Видео

Bhai ye Buddha or unke related Other monk hai...😂

Not Shiva . it's Mahayana sect bodhisatva avlokiteshwer.it means budha

can you make a video elobrating, veesara architecture there are many styles for example vijayanagara style,hoysala style,kakatiya style in warangal,rastrakuta style,chalukya style and also i am fascinated to know what kind of hindu architecture was there in sindh,punjab,kpk of present day pakistan and east afghanistan.like hindushahi style,gandhara style and also haryana temples in india.

historically brahmins have been in india, since the time of world re creation around 50,000 years back. as per srimad bhagavatahm, in south india, madurai, there was a pandya king along with brahmins, who was chosen by narayana to make the boat to overcome the deluge. apart from this so many historical evidence that brahmins are natives and share the same dna as the tribals of india

How was architecture in ancient India ruclips.net/video/pfQRpgKtcPM/видео.htmlsi=N93c-yl1_KrhyGf7

How was ancient Indian architecture ruclips.net/video/pfQRpgKtcPM/видео.htmlsi=N93c-yl1_KrhyGf7

Tere is nothing of hindu type architecture ,word hindu didn't fit to bhatarat . it's bhartiya janta not hindu janta.

Mixed or not balts polonia iran Tadjikistan north india paki kurds serbs romania etc. People of milk yogourt horses kozak .....

Were Kalabhra rulers atheists ?

the term "asian" geographically is absurdly incoherent and eurocentric as there's nothing that Middle East, South Asia, Central Asia, East Asia and South East Asia all have significantly in common that distinguishes them as a group. Europe is objectively a region in Asia. It's separation from the rest of the continent is purely eurocentric as it was based on factors such as religion, culture, language and phenitype that has nothing to do with geography. If we were to follow the same logic then all regions in Asia would be their own continents. Further more, the geographical definition of asian insinuates that europeans are asian too since they had asian descent during their migration out of Africa (as opposed to the definition of African as black african descent or relating to it's culture) Basically, you see how the term just means all of humanity except black africans which is absolutely incoherent as well as the eurocentric definition. The phenotypical usage of asian used by most english speaking countries as those of East and South East Asian descent makes much more sense since phenotype is science, it makes sense also due to the fact that East and South East asians are closely genetically related. I prefer base myself on science than being incoherent and eurocentric. Basically the options we have here if we're being objective and base ourselves on truth, logic and reality, we have 2 options. 1- consider the whole continent (including Europe) as asian 2- base ourselves on phenotype: Asian as east/south east asian ancestry Arab as Middle eastern ancestry Desi as Indian-Subcontinent (specifically in english refering to India, Pakistan, Bangladesh ancestry) White as european ancestry Black as black african ancestry Phenotype exist in nature, there's nothing wrong aknowledging it. But it doesn't mean racism is fine just like the existance of islam doesn't justify islamophobics. I want to add that there's nothing wrong with aknowledging that someone is a mix of phenotype or ethnicity. Black and asian are refered as blackasian. It's also why you can't distinguish a french from a german in terms of looks. Also now imagine an black african with 2 black african parents, being born in Europe. No one would say they are europeans. The separations you mentionned are landmarks. If they somewhat find certain parts of Middle East resembling them, it would've been a different landmark chosen to separate middle east from Europe.

Indians are actually African origin.Thats why you cannot be known as Asians.😊

That's good

I read a story from Cambodia and it said that the Chola Empire was helping the Khmer Empire fighting a war. I want to know more but not enough resource.

please also make video on how aryavart may have extended towards southern india

I can clearly see that you did some impressive research here... Bravo!

Didn't knew you also wrote about alternate history! Would be interested in buying your book

Make video on archeological evidences supporting aryan migration theory

Vedic Aryans we’re fish eating Brahmins who lived along saraswati river their origin is yamnaya from steppes same people moved to Syria Iran etc

First you said that Aryans migrated to India which is completely wrong because in Rigveda there is no iron mentioned in Rigveda so that means Rigveda was written before the start of Usage of Iron. And Archeology discovery in India proves that Iron production was started in India at least 1800 BCE to 2400 BCE so that proves that the writer of Rigveda did not know about Iron. There are 2 theories which sound correct first is OUt of India theory and 2nd If Aryans were really migrated to India so that migration happened at least 3000 BCE to 3500 BCE

Very nice 👌

There is no greek influence in Mahabharatha or ramayana or any Indian literatures.It's all made up by westeners to appropriate Indian civilization.Greeks only influenced indian astronomy and architecture only(coloumns were introduced by greeks).Comparing more profound and large Mahabharatha or Ramayana with small greek literary stuffs is similar to comparing ocean to pond.So reverse can be true,indian mythology influenced greek ones.Especially some greek dieties are shown with peacocks which are only found in India.Pls stop being a western slave like some idiots in India

Greco-Roman reported north races are $ubhum@n, under b00ts of Cimmerian Saka from Aryavart's Gandhar. Europe's kings Goths Norse are post 200 CE and 400 CE Kshatriyas from Gangetic plains. Post 300 BC Khotan Tushara Kusha Agni Kashi Ashvin Kshatriyas from Gangetic plains are Kings of Kushan Hun Avar Khazar Turk Mongol Mughal Tibet. Lords of Beduins landed in Arab during Indo-Roman trade 100-200 CE. They bear Kshatriya's paternal DNA R1a1/R1a1a. Norse Vikings were nowhere near Europe when Huns were pill@ging Europe. Greece Rome rulers from Indra revering Mittani Hatti Hari Kshatriyas of 2k BC.

How continent drift happened

Human themselves originated from India. Look at our jaw line and natural food of India. Nowhere on earth there is natural uncooked complete food for humans but India. Don't lie

3.22 in the video refers to Indra. Lord Indra is an Indian Hindu Deity. Is also the brother of Lord Agni. Indra, in Hindu mythology, the king of the gods. He is one of the main gods of the Rigveda and is the Indo-European cousin of the German Wotan, Norse Odin, Greek Zeus, and Roman Jupiter.24 Jul 2024. THE Ramayana is the very form of the Vedas that have come down to us from the heavens. The Vedas are divided into four parts, namely Rig Veda, Yajur Veda, Sama Veda and Atharvana Veda. Lord Rama is the embodiment of Rig Veda, Lakshmana, the Yajur Veda, Bharata, the Sama Veda and Satrughna, the Atharvana Veda. As per the Institute for Scientific Research on Vedas (I-SERVE), planetarium software has ascertained the birth of Lord Rama as 10th January 5114 BC in Ayodhya. As per the Indian calendar the time of the birth is in-between 12 noon and 1pm, Shukla Paksha in Chaitra month.24 Oct 2023. Lord Rama is still worshipped by Hindus the world over today. With Indra being one of the main gods of Rig Veda. It would hold true that Indra was around the same time as Lord Rama. Going back over 7,000 BC. Which precedes your historical Aryan DNA source dates. Indra originated in India. Research has shown human DNA can change from season to season. Even significant change in altitude living can cause DNA to change. DNA can adapt over a couple of weeks to higher altitude and reduce high altitude sickness by increasing hemoglobin, and red blood cell production among climbers, to make up for the lower O2 at higher altitudes. This shows that DNA can change and adapt according to one's environment within weeks. Therefore cannot be regarded as reliable marker of origination. That aside the Vedas showed advanced technology just recently being successfully replicated on small scale in the lab in years using sonic levitation. Much of these ancient Vedic scriptures were destroyed by the Invading British. Making it difficult to piece together missing parts. Mercury engines capable of interstellar flight are currently work in progress. Check online, do your homework and get your facts straight. Instead of posting BS. posing fiction as fact, when you have no clue what you are talking about. As such you lost a like and put on potential boycott list.

These people continue to spread BS. They have oldest archaeological stuff not more than 10k years and only civillization which can share any details for more than that timeperiod they already declared them liar by making manufactured theory.

Excellent video 😊

You did wonderfully well 😌

Brilliant attempt to decodify the genetics 🧬 yes we all come from one mother in Africa who lived 160k years ago in Africa

Aryans actually came from outer space in a UFO makes more sense

But yamanaya hae R1b not R1a

There was no Aryan migration. Fake western history

A study done on genetics has revealed that a wave of middle eastern peoples have infiltrated India about 65000 years ago and another about 8000 years ago from the Eurasian steppes. These two have mingled with the native s that make up the genetics in India. It’s the steppes people who have actually brought Hinduism to India. They were the true Aryans.

Aryan is a person of Aryavart Bharat India. The Himalayas are the natural boarders. Resettlement of all 500 million Muslims Christians pseudo secularists to these places that in delusional state identify with Aryan Indo Europeans Indian as their homeland. Stop misappropriation of the Indian word Aryan.

Appreciate the series! Is it the ultimate theory? No! But, definitely in the more logical direction. Here are some factors that need to be added and explored. * The dateline:Asko Parpola revised the beginning of aryan migration to 1300ad. * Reading Avesta sheds more light on the aryans per se. After all they're aryans too.When reading the history - not the myths - aryans are praise worthy. * Hence, we are compelled to read this as asura and deva cults. I personally am inclined to see the deva cult undesirable, despicable even. * From 1300 bc - war between asura and deva cults - banishing devas to east of sindu/hindhu river could have happened between 1000 bc - 800 bc. This timeline fits into the pantheon of Indian religions and philosophies. The Sankhya religion, it's spread throughout India, the goddess centric philosophy - prakruthi is nithyam and athma is anithyam - must have been a mighty slap on the deva cult, especially the vedhic brahmin. When we see among all the lands and their cultures, India still cherishes the godesses. And as a final note, seeing the victory of pandavas should be seen as the victory of matriarchy over patriarchy.

Aryas were decent of annunaki

There's is no evidence for aryan invasion theory and migration theory

This is I think the other way round. Migration happened from Indian subcontinent to other places around the world.

Hey Prav Yav Nav, I would like to shed some light on the ancient history, please see below. Here I'm including some references as well. 1. Joannis Zonarae: HISTORICA ANNALUM, Patrologiae, Migne, Paris 1864. "Issa insula in Ionio sinu sita est: cujus incolae Issaei Romanis ultro se dediderunt, suo domino Agroni Sardianorum regi, genitis Illyricae irati. Ad cum consules legatos miserunt. Sed illo mortuo, fillio adhuc impubi haerede relicto, uxor ejus pueri noverca, Sardianorum imperium administravit". (Tomus 134, Pag. 690) 2. Don Mavro Orbini: IL REGNO DE GLI SLAVI, Pesaro, 1601. "Et Tolomeo al 3. Libro al Cap. 5. dice: i Venedi grandissime genti tengono gran parte della Sannatia per tutto il Golfo Venedico. Madi questi Venedi Slaui diremo poi al suo luogo.." (Pag. 15,16) 3. Eusebius Pamphili: OPERA OMNIA (Eusebii Caesariensis Opera Pars Uno). Patrologiae, Migne, Paris 1857. (CHRONICORUM Lib. 2, P.531) "Tiberius Caesar Dalmatas Sarmatasque in Romanum redegit potestatem." 4. Hennannus Contractus: CHRONICON, Patrologiae, Migne, Paris 1882. "Tiberius Caesar Dalmatas Sarmatasque subegit." (Tomus 143. Pag. 56) 5. Ekkehardi Uraugiensis: CHRONICON, Patrologiae, Migne, Paris 1881. "Tiberius Caesar Dalmatas Sannatasque subegit." (Tomus 154. Pag. 459) 6. Aimoini Floriacensis: HISTORIAE FRANCORUM, Patrologiae, Migne,Paris 1880. "...in Sclavorum patriam, qui etiam Winidi dicuntur,.." (Tom. 139. P.772) 7. Joannis Cinnamus: HISTORIAE, Patrologiae, Migne, Paris 1864. "Eadem fenne tempestate Servii, Dalmatica gens, a fide dedicientes Rasum castellum everterunt." (Tomus 133. Pag. 322) 8. Laonicus Chalcocondylae: HISTORIAE, Patrologiae, Migne, Paris 1866. "..ad Europae imperium, genus Illyriorum, qui progressi ab Occidentali versus lonium regione, venerint ad Scopiorum urbem, lingua etiamnum non dissimili utentes." (Tomus 19. Pag. 35). "Haud me fiigit, Triballos, Illyrios, Polonos, et Sarmatas eodem inter sese lingua uti." (Pag. 43) "Sarmatarum lingua simillis est Illyriorum, Ionium ad Venetos usque accolentum." (Pag. 138) 9. F.G. Bergmann: LES SCYTHES, Schmidt, Halle 1860. 10. E. Pricot De Saint-Marie: LES SLAVES MERDIONAUX, Armand Lechevalier, Paris 1874. 11. Ravenatis Anonymi: COSMOGRAPHIA, Otto Zeller, Aalen 1962. "Iterum ad septentrionalem iuxta Oceanum nominatur patria Sarmatorum, quae confinalis existit cum praenominata Roxolania. Cuius patriae multi fuerunt descriptores philosophi; ex quibus ego legi Ptolomaeum regem Aegyptiorum ex stripe Macedonum, sed et praenominatum Hylas atque Sardonium..." (Pag. 199, 200) "..sed ego secundum Sardonium ipsam Sarmatonum patriam indicavi." (Pag. 200) "Quas utrasque Datias plurimi descripserunt philosophi, ex quibus ego legi Menelac et Aristarchum Gothorum philosophos; sed ego secundum Sardatium ipsas patrias designavi in quas Dacorum patrias antiquitus.." (Pag. 203) 12. Caroli Du Fresne Du Cange: ILLYRICUM VETUS & NOVUM HISTORIA, Haeredum Royerianorum, Posonii 1746. "SCORDISCOS, quorum diuersa, pro sedium diuersitate... Ea namque, quae APPIANUS de Sordisco Illyici Filio, & Scordiscorum autore tradit, .." (Pag. 6) ".. delectisque inter veteres incolas sedibus, in vnam coiuerint ciuitatem, in quinque, Illyriorum, Liburnorum, Iapydum, Istriorum, & Scordiscorum, populos maiores,.." (Pag. 5) ".. vltra, Macedoniam vsque, Dardani, & inter eos, atque Dalmatas, Scordisci." (Pag. 3) 13. E. Pricot De Saint-Marie: Ibidem. "La tribu des Scordisques, . Du temps des Romains, ils etaient si nombreux, qu'ils occupaient l'Illyrie, la Pannonie, la Moesie et la Thrace, .." (Pag. 51) "En Herzegovine,. . il convient d'ajouter a cette nomenclature les Scordisques.." (Pag. 53) "Au Montenegro, on retrouve les Scordisques, .." (Pag. 53) "La Bosnie... les Bessi 6 et des colonies scordisques la peuplerent a l'origine." (Pag. 22) "La Vieille-Serbie etait occupee par les Scordisques„" (Pag. 22) "La Moesie superieure, .. Scordici vers la Macedoine.." (Pag. 26) 14. E. Pricot De Saint-Marie: Ibidem. "Saritte - Sarayevo." (Pag. 42) 15. C. Du F. Du Cange: Ibidem."Saraio, Seraglio, Saralium, ."(Pag. 147) 16.C. Du F. Du Cange: Ibidem. "..ad Treburniae, seu Trebinae principa-tum, extenditur: ex continenti vero, vsque ad Seruiae montes..." (Pag. 31) 17. E. Pricot De Saint-Marie: Ibidem. "Aux Autoriates succedent les Ardaei: leur roi Agron.." (Pag. 23) "De son cote, le consul Fulvius Flacus, informe des domages causes aux Illyriens, sujets romains, par les Ardaei (Vardaei et Sardici), etablis audessus de l'embouchure de la Nerenta.." (Pag. 114) 18. Francesco Beriinghieri: CLAUDIUS PTOLEMAEUS GEOGRAPHIA, Florence 1482. 19. et 21. Claudius Ptolemaeus: GEOGRAPHIA, Basle 1540.

First World Empire: Nimrod-God Bacchus: 2025-2000 BCE. The creation of the First World Empire started from Nis, (Naissus) Serbia. Bocharti says that Nimrod’s army became known as Aryans. This is because Nimrod’s (Nebrod) army consisted of professional hunters; the God of hunting in Serbian mythology is called Arion: consequently, we get Arions / Aryans. (Samuelis Bocharti) Nimrod’s wife Semiramis constructed in Babylon first world wonder Tower of Babylon mentioned in Old Testament. Second World Empire: Serbo Makeridov (Asur): 1330-1300 BCE. The creation of the Second World Empire started from south Serbia. Alexander the Great tell us that there was a second world conquest which started from Naissus (Nis, Serbia) and which was led by the God Serbon: a great leader who was proclaimed a divinity-Quintus Rufus. Eusebii Pamphili claims that Serbon fought the Indians ca.1325 BCE and afterwards he built another Naissus at the Indus river, this was the city where Alexander the Great encountered Serbs according to Quintus Rufus and Pamphili (Ptolemaeus Eusebii). Troy: 2000-1184 BCE. Dardania to day Serbia. Third World Empire: Alexander the Great: 336-323 BCE. Son of King Philip the Great Karanovic and mother Olympia daughter of King Neotolomay Molosses from Serbo-Rasa tribe. (Ulrich Wilcken, Gustave Glotz) The creation of the Third World Empire started from south Serbia. Fourth World Empire: Roman Empire: Etruscan organized Roman Empire and eastern Roman Empire and 18 Emperors are from today Serbia Constantine the Great also born in Nis (Naissus). Following the 3rd Century Crisis (290s AD onward, the Empire was feeling less secure and thus there was a need for strong military leaders to take charge. Many Roman noblemen and statesmen were born in present-day Serbia, including 17 or 18 Roman Emperors (Vetranio wasn't universally recognized as an emperor, but was proclaimed a caesar).[2]

World first cultures Vucedol, Lepenski Vir (Iron Gates) starts 11500 BC, Starcevo culture starts 6200 BC, Vinča culture starts 5700 BC, today Serbia. Samarra culture 5500-4800 BCE, Cucuteni culture starts 4800 BC, Varna culture starts 4500 BC, Yamnaya culture 3300 BC. World first industrial revolution ca. 6000 BC. Bronze metallurgy. Today Serbia, (BBC History news March 2010) Gordon Childe-The Danube in Prehistory, Jacque Pirenne-Agriculture at Danube. Today Serbia. Farming start about 6000 BC. Vinca First Calendar start to count years at 5508 BC. (Now in 2024 we have year 7532) Farming wouldn’t be possible without knowledge of calendar. Both development started and developed together. Today Serbia. Harald Haarmann about first Cyrillic writings in Vinca culture in 5500 BC, today Serbia, so 2000 years before any writings anywhere else on the world. Vinca Iron production 1400 BC. Today Serbia. In today English language there is more than 2000 same or similar Serbian words. Names of the Balkan tribes: Pelasgians, Mycenaeans, Etruscan-called themselves Rasi, in Serbia exist even today province Ras. Wendi, (Wendisch museum in Cottbus, Germany, Lusatian Sorbs, Lužički Srbi.) Illiyrians, Macedonians (Homer is saying Paeonian people walked on foot 11 Days to help Trojans war), Dardanians (Original Troy is here, not in Turkey, Homer wrote sea is freezing in the winter-Panonian sea), Moesians, Dacians, Thracians, Rasci, Celts, Scythians, Sarmatians, Arians, Sea People, Peleset, Philistines, Hittites, Bhrygians. Tribes spread in all directions all over Europe and Asia ……. Wild Greeks arrived ~ 1000 BC from Egipt, Hungarian from Asia and Bulgars from Asia they found culture on the Balkans, writings and language and they mixed with domestic people. 18 Roman emperors were born in Serbia because of Etruscan connection. After Trojan war many groups of people left Troy in all directions to middle Europe, northern Europe to Britain and Scandinavia, south to Anatolia.One group under Aeneas sat sail with 22 ships and about 3400 followers and reach Italy-Etruscans. (There is no such thing as Indo-Europian, or Indo-German how used to be called before) Proto Serbian language is mother of all languages, spoken all over the Balkans in Illyria, Thracia, Dardania, Moesia, Pelasgia, Macedonia, Etruria, Bhrygia, Sarmatia and so on….Germans published dictionary in year 1791 German- Illyrian so you can read the words and speak, it is today Serbian.It is older than Sanskrit, Greek, Latin or all western European languages. Plato confirms in his work The Dialogues of Plato-Cratylus the Greeks used Pelasgian (Proto Serbian) to develop their own language.

Mother of all languages is Proto Serbian and I can prove it. Do you know that wild Greeks came to Pelasgian land and found culture and proto Serbian language and they just mixed with Pelasgian people and learned everything there? Here are just some examples. You can see first word is Serbian, second word is Greek and third word is German (Serbian, Greek and German) (ili-Alla-aber) (utočište- eutoichiste- Zuflucht) (blizu-pljsion-nahe) (breme- brjme- Gewicht) (koliba- kalyba- Hütte) (hod- hod-Gang) (Tece voda protiv vode-Teke wudas proti wudei-Es fliest Wasser gegen Wasser) (činim- xinjm- ich thue) (daleko- tale ko- entfernt) (dar-dar- Geschenk) (danak- danj- Abgabe) (delim- dieljm- ich teile) (Dever- dawer- Schwager) (trljam- tribo- ich reibe) (dom- dom- zu hause) (drzim- drassjm- ich halte) (duplo- diploo- verdoppele) (dva- dwo-zwei) (idu- ithuo- ich gehe) (jedan- jadon- eine) (grebu- grabo- kratzen) (kakim- kakam- ich scheiße) (klizam- kluzam- ich gleite) (glina- gli- klei) (kljuc- kljs- Schlüssel) (komora- kamara- kammer) (kanim- koinam- ich thue) (Koliko- kelikos-wieviel) (Kos- kossyf- Amsel) (klisura- klision- Schlucht) (kobila- kaballes-Stutte) (kokot- kokkos-Hahn) (leto- leto-jahr) (levo- laevos-linke) (mak- mak-Mohn) (manje- mjon-weniger) (mama-mamma- Mutter) (muva- muia- Fliege) (meljem- mullem- ich mahle) (merim- meirjm- ich messe) (mesec- meis- Mond) (magla-omichla- Nebel) (nosim-nisso-ich trage) (oko- oko- Auge) (orem- arom-ich ackere) (palica-pelekys-Keule) (put-pat-Weg) (pecem-peso-ich brate) (pero-ptero-Feder) (pijem- pjm-ich trinke) (pivo- pino- Bier) Sanskrit is made-up from Proto Serbian and are the same languages. Here some samples Sanskrit-Serbian-English: (bele-belo-white) (ghughu-gugutka-turtle dove) (dub-dubok-deep) (kaši-kašalj-cough) (kaste-kosa-sickle) (Mata-Mati-Mother) (madhu-med-honey) (majh-medja-boundary) (meša-mešati-to mix) (thunko-tanko-thin) (mara-umreti-to die) (baba-babo-father) (balak-balavac-immature person) (beg-beg-flight) (bedana-beda-grif) (bhrata-brat-brother) (churi-cura-girl) (Gra-Grad-Town) (Lod-Lud-Crazy) (Ljubhva-Ljubav-Love) (Deti-Dete-Child) (Smajase-Smeje se-Lahghing) (Sladu-Slatki-Sweet) (Kadajati-Kidati-Tear) (Suri-Svetli-Bright) (Mač-Mač-Sword) (Bhaga-Bog-God) (Nava-Novi-New) (Moru-Mora-Nightmare) (Čamarika-Čemerika-Hellebore) (Sobha-Soba-Room) (Krsti-Krst-Cross) (Tama-Tama-Dark) (Zvana-Zvono-Bell) (Dina-Dan-Day) (Apat-Patnja-Suffering) (Itvara-Utvara-Spook) (Inoti-Inatiti-Spite) (Učjati-Uciti-Learn) (Uda-Voda-Water) (Košah-Koža-Skin) (Kapalam-Kapa-Cap) (Kabila-Kobila-Mare) Please note additional reference Book from Alokananda Mitter Calcuta India, Similarities between Bengali and Sanskrit and Serbian.

I believe that the original hunter gatherers of europe resembled east indians and also that light skin people from europe or central asia invaded and mixed with indians there is gene flow going to and from

Aryan invasion never happened happened it was outside movement from south of India to outside India. But we are not here to discuss this because you are running an agenda.

Aryan invasion 😂😂😂😂😂 .. Nice Joke

King Pamheiba?

Indians have such an inferiority complex about skin tones that they are grasping at anything that will make them be part of the white race! Some (Sudhansu whatevervedi, sumit pir, shri iyer and other asssorted numbskulls) have found a ready explanation in the difference in skin tones to being the descendents of Aryans! They forget that natural selection will remove people of paler skin tones from climates with high levels of insolation, hence the gradation of skin tones from the north to the south in India. Others like that clown sam Pitroda (friend of the janevdhari brahman of musalman origin) will go so far as to call Lord Krishna and Shivji of being of negro origin because their skin tones were blue black! Now it seems that they have found another ancestor! The Yamnaya! Indians!What a bunch of confused people!

There are no evidences for this theory except the genetics, genetics can be intermingled due to trade routes as well. Linguistic similarities could be due to out of India movement. If Indo Aryans already had a language before coming to India why aren’t there any tablets, scripts or writings found like Indus people did centuries before them. Also if Indo Aryans brought the Vedic religion why there is not a single mention of this movement or any geographic hint outside of India? Why the Vedas mention only Himalayas to Kanyakumari as their homeland. Last but not the least if Indo Aryans came around 2000 to 1500 bce how can they possibly know about Saraswati river extensively. Whip dried long before that period. All false theory only assumptions.