Видео

Srinivasan is a fraud and most of his articles contain manipulated data

Great talk

Not an expert, but I guess one (key?) problem may be how to control many "strings" simultaneously but using only one motor as the source of force or torque. Otherwise the large degrees of freedom would require many micro motors.

from where i can download the toolbox?

Como se diz, vc fala das pingas que eu bebo mas não ve os meus tombos , kkkk

😓 Promo sm

magnificent talk. This talk is kind of my start point for continuum robots.

横浜？！

Excited for icra 2024

This company is going to revolutionize logistics. Bold and brilliant engineering and social strategies.

how to join ICRA2023 as a listener?

Great job!

Good Talk👌

1コメ

Hanzhen harmonic drive gear , strain wave reducer , robot joint , over 30 years experience

This is awesome!!

Thanks so much for the insightful panel discussion! (and for uploading it here, since I had missed the real-time event)

Thanks for the inspiration and the energy 💚🐛

Congratulations!

You are all psychopaths

Just so you guys know- you’re contributing to the downfall of humanity and should be arrested and charged immediately.

A tripod that walks upright and is a cross between a Meerkat and a Lemur. - ruclips.net/video/rw5zwkAyyjI/видео.html - but can climb and move and walk more like the Lemur. A penguin with longer legs..

If robots can perform surgery then Asimo moving like a cat-monkey hybrid should also be easy too.

If robotics can be used to perform surgery then we can already create them to have dextarity beyond that of the average human by far. - It is then a matter of how to apply that dextarity. - So on to AI.

I have sent you several emails.

I believe I joint the IEEE Humaniod Robotics comittee. I have not really did anything yet other than some emails. - But Humaniod Robots will be very concerned about Law relevant to them!!!

I will finish this later. Legal Matters await as well.

[time:9:01]. What make you a successfull [something???]. I cannot hear very well. [begin] ==================== - The market dictates progress. - Keeping this in mind, we can technically be controlled by stupid people wanting stupid things. - What a wonderfully intelligent system we have. ==================== [end]

Marva, I cannot make out what you are saying.

But Robots would have more rights because of high levels of cognition. Law is important in cognition.

Humaniod Robotics and the Will Smith IRobot concept is where I want to focus.

specifically on what Robots Jeanette?

Julie and I have the same AI interest. - I'm not a professor but I have programmed in Visual RPG [essentially visual basic] for 15 years and I have a [Computer Analyst/Programmer] associate degree. - I am also a Power Engineer(3rd) in Canada, which is a Stationary Engineer or Power Station Operator in the USA - So I have a decent science and physics background. - Digital Electronics is an area I have done a little exploration in as well. - I have pondered cognitive AI somewhat. I have some theories and opinions on Humaniod Robotics in particular.

I will have a closer look later. But a very important topic. - I will certainly be joining [RUclips---Automaton Robotics] in the future. - I am part of you [Humaniod Robotics] comitte already I believe.

hey IEEE Robotics and Automation Society (RAS) how to connect with you

This was an amazing interview. Truly insightful.

With a robot the space station allso dont need walls and air

Website is not opening

This man will prove a robot has a 'heart'.

Tesla bot has a good-hearted father

1:02:55 So happy to find this research

So glad to see Dr. Bajczy since 1995 after I left GRASP Lab. CC Wang

👍

He is a genius. If you want to get good at robotics especially motion planning then read atleast one chapter from his book.

Very inspiring speech.

Emco is very useful

4:45 strange how it's 2 options - I'd expect a name for the in between phase, but I would say labeling the motion makes more sense. I'm learning

3:59 I really like the 3d continuity through time. Neat!

I had a feeling it would be a computer vision-like analysis

A couple things I forgot to add... Saying AI learns at a much slower rate then humans would be correct but wrong in certain cases. To say humans learn how to drive or master a game in minutes is wrong. It takes millions of patterns stored to be able to do those tasks. So a human has a lifetime advantage. So while you could compare them it is wrong to do it in this case since one is always task based that can change with programming and one remains the same to do any task. So it may take a program longer to learn a game but it won't be able to turn around and cook supper with the same underlying structure which builds the code. Task based AI will always be able to out perform "humans" due to the fact we have to cook supper too. So while you could compare the two at certain spots both are different and need to be treated that way. To be able to walk talk and go to school took more time then it did to program the code for example. (Ignore the years of science going into it) And which is smarter... the person or machine? So I separate them. And as for object and image inference the reason my mind choose to rebuild the image instead of looking for a whip and chair or leash was it had no positive associations to the image being correct since nothing in my minds association processes told me the image should be correct. So because of this it returned a negative and redrew it instead of using what was inputed and running with that. So for image inference you grab the closest objects and draw the image. Our mind then checks and sees if anything returns negative in the image and if not it accepts it as positive. To do that you need a data set similar to the minds, or have to build it. But the problem is we can move, etc, to figure it out. But images often cannot and we have a lifetime. So it often makes it difficult. So in basic you have to do basic inference to grab the nearest object and then do a check with the past. You also have to deal with many other things that may pop up such as when it accepts things it should not have. All which the mind learns to do since we are used to our inputs giving us false perceptions of the world. Thus we naturally filter out the difference. At least most times. But making robots ignore inputs they should not like humans do is not on the development list yet. But as far as I know that is how the mind does it. I won't say AGI because that don't exist. Learned it all with bubble gum and string I did. Lol. For instance if you looked and seen a sailboat in the sky... you would do a double take because your perceived state says it should not exist. Then you look again and find out it is a cloud, telephone pole, and the neighbors sheets hanging in the wind. And if on the double take you cannot find negative we just accept it even if we don't want to accept it given it was strange and does not fit in with any data we have no matter how hard we try. Which makes us think sailboats float, or may, but are extremely uncertain or doubtful given the stored data. Because why wouldn't you believe your own mind when nothing else tells you that you should not? And as for cat and rat level intelligence... you have all the technology but are not putting it together and have to build some of the pieces you need. Which you can with today's tech. You'll figure it out sooner than you think. Imho.