Видео

It's true that homelessness is a significant issue in both the US and the UK. Despite their wealth, social and economic factors like housing shortages and mental health challenges contribute to the problem. The UK did invest some of its North Sea oil revenues, but comparisons with countries like Norway raise questions about long-term wealth management. Both nations have work to do in addressing homelessness and poverty.

It's wonderful that you're expressing gratitude and faith. Many people find comfort in their belief that Jesus watches over them in times of need. 🙏 May you continue to feel safe and blessed! ❤

It sounds like you're describing an interesting optical phenomenon! When light bends around an object, particularly through the use of curved mirrors like a half-dome, it can create virtual images. These virtual images aren't physically present but appear to be real due to the way the light is manipulated. This concept is often used in optics and holography, where virtual objects can seem to float in space, even though they're not actually there. Is this related to a specific project or topic you're working on? It seems like a cool scientific concept!

Sounds like the scalpel is auditioning for a role in a horror movie! 🎬😄

Life has its challenges, but it's also full of amazing opportunities. It's all about perspective!

I understand your frustration. It's always good to stay informed and critically evaluate information from any source

It’s definitely a wild ride when you dive into the depths of conspiracy theories! What are your thoughts on the impact of such narratives?

Reducing fossil fuel use to nearly zero is a major goal, and it can be achieved either through one big shift or many small, gradual changes. Large-scale efforts like transitioning to renewable energy are crucial, but everyday actions-such as improving energy efficiency and using cleaner technologies-are just as important. Together, these steps can lead us to a more sustainable future.

Global warming deniers will tell you electric cars cause pollution too when they are made and that they can catch fire and so on. The neurons have been replaced with epoxy.

Global warming deniers often point to the environmental impact of manufacturing electric cars and potential safety issues like battery fires. It’s true that producing electric vehicles (EVs), particularly their batteries, involves some environmental costs. However, over their lifetime, EVs typically produce far fewer emissions than traditional gasoline-powered cars, especially when charged with renewable energy. As for safety concerns, while battery fires can happen, they are rare and often no more dangerous than conventional car fires. Statements dismissing the broader benefits of EVs can feel as though critical thinking has been replaced with inflexible viewpoints-similar to your metaphor about neurons replaced with epoxy. It’s important to focus on the bigger picture: the long-term environmental benefits far outweigh the short-term challenges.

The Earth will persist long after we are gone, but humanity's future depends on how we care for it. While the planet itself will endure, our ability to thrive on it is uncertain if we continue down a path of environmental neglect. If we fail to address climate change, resource depletion, and pollution, we may face consequences that threaten our survival. In the grand timeline of Earth, our presence is fleeting, and it is up to us to ensure we remain a part of its future.

It’s more about understanding that our actions impact the planet, and we have the opportunity to make changes for a more sustainable future. Blame aside, it’s about responsibility and finding ways to live in balance with our environment. After all, the Earth will keep going-we just want to be around for the ride! 😊

As long as the CC alarmist grift attracts funding, it will continue.

Panic rarely leads to constructive action. While it's understandable to feel overwhelmed, addressing climate change effectively requires clear thinking and informed decisions. The science behind climate change is robust and widely supported by experts, and focusing on practical solutions is the best way forward.

@@wavesdiscovery: _"The science behind climate change is robust and widely supported by experts, ..."_ It's a scam supported by fraudulent experts, especially in the UN.

@@wavesdiscovery [The truth was deleted by shitheads.]

Climate change science is grounded in decades of research and supported by the vast majority of climate scientists around the world. The evidence, from rising global temperatures to melting ice caps and increasing extreme weather events, points to human activity as a significant driver of these changes. International organizations like the UN work to bring together experts to address this global issue, but skepticism and distrust persist in some circles. It's important to differentiate between healthy scientific debate and claims that dismiss well-established research. While some may argue it's a "scam," the overwhelming consensus from credible scientific communities suggests otherwise, urging action to mitigate the impacts of climate change.

@@wavesdiscovery An example of the [fr.ud] is Mann's "hockey stick" curve. He used real data collected with thermometers in recent history but seamlessly transitioned to unreliable inaccurate estimates from nature (tree ring data, IIRC) for earlier data. But the point he drew heavily depended on accuracy.

These comments often reflect skepticism or frustration, but the reality is more complex. Climate change is happening, it's not part of a normal cycle, and while we can't stop it entirely, we can reduce its impact by making thoughtful choices now. Solutions like cleaner energy and reduced emissions help mitigate the worst effects, giving us more control over future outcomes.

It's already too late to limit the devastation. Without immediate action, we're toast.

The urgency of the climate crisis cannot be overstated; many experts warn that we are at a critical juncture. While some impacts are already being felt and certain damage may be irreversible, it is not too late to mitigate further devastation. Immediate action is essential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, transition to renewable energy, and adapt to changing conditions. By taking decisive steps now, we can still work to protect ecosystems, human health, and future generations. If we delay, the consequences will only worsen, leading to greater challenges down the line.

@@wavesdiscovery COMPLETE BULLSHIT ! The Greenland Ice Sheets melting has been carefully measured and found as Completely FALSE . The Oceans are NOT rising. Welll no more than they have been for the last 2 centuries of mostly reliable measure ie; ~1/4" a year consistently. Most ALL of these 'examples' have been thoroughly Exposed as Pure Fabrications intended to promote personal agendas. Yes there is climate variation.... Just as there has neen over a Billion Years. Our SUN is slightly variable and Earths' orbit is also variable.

While it's true that the Earth has gone through natural climate cycles over thousands of years, the current changes we are witnessing are unprecedented in their speed and intensity. Scientific evidence strongly indicates that human activity-primarily the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation-has accelerated global warming beyond natural patterns. While it may seem like efforts to mitigate climate change are costly, they are aimed at reducing the human impact on the planet and ensuring a livable future. The goal isn't about fixing something beyond our control, but about limiting the damage we are causing.

While some planets show slight changes due to natural factors, the Earth's rapid warming is driven by human activity, like burning fossil fuels. Switching to EVs is one part of reducing emissions and ensuring a more sustainable future, but it's not the only solution.

@@wavesdiscovery address the solar system heating again please I missed that part.

Yes, Vikings farmed in Greenland during the Medieval Warm Period, but today's global warming is more widespread and rapid, driven largely by human activity, unlike the localized climate shifts of that time

For how long ?

@@wavesdiscovery Nope.

Arctic sea ice may vary year to year, but the long-term trend is a steady decline. Climate change isn't about short-term dips, it's about the bigger, long-term impact on the planet.

Using an exception to try and give an overall impression that is flawed.

Using exceptions to paint an overall impression can lead to misleading conclusions. For instance, highlighting a few instances of climate change benefits, such as longer growing seasons in certain regions, can overshadow the broader, more severe consequences of global warming, like extreme weather events, habitat loss, and food insecurity. This selective focus can create a flawed narrative that downplays the urgency of the climate crisis. It's important to consider the full range of evidence and understand that while there may be isolated benefits, they do not negate the overwhelming risks and challenges posed by climate change.

All the stats to claim AGWarming ARE short term stats. Every stat before 1979 is ignored by the chicken little alarmists. The grift is up. Not a single alarmist model has been even slightly accurate. Give it up. Stop trying to scare the children and simpletons.

It does seem like something straight out of science fiction, right? The idea of an unseen force or someone protecting Earth sparks the imagination! But whether it's just coincidence, nature's balance, or something more, it makes you wonder what else is out there that we don't yet understand. Imagine the possibilities!

Great catch! You're absolutely right-the Earth's diameter is about 8,000 miles, and the Mariana Trench is approximately 7 miles deep. That's far from being one-fifth of the Earth's diameter. It’s important for content to be accurate, so thanks for pointing that out! Hopefully, they fix that mistake soon.

Right! Is it that hard to do a voice over with your real voice? No. The answer is no.

Zahi Hawass has certainly been a central figure in Egyptian archaeology for many years, and his influence is undeniable. While it's true that he has strong opinions about how the pyramids were built, archaeology is an evolving field. New discoveries and theories do emerge over time, often from outside the mainstream. It’s important to remain open-minded and encourage scientific debate, but also to consider all evidence carefully. The more we learn, the better our understanding becomes!

@@wavesdiscovery He has banned archaeologists from studying the pyramids and other parts of Giza, Luxor, Saqqara and other sites. If you try to change the current beliefs by introducing new theories he will shut you down. Ask the guys who used a robot to enter a tunnel and found a door put in the tunnel with handles on it to open it. Once he found out about it he shut them down and refused to allow them to continue their research.