Видео

Why is your channel getting less views after making so many amazing videos? Have you ever analyzed it?,,,,

Wow, these guys know their stuff! An information dense hour. Fascinating, clear and informative. Great questions at the end regarding: Russian nuclear barges; Rolls Royce's strategy; and the feasability of using tethered, decommissioned nuclear submarines as mini power stations.

😢 😮. Be. 😮.

Wind energy is a scam and a swindle!

There is no need to wait for the price of Green Hydrogen cost to come down. Have you ever heard of government subsidies ? Just as roads, railways and oil companies Green Hydrogen must be subsidized by tax funds until the scaling slows for profit taking in the markets. What’s the goal here are we trying to save the planet or make investors rich? You decide.

Promo-SM

Incredibly interesting (and shocking) presentation. Thank you. ... but poor audio OEN !

Great talk. I wonder how it got only so few views.

GO TO HELL!!!!👊🏿👊🏿👊🏿

Very instructive, thank you.

This is the energy future !!

How are you producing your ammonia? At a second look, it seems to me this is satire.

Crack

All hydrogen stocks suck and will continue to suck until electrolyzers are conceived, designed, and built that can produce millions of tons of hydrogen per annum. Right now, this is not even close to possible and there is not one shred of evidence by alkaline cell, PEM, SOEC or any other electrolyzer design that it will be possible in the future. Hydrogen electrolyzers and fuel cells are total nonsense in India and everywhere else, the "Hydrogen stocks" are hopeless losers because none of the electrolyzer companies can deliver industrial-scale capacity. They only offer small-scale electrolysis capacity, so they can't provide anything but small-scale revenue. Small-scale revenue will never eclipse their operating budget, so they cannot show a profit (earnings). Small-scale electrolyzers cannot make enough H2 from water to reduce CO2 output at an industrial scale, so they are irrelevant. Renewable energy is coming on line quickly, but to reduce global warming, one must decarbonize all of the greenhouse gas emitting sectors -- transportation, agriculture, residential & commercial building and industrial sources (primarily concrete, glass, steel and industrial chemicals). That means we must create decarbonized fuels such as green ammonia, whereby we take cheap and abundant renewable energy and split water into cheap hydrogen and oxygen. Then, humanity can remove nitrogen from the air (air is 78% Nitrogen) and, using the Haber Bosch method, combine the green H2 and N to make green ammonia (NH3). Ammonia, as a "liquid carrier of hydrogen fuel," can carry more hydrogen/BTUs by volume at a reasonable temperature and pressure than gaseous or liquid hydrogen. Large-scale electrolyzers (no existing electrolyzer manufacturer can provide) would allow green ammonia to fuel and power all greenhouse gas emitting sectors. When electrolyzers are scaled to provide ammonia-scale plants producing four million metric tons of anhydrous ammonia per year, replacing methane feedstock; call me. It is important to realize that to produce one ton of ammonia using today's methane "steam reformation process" conventional ammonia producers for nitrogenous fertilizers release 2.84 tons of CO2.

This is the most ridiculous idea makes no sense at all

Fascinating, particularly the psychology.

The Earth is cooler with the atmos/GHGs/albedo not warmer. To perform as advertised the GHGs require “extra” energy upwelling from the surface radiating as a black body. (ruclips.net/video/0Jijw7-YG-U/видео.html) The kinetic heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmos molecules render that scenario impossible. No greenhouse effect, no GHG warming, no man/CO2 driven climate change or Gorebal warming. Version 1.0 053022

Good news from Australia May 21 2022. The fossil Coalition removed from office.

p̲r̲o̲m̲o̲s̲m̲ ?

The Earth is cooler with the atmos/GHGs/albedo not warmer. To perform as advertised the GHGs require “extra” energy upwelling from the surface radiating as a black body. The kinetic heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmos molecules render that scenario impossible. No greenhouse effect, no GHG warming, no man/CO2 driven climate change or Gorebal warming.

I liked your vid. I have been trying to search for RUclips vid that informs the stuff in this vid.Your lesson is similar to the vids of Dr Ethan. Doctor Ethan's videos are useful and I really learned a lot for my finals! He is the most informative health enthusiast in Nottingham and he explains wellness. I suggest you watch his channel out and give Doctor Ethan a like over here! 👉 #LearnFromDrEthan

Great video “you know”

1) By reflecting away 30% of ISR the albedo, which would not exist w/o the atmosphere, makes the earth cooler than it would be without the atmosphere like that reflective panel set on the dash. Remove the atmosphere/GHGs and the earth becomes much like the moon, a barren rock with a 0.1 albedo, 20% more kJ/h, hot^3 on the lit side, cold^3 on the dark. Nikolov, Kramm (U of AK) and UCLA Diviner mission all tacitly agree. 2) the GHG up/down welling, “trapping”/”back” radiating/delaying/intercepting, 100 % efficient, perpetual warming loop requires "extra" energy which according to RGHE theory it gets from 3) the terrestrial surface radiating that "extra" energy as a near ideal .95 emissivity black body which 4) it cannot do because of the non-radiative heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmospheric molecules. 1+2+3+4 = 0 Greenhouse Effect + 0 Greenhouse gas warming + 0 man caused climate change. All science backed up by experiment, the gold standard of classical science. www.linkedin.com/posts/nicholas-schroeder-55934820_climatechange-greenhouse-co2-activity-6749812735246254080-bc6K version 1.0 021721 oxford