Видео

By the way, you have a typo in the link to four color studios. You put the 'i' before the 'd'. ;-)

Cool system. I could see myself playing this using the Barbarian Prince map for the Hexcrawl. I'm really looking forward to your playthrough.

I look forward to every Hyde Campaign video!!

Is there anywhere we can find your 3rd, orc vs orc, table? 😊 17:24

4 colors site says buy from Drivethru RPG. Spiral bound on LuLu.

third jump = miss-jump! lol ! don't you just love this game.... "I am willing you to turn to book 3" there is nothing the lbb's that says it is an easy game.....

THESE ARE GREAT! :)

I recently bought this rule set and super stoked to see more information about it!

Your video popped up again, so I watched again. All of the artifacts are just so astounding even for me. I really wanted to get all this stuff out there and have other eyes looking at it and thinking about it all. When I started writing the book I had only received the Fletcher Sagas about 4 months prior. I say it in the book, but I want to reiterate how new all of this is. If you have the book, you are in real time mode with every game researcher around the world as you examine and postulate your own theories on what and why. I wrote the book and I keep coming back to my copy to read and ponder, just as you are doing.

You might have changed it since this video but commenting as I go. This is just brainstorming, I am enjoying seeing this in action. With the random encounter table it would it make more sense to keep the Demi Human entries as Demi Human then roll on the table each time it comes up? Sentient races travel after all. Same with Ogres having the chance for Ogre Magi, roll 10% for each Ogre encountered. I would also consider doing the same when encountering things like snakes.

Jon, thank you for a thorough preview of the 2d Delves rules! On the Encounter Balance Table on page 83, it could be explained better. The number of tiers worth of extra foes you roll should come from the table your party is currently working off of. So if it's an average Tier 1 party, any extra foes should come from that Tier 1 table. It makes sense to match them to the group you're already fighting, i.e., look, more wolves, or more goblins, etc. But of course tailor results to your personal model collection and desires. Maybe you want a completely different sort of foe to bolster your base enemies. Also, don't sleep on the wandering monsters (column 2 of page 83). They can really mess up your party's world! Again, thanks!

Thank you very much for another great video. I sadly stopped buying "goalsystem games". I have the first edition of "chaos in cairo" but it has seen better days. I tried to get at least a pdf document and contacted Mr. Pyle and Goalsystem in general and got no answer where to get it. I also own "Chaos in Carpathia" and both editions of "Blasters & Bulkheads" but those got rid of a key feature that made "Chaos in Cairo v1" so great... Action points! You use standard cards to set the initiative and use your action points to move and do actions... It plays a lot like the PC-game "Jagger Alliance". I desperately hope that some day Mr. Pyle will give this playstyle a reboot or at least offers an easy way to get "Chaos in Cairo 1st Edition" :(

I’ll check this out tomorrow!

Love more OPR content! I'll have to listen to rest later, as I need to go, but halfway through, I thought I should mention. Yes, you "must" end every move outside an inch with exception of Charge. That being said, you can get into a scenario where that's just not possible (i.e. flying unit snuggles into a space between a unit and impassible terrain, so it can't really move back from the target at the end of its activation). In that case, just remember that they aren't locked in combat and move on. I know you didn't ask, but just thought you should know, from one Rules Theorist to another. Just to clarify, it's Hit->Save->Wound->ApplyWound. If a rule says a unit is "Taking Hits", those pretty much always need to be Saved against with rolls. For Example, Impact(X) applies "Hits" which must be saved. Devour applies Wounds, which are not saved, but are affected by Regeneration if the target has it. Deadly(X) is multiplied after the save roll. The first dank rider should have sloughed the first hit on the 6 to save because save happens before multiplication. This also means a "single deadly wound" can only kill one model (apply the wound to the model first, then multiply it, no spilling over to the next model in the unit).

dude, thank you for this. this was fascinating.

This was great thank you!

Great video!

I came back and read the comments. I am amused because no one (BroSr) indicates they have an actual clue how to do a Braunstein game. Merely desiring to call a multi sided Blackmoor style game a Braunstein is not playing a Braunstein - that is playing D&D with a divided party. As i say in the interview: The primary condition of the Braunstein is as follows - that players do not interact with the environment. If you need your referee to explain what your senses are perceiving, you are playing D&D, which is Blackmoor play methods. I wish you guys would quit trying to steal Wesely's IP by using his game name for your D&D games. It's just rude.

Following this now, (I might even get up tp date), totally agree now with your opening comments regarding GDW setting (as they lay it out), but doing it yourself is better, I get the players to roll the planets they then blame each other when they turn out bad. And watching them 'run' a Starship is always entertaining. BTW who paid for your initial fuel and supplies? or were they stolen.... you did leave for Blains World in a hurry!. Traveller: play like the dice are trying to kill you!.

In the last 5 minutes I was going what the f***

Very informative. I have been tinkering with Totten's basic game over on the @DragonsBeyondRPG channel. Still need to dig into Totten's Advanced Game that evolved into those variants up in the Twin Cities.

Great batrep. Great upset at the end there.

Thanks for the interesting conversation. I can't keep up with all the new acronyms and names for roleplaying game "aspects" and such these days either. I appreciate you trying to keep the old things in the forefront now and then. I also have to thank you for inspiring me to start my own stream and play solo 1st edition AD&D. Your time, effort, and enthusiasm is contagious!

35:30 There are not one hundred people in the United States who hate The Catholic Church, but there are millions who hate what they wrongly perceive the Catholic Church to be. Fulton J. Sheen

Very informative thanks MR Wargaming and Griff for a great interview!

Thanks. Very enlightening.

interesting discussion

Oops! At 1:33:30 I say Greyhawk - I meant Blackmoor.

Awesome!

2:18 The surface gravity of Saturn is only slight more than earth's, 1.065 g. Its way more massive, but also way larger in diameter, so its surface gravity isn't that high, it never gets to 2 g. I figure the black danger line refers to the point that the atmosphere gets dense enough the spacecraft would burn up if they tried flying though at speed, or the point the pressure would crush them.

Good stuff! Subscribed.

Describing it as a ‘ship to ship’ game has me wondering if it’ll work for WW2 patrol boats? And then the butterfly mind takes over and I’m thinking WW2 fighter combat.

I don’t know why my post disappeared. Thanks, RUclips! Anyway, I would love to see something less abstract, like one player escorting a treasure-laden wagon across the field, and the other player trying to take possession of it. Or the objective could be a specific person in the wagon instead of treasure.

Aragorn is/was a Ranger nicknamed Strider, I think confusion comes from this, although I'm sure Aragorn could also scout. Nice discussion about actually playing the game.

Great discussion regarding placement and in-game considerations of objectives.

27:36 If video games have taught me anything, those will explode and damage all nearby figures when shot.

These theory craft videos make me think of games in ways I never have.

Thank you for reminding us to stretch the old brain muscles every now and then.

I enjoy the theory craft. I have always enjoyed theory craft just as much as playing any game. Even computer games, when I was younger I would spend more time reading strategies for Civilization IV then playing (and I played a lot) keep them coming!

I’ll have to tell War Mutt about this vid. Amen on not being a list builder. I really don’t enjoy that process. I just want to “simulate” a battle where there are objectives and motivations for the conflict. I want to play it out based on the armies you have. Though I wonder if it impacts my enjoyment because I’m not playing in such a way that I will win… I wonder if this is some of the reasons I’ve moved out of minis. This is t making any sense. Looks like I have some thinking to do. Geez, ramble over.

Hell in Microcosm should fit the bill if you're planning to play brigade to corps sized battles. Manouvre unit is the battalion with the company as the sub unit based on 5 cm frontage x 4 cm depth with a ground scale of 1cm = 100m

Fantastic videos. Such a brilliant take and I appreciate your thoughts.

Jim Webster’s rules get a thumbs up from me - absolutely full of ideas I can “borrow” for my own games 👍👍

Hope you get the right rule set, glad you're finding them interesting 🙂 With regard the eye you have my every sympathy, I've had cataract surgery and treatment for a detached retina so I've with you all the way !

I use the 1 minute turn literaly. You know Arneson and Gygax make this. You see the monster? You have 1 minute for make your action or gonna be hit.

Oh how I pine for the Lost Age! In my youth we played Holme's D&D starter box, and just used the AD&D manuals as "supplements". Pretty much every male my age (and a few girls) played the game. Heck, my junior high had a D&D club! We had no qualms about inviting in players (and their characters) from other group's campaigns - it was never a problem. In fact, we always made new friends and our groups constantly morphed because of it. Yep, we actually had fun pre-internet! Edit: Love the channel content. Subscribed!

Great video, I really enjoyed your deeper dive videos into the background of the hobby. i have learned so much.

Did Jeff Perren, coauthor of Chainmail, go on to write anything else?

Do you have a video dedicated to the Egg of Coot?