Видео

@ time 1:08, no it isn't a question of whether it is God's law or Moses's law. You say the Torah is the law of God. And boy do you really look ridiculous in your half baked explanation here. You even contradict yourself from your previous comments. You never really did respond to the comment that was before you. First off, man can't separate what God has joined. Man doesn't have the wherewithal to do that. It is built into creation. That is why the wife committed adultery with the BoD. You said "sending away wasn't the whole receipt." Well, it was at first, because that is what husbands were doing to their wives for "any cause." That is why they were labeled with "hard hearts." The sent them out destitute and unprotected and unable to have a husband to provide for their needs for fear of being stoned to death. Men couldn't take them either for the same fear, because she was a married woman (Deut. 22:22). It was for this reason Moses wrote the BoD. Yeh, they tried to trap Jesus, but pay attention to Christ's response to their attempted entrapment. He changes the Torah and says now, if a husband puts away his wife, with or without the BoD, except for the case of her committing sexual fornication, and he "marries another he will be committing adultery against that wife he put away." This means he now has two wives. Your problem is you refuse to give credence to this fact. This is what makes you a fake and a phony and a sinful adulterer.

More ignorance. @ time103:41 of course, she wasn't defiled by divorce. Exercising the Bill of Divorce was the causation of her being defilement, because it allowed her to marry another man, causing her to commit adultery with him, defiling them both (Matt. 5:31&32). The BoD did not separate the marriage to her first husband. Where you come up with this falsity, I have no clue. "What God hath joined, man cannot separate." This is why Christ condemned and did away with the BoD. But as you said, "better to be married (living in adultery) than not married. Yes, it was only better for her, then to be cast out destitute and unprotected and not be able to have those needs provided, hence why the BoD was written in first place, not because of something she did to deserve to be cast out. If she had married without the certificate, she and her "second" husband would have been stoned. Her and her second husband had to have that document to avoid being stoned for him taking a married woman. Notice how the BoD was against Torah law (Deut. 22:22) and changed it. Oh, that's right, you can't see anything like that, can you? That's right, she was "married" to the second husband, but it was not a pure and legitimate "joining." It was a defiled joining. In 1 Corinthians 6 Paul says, a man taking a harlot "becomes one flesh with her." He is married to her. Is this a legitimate marriage? For the reason of her adultery, she could not go back to her first husband. He caused her to be abominably defiled. So, what does 'Ol' Pete say, "wisdom says, this woman going through multiple men, mmm, this might not be a really good candidate to be in somebody's house." What a dumb statement. Christ didn't call the women being put away by their husbands the ones with "hard hearts." It was the husbands he gave that distinction to. You said she couldn't go back to the first husband, because seed had been mixed. So, who caused that seed to be mixed? It wasn't her. Her committing adultery and being defiled with her second husband proves that she the divorce did not separate her marriage to the first husband. Your advocating of the legitimacy of divorce is absolutely wrong. That is why Jesus changed it and commanded the only time a husband legitimately puts away his wife is if she commits a sexual act of fornication (adultery, homosexuality, bestiality), where she has defiled herself.

He has an inadequate understanding of Hebrew, believing the inflated definition of adultery.

Here you go again Pete showing the depth of your ignorance @ time 58:27. Fornication involves three sexual sins, adultery, homosexuality, and bestiality. In Matthew 19:9, Jesus isn't saying that Deuteronomy 24 involved any of these sins with the husbands putting their wives away. Deut. 24 was about the husband putting her away for any reason (Matt. 19:3), other than an act of fornication, because according to the Torah these sins would have required them to be stoned to death, not put away. The "uncleanness" in Deut. 24 involved "any cause" he didn't like about her and put her away for it ("hard hearts"). Adultery is fornication. Paul identified the man in 1 Corinthians 5, who was being sexually intimate with his "father's wife" as a "fornicator." Jude referred to the inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah as "fornicators." Fornication does not "fall under the uncleanness" spoken in Deut. 24. It is your ignorance of understanding Scripture that makes you say this falsehood. It's your ignorance and blindness that makes you reject Christ's declaration in Matt. 19:9 saying, if a man puts away his wife and marries another, without the putting away be for an act of "fornication," and he marries another woman, he commits adultery. He now has two wives. It is very clear. If a man can have more than one wife, why would Christ declare such a thing to start with? He would be foolish and stupid. Why would the disciples say what they did in response to what Christ said, saying "If the case with the man be so with his wife, it is not good to marry." What do you think they are concerned about in this statement, if a man is not restricted in how many wives he has? And then, how did Christ respond to them? He correlates their statement with a man being a "eunuch." You know what though, you won't hear any of this truth, because you don't want to hear it. You will just continue to ignore it and live in your fornicated adultery with your two wives, having a defiled marriage and a defiled bed, only worthy of judgment (Heb. 13:4). So yes, Yahshua did change the Torah. A husband's wife who does commit fornication is no longer condemned to death (Deut.22:22), she is just put away instead. That is why I asked you on another video, if your wife committed adultery against you, would you stone her to death and the man also, according to Deut. 22:22, in the Torah? You ignored my question and didn't respond.

Complete moron. Pray for him. He needs a spanking from yah!

video starts at 1:59

🤯 mas não é? é oque se espera do sistema? Cães gulosos como profetizou Isaías? Farão negócio de voz. profetizou Pedro! Eles não se interessam pela verdade. Pela lei de Elohym. Mulheres solteiras trabalhando geram mais dinheiro pro sistema. Doam mais. Ficam anos dando dinheiro acreditando que é só esperar. Quando percebem que foram enganadas e vão ficar solteiras correm para o mundo desesperadas à procura de um homem..

That’s absolutely absurd.. he’s no apologist, but rather he should be apologizing for that asinine comment… great debate bro Pete! You guys did a great job.

Bro, Gino Jennings said nothing wrong. 😮. The devil is using you...

Im a bit troubled by his teaching because he also teaches that sex is marriage. Going to the bible, I can't really deny this. I lost my virginity to my first girlfreind so I guess according to that teaching she's my wife. I thought it was OK to break up with her and go to another because I thought marriage was more than just sex. So if this is biblically accurate I guess I'm an adulterer and I made her an adulteress because I put her away ( without a certificate of devorce obviously cause to me it was just a break up at the time). So my question is how do I repent from this? Is it enough to recognise this was wrong seek forgiveness from God and not do this again. Or do I have to try and get back with my ex? To me the latter would be an extremely mentally ill thing to do since she has a new boyfreind and they own a house together. Surely by attempting to upset that I would be doing more harm than good. I know according to deuteronomy you are not supposed to go back to original partner after divorce and remarriage but I didn't give her a certificate of divorce so does that means according to this we are still married and I just sent her away? The thing is this is a new culture. You were saying the point of the certificate is so other men know she's free to marry. But no man cares about that these days. Especially when they are unbelievers which my ex is. So does god take this into account and therefore is the sending away enough to constitute divorce without a certificate?

Great points brother! Yes tvus had blessed me. I agree that nothing in the Re-newer Cobebsnt set of the scriptures cannot add anything brand new nor take away any laws from out of the 1st set of eternal covenants of the scriptures. But you’re right on when you tell us that Christianity as the false religion that it is has tried to add and take away and no one has challenged them and their lies to a sufficient amount to make better corrections. I will have to look into this in the Hebrew and Aramaic versions of this verse also, which had the most original meanings of what all scripture says.

Well bro Pete a man can’t force her to stay if she wants to go. If she leaves she better remain single.

Those who knoweth the right thing to do and don't do it shall be beaten with many stripes st Luke. 17:V 3 if your partner or whoever sin against you rebuke him and if he repent forgive him and if he sins seven times in a day rebuke them and if they repent forgive them that is Jesus Christ teachings he said my sheep hear my voice

Jhn 1:17 For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ............ u really think Yah will reject someone who believes in Yahshua coz he eats porks .....then yashua wasted his time coming and dying for our sins..........it is not a salvation issue Rom 14:17 For the kingdom of God is not eating and drinking, but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit

What is the difference between wives and concubines? If a man lays with and knows one of his concubines, does she not then become a wife?

Are you saying that a taken woman prays to God directly, she is sinning? Are there no scriptures that illustrate women praying directly to God? I seem to recall scriptures saying of a woman that her prayers were answered in obtaining children. Am I wrong? Are women not to pray? If they may than how and to whom may they pray?

It's clear to see that polygyny is righteous both in The Word and with the understanding that the world ONLY hates it when it's done the way YHWH said to do it.

James wrote to the twelve tribes scattered abroad

You’re forgetting Timothy and Titus which does say that if a man is going to be a deacon or leader in a congregation of a synagogue assembly, then he should only have 1 woman. This makes sense since He can’t please many members in his congregation and many women. He won’t have enough time and money and resources to serve so many people. We also have to beware of not marrying more than one woman because of the lust of our flesh only. We are called to do only the will of the Holy Spirit (Ruach) and if The spirit does not lead us to be with more than one than we must obey not to take more than one woman. I’m still asking and praying for either option and staying honest and open to whatever plans YaH already set up for my destiny before the world existed, just as this is what we are all called to do which Hebrews 4, attempts to instruct us to do. We must labor now to enter into YaH’s sabbath rest on not just once per week but every day 24/7, as this law is meant to be applied on a daily deeper level of living in a constant state of love for El, ourselves & then our neighbors as ourselves.

🛑🛑🛑 Have you read bible scholar michael david coogan stance on polygamy..??? 🛑🛑🛑

Jesus rebuked the elders for emphasizing washing hands (a good healthy thing) instead of killing disobedient children. WWJD?

I get it scripture does say Pual is hard to understand, but we must honestly deal with what Pual has to say as it scripture as well.

Can I attend by myself?

7:51 😂😂😂 True humans are a pair bonding species but the problem is pair bonding is not same as lifelong monogamy with total exclusivity...Pair bonds can take different forms including polygyny serial monogamy social monogamy polyandry group marriages etc...

Are children born in polygyny considered illegitimate?

2 Peter is a wrong translation and is also consider not written by Peter ruclips.net/video/C9Q9mpZwpfk/видео.htmlsi=DAmIjHOUjN7wITdL

Great stream, Shalom!

WAKE UP!!..The convicted Felon antichrist has returned and will begin to rule the world within days or a couple of months as we are now in the midst of the final 7yr week spoken of by the prophet Daniel 9:27(that started with the Abraham Accords). Therefore, JESUS will evacuate HIS faithful very soon to escape that great Tribulation. Repent, Obey CHRIST, and Be Ready!

Good evening to you, Pete. I'm surprised you're on. Excellent timing. I have a question. I have been researching illegitimate children in a polygyny relationship? This marriage question comes up. In polygyny is not possible. Any clarity is greatly appreciated. Blessings to you 🙏. Expat in Costa Rica.

Hard for me to believe Paul was a real apostle , in my opinion he contradicts Yeshua , I have battle against this feeling for many years but for me Paul goes against all the prophets in the Bible . I saw your 7 video series on Paul and still was left in blank 😂 if is possible can you do a review on a RUclipsr called Jesus word only about this same topic . God bless and great video as always 👌

Good stuff 👍🏼 Shalom bro 👊🏼

God bless that family!

Monogamy Only Dogma: brilliant way of ensuring the following: Splintered, single-parent households due to divorce over "infidelity." Overabundance of single women [and single mothers], as women outnumber men in an almost 2:1 ratio. Hike in prostitution, pornography, only fans, etc., as a result of women not being able to find a husband due to the sheer numeric impossibility of it. Spike in abortion because, without access to husband, women facing pregnancy out of wedlock often consider abortion as a legitimate solution. Single or dual-income households and homesteads instead of three or more-income households. Longer time spent in debt to a mortgage or other usury-based loans as a result. Longer time spent towards actual ownership, freedom, and autonomy of things like houses and cars, due to less income and less free time to increase productivity [because one woman caring for one child or more is a handful]. Increased dependence on "external childcare" like daycare or 8 hour a day schools, so children can be heavily vaccinated and brainwashed and essentially not raised by their parents / tribes / families. [People fail to realize that even in "monogamous" societies, there were often female handmaids, maids, and "slaves" within the household to take the load and pressure off of the mother / wife, almost no society or culture in history has seriously only had one mother / wife in the household, as it puts a lot of stress on that single woman]. It is all simply designed to produce economic dependence and slavish devotion to the Babylonian government. Socioeconomic and population control, all in one, also destabilizes the very natural relationship and balance between men and women [men are polygynous by nature, women are monogamous by nature, generally speaking]. MONOGAMY ONLY makes zero sense Scripturally, but even beyond Scripture it makes zero sense economically, socially, or biologically. But it makes a lot of sense for the powers that be. Intelligent, productive, autonomous "tribes" [extended families] have always been the number one threat to an imperial government autocracy.

Monogamy-only teaching is a modern cultic invention, not a biblical mandate. Nowhere does Scripture command that a man may have only one wife. The patriarchs-Abraham, Jacob, David, and others-had multiple wives with no condemnation from God. The law of Moses regulated, but never forbade, polygyny. Even in the New Testament, Paul’s instructions for overseers to be the "husband of one wife" imply that others were not bound by such a restriction. The idea that monogamy is the only God-approved model is a later tradition, not a biblical doctrine.

If polygny is sinful and men like Abraham, Jacob, David and the others were living sinful lives in this regard, I THINK I AM MORE RIGHTEOUS THAN THEM. Why? All these years, from the bottom of my heart, I was able to control myself and stick to one wife WITH ALL THE SENSUAL PICS I see everyday in Facebook, with all the scantily dressed women I see in malls and with a history of two women proposing indecently to me twice in my life. Why can't these guys control themselves when a lot of us here in this X-rated world of 2025 can control our desires? Are we better than them in this aspect? Wow! I think God should start answering a lot of my prayers ala David in the Psalms. If polygyny is sin I will struggle not looking down on these men for the rest of my life. If a regular Joe like me can do it why can't they?

I😊BROTHER YOU CANNOT GO UP WITH THIS FALSE TEACHER /PREACHER ;HE AS SURROUNDED HIMSELF WITH A COHORT OF YES MEN WHO WILL PULL A MACHETE MACHETE ON YOU FOR THE FIRSTWORD GINO JENNINGS FALSE /BRAGGART /ARROGANT BASTARD.

Now you guys should be able to see what’s wrong with the so called church in the USA? This is why people are so lost and doing foolish things in their marriages. Gods way works man’s way doesn’t work out well.

That dude hopefully isn’t a pastor. Why would you give advice like this that goes in the face of Gods commandment not to intermarry with those unbelievers… They guy shouldn’t be giving any biblical advice to anyone. Paul repeated this in 2 Corinthians.

May the Lord my God bless you and keep you and all of yours. Thank you.

Jasher 16:8 And Abram recovered all the property of Sodom, and he also recovered Lot and his property, his wives and little ones and all belonging to him, so that Lot lacked nothing.

No Monogamy means one romantic and sexual partner for life....Even if one person dies other spouse should remain celibate...Any deviation from this is a form of polygamy

Never underestimate the absolute ridiculous insane lies people will come up with to avoid this truth worth watching full vid ! Go pete

Definitely not monogamous

Excellent point! Western civilization is not monogamous. It has adopted a perverse form of polygamy.

I love the smile as you say this...looks like you're about to cause trouble and then sneak out the back 😂

So, if your one of your wives commits adultery against you are you going to have her stoned to death according to the Torah? You hypocrite! To say that someone is wicked because they repeat the words of Christ is the one who is wicked and anti-Christ. So, just go on, you and your wives all living in adulterous sin, because you are obviously reprobate just like the Pharisees, who rejected Christ and His teaching.

Moses claiming to get his information from God allowed divorce. Jesus claiming Moses tolerated (suffered) divorce? So God allowed and sanctioned divorce (sin) by Moses? It took Jesus to set the record straight? So much for the law being perfect, spiritual, pure, just, right, holy, good, and righteous.

Wake up - Wake up Pete, we don't live in Torah times anymore. Just because the hypocrite Pharisees reiterated what Moses commanded and its processes when asked does not in any way support you. How lame of an argument!! You had better start paying attention to Christ's response. That is what matters. He in no way endorsed the Bill of Divorce that caused their wives to commit adultery. Yes, the guys with the "hard hearts" that you look to and love. Jesus condemned the Bill of Divorce saying, "it was not so in the beginning." Divorce was not God's will in the beginning and not so now. Their cruelty to their wives forced Moses to write it and here you are wallowing in it. So how did Jesus respond? He said, "I SAY UNTO YOU." Now, the Son of God lays down His law, stating that if you put your spouse away and you add another wife, you are an adulterer And, it doesn't matter whether you use the BOD or any secular system. You are still married to a wife and by adding another wife you commit adultery. I know you just don't want to hear it, because you are deceived in your sin. What I am saying is no man-made doctrine. This Scripture is as clear as a bell. You just refuse to take Christ's words to heart, which puts you at odds with Him, not me. God didn't literally have two brides. He was using a metaphor in His description. Have you ever heard of a metaphor before and know when one is being used?

The sin of divorce is not what Christ focuses on. The term he uses is adultery. Divorce doesn't itself produce adultery. It is just an action that people use because they think that it separates the marriage. Yet it doesn't, and Christ is clear on that. We see this by the fact that the man who marries the divorced wife commits adultery with her. So if the marriage is not separated, then they are still a valid husband and wife, no different than a couple who hasn't initiated a divorce. So, adultery applies to both who adds a wife by "marrying another," which is "adding another (wife)."

Because the spirit of Jezebel is not just about the rebellion of women it is also about the abdication of authority to women. Women will live and die to realize the desire for their husband.