Видео

Its so dumb that they used it as marketing only for it all to fall flat on its face with Head Marsh Boland Marnus and Usman playing like 4 between them

Yep i flipped to Wade as he has the gloves and can take the injury risk to get the cash to get up to Neser and Johnson

Johnson i feel like just has a higher hit rate he also seems to bowl just outside of the initial PP which helps him for ER bonus

Thanks I was thinking that Johnson might get points but I couldn’t decide because Bartlett’s lower break even. But I’ll follow your advice Because you do way more research than me. Thanks

Marvel has a roof that they can close

Yep sounds good, If Agar plays tonight i will have 11 players which is enough for me. Just gotta get the VC or C right at that point

Yep don't think it should be too bad but definitely a game i have in the weather watch category

Not with the rain in Sydney probably more likely that they don't get on than they do

More so that i reckon that they won't bomb down in price but they will go down 40-50k in the first 4 or 5 weeks and these guys like Farrell and other semi-premos could gain 200k or so very quickly alongside a rookie gaining cash to bridge the gap whilst scoring the same amount of points on field.

No but i don't know his exact midfield percentage so looking for value options in defence than the top line players. I expect him to be a 50% CBA midfielder but the other 20-30% game time will be interesting.

@kybroome great content again man plenty to think about. Also have ya got a league code I can join

@@fire_titan5735 D7LWHTEK

​@@kybroomeI joined also.

Thats a weird thing but pretty sure that scoring at grounds doesn't have much correlation etc

Yep this has been a terrible advertisement for BBL that you have a mass of LRP's playing etc and squads just not having state quality players in them

100% has had 2 games so will probably forget how to bat for 24 months

Doesn't sound like he is as he leaves around the same time as Overton for the T20I's for England. Don't know if that is Round 8 or 9 that he leaves by

Believe he is out for 1 more game but will have to double check it, still a great hold during the single to get a loop option especially with rain around for the first game

Yep Dale usually wouldn’t be a good option but with the fact that only 1-2 other guys above 90-95 actually have value or no negatives about them (eg early bye) Dale suddenly becomes an alright option

No, is basically an undersized tall and doesn't get much of the footy itself. Last 3-4 years he has averaged 55-60 which when he is priced at 38 isn't much value at all compared to the rookie half backs and Coleman himself who all have 30+ points of value in them

@kybroome i see, thanks

In consideration for that M3/4 slot but not in the side at the moment

He is one that I picked up on from a SC podcast (forget who exactly) currently sitting in my utility spot as might want 3 of those roaming half backs especially considering that many will have Mills and Coleman off in Rd3. Given that I picked up on him after Christmas he wasn't included in this as I believe this was recorded on the 12th

@@kybroomecheers!

@ I think it’s a myth. Source close to the club says he’s a slow small. I’m long on Short.

No too up and down as well as old and injury prone

Yep thats why he probably needs to be moved up to the wing but the wing already has Gulden McInerney and Lloyd

Glad you like them!

When i get back in the country on so like early January

Yep he sounds like the big boomer this year and mostly due to the FWD status tbh

Okay surprising that Reid isn't there but with 5 on ballers all it takes is 1 injury and he goes from fringe 23/sub then onto the bench

@ I think that Reid definitely has a shot at getting a game next year, except if he does I don’t think it will be in the midfield. I think it will be either half-forward or half-back.

Fair could always be the classic half-forward with 20% CBAs

Key Forward so is pretty much an auto pass even if he has the secondary ruck role. He isn't going to score consistently and also isn't going to jump up by enough average per game to be relevant

Yep Perryman is in the awkward bracket because Coleman is a more valuable option just due to the huge discount but Perryman could be that guy that we grab early out of the bye because he could be a genuine top 6. Obviously haven't made my AF side yet but he is currently in the SC side

Fair that was the vibe I got from his stats and rookie profile. Just think that high end talent is newer and above him in Curtin and Draper that he will struggle

​@kybroome my concern with Curtin is his role. He's currently training with the midfield group. But I can see him also playing forward which is a score killer. If I'm Nicks, he plays half back in the AFL. With stints on-ball. Because he absolutely killed it in the SANFL and although he will be a decent midfielder, with a huge ceiling. At this point, his biggest impact at senior level is HB. On the first or second tall, but a running HB. I can't see him being the midfielder we want at this point, I don't trust Nicks. At some point though, Dan Curtin will be hugely relevant! Wether it's early 2025 I doubt. But if he plays the first two games in a friendly role, I'd grab him! But reluctant to start atm. Sid the Kid, straight in!

Problem is Nicks doesn’t believe you can really have a tall running half back. Curtin should be on the medium forward and intercepting and running or being played on ball

Don't forget J.Dawson has only played in the Mid for under two years (and already has AA status) He'll get much better with more experience & a more settled role & with better support around him ie Draper, Curtin, Peatling.

He will only really get to like 110-115 again if he plays consistently in the midfield

Probably won’t given the history but got to back the bloods

Batting 7 and bowling 1-3 isn’t the best role imo especially if they want to nurse him into the tournament

@ thanks, who would u say the top 5ish must haves before the game tonight cos I’m rushing trying to fix my team

@@louisovens15 Sorry that i didn't get to this went to bed at Tea (because thats midnight in Florida). Would say the must haves from the gades are Khan O'Neill Zampa and then you look at bench players like Thornton from the Strikers.

@ nah all good, didn’t realise you were outside Australia

No worries, glad it helped!

Appreciate that! Glad they’re helping

Don't know if he will play even now and this was recorded before the Inglis news

@ if he plays though, you’ll get him most likely?

​@@kybroomewhat's the Inglis news?

Will be held over for the Aussie side and won't be available for Perth

@@kybroome we’re talking about Webster right? That’s not confirmed is it?

Any team that hasn't played yet can be freely traded. One their game kicks off then they are locked in that position for the round, whether that be on field or not. When we hit round the end of rd1 you will get 3 trades per round and 2 boosts which can be activated in separate rounds to give you a 4th trade for the round.

Yep he only covers for Seifert. He can be used as a Captaincy loop to allow us to take Curran's VC score and double it

So if Curran performs do you switch the captaincy from short over to Doran?

Yep

Nah, Connolly is going to play and bowl before Turner and they will have Agar back in rd2 so he becomes just a number 5 batter that doesn't bowl

@ yes that makes sense now vulnerable of not batting and won’t bowl, not worth it for that price even on the double. thanks mate! sounds like beau webster will be released, inglis and boland to be held back

Yep hearing that and it will change my side slightly but we will see. Need to figure out how to get another 16k from somewhere. Probably just a simple Rogers to Paris and then Edwards to Webster

@ yep my team is relatively similar to yours my field was the same as your video except i have Webster over tye. bench is the same but a bit weaker with buckingham in the bowlers. if he isn’t named hopefully bazely is because i have 21k to afford him from buckingham.

Thats a lot of cash left in the bank that could be used to make cash but also your missing the point that you have another 120k guy maybe say Milne who potentially doesn't outscore Short over 1 game and thus you have potentially kept cash in the bank all for less points and maybe 10k cash generation/cash loss mitigation. Like for Short to drop 15k he has to score 50 in the first game.

@kybroome which still means you don't have Short for the double in round 2. Which is my point! This way, you get a cheaper version, and have a VC on Short in R2!

And if Short goes more than 100 say 120-140, you either have to go without Short or have to tear up your team in a sub optimal way to get him. Basically season relies solely on Short scoring what you project. I ain't taking that much risk for one guy

@kybroome so, what sort of score would leave me out? He would need in excess of 110 for one game. Basically, it's not I taking the risk on the one guy!

Would kill your game off if Short went 140 as he would go up 12k

No worries, glad they help!

Appreciate it!

Price changes happen after each round

Friday

Richardson is probably the most under priced and best batter of the lot there. That’s if your fine with the increased injury risk

Good debate. Think Rogers bowls 4 and bats 3 positions lower than Khan who will bowl 3 overs. Is that extra over going to be worth 2 positions higher in the batting order. I probably go with Khan by a matter of 1-2 points of average tbh but it is so close it could go either way

No this is the most owned players from all the teams. My team reveal will be released on the 14th of December

Much appreciated!

Your welcome