Видео

Thanks..

how to find v1 ?

excellent video! Thank you!

Amazing , the top level of understanding . intuition

He says corrects himself four times: at 11:58, 13:23, 13:55, and 14:12 (confused between back of the wing and tip) and says "I'm sorry" thrice after mixing up stagnation and separation. He's drunk!

At 2:02 you mentioned that tau only varies in the y direction, yet you wrote that d(tau)/d(y) is equal to zero. Isn't that contradictory?

If y=H then...

We don't have any punts in the US.

4:42 so the convective part is independant of time, is that correct ? Is it as if it was "moving" accross space at a certain point in time kept constant ?

this is explained so clearly!

Great Sir...

Only great explain of fluid mechanics I can find in the internet

i'm writing the report for 3A1!! Really thanks for your help!

2:46 here you mean there is no pressure gradient along x direction ? or you mistakenly written partial wrt y as pratial wrt x

This is probably the most comprehensive explanation of how adjoint optimizations work. Everyone else wants to jump right into the math without giving a good intuitive understanding about what is going on first.

Thanks for the explanation. But can you tell what does it mean physically when the flow is irrotational that we are able to apply Bernoullis eqn accross stream lines. Also why is stagnation pressure uniform? Does it mean the static pressure component will adjust itself with velocity variations along the flow?

I can tell from your elegant explanations that you have a deep understanding of fluid dynamics. Excuse my stupid question, but I am trying to develop an intuition for the subject. I don't understand how V1 an equal V3 if there is a static pressure loss? Thank you.

where does the force comes in if momentum is conserved between layers?

0:48 why you used volume instead of area

sir ,could you please suggest reference book for this derivation

Thanks for simple explanations.

How to study the accuracy and uncertainty of this Vortex speeding meter

What types of fluid is this valid for? Liquids sure, but gasses?

great explanation!

how a good lecture!! thanks alot

why do we use the reynold's number? it seems like an arbitrary simplification that should be the result of the calculations rather than be used by the calculations

Excellent video

Excellent another video

Excellent video

No more War!!!

Many thanks for the great videos explaining essential processes and concepts simply!

this is just analytical partial derivations, right?

The fact that the concept is explained so well within 4 mins is amazing. Thanks a lot for these videos

what a tremendous explanation!

Thanks for the helpful video. Just to clear up for the case where we apply Bernoulli along a streamline where you dot the equation with v. Would omega cross v be zero without dotting it with v? If so, then it seems the omega cross v term is always zero- which would seem to trivialize the condition of requiring zero vorticity. Thanks for the content!

Excellent explanation. Rich in details, yet very brief. This is how every teacher should be. Thank you.

Dear Professor! Excellent video! Thank you.

Any similar explaination for gas's orifice?

I like your channel. Thank you very much !

9:33 "...coated in condensed milk.... of all things" some small and quick humor right there

I'm confused about why it's more efficient to solve for how the lyft/drag changes with respect to each flow variable. Are you solving a PDE for each flow variable? Or does it have something to do with how you evaluate the lift/drag from the flow variables? Thank you! Lovely explanation of concept.

Are you confusing height with altitude? They are completely different.

Thank you.

Thank you! Super useful video

Thanks for the very good explanation! Would it be possible to compute the derivatives directly for the lift/drag-ratio rather then doing it independently for the two quantities? I assume that would reduce the required computational effort further (by the cost of one foward function evaluation)?

you explain things ver well. In university, there is a lot of confusion between separation and turbolence

Great explanation

Thank you very much this is the best theoretical and engineering-practical explanation I've come across online.

May i know what is the name of the equation? and is there any book show the above equation?

Boring teaching/lecturing.