Видео

Amen 🙏 🙏 🙏 ❤

🎉❤🎉❤

AMEN

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤l love you too

Pray 🙏 for my late husband God Rest His Soul And Always Let Him Know He Was The Love Of My life and Ways Will Be Amen 🙏

Lord God I pray 🙏 for the souls in purgatory of my family members and friends Amen 🙏

Lord Have Mercy on All souls in purgatory amen 🙏

Even if you could call the Torah/bible/Quran evidence, it’s poor. If the bible is egregiously faulty then the main character’s existence is likely fantasy. If the existence of Yahweh/Allah is a fiction (Muslims believe in the first five books of the Old Testament) then the god man/prophet Jesus cannot stand, nor any Abrahamic Prophet, such as Muhammad. Faith (belief without evidence) based on the contents of the bible/Quran is suspect, for the following reasons… Of the Canaanite gods. El was the top god (sort of Roman Saturn) Ba’al (Jupiter) was next, then down the line was the war/storm god Yahweh (Mars). The Jews nicked him and made him the creator. The first line of the bible is clearly incorrect. The Earth was formed at least 9.8 billion years after the heavens. How did the creator get that wrong? And, the rest of the creation is wrong. It’s as if an ancient ignorant tribe wrote it all by themselves. &, it takes light 2.5 million years to travel from Andromeda galaxy (seen with the naked eye from Earth by ancient Jews) to Earth. That makes the actual heavens older than biblical heavens. The bible a man made fiction? There are no waters above the firmament. Heaven isn’t up there either, we’ve been there. The tribes of the Middle East wouldn’t have known oceans would be frozen but for the heat of the sun. Yet, in the biblical account, water filled the oceans and outer space, all with no sun, and the light that made up the day was created before the sun? The ancient Jews had no concept the sun caused day and night onto a rotating Earth. The moon isn’t a light. It’s fiction by an ignorant tribe with no access to a god or reality. Adam was made from dirt by magic and he, this god, forgot about Eve, an afterthought. so not an all knowing and wise god then? Snakes and donkeys talk, nonsense fiction, right up there with Harry Potter, though JK Rowling was clearly a better writer with fewer continuity errors. This god set up Eve by placing this magic apple within her reach, before she knew right from wrong. Then punished humanity thereafter. What a vicious god, if not a fictional one? Nonsense fiction, by an ignorant ancient people writing about their mythology, their nation’s origins, steeped in the mists of the past, just the same as the Greek, Persian and Babylonian cultures write about their make believe gods who were equally fervently worshipped. Inanna, the dying and rising goddess was such an example, worshiped for 2,500 years. With more dying and rising gods in the lexicon of ancient myths. Virgin births were pretty common too. Romulus and Remus, twin founders of Rome, born of the virgin Rhea Silvia. In ancient Egypt, Ra (the Sun) was born of a virgin mother, Net; Horus was the son of the virgin Isis. The Phrygo-Roman god, Attis, was born of a virgin, Nana, on December 25. He went on to be killed and was resurrected. Adam and Eve’s children (as Eve was a clone of Adam) and grandchildren (as Cain, Able and Seth only had Eve to produce offspring or with their unknown sisters) could only have been produced by incest, then double incest, according to the biblical account. But, as Eve was a clone of Adam, there would be no genetic diversity. Such a lack of diversity would have meant the death of the human species, ask the Hapsburgs. But then, their created god wouldn’t have known about genetics? The Exodus didn’t happen according to all evidence, acknowledged by the Jewish archaeologists who have tried to find it. The Egyptians never wrote of their army being swallowed by the sea. Mosses may never existed. There is a massive amount of genocide in the bible by a god who failed to get the locals to behave. Genocide because the Israelites needed a land to make home. If a creator of the universe and humans could have just thought a new land, a new island, south of Cyprus, it would have appeared. Easy for a god, not so for an ancient tribe to pull off? Then, this god could have told these others how to behave and punished individuals, if that’s what was needed. But no, he went straight to mass murder. What? And, the greatest god in the universe was defeated by iron chariots: Judges1:19. That is so ridiculous, such a puny god. Or, is it because the story was a creation of a tribe that had no concept of future technologies or tactics to defeat these new Iron Age chariots? I’m sure that a human Napoleon type tactician could have done better. Genesis 19 tells us of Lot being raped by this daughters. And yet this god is moral? He could have changed the course of their predicament, found him a younger wife or servant to sleep with, if a god. More incest. No respect for genetics? A blood sacrifice barbaric religion. The books that were supposedly written by Mosses consist of a linguistic style that didn’t exist at the time of his “life”. It’s a fictitious narrative, written by the Jews to give their new nation an historical legitimacy, and unify them, in the midst of other powerful cultures in the Middle East. Didn’t help much though, they were constantly being invaded and subjugated by more powerful “gods” of other warring nations. Even Yahweh acknowledged there were other gods. Remember the Ten Commandments tablets that were conveniently broken and then without fuss, lost. An all powerful creator of the universe who missed the opportunity to create the tablets out of an advanced technology, Titanium or, something really exotic perhaps? Is that because the Jews didn’t know about such a thing with no understanding of the future? The forging and preservation of such a technology would have cemented the truth of their god. Broken conveniently disappeared stone tablets: clearly, no god involved. Noah and his flood occurred when the Egyptians where going about their cultural and religious practices that continued afterwards; and, their religion was not replaced by the flood family’s immediate ancestors, fanning out from the ark. The Pharaohs and their gods continued unabated. No Yahweh? More incest? Another genetic bottleneck? The Chinese culture and writing developed along a continuum and they too were never taken the religion of Yahweh from the Middle East, by Noah’s relatives. Odd, don’t you think? Do you think? And, the ancient Britons and Australians failed to notice they were meant to be dead. The New Testament, if it is read, critically, is inconsistent and evolves over time. Indeed, the gospels were not written for decades after the death of this Jesus, whose birth and death are still questionable and no date can be asserted with clarity. There’s no evidence that all the first born were killed either in Egypt nor by Herod. I think the Egyptians would have recorded such a calamity and the calamities of the plagues, but nothing. Was it all made up? There is real historical evidence of John the Baptist, but not of the greater Jesus. There is historical evidence of Apollonius of Tyana, who allegedly ascended to heaven, similar to Jesus, but there is no extra biblical evidence of Jesus during his lifetime. There is an historical record of Jesus Ben Pandira but, no Jesus the Galilean outside of the bible. Nothing. There’s Jesus ben Ananias, a rude peasant, who went around Jerusalem in 66CE prophesying its fall in 70CE; he’s recorded in documents outside the bible, but not the biblical Jesus. His alleged disciples never wrote anything they were uneducated peasants. Contemporaries never recorded his miracles nor his troublesome nature. The bible account says he was widely known and a divisive figure that the Romans never recorded. Neither did the Jews. And, the crucified were left to rot on the cross/pole on which they were hung as a warning to insurrectionists? No empty tomb, it’s a fiction to turn a myth into a “fact”. To turn a dead man or a fictional man into god. Pilate was, in real history, recorded history, a truly nasty contemptuous man, he would never have allowed a crucified body’s removal to undermine its purpose as a warning. And, the alleged trial is a tale of the blood cult of scapegoating. Even Barabbus was a literary device representing scapegoating, suggesting it never occurred. Barabbus means, son of the teacher, or son of the father. The gospel writers where representing the two characters as essentially the same, one became the goat sacrifice. And, the twist was that the Jews shouted to let the murderer go, allowing the blame for Jesus’s death to be placed on the Jews and not the imperial Romans. It was very much a political narrative because the Jews and Romans where essentially at war, the destruction of the Temple in 70AD/CE, and this new sect/cult needed to distinguish themselves from the Jewish troublemakers, and the ongoing violence of the time. Paul never knew Jesus and only depicted him as a spiritual vision. He knew nothing of the man and nothing of his life or his teachings. More evidence that the Chrestos (anointed) was mythical? The gospel writers are unknown. The church gave them names years later. The first time the gospels were mentioned was in 180AD/CE by Irenaeus. Indeed, a very prominent Christian, Theophilus of Antioch (Feast day 13 October, died circa 184 AD/CE) said that he came to believe in Jesus from reading the Jewish Scriptures or, Torah. No mention of the gospels, no quoting of anything Jesus allegedly said. That’s really odd because a conversation with a Christian today invokes quotes from the bible. Best date for the gospels is circa, 170-182 AD/CE. The myth of the god man Jesus was created over many years. Mark was first written, not until at least 70AD/CE, say Christian scholars but, as above, likely much later. No record of the star of Bethlehem, of graves emptying, or sky darkening. It’s fiction. No Mosses, Abraham, no Noah, no Flood. As for flying horses in the Quran, that’s straight out of Greek mythology. No one should believe such nonsense today.

For all the aborted babies.

For the person s dying at this time, have mercy on them Jesus.

Saint Borges pray for us❤🙏🏻💞.

Relativity reproves Jesus' teachings.

Holy Mary Mother of God please pray for Us sinners now and at the hour of our death, Amen and Amen

I say this prayer for all the souls in purgatory especially those priests in God I trust amen

Make me 🤓 for me and Heaven for you guys to be Praised in Jesus Christ name Amen 👀🕊️💯🤺✅👑🦋🛰️🪤📜📜📜📜🥝🥝🫐🕯️🪆🪆🔦🙏👀🕊️ Seeking devotion abundance and the Messiah of Finding out the blessings in your will believe in God 🛒 yes I do believe in you and keep your commandments safe travels in Worship 🔥😂😂 Lord God bless you 💕 on my behalf now it's Meaningful faith and trust in Thee Lord God bless you all things through Christ who strengthens me and Heaven for you guys God bless You all who believes in the name of Jesus Christ name Amen 🧐🎶🎵 blessings to all of us updated the name 🕊️📛 Amen and Amen and amen amen 😮💸💸💸💸😊😅

💐 Hello 🧐 my 🎶 Nana 🔦 Son 💐 shine 💐 I 🧐 love 🎶 God 🔦 bless 💐 you 🧐 all 🎶 who 🔦 believes 💐 in 🧐 the 🎶 name 🔦 of 💐 Jesus 🧐 Christ 🎶 name 🔦 Amen 🧐🎶 Hallelujah 🔦

I Hail Thee Jesus Crucified for Granting Me Life ❤Viva Cristo

Please pray for my soul. No matter when in time you may read this…and for my son Owen. Please help me get to heaven. I’m due to leave this world soon. Jesus have mercy on me a sinner.

🤔 Interesting 🤔 international 🥰 intercessors 😍 intercede 🤔 yes 🥰 yes 🥰😍

🤔 Interesting 🤔 international 👀 intercessors 📛 intercede 🙈 Amen 👀📛🙈

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ amen 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏 🙏 🙏🙏

I’ve been a Catholic for 22 years. I had never heard of this end of year Prayer! What a lovely gift to discover here at the end of 2024! Going into the next year 2025, may the Blessings of this lovely Prayer be with us always! May 2025 be Blessed with good health, happiness and good success in all that God Provides!!!In Jesus’ Name, Amen!!!Peace be with you all!!!

Oh my Heavenly Father Amen 👀🕊️ Seeking devotion abundance flow into my life in reality mind that you are my brother in Jesus Christ name yes 🕊️🤣🍿 7 with humanity it's Meaningful faith and trust in Thee Lord God is with you God bless US myself for all who believes in the name of Jesus Christ name Amen 👀🕊️🕊️ Seeking and strength forever ♾️🌊🌬️🚪♾️🌊♾️♾️🌊🌬️♾️♾️♾️🌊🌬️🚪🕯️♾️♾️🌊😅

Àmen jesus christ heal my stomach I belive in you jesus christ amen ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊

❤amen❤

Thank You, sweet Jesus, thank You...

Deo Gratias

❤❤❤ amen 🙏🙏🙏

Amen 🙏 I love you God and Jesus please bless everyone who commented 🙏 ❤️ ♥️ 💖 💗 💕 🙏

Amen

💝💖💖🌷

St Stephen pray for us and all souls in purgatory amen ❤

FIAT🙏❤️🌹😇

very very long time ago and you have to wait for the best friend from nypmyrapqu or something like jesus love you too and you have to wait for me jesus and the kids are a bit better now but I can do foop jesus ❤

❤ very very. Long time waiting for you jesus even ls for my birthday eng I. Do you have any ideas for my friend from nypmyrapqu ❤ love jesus love jesus and you have a lovely day 😘

Amen 🙏

Healing for my brother and myself. Thank you Jesus ❤️

Praying this holy Chaplet for my husband, parents, in laws and my lineage.

Amen 🙏 ❤️❤️❤️

Infant Jesus bless & heal us.

Beautiful, thank you

Thank you and praise you Jesus Amen

Interesting 🤔 international intercessors intercede yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes Amen Amen 👀🕊️🕊️ Holy One Hallelujah 🔦🕜🕐

John 5:19 (NIV) Verse: “Jesus gave them this answer: ‘Very truly I tell you, the Son can do nothing by himself; he can do only what he sees his Father doing, because whatever the Father does the Son also does.’” Interpretation: Jesus makes it clear that his power and authority come from the Father. This passage emphasizes the dependency of the Son on the Father, highlighting Jesus' humanity and the limits he accepted in his incarnation. 4. John 8:28 (NIV) Verse: “So Jesus said, ‘When you have lifted up the Son of Man, then you will know that I am he and that I do nothing on my own but speak just what the Father has taught me.’” Interpretation: Jesus here emphasizes that his teachings and actions are not from himself alone but are given by the Father, suggesting a distinction between him and the Father, and underscoring his role as a messenger and servant during his time on earth. 5. Matthew 24:36 (NIV) Verse: “But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.” Interpretation: In this verse, Jesus declares that only the Father knows the day and hour of the end times, not even the Son. This has been interpreted as a clear indication of Jesus’ limitations in his human nature, particularly in knowledge. While he is fully divine, this passage shows his voluntary acceptance of human limitations. 6. Philippians 2:6-7 (NIV) Verse: “Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage; rather, he made himself nothing by taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.” Interpretation: This passage from Paul underscores the mystery of the Incarnation: though Jesus was in the very nature of God, he took on human form and did not grasp onto his divine privileges. Instead, he emptied himself to fully experience human existence, including its limitations. 7. John 17:3 (NIV) Verse: “Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.” Interpretation: Jesus prays to God the Father and refers to him as "the only true God," while referring to himself as the one sent by God. This prayer seems to highlight the distinction between God and Jesus, particularly focusing on his role as the one sent to fulfill God's will.

John 14:28 (NIV) Verse: “You heard me say, ‘I am going away and I am coming back to you.’ If you loved me, you would be glad that I am going to the Father, for the Father is greater than I.” Interpretation: Here, Jesus clearly states that "the Father is greater than I," which some interpret as Jesus acknowledging a distinction between himself and God. This passage can be seen as Jesus emphasizing his subordinate role during his earthly ministry, pointing to the relational hierarchy between him and the Father. 2. Mark 10:18 (NIV) Verse: “Why do you call me good?” Jesus answered. “No one is good-except God alone.” Interpretation: In this verse, Jesus responds to being called "good teacher" by pointing out that only God is truly good. This has been understood as Jesus redirecting the attention to God the Father, possibly emphasizing his humanity and reliance on God’s goodness. However, some theologians argue that this statement invites the person to reflect on Jesus’ divine identity, without outright denying it.

Let’s explore additional potential contradictions or areas where John the Baptist’s prophetic message in Mark 1:7 might be perceived differently across the Gospels. While none of these are outright contradictions, they highlight different theological angles or narrative details across the accounts of John's ministry: 1. Luke 7:18-23 - John's Doubts Revisited In Luke 7:18-23, similar to Matthew 11:2-3, John the Baptist sends his disciples to ask Jesus if He is truly the Messiah: Verse 19: “He sent them to the Lord to ask, ‘Are you the one who is to come, or should we expect someone else?’” Verse 22: “So he replied to the messengers, ‘Go back and report to John what you have seen and heard: The blind receive sight, the lame walk, those who have leprosy are cleansed, the deaf hear, the dead are raised, and the good news is proclaimed to the poor.’” Perceived contradiction: Similar to the account in Matthew 11, this passage raises questions about John's certainty regarding Jesus as the Messiah, despite John’s earlier prophetic declaration in Mark 1:7. How could John, who so confidently proclaimed Jesus’ greatness, now express doubt? Explanation: John's doubts likely reflect unmet expectations of the Messiah’s role, specifically in terms of political liberation. This does not negate his earlier proclamation but rather shows his human struggle with the unfolding of Jesus’ ministry, which emphasized spiritual transformation over political revolution. 2. John 1:19-21 - John Denies Being Elijah In John 1:19-21, when asked by priests and Levites who he was, John the Baptist denies being the Messiah, Elijah, or “the Prophet”: Verse 21: “They asked him, ‘Then who are you? Are you Elijah?’ He said, ‘I am not.’ ‘Are you the Prophet?’ He answered, ‘No.’” Perceived contradiction: In Mark 1:7, John clearly identifies himself as the forerunner to Christ, which seems to be a fulfillment of the prophecy of Malachi 4:5-6, where Elijah is predicted to return before the "great and dreadful day of the Lord." However, here in John 1, John denies being Elijah, which could seem inconsistent with his role as Christ’s forerunner. Explanation: John the Baptist denies being Elijah in a literal sense, as he is not Elijah reincarnated or returned to earth physically. However, in Matthew 11:14, Jesus himself identifies John as the spiritual fulfillment of the "Elijah" prophecy: “And if you are willing to accept it, he is the Elijah who was to come.” John’s humility and self-denial reflect his role as a messenger, not as a reincarnation of Elijah. 3. Matthew 3:14 - John’s Initial Hesitation to Baptize Jesus In Matthew 3:14, when Jesus comes to be baptized by John, John expresses reluctance: Verse 14: “But John tried to deter him, saying, ‘I need to be baptized by you, and do you come to me?’” Perceived contradiction: Some readers might see this as contradicting Mark 1:7, where John acknowledges Jesus' greatness and superiority, but then shows hesitation in Matthew when it comes to baptizing Jesus, as if he didn’t fully expect this encounter. Explanation: John's reluctance to baptize Jesus is not a contradiction of his previous prophecy but a reflection of his deep humility. In Mark 1:7, John expresses unworthiness to even untie Jesus’ sandals, and in Matthew 3:14, this humility is again displayed as John feels unworthy to baptize the sinless Messiah. 4. John 3:25-30 - John the Baptist’s Role After Jesus Begins His Ministry In John 3:25-30, John's disciples express concern that Jesus is attracting more followers than John. John responds: Verse 28: “You yourselves can testify that I said, ‘I am not the Messiah but am sent ahead of him.’” Verse 30: “He must become greater; I must become less.” Perceived contradiction: In Mark 1:7, John speaks with great certainty about the coming of someone mightier than him. However, in John 3:25-30, John’s disciples seem confused or concerned about the growing influence of Jesus. Some might interpret this as a lack of understanding among John’s followers regarding Jesus' identity and role. Explanation: There is no contradiction here, but a difference in focus. John the Baptist’s followers may not have fully understood John's prophetic role as the forerunner, while John himself consistently points to Jesus as the one who must increase in prominence. This dialogue in John 3 reaffirms John’s earlier declaration in Mark 1:7 and highlights his continued humility and recognition of Jesus’ superiority. 5. Matthew 17:11-13 - Jesus Confirms John as Elijah In Matthew 17:11-13, after the Transfiguration, Jesus clarifies John the Baptist’s role as the fulfillment of the Elijah prophecy: Verse 11: “Jesus replied, ‘To be sure, Elijah comes and will restore all things.’”Verse 12: “But I tell you, Elijah has already come, and they did not recognize him, but have done to him everything they wished. In the same way the Son of Man is going to suffer at their hands.” Verse 13: “Then the disciples understood that he was talking to them about John the Baptist.”

The Gospel of the Hebrews (2nd Century) Background: This gospel was used by Jewish-Christian groups and, like the Gospel of the Nazarenes, emphasized the human nature of Jesus rather than his divinity. Key Idea: Jesus is presented as a holy man and teacher but not as God incarnate. The text often emphasizes Jesus’ role as a servant of God. Council’s Response: Like the Gospel of the Ebionites and the Gospel of the Nazarenes, this text was excluded from the New Testament canon. The council’s affirmation of Jesus' divinity stood in contrast to these early Christian writings. Example (Jerome): "The Gospel which the Nazarenes use speaks of Jesus as a man, not as divine." 6. The Acts of Paul and Thecla (2nd Century) Background: This apocryphal text focuses on the adventures of Thecla, a female disciple of Paul. It emphasizes asceticism and the power of spiritual teachings but does not present Jesus as divine in the same way the canonical Gospels do. Key Idea: While Thecla's story highlights miracles, it does not affirm the divinity of Jesus in the manner accepted by the Nicene Creed. Council’s Response: Though not explicitly addressed by the Council of Nicaea, this text was excluded from the canon and rejected by early church fathers for its unorthodox presentation of Jesus. Example (The Acts of Paul and Thecla): The text emphasizes moral teachings and asceticism rather than the divinity of Jesus. 7. The Gospel of Thomas (2nd Century) Background: This Gnostic text, known for its collection of sayings attributed to Jesus, presents a very different view of Jesus than that found in the canonical gospels. It does not focus on Jesus’ death or resurrection but emphasizes hidden, esoteric knowledge. Key Idea: Jesus is presented as a revealer of wisdom and knowledge rather than a divine being. The emphasis is on secret teachings about the nature of the soul and salvation. Council’s Response: Although the Gospel of Thomas was popular among some early Christian communities, its Gnostic views were condemned by the church, and it was excluded from the canon. Example (Gospel of Thomas Saying 77): “I am the light that is over all things. I am all: from me all came forth, and to me all attained.” While this saying could be interpreted in a metaphorical sense, the lack of emphasis on Jesus' divinity contributed to its exclusion. 8. The Gospel of Peter (2nd Century) Background: This apocryphal text was discovered in the 19th century and presents a version of Jesus’ Passion, Death, and Resurrection. However, it does not contain the same theological elements found in the canonical gospels. Key Idea: Jesus is depicted as a suffering human, and the resurrection is portrayed in a more mystical, less doctrinal way. Council’s Response: The gospel was excluded from the canon due to its divergent portrayal of Jesus and his resurrection, which did not align with the Nicene understanding of Jesus as God incarnate. Example (Gospel of Peter): The resurrection is described as a supernatural event, but the text emphasizes Jesus’ humanity rather than his divinity. 9. The Gospel of Valentinus (2nd Century) Background: Valentinus was a prominent Gnostic theologian whose teachings were based on a dualistic view of the world, where the material world was seen as inferior. His gospel was closely tied to Gnostic beliefs. Key Idea: Jesus is portrayed as a spiritual being who reveals higher knowledge, but not as a divine being or part of the Godhead. Council’s Response: Valentinian teachings were condemned as heretical, and texts associated with him were excluded. Example (Valentinian Gospel fragment): "Jesus came to reveal the hidden knowledge of the Father." This emphasizes knowledge over divine incarnation.

jesus is not god

Amen