Видео

I approach an argument as an opportunity, not to be "right or wrong," but to test my postion to my satisfaction. If the other side can poke holes in my argument then I have an opportunity to reevaluate my position ... 0:59

Weakness isn’t defined here. Surely F.N. wasn’t particularly physically strong, so does that mean on one level we can regard him as weak? So we need to differentiate between types of strength and weakness. How are people lying to themselves when they are weak, how are they not recognising their own limitations? The romantic example lacks depth. Surely, it’s the stronger person who moves on with his life and finds someone who values him rather than be only concerned with being rejected? Agreed that tearing others down is weakness. I think reading Life by Rudyard Kipling would be more insightful.

If you add some background music to this video, I think it would be perfect! The content and the visuals are great. Adding some background music to set the mood makes a huge difference! Cheers.

Great video. Reinforces my belief on silence. Just wish it was longer.

“Be kind to people, be ruthless to systems” -Michael Brooks

If you knew most arguments weren’t worth it, would you still fight? This video reveals when it really matters and when it doesn’t. ruclips.net/video/lJ-_25-mv44/видео.htmlsi=hfWyzM9ECfQeQRhq

The weak version of me will die

This entire video was ripped off from another channel, Unsolicited Advice. What’s the point of making videos if you’re not going to put any original thought into them or even give credit?

HE RULES

I CALL HIM FRED

DAMN STRAIGHT FRED

I don't think one should particularly care what this guy said. He was quite extreme in his views, very critical. I don't think he offered a positive model to emulate. Being obsessed with his views is probably a sign of immaturity and self-centeredness.

I read this book called Office Warfare that applies Nietzsche’s ideas to office politics. You can best contemplate this phenomenon of weak individuals in the modern workforce.

Subscribed. Please do more of Nietzsche.

Maybe I’m missing something, but he is wrong on this one. It is not weak, it is a care towards what is true. Unless the “arguing” is not a discussion and rather a blunt force of claims that are never really checked but only desired to be reinforced, then yes, it is weak. However, if it is a discussion or debate meant to drive further investigation, to find truth and hopefully agreement, then it is not weak. By assuming you have the truth, you are letting yourself be flawed and forever flawed. Some may argue because they do believe they have the truth, and they want others to agree so that they too can be in the right and know what they know. Of course, without a willingness to consider that they themselves maybe wrong instead of the other or both be wrong, then it is flawed as well. You can strong and foolish, which is dangerous. You can weak and foolish, which is can be a problem, but can often times just be nuisance. Or you can strong and wise. Being willing to have a discussion, to have a conversation, talk, and so on, allows for growth. Wisdom. I would choose to be strong and wise rather than strong and foolish.

He makes a strong argument

I guess jails are full of these mini Nietzches?

because he was psycho

Because he was a weak man himself

You stole everything in this video from Unsolicited Advice. LMAO Neitzsche didn't talk about "nice guys", Unsolicited Advice did....

These people finding unique ways to pronounce his name is getting out of hand. "Neetska" is just ridiculous

So, Nietszche is wrong here. Logic is the superior value of humanity and at least in the ancient years, it was essential to argue like Socrates. Nowadays, it seems that the western world is diminishing this value. Frivolous and trivial emotionality prevails in many cases and this is an obvious decline. And finally, it is unrealistic to believe that everyone will be strong but, it is quite realistic to aim that our society will value rationality over emotionality

I do not see Socrates questioning as an argument but more of two people seeking knowledge. All he knows is that he knows nothing. That is the starting point.

Nietzsche's philosophy was a product of its time. Everything Nietzsche had to say about strong and weak character and master and slave morality is far better understood in terms of attachment theory and trauma. No one is simply weak, nor strong. There is always an emotional and relational reason for why people are the way they are, and generally what they need is not will to power through self-admonishment, but emotional safety, and healing.

Arguments are rarely ever about the subject being debated anyway. They're usually about the underlying emotions and attachment issues of the participants.

It isn't arguing that is weak, it is arguing over trivial matters. Argue about important things, like trying to convince a suicidal person that there are reasons to live.

Thanks❤

He has a good point

Maybe he was just bad at it or mostly picked the wrong side... 😁

More like he wanted someone to dominate and control. No thanks.

Because he was an authorical Charakter and weak himself af

In conflicts people do not give a damn if you are right. They will do everything necessary to win. They care only if you are ready to affirm and execute your will.

If an enthusiastic conversation with someone with a different point of view than you is exhausting, youre weak

I think arguing is for the strong, just like architect who builds something extraordinary, while people without argumented believes are crumbling buildings with shaky scaffolding

In one German leader cabinet was Nietzsches bust. They not think they just lead, but maybe if they stop and think all that industry not war atrocities perpetuated by leaders but rivers trout disappearing in Germany due to chemical manufacturing activity, trout very sensitive to water pollution. Nobody say that instinct (gut felling) is not important, but gut feeling is personal, if we apply single person gut feeling to all nations actions it will lead to disaster of massive proportions.

Sounds like you're writing a long essay to say arguing is pointless, sounds like arguing for me.

If I told you you're right, it means you have no right.

100% true

It's because he understood the true nature of women. People in general are boring. They're stupid, superficial and ironically arrogant. They do things that doesn't make any sense (like engage in small talks with strangers in a bar, get drunk, kiss as many people as you can in one night, etc.) just to please people that they don't like and to "feel part of the group". But women are much worse. Usually men are indifferent to one another, but women always try to take advantage of you somehow. And usually women fake who they really are all the time. They can talk kindly in front of you, but behind your back they're fucking snakes. We men, on the other hand, are much more straight-forward. We say what we think, either we like or hate a person, which makes conversation and conflict resolution much easier. And being honest, I'm almost 30 years old and I never, in my entire life, met a woman that had an interesting conversation. All they can talk about is stupid things like make-up, clothes, shopping, traveling and criticize other people (especially other women). They can't have any interesting conversation on history, philosophy, politics, geopolitics, science. Every fucking time I try to bring one interesting subject to the conversation with a woman, they ignore it or make stupid noises with their mouth, like they don't have a clue what I'm talking about, and right after they move on with one of those stupid subjects. 🤦🤦🤦

Bold load

I would advice you to not upload videos because your gard work is not apprecited by masses. Unless money is not your goal. Improve thumbnails and video editing and then see. ❤❤

Thanks brother!

Please check out some "No Frills Nietzsche" cat videos on my channel!

Why this videos doesn’t have 1 million views, is the question I need to know. Every second of it deserves a thousand likes!

The Actual Abyss is within ourselves.

This sick, racist looney ended up wherr he deserved to be: in a lunatic asylum! A third-rate thinker, the so-called superman was a weak, pathetic nobody!

This is brilliant. I'm so glad i was recommended this video. Very concise and intriguing!

It doesn't matter - nihilism

added to my books to read before world domination mmm

This is the kind of video that gets 1 millions after 5 years