Видео

Great conversation!

Great summary and framework!

Lol I don't think that I think this way, but I don't think that it's healthy elther. I'm constantly in arguments with friends and family for trying to get to the bottom of what is really going on, rather than putting the analysis to one side and supporting them in the moment. I debate AI too hahahaha 😂 to try and improve it. I wish that I could just shut up and let it go.

Thank you for this video! Great content! Though it seems like it was sped up and/or had micro cuts - maybe I'm in the minority but for me that made it quite taxing to watch

Who on earth could think opioids are not addictive lol.

Amazing and very informative video. Glad it appeared on my feed.

Wait, are you saying you can't just use ChatGPT to decide if research is DEI and suggest public policy based on your results?

Harris nuanced? Her cognitive ability was consumed memorizing the scripts written for her...😂

Although, you seem to be talking only about work in the scientific and academic communities. The Opioid Crisis was driven by a billion dollar pharmaceutical industry. If it were not the Porter & Jick memo, I think Perdue would have found another inappropriate text for justification. I'm not so worried about AI errors being spread and magnified, as I am the misuse of AI by moneyed interests. For that matter, the current problems of financial and powerful interests within academia, and just perverse incentives in academia generally. Another famous "oxy-" example , Oxytocin -scientists have been unable to reproduce the original findings, even the researchers at the Université Catholique de Louvain, where the original experiment was done, have not. This would have been relatively harmless, if not for a poorly regulated supplement industry using the data. Will such issues be magnified with AI? It greatly depends on how profitable such AI mistakes might be.

The reality here is that...our system or relying on authority to veryify information is over.

What happened with that study....wasnt an accident. It was a cornerstone

You make some good points that every person consuming information these days should keep in mind (especially researchers), but I think this is similar to the "ban of plastic straws" type of thing again, where symbolic responsibility is pushed down on to end-users. What opioid, climate, plastic crises have shown to me is that companies/people doing harmful things are willing to commit fraud, fabricate research, bribe people for profit. If they weren't be able to find an AI summary of a study to misrepresent then they'd just fabricate some. Current generation of AI definitely allows faster muddying of waters and can be misused accidentally (why I think everyone should keep what you are saying in mind so the accidental part is minimized), but it's just tool and the problem is people misusing it on purpose.

Interesting

As someone in tech, I can say that I'm not super confident that 2024's version of "AI" can actually work the way you're imagining. It feels like there's kind of a cargo-cult mentality around LLMs, because you can give them instructions and surely that does something, right? But I'm concerned about the idea that it's even possible to come up with a set of instructions that you can give a commercial LLM model that would *reliably* do any of this. Prompt engineering just is not the same as actual engineering, and these other companies spent billions to build tools that do exactly the bad version of this; I don't see how you can promise to undo that without billions in better training.

Enjoyed Myra’s business leadership perspective. First, you home in on the problem you aim to solve then develop an organic GenAI policy to frame adoption.

The sienna again

Hey Jessica, do you know me sienna

Society should treat addiction as a form of Darwinian Selection. Give the addicts access to Don Henley's "all the drugs they can do" and let nature take its course. It costs relatively little to toss a corpse into a Potter's Field compared to rehabilitation or the resulting *CRIME* that comes with an addicted percentage of the population. Readers may not like to admit that the above makes sense. My counter, is if you want to support addiction 'services' then you should pay for them yourselves or allow me an opt-out from the distributed costs, like insurance, rehab hospitals, policing, jails, and you must also be willing to compensate the victims of drug related crime! Stop pushing it off onto the population that has the good sense and the strength of character to "Just say NO to drugs!" P.S. I would extent the same conditions to Alcohol & Tobacco too. And following that, junk food, gambling, let's just say all the vices in general.

Super excited about Moxie 2.00.

As usual, an informative and insightful session. Thank you very much.

❤George cameo appearance!

Excellent overview of how GenAI tools can supplement including key caveats and best practices.

Extremely helpful. Thanks a lot

🎉Congrats on the webinar with researchers in Sydney!

ممتاز

How exciting to learn that the creative and design of the new 2.0 was created in #Canva but was undergirded by Moxie users feedback! I see this as a case study of how #edtech product development benefits from the action research model. The explanation for the Why? friction is non-negotiable at the risk of losing revenue highlights the integrity of the co/founders. 👏

Bs, still do ai Hw is bs, not killing time and youth on that

Really enjoyed the webinar. Your comment on the creation of outlines using AI for neurodiverse people certainly resonated strongly. It is my primary use case.

Thank you for such informative presentation. I learn a lot from it.

Great conversation! I love your content!😀

Thank you for the wealth of resources mentioned and linked in the show Notes!

Personally, I turn off all of these tools (Grammarly, PaperPal, Trinka, Quillbot) when I am writing, and then use them (in combination) as a separate proofreading activity once I have finished writing. I teach my students (non-native, freshmen to PhD) to operate in the same way.

Looks fabulous !!

This is AI

Some great thoughts here. As usual, you provide the voice of reason in these AI-driven times.

Another informative meetup! When I heard “napkin” as a free tool to assist in illustrating text/concept my mind immediately went to the triangle drawn on a napkin to sketch the three Texas markets Southwest Airlines aimed to serve when it launched. The production burst resonated with me. It makes sense that flow is negatively impacted with auto-correction embedded in the software tools we use.

Excellent topic Kim

I couldn’t wait to play with GAMMA AI after learning about how it could be used to create a presentation. The output blew my mind! Using my critical thinking skills, I entered into the dialogue/co-collaborator phase to refine the generated graphics that aligned with my audience.

Walker Joseph Brown Donald Gonzalez Betty

I am loving these short bite-size videos you are posting recently. Very accessible and understandable. Very useful in the classroom.

As gen-AI becomes fully integrated into all the software tools we use, including Microsoft 365, citing the use of AI becomes meaningless because we will be using gen-AI constantly as we work. I don't have the solution but it's clear that traditional approaches won't work. My approach has been to ask AI to include sources. I then validate and cite those sources. AI helps me identify the information and source, and assist with the writing. I direct the AI, assess its responses and provide feedback, validate the information and sources, and then cite those sources.

❤ the peaches! Thanks for the series recommendation @Kimberly. May want to add Perfect Couple and Slowhorses to your list.

❤❤❤

A learned a lot through this video. Thank you.

This was really helpful. Thank you!

Anderson Barbara Garcia Deborah Martin Matthew

Hall Elizabeth Rodriguez Kimberly Rodriguez Shirley

Meaty conversation exploring the latest #GenAI feature announced by #Blackboard. Fertile space for scholarly practitioner research on the use of #edtech as a solution to a problem.

My question is about how many times shoukd I request stopping charging me twice ( for the biweekly payment as well) while they have alrady annual plan.

Sorry for being asleep... LOL 😪😴🛌