Видео

oh, man , amazing!!! THANK U!!! UH! F***K! GEANIOUS!!!

¿Te gusta el arte austríaco?

First glaring mistake: comparing plastic clarinets to saxophones. While plastic clarinets are good, plastic saxophones that can make any notable sound do not exist. Also, the Tarogato is NOT A WOODEN SAXOPHONE. It’s a completely different instrument.

the simpler and therefore better and more elegant instrument.

Omg watching this as a second year physics student

thanks

wow, nice trick explaining the issue with a conical bore

Taste

I've learnt nothing.

So they are different because math?

So why does a saxophone sound nothing like a flute?

Your sense of humor is priceless. I will subscibe to your channel and I expect content like that in future, bro.

Cool and interesting Video. Keep it going

Excellent video! Thank you for this great explanation.

Easier explanation: Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic....

The fact that this video didn't go viral makes me feel: a) Enraged and confused (to be fair, everything enrages me and confuses me) b) "The algorithm" is broken (or it hates accents?) c) The algorithm faithfully reflects the taste of humans, and is humans who are broken.

I like your video, however, I want to point out a caveat about the second law. It is commonly misunderstood that entropy means the same thing as disorder. You definitely could get the configuration of the LOL pattern regardless of which direction time is going. The second law does not say that order decreases over time. It is simply a statistical statement which applies in both time directions, where if you increase the volume of possible states for a set number of particles the number of possibilities increases. Therefore the entropy of the universe should actually stay the same because the universe is not actually becoming more volume us in space-time because the space-time itself is stretching not appending more.

The video you made is one of the best videos I have ever seen. Thank you

You pulled that apart well. I have over 20 years of screaming that right-hand rules are mnemonic devices and do not belong in explanations of cause. Look at the real CAUSE of the gyroscopic effect. Angular momentum is a math analogy that indirectly gets the right answer but leads you away from the cause. Spin velocity and tilt velocity are perpendicular vectors that will not affect each other. The gyroscopic effect is a collection of several effects, and one in particular, the causal accelerations, are something you've never seen. My video was a hasty zoom meeting presentation, so it's not about production quality. ruclips.net/video/Sip_9ew2RjA/видео.html

Can you lube the tubes and see how that changes the speed they climb the tube by lowering friction

Very interesting.

I see it's rotations braking the universe again...

It's funny how all that math and analysis boils down (from an empirical POV) to: gravity tilts them down => antisymmetry => they go up

Going to the free fall tower for an experiment is dedication.

Love the broken humor. Great video overall.

This video helped me to understand my balls.

Love your humour and the way you explain. Looking forward for more physics videos! 🙌

Using the middle finger trick next time in class, thanks.

fantastique video

I can only assume that the video creator was brutally murdered by Lizzo after the remark made at 2:52. 😂

I'm curious how this translates to the human voice? 1) what type of pipe are we like, if any? We are able to produce all the harmonics, is that because we're like a cone? 2) are the harmonics we produce caused via addition of sines converging (like these instruments) or from the pattern of the vocal fold "wave"? In more technical words, are human harmonics caused by the pattern of the air pressure in TIME DOMAIN, or by a convergence of perfect sine waves in the FREQUENCY DOMAIN?

Thank you for the video

The flute is NOT inferior

I wonder if there's a way to design a saxophone-sounding instrument that's with a cylindrical "closed pipe" to be able to play lower notes.

more vids please

I found a video where someone plays these different shaped tubes, and one of these tubes seems to overblow at 2 octaves instead of 1, or a twelfth (octave+fifth). The video is called "Pan Flute Tubes Harmonic Combinations"

Homie just called the flute a simpler instrument. Lost me at that...

I have never asked myself that question, nor would anybody with a healthy view of reality. A saxophone is a clarinet with an erection.

At 0:43 my heart jumped for a second expecting to hear the old game grumps 10 minute power hour intro

I wonder if Adolphe Sax knew about these wave interactions when he invented the saxophone.

Saxophone is the pack a day smoker aunt of the clarinet

a superb video.. was looking for such a video explains this subject.. thanks for sharing

So a saxophone is to a clarinet as a flugelhorn is to a trumpet.

great video. thanks. what about a conical flute? would it work?

No but i've always wondered the difference between soprano saxophone and oboe

Gonna guess before watching and say that it's because the clarinet has a straight resonating column whereas the saxophone has a cylindrical resonating column

So a saxophone has a closed mouthpiece, so it should have one open end (like a clarinet), but since it conically expands it effectively has two open ends (like a flute). The gross generalization I take from this is that conically expanding bore adds one the the number of openings. Obviously, the next question is: what does a standing wave in a tube with three open ends sound like? What is the sound of the flutophone, aka flaulto sax? Looks like the experiment has already been performed, and the results are not promising: ruclips.net/video/EN9BBYIp0OM/видео.html

This was an amazing video! I knew that the bores of each instrument affected their sound in different ways but I didn’t know how it actually worked math wise. Thank you for putting this resource together :)

this boy called the flute inferior lol

6:24 just a quick note - the fundamental frequency is the first harmonic (at least that’s how it’s taught in IB physics) and there’s no such thing as lambda 0.