- Видео 166
- Просмотров 128 689
Rudy Galfi
США
Добавлен 31 июл 2006
Видео
Galfi Vacation 1965
Просмотров 359 месяцев назад
Road trip to Canada in the summer of 1965. These films were recored in the summer of 1965. Dad purchase a new car. A 1965 Chevy Belair. I remember him buying the car carrier for all of our luggage. While watching this video, if you see anything you want noted in the description, note the time marker and a brief description and send to me and I will add accordingly. 0:00 Driving to Canada 0:50 M...
Carbon Cub FX-3 in-flight wing failure Recovery
Просмотров 13 тыс.2 года назад
Carbon Cub FX-3 in-flight wing failure
Curtiss JN-4 “Jenny” in flight with Sullivan smoke system
Просмотров 7952 года назад
Distributed by Maxford USA The Curtiss JN-4 "Jenny" was one of a series of "JN" biplanes built by the Curtiss Aeroplane Company of Hammondsport, New York, later the Curtiss Aeroplane and Motor Company. Although the Curtiss JN series was originally produced as a training aircraft for the U.S. Army, the "Jenny" (the common nickname derived from "JN-4", with an open-topped four appearing as a Y) c...
Oceanside 2020 on the Strand
Просмотров 222 года назад
Awesome shots of the Strand after the storm and great sunset views of the Oceanside Pier.
New York Rear Window Timelapse
Просмотров 152 года назад
20 Sec time-lapse of the building next to the hotel.
RC Bruce Thorpe Enterprises Delta Vortex
Просмотров 6332 года назад
RC Bruce Thorpe Enterprises Delta Vortex
RC Plane - Carbon Cub FX-3 in-flight wing failure.
Просмотров 99 тыс.2 года назад
RC Plane - Carbon Cub FX-3 in-flight wing failure.
Yeh there is much to be said for high performance flying and wing loading for me a cub style aircraft that is balsa should be flown in scale type manner- unless u have reinforced the spare and wing ribs to do high performance maneuvers just my opinion
Heartbreaking
I’d say it’s kinda like stretching a rubber band but it’s a grown ups toy and I’d do the same thing with it
318 there is a single flutter of starboard wing, then it shattered. the flutter itself should not have happened if there was not already some 'invisible' weakness/damage in that wing half.
Guys this needs to be reported to Horizon on a serious note.... there seems to be manufacturing flaw in the wing. This plane is supposedly designed to handle upto 200CC engines..... Horizon shud replace your plane ....
That's how my uncle's full-size cub crashed back in the 60's with he and his family aboard. RIP
Get an Extra 300
Flutter
true. see my analysis above.
When was this 😅?
Damn, I just commented on the crash video, about how the camera person sucked. Then I watch this one recorded in retard mode. Turn the camera horizontal.
The guy incharge of applying the glue called in sick that day it was built
That is what happens when you fly outside the flight envelope. Just as well he hasn't got his hands on the controls full size.
this comment is what happens when you don't know what you are looking at. see my analysis above.
@@daviddavids2884 What aviation experience have you got ?
The NTSB has determined that running up the engine in pre-flight placing excessive point loads on each side of each wing, instead of supporting the tail or the fuselage has caused the fatal wing spar to explode under G load. I bet after reading this comment you’ll never run up another RC Aircraft again like that.
LOL
😊
Needed, one carbon fiber tube.
Google "Carbon fiber tube". That would have prevented this.
H9 reply: 'Obviously he hit a cloaked UFO that couldn't get away fast enough...'
Chinese junk...
You need to do your research before marking an inaccurate comment. The are made in Yakima, Washington
Who is going to pay for the corn destruction ?
Bahahahaha !
Id like one of those. Nice flying!
there is 2k gone
I have seen plenty of RC pilots at the local field who insist on flying scale planes in a fantastic way (fantastic as in fantasy, away from reality). One guy flies a Freewing B2 bomber as if it were a pattern plane (loops, split Ss, Cuban 8s, inverted flight). Another flies a small T-28 as if it were a 3D plane). I see large warbirds that attempt to take off as if they were IMAC planes. Others bank and yank scale EDF jets as if they were hot racing planes, to the point that they flex the wings way too upward, as if about to break. I don’t know what’s the point of flying planes in a way they were never designed for. This is asking for an eventual structural failure and a crash. Just today there was a pilot who had not flown an EDF jet before and even with assistance, he kept making maneuvers that were over stressing the wing-the wings were flexing upward a lot with the high speed, tight turns he was doing. Pure bank and yank, with no finesse or smoothness.
Ain't no 3D plane!
what a badasshole "pilot"..........
Plane was not being abused! Stupid comments. Something was defective. It's not a glider! It was meant for aerobatics! 40 years rc experience.
Ha ha ha An ARF cub let alone a company like Hangar 9 known for light weight being flown full throttle in a down line with abrupt pull ups. The guy was all over the sky, no semblance of a routine, just banging the sticks around. Ha ha
@MikecamRC Plus literally never blew the wings apart on a model! Nevee seen it happen in person, only youtube.
Let it snow let it Snow let it Snow
ooof
I would call that an In flight pilot failure...
Why does anyone think they can fly an airplane that is not designed for stunts in real life? Would you fly it that way if you were in it? Buy a pitts special or an equivalent. I'd used to spend months building RC balsa models and to crash them devastated me. Now people don't G A Sh-t. Sorry dude you got what you deserved flying like that a wrecked plane.
Why does anyone think they can fly an airplane that is not designed for stunts in real life? Would you fly it that way if you were in it? Buy a pitts special or an equivalent. I'd used to spend months building RC balsa models and to crash them devastated me. Now people don't G A Sh-t. Sorry dude you got what you deserved flying like that a wrecked plane.
Why does anyone think they can fly an airplane that is not designed for stunts in real life? Would you fly it that way if you were in it? Buy a pitts special or an equivalent. I'd used to spend months building RC balsa models and to crash them devastated me. Now people don't G A Sh-t. Sorry dude you got what you deserved flying like that a wrecked plane.
Why does anyone think they can fly an airplane that is not designed for stunts in real life? Would you fly it that way if you were in it? Buy a pitts special or an equivalent. I'd used to spend months building RC balsa models and to crash them devastated me. Now people don't G A Sh-t. Sorry dude you got what you deserved flying like that a wrecked plane.
Why does anyone think they can fly an airplane that is not designed for stunts in real life? Would you fly it that way if you were in it? Buy a pitts special or an equivalent. I'd used to spend months building RC balsa models and to crash them devastated me. Now people don't G A Sh-t. Sorry dude you got what you deserved flying like that a wrecked plane.
be interesting to hear what horizon says that's a lot of money for their cheap as fault, they build them cheap as hell but charge you big time for Chinese junk
music is sickening, pick it up and clean up your mess in the farmer's field
It was only a matter of time flying like that…
Drunk pilot's final words to ATC: "Hey man, watch this!"
The DTSB report said that the pilot exceeded the Vne speed, causing the right wing panel to disintegrate.
I'm not sure who hanger 9 has building their planes but if you have a chance to see their uncovered airframe the first thing you notice is how conservative they are with glue and basswood. You can't trust the super glue hinges either, but that's a problem that might not show up for a few years. All of the ARTF/RTF stuff I've bought is the same way. Rebuild, reinforce, recover, and refly bud!
Watched at 1080p, 50% speed. You can see the wingtip just inside the leading edge light flex then sheer off around the wing strut. It's really hard to tell, but did you have the flaps going as well? Maybe as flaperons/flap-aileron mix? If you are looking for aerobatic planes that size look at the Legacy Aviation line from ExtremeFlightRC. Pretty popular at my field but I can't afford to fly/lose anything bigger than an 80" seagull models.
Pretty sure Phoenix model in Vietnam builds H9 planes. Not sure this exact one but in a recent video from the Phoenix model factory, there were a stack of H9 planes waiting to ship out.
You could tell the pilot had been dead for awhile by the time they found him. He was stiff as a board.
H9 should take care of such a failure... IMO a certain design and/or material and/or workmanship problem...
Maybe not the smoothest flyer but they was nothing ridiculously aggressive about his flying there must have been something underlying setup or quality control issue.
Way too fast for its scale...
Maybe you should send the video to the manufacturer and see if they will give you a replacement!
Might as well flew it into a brick wall. When at 30% power it flew perfectly.
Bien fait pour sa gueule !!! c'est du n'importe quoi !!! cet avion n'est pas un avion de voltige, ça lui apprendra à respecter le modèle qu'on fait évoluer. On voit du tout et du n'importe quoi en aéromodélisme, dans ces vidéos. Y'en a qui ferait mieux d'aller faire autre chose comme passe-temps. Y'en a marre de voir ce genre de conneries.
I'm not sure but I think it suffered flutter on the right aileron causing immediate structural failure
That is a damn shame and should never have happened! Why ARF manufacturers can't make a strong plane is beyond me. I'm really sorry for you. I seldom purchase an already built plane unless I know who built it. I prefer to build my own,
CHINESE.
@@tobysmith4662 Yup