Видео

im assuming you mean the edit window in pro tools. you need to hit command = or ctrl = if you are on pc

@@chad100k8 I just have the waveforms’ vertical size increased. You can adjust the size without affecting the volume.

How ​@@jakintoh

@@JaayleeMusiq cmnd + option + [ or ] there is also a little waveform box to the right of the ui near the clip list underneath a checkered box, you can click on the top section of that waveform or bottom to increase or decrease the size.

@@Realtalkyou08yessir I’m going through the Apollo x6

We used a u87ai mic into a hazelrigg vlc preamp and apollo x6 interface. Everything else was in the box bar for bar

@@ProdByxForeva23 vocal tracks in mono and my vocal aux is in stereo

@@balam.rashad thank you and soothe is a banger plug-in 🔥🙏

@@keithwillems9786 thankfully there’s plenty of good recording gear on the market now a days. However, I think if you are serious about recording music and are surrounded with multiple professional artists or you want to reach for that same level of quality, there’s nothing that beats the top of the line equipment. These are pieces of gear that are hand built to last decades and the quality you get with them definitely backs up the price.

Don’t even bother with warm audio. It’s extremely cheap. Stam Audio makes amazing gear. And so does Audioscape.

@@8BKV honestly it’s versatile for pretty much anything. I used the plug-in on one of my latest videos to get the vocals to sit brighter.

How would you say it compares tone wise to a 1073 or ssl pre. Thanks for answering my questions.

@@8BKV the 1073 definitely has an exaggerated top end that can be too much sometimes. The vlc has more of a smooth and musical top end when the high boost is turned up. I'm not too familiar with the ssl pre but all of these are great options. However, I find more flexibility with the vlc and I can typically pull out whatever tone I want with the built in eq.

@@SorryBoutThatBuddy if the artist doesn’t like an effect there is always an opportunity to undo. I’m not saying the engineer should take over full creative control on a song but rather try out opportunities and if the artist doesn’t like it we can always go back to how things were. You’ll never know if someone doesn’t like something if it was never done in the first place. At the end of the day, it is a team effort.

@@zachpitt9249 I typically record at a higher format 48khz and convert it for other formats if I need to. This doesn’t make a huge difference but play around to hear what conversion sounds better.

It’s an open bus input that I renamed to vocal aux. you can make new bus’s in the i/o setup

@@zachpitt9249 it’s a mixture of a good vocal performance with a good recording technique. Hardware does help a lot when used correctly to enhance a performance. However, in the mix, eq and compression is mainly for dynamic control and tonal shaping, so when engineers use barely any plugins, it usually means during the recording process the source already sounds 90% finished. You can try boosting 10-16k for air but if there isn’t much frequency content up there to begin with, then boosting up there isn’t going to help you much. I’ll make a video soon about this to help explain the topic better.

@@jakintoh thanks man it's going to be very interesting content! 😊

I love mine. Use it constantly.

Thank you

@@zachpitt9249 there’s several things you might be doing. You could be recording too far from the mic, cutting too many lows, or boosting too many highs.