Видео

Time will tell. But even on the surface the flavors thing doesn't relate to any other aspect of physics. That raises my concern when anything is explained to fit.

@@TomHendricksMusea we have evidence that neutrinos change. That means either they are not going at the speed of light (and not massless), or that most of 20 century physics is wrong, or that the substantial evidence or interpretation of flavor-change is wrong.

@@ChadMILLER0 The rest of my ideas challenge a lot of currently accepted ideas Summary Here are the key components of all my physics posts. Photons are eternal and outside of time and distance. The singularity of photons began the Big Bang. Photons created mass through pair conversion of electron positron pairs in the Big Bang. These electrons and positrons made the elementary particles which in turn made the atoms. Protons, for the most part could only be created in the immediate era after the Big Bang. Neutrons may be unstable protons. The proton neutron bond in the nucleus, kept neutrons from decay and was key to building all elements. Neutrons and hydrogen atoms may be the same thing, but with different electron placements. The key to atoms stability may be the deuterium nucleus or deuteron that help binds one proton to one neutron. The missing anti matter is in protons and neutrons. Photons, electrons, and positrons, may be different versions of the same thing. Virtual particles may be a key part of quantum leaps. Virtual particles may power beta plus decay. Neutrinos may be a type of tiny photons: massless bosons that go the speed of light. The mass of the universe comes from photons converting to electron positron pairs in pair conversion. The energy of the universe comes from electrons and positrons annihilating and converting to photons. The universe is 5% charged matter and 95% neutral force. Dark matter is not gravity from invisible baryons pulling, but antigravity pushing from empty space. Dark matter and Dark Energy are both anti gravity pushing from empty space. The cosmological redshift supports this. The force from the Big Bang singularity was photons / dark energy / dark matter /anti gravity . They are the same. The force caused by acceleration is anti gravity, not gravity. Time has speed limits up to the speed of light. 95% of the universe seems to be without charge, detectable matter, or gravity: dark energy plus dark matter. The universe is open ended and will continue to expand.

Thank you Susanne!

Thank you Dolopo!

Thank you Steve! 🎼🎸📼🎹🎟🎙🎤🎶📻📷

Thank you Jim!

Thank you Dolapo !🎶🎼🎺🎧🎤📻🎻🎙🎸

Quarks - do they REALLY. Exist ? These problems remain Suggestion that quarks were not discovered but instead invented to solve the magnetic properties of protons and neutrons. These properties can be solved in other ways. How can such a small electron match the charge of a massive proton? Explain. There is the proton radius puzzle. Explain. Quarks exist in pairs; so why does the proton and neutron have 3 quarks? Neutrons are made up of quarks which do have charges. So physicists expect neutrons to interact with the electric field - but they don't! Explain. This article, Inside the Proton, But the quark model is an oversimplification that has serious shortcomings. "It fails, for instance, when it comes to a proton’s spin, a quantum property analogous to angular momentum. The proton has half a unit of spin, as do each of its up and down quarks. Physicists initially supposed that - in a calculation echoing the simple charge arithmetic - the half-units of the two up quarks minus that of the down quark must equal half a unit for the proton as a whole. But in 1988, the European Muon Collaboration reported that the quark spins add up to far less than one-half. Similarly, the masses of two up quarks and one down quark only comprise about 1% of the proton’s total mass. These deficits drove home a point physicists were already coming to appreciate: The proton is much more than three quarks." Quarks don't fit the recent discoveries of the electrical properties of a neutron. Fact Electric charge is not uniformly distributed inside neutron. Close to the center you find positive charge. Explain. Using precise data recently gathered at three different laboratories and some new theoretical tools, Gerald A. Miller, a UW physics professor, has found that the neutron has a negative charge both in its inner core and its outer edge, with a positive charge sandwiched in between to make the particle electrically neutral. Anti neutron and anti proton have anti quarks? Explain For a quark to be both a wave (and a particle), then it too must have at least a crest and a trough. So three quarks must have 3 waves. Explain Fact Neutron has no electric charge. Neutron has magnetic movement. (So charge inside neutron acts like a small magnet) Explain. Neutrons are radioactive if they are free of atoms If extra neutrons are added to shell it becomes extremely radioactive. Explain Strong force needed to keep protons from flying apart, but strong force is also applied to the neutron that has no charge. Explain "The proton is intermittently full of these virtual particles and, in fact when we try to estimate how much they might contribute to the mass of the proton, we find that the quarks themselves provide very little of the total mass and that the fields created by these particles contribute most of the energy that goes into the proton's rest energy and hence it's rest mass. The same is true for the neutron...." A universe from Nothing Krauss. Quote in Probable Universe p 48. EXPLAIN 'No one has been able to do with a quark what Thomson and Millikan did with an electron, measuring it's charges, or mass, or even it's charge to mass ratio. For this reason, we cannot yet include quarks among the ranks of the observed particles. "From neutrinos to the top quark there are 14 orders of magnitude of mass that the standard model needs to explain. This is hard to do even with the HIgg's Boson which is the missing ingredient. - Joanna Baler Why don't the opposite charge quarks annihilate each other within the proton and neutron? The elementary quark and gluon particles involved in a high energy collision are not directly observable. The interaction produces jets of newly created hadrons that are observable. Because of the extremely high energies involved, quark-antiquark pairs are produced by pair production QUARKS DO NOT MAKE SENSE - or the 3rd quark is REALLY weird. Proton = 2 up , 1 down quarks. Neutron = 2 down, 1 up quarks. So the difference between the two is the 3rd quark. Both the proton and neutron, have one up and one down quark. That leaves the difference between the proton and neutron as the 3rd quark. So difference between a proton and neutron is due to whether the 3rd quark is up as in a proton, or down as in a neutron. So, if that's true then: The third quark determines these things: If it has an up quark - proton, then the particle is immortal. If it has a down quark - neutron, then the particle decays in 10 minutes. EXPLAIN If it has an up quark - a proton, then the particle has less mass then the neutron. If it has a down quark - a neutron, then the particle has .1% more mass than the proton. So the down quark weighs .1% more than the up quark. EXPLAIN Quarks have no measurable physical extension, and seem to exist at points. Yet that single point does all this and more. EXPLAIN The proton has an up quark, and that magic third quark also determines half of the electromagnetic force in the universe. And it in no way is like the electron, the other half, except in being an opposite charge. EXPLAIN The electron is one full charge. That magic third quark is 2/3+ charge, yet it determines half the charge of the universe. EXPLAIN. The up and down quarks combined for a proton or neutron, account for 1% of the mass - the rest is binding energy. That means that that third quark is by itself less than 1% of mass, yet still determines half the charge of the universe? EXPLAIN Quote, In addition to the 9 percent of the proton's mass that comes from quarks' heft, 32 percent comes from the energy of the quarks zipping around inside the proton, Liu and colleagues found. (That's because energy and mass are two sides of the same coin, thanks to Einstein's famous equation, E=mc2.)Nov 26, 2018 When three quarks team up only a small part of the proton's mass comes from the masses of the quarks. Most is binding energy. So that third quark has virtually no mass but can do all these magic things. EXPLAIN.

Thank you! Consider this new studyUsing precise data recently gathered at three different laboratories and some new theoretical tools, Gerald A. Miller, a UW physics professor, has found that the neutron has a negative charge both in its inner core and its outer edge, with a positive charge sandwiched in between to make the particle electrically neutral.www.washington.edu/news/2007/09/17/research-overturns-accepted-notion-of-neutrons-electrical-properties/

Fair question, I think it's made up by binding energy. Remember the same problem occurs with the quarks idea. Quote, The up and down quarks combined for a proton or neutron, account for 1% of the mass - the rest is binding energy. Here's more problems with quarks. Compare the two. Quarks - do they REALLY. Exist ? These problems remain Suggestion that quarks were not discovered but instead invented to solve the magnetic properties of protons and neutrons. These properties can be solved in other ways. How can such a small electron match the charge of a massive proton? Explain. There is the proton radius puzzle. Explain. Quarks exist in pairs; so why does the proton and neutron have 3 quarks? Neutrons are made up of quarks which do have charges. So physicists expect neutrons to interact with the electric field - but they don't! Explain. Quarks don't fit the recent discoveries of the electrical properties of a neutron. Fact Electric charge is not uniformly distributed inside neutron. Close to the center you find positive charge. Explain. Anti neutron and anti proton have anti quarks? Explain For a quark to be both a wave (and a particle), then it too must have at least a crest and a trough. So three quarks must have 3 waves. Explain Fact Neutron has no electric charge. Neutron has magnetic movement. (So charge inside neutron acts like a small magnet) Explain. Neutrons are radioactive if they are free of atoms If extra neutrons are added to shell it becomes extremely radioactive. Explain Strong force needed to keep protons from flying apart, but strong force is also applied to the neutron that has no charge. Explain "The proton is intermittently full of these virtual particles and, in fact when we try to estimate how much they might contribute to the mass of the proton, we find that the quarks themselves provide very little of the total mass and that the fields created by these particles contribute most of the energy that goes into the proton's rest energy and hence it's rest mass. The same is true for the neutron...." A universe from Nothing Krauss. Quote in Probable Universe p 48. EXPLAIN 'No one has been able to do with a quark what Thomson and Millikan did with an electron, measuring it's charges, or mass, or even it's charge to mass ratio. For this reason, we cannot yet include quarks among the ranks of the observed particles. "From neutrinos to the top quark there are 14 orders of magnitude of mass that the standard model needs to explain. This is hard to do even with the HIgg's Boson which is the missing ingredient. - Joanna Baler Why don't the opposite charge quarks annihilate each other within the proton and neutron? The elementary quark and gluon particles involved in a high energy collision are not directly observable. The interaction produces jets of newly created hadrons that are observable. Because of the extremely high energies involved, quark-antiquark pairs are produced by pair production QUARKS DO NOT MAKE SENSE - or the 3rd quark is REALLY weird. Proton = 2 up , 1 down quarks. Neutron = 2 down, 1 up quarks. So the difference between the two is the 3rd quark. Both the proton and neutron, have one up and one down quark. That leaves the difference between the proton and neutron as the 3rd quark. So difference between a proton and neutron is due to whether the 3rd quark is up as in a proton, or down as in a neutron. So, if that's true then: The third quark determines these things: If it has an up quark - proton, then the particle is immortal. If it has a down quark - neutron, then the particle decays in 10 minutes. EXPLAIN If it has an up quark - a proton, then the particle has less mass then the neutron. If it has a down quark - a neutron, then the particle has .1% more mass than the proton. So the down quark weighs .1% more than the up quark. EXPLAIN Quarks have no measurable physical extension, and seem to exist at points. Yet that single point does all this and more. EXPLAIN The proton has an up quark, and that magic third quark also determines half of the electromagnetic force in the universe. And it in no way is like the electron, the other half, except in being an opposite charge. EXPLAIN The electron is one full charge. That magic third quark is 2/3+ charge, yet it determines half the charge of the universe. EXPLAIN. The up and down quarks combined for a proton or neutron, account for 1% of the mass - the rest is binding energy. That means that that third quark is by itself less than 1% of mass, yet still determines half the charge of the universe? EXPLAIN When three quarks team up only a small part of the proton's mass comes from the masses of the quarks. Most is binding energy. So that third quark has virtually no mass but can do all these magic things. EXPLAIN. Quarks interact strongly and link in twos or threes to make particles such as pions, protons, and neutrons. Yet the other half of the charge world, electrons, does none of these things. EXPLAIN Physics is a science of pairs. For every particle there is an anti-particle. Virtual particles come in pairs. Spin, waves destructive and constructive interference, etc. In these cases the pairs are virtually identical and or mirror images of each other. So why would electromagnetic charge have electrons and protons so different from each other, and in no way seem built on exact opposites, or mirror image opposites. EXPLAIN! There is the proton spin crisis where the 3 quarks and their spin doesn't work. "Physicists expected that the quarks carry all the proton spin. However, not only was the total proton spin carried by quarks far smaller than 100%, these results were consistent with almost zero (4-24%) proton spin being carried by quarks." Wiki. EXPLAIN. PARTICLE / WAVE duality includes atoms, electrons, protons, neutrons, quarks and gluons. Now imagine a nucleus of deuterium that has no particles only waves: that includes a proton wave, neutron wave, 6 quark waves, plus gluon waves. EXPLAIN Two quark meson are bosons not fermions. EXPLAIN Mesons, with 2 quarks are 1.2 times the size of a proton or neutron. EXPLAIN. NEITHER electrons or protons can decay, so both should be elementary particles, but protons are not considered elementary. EXPLAIN Neutrons are radioactive if they are free of atoms If extra neutrons are added to shell it becomes extremely radioactive. Explain.

@@TomHendricksMusea You've earned my subscription. You've written too much, here, for me to read tonight. I'll just say this in response to Pine_Wood: There is actual mass and there is apparent mass. From the Universe's perspective, they are the same. The inner electrons going around the nucleus of a uranium atom have much more mass (apparent mass) than they would going around the nucleus of a hydrogen atom because they must orbit(al) around a uranium atom closer to the speed of light to avoid electron capture. Just imagine how fast they could be spinning around each other if they (or positrons) are the fundamental particles that make a proton or neutron. We already know that, if an electron is squozen (yes, I call it squozen) into a proton, then the proton turns into a neutron. This happens all the time with electron capture in elements, like thorium, causing the element to move down the periodic table by one group. An electron combines with a proton to form a neutron, turning thorium into actinium. I like the idea that positrons are what give protons their positive charge, and it is an elegant explanation to the question, where are all the positrons? Your diagrams also explain why neutrons are only slightly more massive than protons.

@@peterwexler5737 Well said.

Thank you, I say quietly 😊

@@TomHendricksMusea ❤️

Thank you! Sadly no musician has much of a chance. I wrote this .. So WHY were there so many great hits THEN but no one can get one NOW? Aren't the new musicians just no good? NO HERE IS THE REASON !!!!! Then there were hundreds of music labels competing for best song - and they were competing against separately owned media, and radio stations. NOW the Big 3 Labels (google it) control not only the entire music industry but through their parent companies and their clout, all radio and media. No wonder the reviews are so great but the music is so bad! Join the peaceful music revolution against these 3 labels.

⁠@@TomHendricksMuseawow! that is eye opening, i will join the revolution!!

@@nowhereman9103 Great!

Thank you for considering these new ideas!

Me too!!!