6x is 640x480 and 14x is 480x320, it's the highest resolution thermal scope under 20k.

About 30-50 meters. Rainy weather for some time, that's why you don't see much detail in the environment = all the same temperature.

And when I show animals at 300 meters, people ask why don't you show them at 20 meters. There are plenty of videos with various distances, beyond 250+

@@NightVisionViking said no one ever 🙄

@@NightVisionViking have you got a link to the plenty of videos that have videos over 250

About every time actually. @@20ppc

Just check my profile, or use the search function.There are at least 2, with the XL50 uploaded about the same time as this one.Have a nice evening. @@20ppc

No, there's no wind meter.

I have both, but I haven't been able to use them side by side. The XL50 only goes to 14x, while the XG50 does 24x. Not sure to be honest, but how often do you shoot above 14x?

@@NightVisionViking I rarely use magnification higher than 8X.

@@JH-si9gq Well, there's your answer if you can afford the XL50. Check out the other videos I did as well, there might be clues. Especially the one with LRF + Ballistic App.

Do you know the price difference between the XG50 and XL50? In Sweden.

@@JH-si9gq Just check Astro Sweden's homepage and do the math.

It's NOT three times the price of a 640.

Yes

Yes this is close, around 20 meters. Shooting a fox at 150-200 meters will be more of a challenge, but possible. (I'm not pro long range hunting)

I think around +15C and raining.

I bought it 3 months ago and don't know how well it works. It's hot in here and I'm amazed that you made this video. Our temperature during the day reaches 45 degrees Celsius, and at night it reaches 28 degrees Celsius, and when searching for the deer it cannot be seen clearly.

@@Colt-223 Did you use the focus ring? :) Tried black hot?

Yes I used it. Accuracy in black and white was not difficult while the other options, although equal, were still indistinguishable and not clearly distinguishable. The color of the deer is the color of the mountain and cannot be detected like your video recording. The problem is that our weather is hot and we are impatiently waiting for winter to see the difference

Yes, something like that. I did several videos and can't remember exactly.

That sounds very unusual.

I didn't feel like it.

@@NightVisionVikingwould be nice to know the distance though.

@@yaykruser From memory they are at 50-200+ meters.

@@yaykruser From memory they are at 50-200+ meters.

@@NightVisionVikingthank you :)

I can't remember exactly, but around 25-30 meters I think.