Видео

Thanks haha 🤣

Both drone guys killed it!! Thanks man

thanks man!!! hopefully we can do something together (finally) soon!

@@TheLostKuma let’s do it 🫶🏼

thank you, had a great team of amazing friends.!

you killed it on the visuals!!!

@@TheLostKumawe made it! Good team work and a lot of passion :)

Mike & How were absolutely awesome on all the FPV scenes

Yes, correct - as expected it compresses down a bit the deeper I go, but it still maintains its properties surprisingly well (still feels gel like) and haven't noticed any functional difference whether at 1 meter or 35.

@@TheLostKuma I see. And turns out it has a pressure balancer in its handle (I read it somewhere). Maybe it is like a compressible compartment. Meaning when the environment pressure rise, the pressure inside the casing also rise against the inward force, so the screen and the phone will not heavily compressed. Clever engineering.

hey! this was from quite a while ago and unfortunately dont have any canon adapters anymore so can't test this :(

you'd have to use an autofocus system like lidar

Thank you !

thank you !

Will def do! I'm only just starting out in uw video - have posted something already but hopefully get better over time.

Hey sorry unfortunately the camera was loaned to me by a friend to try (without a cage) so won’t be able to answer that :(

I dont think theres a cage that would get in the way. Rigged up its a little cramped but no issues yet

its a stunner! <3

Cinema

basically for production use, where smaller lenses or small camera like this one aren't sensible. narratives, commercials, and some music video type stuff if it fits hte look desired...

tbhonest i wouldn't choose the sp3's at all to begin with. but that's just my personal preference!

@@TheLostKuma would love to hear more as to why not!

ah sorry cannot remember anymore.... (this was originally posted a long time ago on IG)

Hey sorry, sharpness is one of the things i never specifically test for so I can't really comment. They're all certainly sharp enough for my needs, but obviously everyone's needs vary

Hey sorry I wish i can help respond to this but i'm not entirely sure on this. I also never trust makers' specs so would prefer to find real-world usage tests/experiences as well. Maybe try messaging some concert/event type shooters on IG that use fujifilm!

@@TheLostKuma ok, thank you for responding. Have a good day

Thanks for the comment! I generally just try to post footage, even if i'm just shooting random things without much intent. Plenty of others happy to spend 10 minutes and 8 seconds talking about gear without using it much.... makes me very happy when others find anything I post even remotely useful. Thank you again!

oh- and same for me! for production use obviously its getting rigged up but for personal use i really like to strip it down and go easy/casual for fun. its very liberating :)

@@TheLostKuma absolutely! There's not much out there on this lens for the Komodo specifically, so literally anything is helpful, lol. I saw some of your posts in the FB group so I had to come here and find more. Glad I did! 😎

yessss. thanks =P its a good rig haha

Hey sorry, haven't heard of the xp adapter before

Yeah, the compression makes it really tough. For me the chromatic aberration on the cp3's are a buzzkill because I really like the design and lightweight/size of the cp3's... considerably worse CA than i've seen on just about any other lenses sadly. but otherwise do love them. While its nice if brands are a bit more engaging or responsive, I wouldn't read too much into it, in reality none of them REALLY care, they're all out there to make money. What's important is getting the image we want for the project we're on!

What is your favorite good cinema lens that's expensive let's say but not ARRI or Zeiss supreme level? Let's say something around the CP.3 (maybe Tokina Vista? but they're huge)@@TheLostKuma

@@ronbackal hey that's a really tough question. for me i'll always choose things with character (like rehoused vintage) vs something modern and clean becuase the benefits are so marginal esp when on lower budgets and not with larger crew).

I mean I only have Sony 50mm f1.2 and FX3, but I was toying with the idea of renting and considering more expensive lenses . Than, I’m not sure that for what I’m going to do- to shoot alone and edit my own footage- that it will be so important, versus maybe buying a Sony Burano which is a much better cinema camera

@@ronbackalonly my personal opinoin but i'm SUPER meh about the burano tbhonest. Personally i think teh a7s4 gen cameras (given it's coming later this year unless schedule changes) will be a much better investment when the updated fx3/6 on that tech comes.

😂😂😂😂🙏

Oh man I’m pretty sure we did but can’t remember anymore what we would have used, sorry!

thank you! all cus i had a great video instructor :)

Thanks man! You’re all too kind 🙏

hard to go wrong with either, or any modern camera these days!

@@TheLostKuma After doing more research I think the x-t5 is the move because it also takes amazing pictures, especially with the "FujiFilm" look. By the way, can I use any lense for the x-t5?

@@Migi-eg2nm you'd have to use native fuji lenses, or adapt EF/PL/LPL/M glass! (or other dslr mounts)

@@TheLostKuma thank you!

Had an awesome teacher :)

haha what does that mean?

maybe the 15mm then. it'll be less prone to CA and also more future proof across sensor sizes

its a easy fix in resolve to eliminate RS completely though for the blackmagic's

@@TheLostKuma Hmmm today I learned. Is the FX3 doing similar processing in camera? Why do some camera have worse rolling shutter than others? Is it a hardware feature or how the camera's software processes the footage?

@@zbytpewny its a function of a few things- the sensor's readout speed, camera's processor's ability to process it, etc. the a7s3/fx3/zve1/fx6 sensor is fast readout becuase its a fast readout sensor but also it's very low resolution, less data to have to read out so it can read it out faster.

@@TheLostKuma thanks for the info, I may still go for the FX3 due to the lowlight performance mostly, but you have got me thinking again.

@@zbytpewnyi will say though, i find 12800 incredibly overrated and grainy. its not really native in feeling, and i guess why they dont officially say its dual base iso

thanks daeil =P

thanks se =P !

its always fair to have personal preferences for any or no reason!

@@TheLostKuma Yes.

BMCC full frame!

@@TheLostKuma thank you

Thank you 🙌🙌

i think for personal use modded leica r is a great choice, but i'm extremely anti-modded lenses for all other use case scenarios when possible

Thanks 🙌🙌👍

thanks :)

They’re awesome! I keep a set of modded only as well I used with Kipon boosters. Love Mamiya!

There really is no comparison. They're just very different lenses, but then again, same can be said about the price!

In all honesty its almost as if cooke was quietly bought out by a private equity shop and forced to make the sp3's in china as a cash grab to capitalize on the cooke name, and sacrifice a bit of legacy. that's what my hedge fund manager brain/background tells me. they did do a good job on creating a set of cheaper lenses, but i wouldn't use them as a b-set on a panchro shoot. but that's just me. Nothing wrong w/ the SP3's though, but felt marketing it as a small panchro was a bit of a stretch and missing out on LPL was a big mistake.

thanks man =P