Видео

han våldtog honom så hårt :D

Bro dawkin have no clue about these terms

Shh

Sorry, you may have not noticed that a) science doesn't deal with supernatural explanations, b) there are interactions between atoms and particles which aren't "guided" (just a few rules need to be followed). Your statement about what _all scientific evidence_ shows is just wishful thinking.

@@MaGaO You dumb retard... "Rules are to be followed" you say...yet the atoms that "follow rules" don't posses the capacity to understand rules, let alone follow them... So they are guided... This is such an overly obvious fact, that you really have to be one deaf, dumb and blind little arrogant prick to not accept this... Stop raping the word science, this is ignorance in its purest form.

Your text is full of logical errors and fallacies that show your lack of understanding of science and atheism. Let me point out some of them: - You claim that science proves that material beings are directed by an immaterial being, but you do not provide any scientific evidence for this claim. Science does not deal with immaterial beings, nor does it prove or disprove anything. Science is a method of testing hypotheses based on empirical observations and experiments. You are making a **category mistake** by confusing science with metaphysics. - You present a **false dilemma** by saying that either material beings are directed by an immaterial being, or they are directed by nature. This is a false dichotomy, because there are other possible explanations for the movement of atoms and particles, such as quantum mechanics, chaos theory, or emergent phenomena. You are ignoring the complexity and diversity of the natural world, and oversimplifying it to fit your preconceived notions. - You also create a **straw man** by misrepresenting the position of atheists. Atheists do not necessarily call the immaterial being nature, nor do they endow nature with the capacities of God. Atheists simply lack a belief in any gods or deities, and may have different views on what nature is and how it works. Some atheists may be naturalists, who believe that everything can be explained by natural laws and causes. Others may be agnostics, who do not claim to know whether there is an immaterial being or not. You are attacking a caricature of atheism, not the actual position of atheists. - You use **emotional language** and **ad hominem** attacks to disparage atheists, calling them pathetic, blind, and wrong-doers. This is irrelevant to the validity of their arguments, and only serves to incite hostility and prejudice. You are not engaging in a rational dialogue, but in a hateful rant. You are also contradicting yourself, because you praise God for creating eternal hell for atheists, while at the same time accusing them of destroying humanity. How can you claim to be humane, when you wish eternal suffering on others?

​@@NurSa3id Please don't project your mental issues on me. There is no need for a particle to decide to follow some rules. It just does. I'm somewhat sorry you get so butthurt by reality but it's your fault for not understanding it or science. Then again, that may explain why you cling to the idea of a _guide_ doing everything.

It doesn't

@@razagamerofficial1859 you typed that comment thanks to science

@@Simon.15 literally Richard Dawkins and his followers live in fools paradise they have zero understanding of science and specially their philosophical position it doesn't work this is core principal of science it is indeductive method we can derive theory to explain data doesn't mean it's true or it work it doesn't give us absolute truth it is only dawkin who say it work bitches I have no problem with science but when you say it is omnipotent or it support atheism that is bullshit

Devil bless you

Well of course he did, they fucking crucified him!

almost works as a joke except childless insinuates human.

@@deanfowles3707: The insinuation was the joke. It actually happened in Norway and our language is slightly different, but the child-parent relationship applies just as much to dogs as it does to any other tree.

@@jeschinstad ah fair enough

Take that nonsense elsewhere.

@@Severin69 Please watch. ruclips.net/video/A0iDNLxmWVM/видео.html God bless:)

But just like Christ's teaching about false prophets science has its share of false prophets as well. As far as I can tell Dr. Dawkins teaches the truth as best as he understands it about evolution and other scientific concepts. False prophets of science include people who deliberately teach false teachings about science for money and power and people who endlessly get grants to pretend to try and cure a disease or something and never get anywhere. "Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth" as Paul would say. Truth is God in science and anyone who adheres to scientific dogma over revealed truth (up to date scientific evidence) is guilty of heresy and should be excommunicated from science, cut their funding cancel their career. P.S. the church no longer burns people at the stake for scientific discovery, False priests of science (heretics) have filled their niche by hindering innovation.

Not great, just a loser. We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. God is the reason for us and all we have. ruclips.net/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/видео.html The odds are NOT there. ruclips.net/video/W1_KEVaCyaA/видео.html ruclips.net/video/yW9gawzZLsk/видео.html

Most hypocritical. We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. God is the reason for us and all we have. ruclips.net/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/видео.html The odds are NOT there. ruclips.net/video/W1_KEVaCyaA/видео.html ruclips.net/video/yW9gawzZLsk/видео.html

You're a loser that also hates truth. We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. God is the reason for us and all we have. ruclips.net/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/видео.html The odds are NOT there. ruclips.net/video/W1_KEVaCyaA/видео.html ruclips.net/video/yW9gawzZLsk/видео.html

John 7:7 King James Version 7 The world cannot hate you; but me it hateth, because I testify of it, that the works thereof are evil. Hebrews 11:6 King James Version 6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him. John 1 King James Version 1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. God loves you so much that He sent His only begotten Son to die on the cross to pay for your sins. If you believe and put your trust in Jesus Christ, that He died on the cross to pay your sin debt and that He rose again on the third day, you will be saved. once you are saved, you will not die in your sins and be damned to hell for eternity. God will remove your sins and your soul will be washed clean with the blood that Jesus Christ shed for us on the cross. your own good works will not get you into heaven. Jesus Christ did all of the work for you, all you have to do is believe and put your trust in Him and He will save you. Ephesians 1:13 King James Version 13 In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,. Jesus Christ is coming back very soon and we all have to be ready. I pray in Jesus Christ's mighty name that you be saved.God bless:)

You and Richard are losers. We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. God is the reason for us and all we have. ruclips.net/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/видео.html The odds are NOT there. ruclips.net/video/W1_KEVaCyaA/видео.html ruclips.net/video/yW9gawzZLsk/видео.html

@@2fast2block : I don't care if Dawkins is a loser, but why am I a loser? I said Universe came from a Supernatural God - The Queen of All Heavens, Aliens and UFOs who installed the software called intelligence and gave us some basic books to start the journey, until we return to the stars.

@@imsaptarshi "but why am I a loser? I said Universe came from a Supernatural God -" You previously, "Not because I agree with all of his views, but the way he speaks, smiles, display fangs after calling all believers "bitches". It's like enticing spells of Harry Potter." You sure seem to favor him there. "Fundamentalists, people of blind faith with rigid definition of theological concepts who need renaissance that all other major theologies went through on this planet in humans to apes, monkeys, gorillas, ants, lambs, goats, cows and all other social animals, can call it Satanic or Devil's voice etc. Again, you sure seem like you back him up. People who believe God go by evidence, NO by blind faith. "In the 4 Indic theologies, there is no place of a rival of the all powerful God(dess). If there is an antagonist of the Almighty, surely S(He) is not all powerful. Existence of an antagonist is just an illusion (maya) created by the Almighty to distract people of shallow faith." That could go....however. "The Queen of All Heavens, Aliens and UFOs who installed the software called intelligence and gave us some basic books to start the journey, until we return to the stars." Now that sounds like an "indic" Indian god(s). There are false gods and that's one(s) you chose.

@@2fast2block : I am not bound to answer you what I choose and why. Who decides what is true and false, mere votes? That's basically majoritarian politics? I said I like Dawkins' style of talking. I never said I support his views. Read my other comments in the same thread where I criticized him for unnecessarily abusing believers - does not matter which faith and which social group.

@@imsaptarshi you before...."but why am I a loser? I said Universe came from a Supernatural God -" I showed you did not do that so... " I am not bound to answer you what I choose and why." Yep, you can be a lying loser. "Who decides what is true and false, mere votes? That's basically majoritarian politics?" As I showed, I gave evidence called science. Here I give evidence how you can't back up even what you say. "If he ever appeared as a candidate in national/international elections, surely I would have voted for him. Not because I agree with all of his views, but the way he speaks, smiles, display fangs after calling all believers "bitches"." Wow, you'd vote for him for those lame reasons. You think that lying joke would have got the approval of God for you to do so. You sure live a double standard.

It works and you losers don't follow what works. We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. God is the reason for us and all we have. ruclips.net/video/JiMqzN_YSXU/видео.html The odds are NOT there. ruclips.net/video/W1_KEVaCyaA/видео.html ruclips.net/video/yW9gawzZLsk/видео.html