Видео

bro i just saw your video you're good at tips ❤

except for aerochrome

Hey Noah this was so helpful even for beginners!

Hello, do you have to lock the focus knob to change the aperture ? Qi have the elmar 50 collapsible and this is the only downside that I find on this lens. So I wonder if you can change the aperture on the summicron at any focus distance Many thanks !

Just to confirm, the setup at the end just has 5 lights, right? Or which light am I missing? This is a great setup, thanks! which watt-second strobes you are using in the simulation? thanks in advance!

do you have the tif files for those shots? they all look kinda out of focus/blurry in the video?

Where did you get these lights form?

What software do you use for this?

Hello Noah! We'd like to collaborate with you. Please let us know how we can get in touch with you.

Momo did phenomenal in this photoshoot!

Who would have thought...

your videos are bangers dude

She is so cuteee, love her 💖💖💖

Better put a filter on lens. It scratches most easily.

Straight to the point review! Thank you

Yo this is nice but why convert them to b+w in a comparison

So accuracy of the focus is the same ? Just the speed of focusing is different?

Very cool Video!!! When you would make the biggest print you have ever made, which one would you take? (could the Hasselblad hould up maybe with better lenses?)

Thank you. I have one, wasn't sure it was any good.

Y’all need to to take pictures of ethnic women, it’s always men of color taking pics of white women lol

Video on 12 second in fact. I-pause-Like-pause-Hasselblad-pause-Its-pause-Personal-pause-Preference-pause. XD

Great comparison man! If you don’t mind me asking, what price did you pay for the G2?

Well, my beloved lomo400 and lomo100 are absent... I never compared them directly to portra so would have been cool to see. But still cool video ! It’s just not “all” 120 color films haha

hi.. is there a difference in "image quality" when using the same lens?

the hasselblad pictures look very unsharp almost blurry. not shure if they are out of focus or if it's something else

name model?

thanks you answered my question in a short video !

I shot with a Mamiya TLR for decades. During that time, the square format was my favorite. On two separate occasions, I had the opportunity to replace my TLR with a Hasselblad SLR system. I did not because I just did not like the way the Hasselblad felt in my hands and the way it operated. When I finally replaced my worn TLR system, I did so with the Mamiya RB67 and have been very happy with my decision.

Liked the model, locations, props, wardrobe, and images. I would love to see the images in the publication. I also liked your cameras selection. I shoot with an RB67 SLR with 90/50/180mm lenses and a Contax G1 rangefinder with 45/21/90mm lenses. What lenses do you normally use with the Contax? Why do you pair the RZ with the Contax? I like to pair my RB with a small camera like the Contax G1 or the digital compact to use as a warm-up before using the bigger camera and to use as a backup in case the bigger camera stops working.

Finally found someone comparing G1 and G2, nice review and nice model.

I find these videos interesting when people say one brand of camera vs another brand of camera, am I wrong to say that the end result on pictures would end up being dictated by the kind of lens you used? So it isn't completely a camera perspective, more a lens perspective. I'm not criticizing this video just to be clear, I shoot film myself I have a lot of film cameras it's just an observation :p

I prefer pairing my Contax G1 small format 35mm rangefinder with a Fuji 6x9cm medium format rangefinder because the images from both cameras share the same aspect ratio.

SQUARE is the ONLY way to go! Rectangles are asymmetric, off-balance, claustrophobic.

You're right. The Kodak Portra series nails it for portraits.

can you do a editorial using a phase one 150 mp camera Now ?

On the Contax G, the 45mm is THE LEGEND!

This was awesome man. What lenses did you bring for the G1?

Awesome video, I love watching vids on both the rz and hasselblad!

I shoot with the Contax G1 and the Leica M6. There are times when I need the auto focus, auto exposure, and auto film wind features of my Contax G1 with 21/28/45/90mm Zeiss lenses. There are times when I need the manual focus, manual exposure, and less operational noise of my Leica M6 with 21/35/90mm lenses. My 21mm and 90mm are Leica lenses. My 35mm is a Zeiss lens. All my lenses produce excellent images. Each camera, with its own set of lenses, is enough for photographing most situations. However, when I do not have time to quickly change lenses, I prefer to carry three bodies with a lens mounted on each body. My favorite combination is: 21mm f/2.8 Zeiss on Contax G1 35mm f/1.4 Zeiss on Leica M6 90mm f/2.8 Zeiss on Contax G1

Great job mate! Portra 800 is fire. The most versatile film in my arsenal.

Nice work showing all of the options Noah!

Back at it with another one!

currently waiting for some lomo 120 film :) great comparison video! i wish there were more choices is the the 120 world

Good job!

Dope, subbed.

Love this lens for bnw!

This was a lot of fun to watch. That black Hasselblad lens is huge! Was that a 250mm, or a 150 w/ extension tubes?

I just got a G2 and love it so much that I stopped using my Leica M6 pretty much. I only have the 45mm lens now but wondering if I should get one more. Do you recommend any? I was thinking the 90mm for portraits but honestly, the 45mm has amazing bokeh already & gives you close focus up to 0.5m which is great for portraits...plus it focuses faster? (Haven’t tried the 90, but just from what I read). And in regards to the 21mm how do you find it? Would love to hear your thoughts / recommendations. We need more video reviews of these lens, I can hardly find anything out there.

Nice shots I’ll pick the rz67

The Zeiss glass is a bit cooler in its colour rendition. It has that reputation. It is crisper though and the flatness of field and sense of depth is something that planar design has a reputation for. Interesting to see it so clearly in the side by side comparison.