Видео

Thanks Sadukie!

Thank you for your tutorial

Where can I find the solution on GitHub? Thanks

This is great, thank you Sadukie!!!

nice work

Clear and simple: Thank you for sharing!

Nice video, but the white screen is strong and the script font is really small

How does this Modular Monolith compare to other decoupled monolithic architectures like Hexagonal Architecture or Clean Architecture or Vertical Slice Architecture?

Dotnet background looks like a really interesting tool, thank you.

This was helpful. Thanks

Awesome video, thank you

Promo`SM 😴

awesome hahah

Too white but well done

Very nice video but i'm stuck at something. I keep on getting this error with the "build with dotnet": Run dotnet build --configuration Release dotnet build --configuration Release shell: /usr/bin/bash -e {0} env: DOTNET_ROOT: /home/runner/.dotnet MSBuild version 17.7.4+3ebbd7c49 for .NET MSBUILD : error MSB1003: Specify a project or solution file. The current working directory does not contain a project or solution file. Error: Process completed with exit code 1.

some 30 commits making various attempts to get the build job to pass, this video finally had the solution I needed thanks man

What an awesome project / package to create console apps! Thanks for the demo.

Thanks for the great overview. Man are your demos packed and concise.

I'm doing the same using .NET 8 preview and it's failing at deployment: Error: Failed to deploy web package to App Service. Error: Deployment Failed, Package deployment using ZIP Deploy failed. Refer logs for more details. Do you know what may cause this?

This video was very helpful. Thank you !

Much appreciated!

thank you for the useful content that you provide

Thanks 😊, easy to follow

helpful!

Great!.... Thanks for share your knowledge.

If you want to learn how you can incorporate these into your CI/CD pipeline, sign up for our webinar happening June 27, 2023 at 1:00pm US Eastern Time: mailchi.mp/nimblepros/real-world-cicd-tricks-to-boost-your-apps-quality-webinar

work tks!

Worked a treat - thanks.

'Promosm' 💃

Hello, I follow the steps but the appointment is not showing in my calendar.

I've been looking for something like this. Thank you for sharing.

Thanks for showing and explaining.

Why create Everything.sln in eShopWeb folder ? why not in root folder ? Generate Excel (Code Metrics result) using commandline for automation process? (generate excel and send mail for example) ?

@NimblePros , Thank you for taking the time to do this . its adds up to the amazing pluralsight course

Gotta love the Music to Code By soundtrack 😄

Thank you for sharing your knowledge

Yeah, I guess that may be orange.

Resharper slows my pc down so much, that its annoying and i get the job quicker done with the build in tools from VS2019 and some free addins. Except for hardcore refactoring this tool is not of any use imho

Fantastic intro. Despite F-12 not working for me with Latest Resharper Ultimate and VS2010. Also could you make resolution higher? Thanks!!!

cool vid but I would not use ternary inside a function call to me it's less redable

Nice. Thanks for sharing this.

How I felt when I first dealt with resharper /watch?v=6f0Rkkp7cxQ

Taking your change to the ultimate refactored lines, why not make a new function GetLowestValue? public float GetLowestValue(float[] input) { //type checks and comparisons go here } The end result is much easier on the eyes and hands. Could also make it generic, but RUclips is confusing my example for HTML...

That's not more readable or maintainable. it's a bug waiting to happen. If you're not using curly braces, at least indent. Or use the features of the language. x = Math.Max(maxX , x); x = (x > maxX ) ? maxX : x;

This is a good kick off video for Resharper

I didn't watch the video.. I am at work and I very quickly realized that resharper would not be usable for the task I am trying to conquer. My point is I read your dumb comment which said "surely nobody would agree that the ternary operator is easier to read.." and I respectfully disagreed. to which you posted a kindergarten example. Now that the history lesson is over I will sum this all up with a short comment: you should learn how to program brother.. it is a worthwhile endeavor.

you can't use such a pathetic example and talk about reliable maintainable code.. Obviously if someone did what you are suggesting, they are a geek. But in many contexts the ternary is way more elegant and readable. Example : you are writing code in a language that does not have a switch statement, so the best you can do is write nested if/else logic. I would rather write something like (x == 1) ? dothis: (x == 2) ? dothat: ... ; See how your baby example doesn't qualify as a good argument?

I disagree.. I prefer the elegant look of the ternary.. plus as you are writing you just type ()?:; and then fill in the blanks. It separates the boys from the men.

480p? did you record this with a potato?

Very good! Thank you for the video.