Видео

Dei = discrimination 👎

Here's a well deserved 👎 on your paid advertisement video bud. Enjoy it because y'all earn every last one. 😁👎

Ah yes another 👎 on your scam 😁👎

Another annoying paid advertisement that im giving a nice fat 👎 for. Enjoy it because you guys spend so much time flooding our feeds with unwanted crap/scams. 😁👎

What an inspiring talk !! I loved hearing your innovative journey and career growth in the field of finance and software industry. Your insight and perspectives as a woman senior leader in banking industry is so inspirational to young generation . A post-cast you should all watch and learn. Thank you and congratulations . 👏

Helpful content in your channel Thanks

A wise woman, quick witted and of great good humor. Very interesting interview.

Brilliant point on cost as main decision making factor. 👏

"PromoSM"

Hello I just visited your channel you are constantly posting videos and found that your channel is not properly SEO. That's why the SEO score is showing very low. Video tags and descriptions are not SEO-friendly. Your channel should be properly SEO-friendly. Then your channel will reach the targeted audience. As a result views, likes and subscribers will increase. Are you interested in RUclips video SEO services? As a result, you can reach your videos organically to the targeted audience, thereby increasing views and subscribers. I am waiting for your reply. Thank you

The UN's IPCC AR6 report, chapter 11 'Weather and Climate Extreme Events in a Changing Climate' summarises the fact that severe weather events cannot be detected as increasing, nor attributed to human caused climate change: Increased Flooding: not detected, no attribution. Increased Meteorological Drought: not detected, no attribution. Increased Hydrological Drought: not detected, no attribution. Increased Tropical Cyclones: not detected, no attribution. Increased Winter Storms: not detected, no attribution. Increased Thunderstorms: not detected, no attribution. Increased Hail: not detected, no attribution. increased lightning: not detected, no attribution. Increased Extreme Winds: not detected, no attribution. There is no climate crisis. The UN's IPCC AR6 report, chapter 11 'Weather and Climate Extreme Events in a Changing Climate' summarises the fact that certain severe weather events cannot be detected as increasing, nor attributed to human caused climate change: Pages 1761 - 1765, Table 11.A.2 Synthesis table summarising assessments Heavy Precipitation: 24 out of 45 global regions low confidence in observed trend (12 medium confidence), 43 out 45 low confidence in human attribution. Agricultural Drought: 31 out of 45 global regions low confidence in observed trend (14 medium confidence. No high confidence assessment). 42 out 45 low confidence in human attribution (3 medium, no high confidence). Ecological Drought as above. Hydrological Drought: 38 out of 45 global regions low confidence in observed trend. 43 out 45 low confidence in human attribution (2 medium confidence, no high confidence). So the IPCC are saying we didn't cause droughts and we didn't make it rain. How surprising! There is no objective observational evidence that we are living in a global climate crisis. The UN's IPCC AR6, chapter 12 "Climate Change Information for Regional Impact and for Risk Assessment", section 12.5.2, table 12.12 confirms there is a lack of evidence or no signal that the following have changed: Air Pollution Weather (temperature inversions), Aridity, Avalanche (snow), Average precipitation, Average Wind Speed, Coastal Flood, Agricultural drought, Hydrological drought, Erosion of Coastlines, Fire Weather (hot and windy), Flooding From Heavy Rain (pluvial floods), Frost, Hail, Heavy Rain, Heavy Snowfall and Ice Storms, Landslides, Marine Heatwaves, Ocean Acidity, Radiation at the Earth’s Surface, River/Lake Floods, Sand and Dust Storms, Sea Level, Severe Wind Storms, Snow, Glacier, and Ice Sheets, Tropical Cyclones. How about some quotes from the UN's IPCC AR6? "There is low confidence in the emergence of heavy precipitation and pluvial and river flood frequency in observations, despite trends that have been found in a few regions." "There is low confidence in the emergence of drought frequency in observations, for any type of drought, in all regions." "Observed mean surface wind speed trends are present in many areas, but the emergence of these trends from the interannual natural variability and their attribution to human-induced climate change remains of low confidence due to various factors such as changes in the type and exposure of recording instruments, and their relation to climate change is not established. . . The same limitation also holds for wind extremes (severe storms, tropical cyclones, sand and dust storms)." There is no objective observational evidence that we are living through a global climate crisis. None.

Interesting discussion 👍

Very informative indeed❤

Excellent 🎉

Very interesting and inspiring 👏

Extremely enlightening.

takeaways++ "Try everyday to find the Balance"!

If 5g has infinite data cap Then it can replace it

Does it work with Effects Styles?

great!

There is no replacement for real experience; which Umair has. He knows what he is talking about. Great Job Umair.

Awesome Umair :)