Видео

hay po

The PCF is good to glance at to refer to what a functional silo should be covering, but it fails to communicate what bpm is all about = working cross functionally and there are no other resources APQC have (unless you are a member) that accounts for cross functional work

It is called the PROCESS classification framework, not the Capability or Data classification framework, with respect to Moritz.

Some really really great questions from the host, simple, honest and practical. I studied a lot of APQC material at the start of the year, still I find the content and the PCF itself hard to engage with and I personally couldn’t transition the theory into action. The PCF levels are not actually logically hierarchical, they are just logically grouped, meaning you could take out a Process Group from Category 1.0 and file it under Category 2.0 under the process you end up making and so on. Seeing how the PCF can be used to create End to End processes (the how) would be a big help to understanding how the PCF is actually used and how this translates inti physical tangible action, but the E2E content is behind an expensive membership paywall, you can’t even view one for a taste.

I can't think of anything that could go wrong

Sure let's beg for less control over our lives, thats amazing

Had to look up SIPOC ;)

I'm with team EPC. I'm not a professional process mapper but recently had an experience with a professional process mapper who used BPMN and we ended up getting hung up on roles (e.g. receiver of the task or doer of the task etc)...it's a bit hard to explain and this was because we had the swimlanes and struggled because events can be described within the context of the doer. I can see why the IT community would prefer BPMN but for someone who uses PM for role clarity, conflict resolution, business analysis I think the EPC approach works much better.

Super informative video coming from two people with great industry knowledge. Thanks for the content, +1 new subscriber and will watch your back catalogue.

"Six Sigma Champions are con men" “All you have is smoke and mirrors” - Creator of Six Sigma, Mikel Harry 91 % of Six Sigma companies have trailed the S&P 500 (Qualpro survey). An 8 yr study at Ford showed an average of 1 in 5 parts defective AFTER improvement for “successful” Six Sigma projects. Six Sigma is a destructive scam based on pure farce. It started with Mr Bill Smith and his out-of-control molding process that happened to drift “as much as 1.5 sigma”. Smith buddy, con man Harry, “proved” Smith disaster happened for every process ... based on the height of a stack of discs! Most folk never bothered to check. “Neutron” Jack Welch at GE described Harry as a “madman” and said no one had any clue what he was talking about. Jack handed over $1B anyway. A scam was born! GE has now thrown the Six Sigma trash out. EVERY aspect of Six Sigma is worthless, from its normalization nonsense, to its irrelevant enumerative methods, to its paralytic DMAIC. Dr Wheeler, the world’s leading process statistician, calls Six Sigma “GOOFY” and the stuff of “the tooth fairy”.. CBS calls it the most stupid fad of all time. There is never justification to stray from the giants of Quality Dr Shewhart, Professor Ishikawa, Professor Lewis, Professor Deming, Dr Taguchi and Dr Wheeler, for the lunacy of Six Sigma’s con man. How the Six Sigma fraud was started: ruclips.net/video/0kZbJLHK_4M/видео.html Lean was tacked on to prolong the Six Sigma Scam. 98% of LSS implementations FAIL (IW survey)

𝓅𝓇𝑜𝓂𝑜𝓈𝓂

Thanks for the break down J-M and Roland, this is interesting. I have to say, I'm team Roland with BPMN. I'm new to the industry but it just seems to make more sense, especially when it comes to very complex models, as it can all stay nice and tidy.. I'm going to throw loads of questions at you both i hope you dont mind... Do you find that EPC will always come before BPMN, given it is focusing on executive level broader organisation topics, then you would utilise BPMN to understand specific processes within? Can you link/relate EPC diagrams and BPMN diagrams together, if circumstance calls for both being needed - Using VIsio or Lucid or Miro? I totally appreciate the point of keeping it simple for the client, especially as they dont know the difference between events, elements, sub processes etc... OR even really care how the sausage is made, they just want the outcomes delivered. BUT i really don't want to have to make a simple version on MS Powerpoint or miro etc..) So what would you do? Thanks a bunch guys, i will be making my way through your content, catch you later.