Видео

So, we also cannot detect Hawking radiation? Because it is stretched to infinity, or too weak, or too theoretical? Thanks for the interesting video.

I was in a cab entering the Lincoln Tunnel when the story of the Concorde crash came on 1010 WINS. Told the driver: Well, that's it for the Concorde.

the snoot has drooped

10/10 Very reliable. Flew to France with one of these. 😝

The sad thing about this footage was it took them 14 years to get it into a hanger she stood there at the side of the airfield all that time from the day she landed basically rotting away Should of let Richard Branson buy the fleet of planes probably be still flying today

Your filming the roof

I flew from Sydney back to the UK in one of these in 1964. Then UK to Singapore in 65 and back in 68.

I flew to Barbados on G-BOAF BA273/27/02/1988 via Shannon. Absolutely brilliant experience flying at Mach 2.2 at 65,000 ft. Excellent crew and service on British Airways. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧

Looks amazing and sounds amazing.

This video is awful. Why couldn't you just film the plane, and have voice over?

Elegant

So sad to see this.. the fastest passenger plane we've ever made in a museum.. So sad...

*D* *R* *O* *O* *P* *S* *N* *O* *O* *T*

God said let the snoot droop and the snoot droop

*THE SNOT HAS DROOPED*

Just beautiful to see.

Fun fact. Most of the BA Concordes are still owned by BA. They were technically "on-loan" to various museums worldwide.

fly it

I love the way there is a van leading it to warn oncoming traffic haha like they wouldn't see Concord travelling at 2mph.

The last passenger flight was invited guests only apart from the 1 passenger who had booked many months in advance, before her retirement was announced. BA honoured his booking, and he flew with the celebrities & media folk invited on by the airline......

Could you please explain how the simulation of the cosmic web was done. What type of data/sources was used? Was it based on observations of galaxies? Was it based on assumptions about dark matter (and there are many different models)? Without this information, the rest of the conclusions are meaningless. Bullet cluster simulation was good. However, note that there is increasing consensus that a different species of dark matter could self-interact at sub-galactic scales. It may also be speculated that dark matter particles do self-interact but due to the extremely low density in clusters, they appear not to interact because of the huge interparticle distances.

I flew on G-BOAF on the 27 February 1988 from London Heathrow to Barbados via Shannon. BA273. Absolutely magnificent flight and service. Mach 2.2 at 65,000 ft, the edge of space. Beautiful flight!!

No fair!! Living after 2003 means all you get for air travel is: -Shitty airplane food -Being a sardine for 12 hours What is there to possibly be happy about in today's air travel vs. being on a Concorde??

underrated video - watched the whole thing through - wish we could bring back the concordes glory ❤

The Concorde featured a droop snoot. -- Droop snoot? -- The snoot would droop. -- The snoot drooped.

Gravitational simulations are a poor substitute for dark matter methods. Just a little science and understanding is involved here. Do yourself a favor and read a little. The evidence of dark matter is overwhelming. Sadly the evidence for the standard model particle of dark matter is completely lacking. Here's the problem. Dark Matter has been around for far longer than standard model particles. Since they are so old and slow moving and neutral and massive they are not found just anywhere. In fact they tend to be found only at the centers of large massive objects like stars and planets and moons and the like. Otherwise, they are found in the halos of galaxies. The exception would seem to be large massive yet fragmented objects, such as the asteroid belt protoplanet between Mars and Jupiter. The masses of dark matter particles may well have several varieties from the least massive and youngest to the most massive and oldest. The least massive and youngest may well fall into the logarithmic scale proportional to that between Gravity and Electromagnetism. This is the hierarchical scale with Hadronic and Leptonic quarks at one end, the bottom end of this scale. This spans 10^36 in a scale proportional to the relative number of dimensions applying to this scale. Clearly there must be several dimensions in this scale. Approximately 7 dimensions seems to be the least massive divisision of this logarithmic scale that makes any sense. Applying a natural scale suggests that at minimum 1/18 of 36 or about 10^2 times as massive as quarks for the least massive initial stages or types of forms of dark matter, while 1/7 of 36 or about 10^5 or more times as massive as quarks for the most massive forms of the initial stages or types of dark matter. Consequentially, small quantities of this novel form of dark matter should be able to be detected, then found, isolated, formally discovered, transported, refined and manufactured. Obviously research and developments in the asteroid belt are going to be instrumental in this discovery. The slow pace of space exploration seems to mean that it's going to be a while before we get this discovery at long last. Of course, the future of dark matter doesn't really begin until its formal discovery, so we'll have to wait till then, whenever that may be. part 2 Ok. So the Chrysanthemum or Mum, sometimes called the Mon when depicted in art, can now be understood in terms of highly temporary but sometimes long lived quark models. It is sometimes well established that early versions of the mum were constricted within 2 dimensions. They were strongly limited, apparently limited to about 21 petals, as predicted by Fibonnacci. However, in later Mon depictions, full blown 3 dimensional mums have been depicted and are apparently grown and are flourishing. These are much larger than previous 2 dimensional models. In counterpart, quark models in the standard model have far exceeded the dark matter models contemplated. For instance, Charm quarks are over 600 times larger than standard Up quarks, and Bottom quarks are over 400 times bigger than standard Strange quarks. In previous models of the Fibonacci model of quark expansion, the numbers (10^2 to 10^5) are well known and within the known potential of this dimension of dark matter. We can expect this dimension of dark matter stable components within isolated dark matter, such as within isolated galactic halos. However, trapped dark matter components such as within stars, planets and moons may be decaying quickly, as exhibited by our own Moon, which has shut down and become locked in its gravitationally stabilized orbit, and the planets Mercury and perhaps even Mars, which apparently have also slowed down, and headed for stopping. This energetic model is shocking, and further dark matter and similar quark models, may be decaying or already gone, so the Mum/Mon model will be an important strategic exploration and investigation. I like the Chrysanthemum model for quarks anyway. It depicts the exponential growth of standard model quarks that we have already seen. However, I think we will see a plateauing of such quark expansions, I think the upper limit of further discoveries such as within the Cern Large Hadron Collider may be reached at about 10,000 times the mass of standard model Up quarks. Spoiler Alert: There may be some new quarks within this range. However, some dimensions or ranges of dark matter quarks may already have expired and would only be available at galactic scales of discovery and investigation. So dark matter research may still have local frontiers to discover, but may stall at this range. The good news is that we have an extremely long time to do this research and discovery of standard model quarks before dark energy expansion catches up with us. Relax. It's cool. I hope that you have enjoyed this Fibonacci mathematical Chrysanthemum experiment in both quarks and dark matter. Thank you for reading. part 3 Ok. So we are now assuming the Fibonnacci based Chrysanthemum model of hyperdimensional dark matter and quarks. Or we still have sluggards or Luddites who can't keep up. In this assumptive model, this structure suggests that such matter would be in the range of 10^5 to 10^8 times the mass of standard model quarks. For regular folks this is from 10,000 times to 100,000,000 times this mass. That is really close to the neutron star category of matter. While this may be amusing consider where this is going, the next phase of dark matter and as yet undiscovered quark masses would have to be in the range of 10^13 to 10^21, or 1,000,000,000,000 to 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 quark masses. Is this in the range of black holes yet? Or are we still stalled at very large neutron stars? Again we must pause and consider where we are. The first stages of dark matter is from 10^2 to 10^3 masses, the 2nd stage would be from 10^3 to 10^5 masses, the 3rd stage would be from 10^5 to 10^8 masses, and the 4th stage would be from 10^8 masses to 10^13 masses. Whew. Theoretically the 5th stage of dark matter would be 10^13 to 10^21 masses. That still leaves us with the 6th stage of the mass of dark matter and quarks. This is the staggering number of 10^21 to 10^34 masses for quarks and dark matter. Wow. This is clearly the end of our Chrysanthemum dark matter models. It is also the end of our hierarchical mass models. What comes after the end of our Electromagnetism model? I dare not postulate. But I suspect outer space models of dark energy. This is the incredible range of from 10^34 to 10^55 masses, a gut wrenching number times the mass of standard model quarks. This is the amount of masses that represents the beginning or the ending of the universe. It's not just a black hole. It's the end. Sorry - not sorry.

THE DROOP SNOOT

A droop snoot. The snoot would droop

Some super footage there.

The snoot drooped

I always like this plane since I play BF1

Well it is called the ps portal remote player 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

I was lucky enough to Tow this actual Aircraft once at Heathrow.. I will never forget that day .. I look forward to visiting soon

It's a trajedy British Airways refuse to let one fly just for heritage purposes

I love concorde it is a beautiful air plane. Back in January onboard at manchester airport for a full 2 hours tour and it is good

Curvature of the earth.. WTF... brainwashed.

A great plane, no doubt! It never seems to receive proper appreciation next to SPADS, Se5’s, Sopwiths, Fokkers, & Albatroses.

Cool helicopter!

So sleek and elegant, it looks so much like a concept aircraft of the future that it must be weird climbing into the cockpit, and seeing all those analog instruments from a different age.

There are two aircraft that someday, somehow, I dream to see returning to the skies. Concorde, and the Antonov An-225 (Mriya.)

Kinda sucks that a place meant for conservation decided to alter and change the aircraft to make it an amusement attraction.

Wish They Could Get Her Flying Again

DROOP SNOOT

These days you'd just slap a camera in there instead of the whole nose lowering for visibility.

I am lucky to live relatively close to this Concorde (Cornwall). I hated seeing it sat outside for many years. I was so pleased when they opened Aerospace Bristol. It was a surreal experience seeing and touching it. I loved the interior black leather seats as this was the last refit. I heard the sonic boom many times in Cornwall as it was flying to the US over the ocean. I also saw it in the 90's flying at Leeds Bradford airport when I lived up north. Amazing aircraft.

She belongs in the sky, not on the ground!

So 50 years ago we create the most incredible plane ever made now we waggle the nose a bit and it gets a round out applause! We are going backwards!

The snoot, would droop

Business Class ruined the future of these planes.

Outstanding work! 🙌