Видео

My Terrence Howard peer reviews were way better than these 2 goofballs we're watching here!

I've been really enjoying watching ALL OF Christian RUclips vs. Billy Carson!

All i hear is a mean and angry hag who doesn't like terrance Howard. Disgusting

I think she meant The Artificial Intelligence, the Skynet Terminator Overlord that conspiracy theorists think is already dominating the planet. 🤔

Terrence "Closed Fist" Howard... aka Terrence "I Lost My Mind and Slapped her in Front of the Kids" Howard

Terrence Howard is human garbage; he hits women (He has a known history of ADMITTED spousal abuse). Let's all take a moment to remember that

Love them both 💕

How ard earth did Terrence get so brain damaged?

To quote the late great Canadian actor Donald Sutherland in his greatest role ever -- that of Oddball, the World War 2 tank driver, in Kelly's Heroes: "You're just spreadin' them negative waves, baby!"

Tyler is cancer, he's even exploiting the death of his own father in front of the eye of the entire world and people don't bother that and instead react with empathy 😂. Tyler is a manipulative lying narcissistic women beating addict who's so lazy he cloned his own voice and drop videos in a tempo enough to prevent demonization 😅

why are u 96p

You're doing a fantastic job! A bit off-topic, but I wanted to ask: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). How should I go about transferring them to Binance?

Dangerous grifters, or dangerously mentally unstable?

3 = pi sounds like an engineer thing LOL god bless!

Zoomer quit apologetics I believe the best way to make a decision on what religion to choose is to read the religious text for yourself and see if its reliable To me, Jesus' promise of eternal life if you put your faith in him is reliable John 5:31 “If I testify about myself, my testimony is not true."

Is this the guy who's complaining about not making as much money as Robert Downey Jr. in Iron Man, when Robert played THE TITLE CHARACTER?? They have REAL math in Hollywood, too, Terrence. The only math Terrence is really interested in is $$$$ > $$$. Let's make him King of Dunning-Kruger-Land! He won't know what that means, either.

Wait... So if I'm hearing you right, you programmed the voting machines to favor Trump?

Ooh, one of my hot buttons. Because provisions of law in my state that mandate open ballot format are ignored, tricks like SQL injection can't be found by audit of ballot data. It's incredible. Election law in Texas is not followed to the letter, and one important detail creates an enormous security hole.

This is the comment I made on the original video that I think helps to clear up some of the issues: "The semantics of this video is somewhat murky, because you keep saying that "AI doesn't exist" while talking about it in the same breath as something that does exist. Some disambiguation would be helpful. I infer from context that you're saying "A computer that is as smart as a human in every way isn't something that exists", which is accurate. Part of the problem is that AI isn't a single thing. The term "AI", as it's generally used, refers to "any computer program that simulates some aspect of human thinking", and this refers to many things that clearly do exist. The part of the program that controls the opposing side in single player video games is (and has been for a long time) called AI. Large language models are called AI. Machine learning algorithms are called AI. Generative adversarial networks are called AI. The programs that have beaten human chess and go champions are called AI. So, semantically speaking, "AI" is not a single thing, but a general class of computer programs that are designed to simulate some aspect of human thinking, which clearly do exist. (Otherwise what are you making a video about?) One thing to realize is that different AI abilities develop at different rates, and in many specialized areas (such as chess and go), machine intelligence is already far superior to human intelligence, and the number of such areas is steadily increasing. The first autonomous cars were not as good at driving as humans, but current ones arguably are (and if they're not yet then it's just a matter of time). It seems like what you're really trying to say is "The things we call AI shouldn't be called AI", in which case it might be helpful to suggest an alternative term for all the things that are currently referred to as AI. You're also doing a fairly decent job of pointing out many of the current limitations as well as misuses of AI. Another thing to realize is that the many applications of AI are improving rapidly, so the state of the art is not static. There used to literally be no such thing as AI. Then there was very primitive AI. Then there was slightly better AI. And now we're reaching the knee of an exponential curve that represents an explosion of machine intelligence. So, whatever limitations of AI may exist today, there's a good chance that there are researchers who are working on overcoming those limitations. The history of AI development is littered with tasks that were once thought to be too complex for computers to handle but were subsequently overcome. Any statement of the form "AI can't/will never be able to..." is likely to have a short shelf life. As AI continues to develop, it's important to be cautious about excessively trusting imperfect systems, but it's also important to realize just how rapidly those imperfect systems are improving."

But what does UFO Jesus say?😂

im here because islam bad. thats pretty much it. all religions are bad but they are definitely bad

woah im the 13th view. what is this why am i here oh god that doesnt exist im scared

Interaction for the algorithm!

Collier is brilliant. What is great about her videos is she talks in simple terms. She is using a.i. as the public understands the term. You can substitute agi or artificial super intelligence or artificial sentience or consciousness to get the point. Rather than being "mean" to her, try learning from her. Pose questions in scientific debate. And for her warning about LLM and advanced machine learning I suggest, is your life better now that you can never get a human on the phone at a corporation? Press 4 if yes, 3 for no, 7 to return to the main menu. I know you are too young to have a frame of reference for that. But I would recommend... If you really want to contemplate ai/agi etc ... Study more pure physics and related (math based) philosophy. Can you solve the hard problem? The measurement problem? Determinism vs probabilistic universe? Are you a reductionist? Or into emergence? Have you contemplated Mary's room or the Chinese room? Do you know what your cognitive biases are? Much of what Dr. Collier talks about (with a droll humor) when she makes videos outside of straight physics is the overall shitty nature of human behavior. That's why "a.i." will ruin everything, anyway.

Interesting subject matter. I hope I can offer some contrary opinions while respecting your thoughts. I remember a movement by shallow and likely untalented people in the 90's to create a programmer's license. Regulating what you can express in Visual Studio Code makes as much sense as regulating what you can express in Word. In either case, law already applies. Murder by AI is already illegal. Fraud by AI is already illegal. If you can't find the people to prosecute, then the crime is already out of reach. Regulation limiting me isn't going to solve that. I hate AI. Regulating it is like stopping a dog fight by grabbing one dog. Scofflaws will just attack. Elon Musk is a clown - or a paradox. Whether he scammed the government out of funding for it or not, he's led some very creative engineering. His rocket engines, for example, look to me to be models of simplification. His robotics have been risible. He's a child in many fields. His statements can't be trusted. His Neurolink advances are near magical. My point is we need to target enforcement correctly. For instance, if you want to stop scammers from draining bank accounts, stop letting banks off the hook for unauthorized transfers. I don't care if my money went through nine hops before disappearing into bitcoin in North Korea. I want my bank prosecuted for releasing my money inappropriately. Do that, problem solved. Banks will not practice loose authentication after that first sting.

There are more mathemagicians who think they are women, then there are women who think they are mathematicians. - Curtis Yarvin

Why are we shocked at this. Why isn't 1+1 ==24? We have as a society that a man can have a period and have babies. We believe that there are more than 2 genders. Actually 1x1 =3. God told Adam and Eve to multiply. The two of them multipiled and they had Cain. That' 3. If it's twins then 1x1=4

It seems the basis of any good conspiracy theory is that only you know the truth. You have this special knowledge and that makes you superior to everyone else. In the real world, knowledge comes from learning, whether you get it in school or studying from reputable sources on your own.

Yeah it was Kramer 💯

What an odd individual you've found!