Видео

my goal was to beat Stockfish 14 level 7 and I already have a draw. I beat six. it’s definitely possible, although it’s weird that nobody cares

it’s called chess with jokes because the chess isn’t the joke. it’s 100% real and I have dozens of videos that show my screen and mouse, but if you don’t believe it I agree to all demands to further prove I’m not cheating

@chesswithjokes it's just a little strange. Your analysis and understanding of the positions as explicated by your commentary is very basic, shallow, something id expect out of a beginner chess player with limited positional understanding. It seems like you dont understand the moves youre playing, and youre taking an awfully long (and consistent) time with all of them. Just doesnt add up. Wanna prove you know what youre doing then play me in bullet chess

I technically cheated by looking at engine analysis during games I lost in 2018. It's very well documented and for two years the majority of my audience literally works for Chesscom or lichess, so naturally I speak with the assumption that my audience knows I don't cheat and I got totally shafted by a system that has no mechanism for fixing errors. 1. Chesscom bans people. 2. If those people aren't professionals, there is no process to fix it. 3 If the people become elite players, it looks really bad for Chesscom and is essentially like they gaslit the effective victim. That's me, the victim. The BIGGEST victim. I've never been banned for cheating, I'm shadow banned for playing high accuracy games as a non-professional. I live streamed the process beginning to end, it took less than an hour

So you think I am a 1200 with 10 wins against professionals including an international master? It's on my lichess public profile. Is that your stance? It doesn't sound logical or thought out or even possible in any sense, but I don't understand what you're implying I guess

@chesswithjokes having rare wins againt titled players in blitz is cool but it means nothing for your skill, you are clearly around 1200 strength from the games in this video because you played pretty poorly, what rating do you think you are because im 2100 and i would be down to play some games against you

When you’re ready to accept I’m not cheating my videos will still be here. So many people are confused about what the joke is. There is no joke. I’ll be otb irl in about a month- again (so i obviously know I’m not 1200. Bro.)

they detect high accuracy games as an anti-cheat measure and I get auto banned within 10 games. there’s a video under the live tab showing the whole thing in real time

@@chesswithjokes I have high accuracy games pretty often. I have never been banned? I also imagine you don't get that many high accuracies as a 1200

​@@Bapple34its super easy to have a high accuracy game at any level, if you just dont blunder and your opponent makes a decent mistake early mid game you can sometimes easily consolidate into a highly accurate game

@@Bapple34 I am one of the most accurate players in the world, objectively speaking, statistically speaking. I mean as in only professionals have statistics that resemble mine (85% accuracy 35 ACL). It might be that playing robots causes the accuracy, it's not 100% "I'm basically pro"

I want to be a chess content creator who plays tournaments, not a world champion who occasionally streams. I’m pretty vocal about that

During games. That's what I've been banned for. 7 years for doing as far as I know and it's what Kramnik accused Naroditsky of doing

It's the highest level of stockfish 14 fairy beaten in a 3 minute game. But you can call it anything you'd like!

Nope that’s Stockfish fairy 12, this is 14 and it’s a 3 minute game not from a position as in that game. since he’s not been playing often right now I’m probably slightly stronger than schrantz but I’m a fan of his! edit to add you can see how much stronger 14 is because in that video Stockfish blunders a piece, there are no blunders and only one mistake in this game but again big shout out to vampire chicken who walked so I could swim

@ well, good. 👍

"According to current chess knowledge, virtually no one has ever beaten Stockfish at level 6; even experienced chess players would find it extremely difficult to win against a chess engine at this level, making it nearly impossible for anyone to consistently defeat Stockfish level 6, let alone a large number of people. "

@@LightFactory738 if only it were true..

in a 3 minute game and as stated in the video I looked extensively before making this claim and did not make the same claim when I beat Stockfish Level 6 in a 7 minute game. I was 50/50 then, I’m 95% sure now

I’m pretty sure Eric Rosen could do it but I don’t think he would have any obvious reason to do so as it would take him at least 50-100 hours

​@@chesswithjokes bro... in what reality you live in? when i was 1000 i beat it in 3 attempts... and eric rosen have beaten it multiple times on streams at the beginning of his career...

Please link and I’ll fix this! Thank you I can’t find anyone (Stockfish level 6, 3 minute game) but as far as I know I am the first. Andrew tang and Rosen played correspondence and 1 minute games I’ve never seen anyone playing 3

thanks for watching and commenting!

that's amazing, so you decided that you would learn chess against stockfish level 4? May I ask why you did that and why you decided to post this comment here rather than, for instance, the Eric Rosen video with hundreds of thousands of views?

@@chesswithjokes I just decided to try myself vs computer first. After loosing first games that entertainment became a chalenge to beat it. I don't think I am able to compete with people yet. I googled what this stockfish computer level is comparing to people rating and thats how I found your video. Few days ago I won one time vs lvl 5 with white, but cannot get even a draw with black.

some people don’t have the intuition to repeat 3 times (draw by repetition, I just naturally assumed it was a drawing mechanism) but you’re miles ahead of where I was 25 years ago and it only took me 50,000 games and thousands of hours of streaming and watching others play so don’t worry if it takes longer to beat level 7!

this is the nicest comment I've gotten in 2 years

For the hand camera- a small group of people have spent years online and offline trying to “prank” me with hilarious jokes like following me in public while recording me. So I’m over-providing evidence for fewer problems in the future

the fastest any human has ever beaten the Stockfish 14 bot levels 1 - 5 (beginner to master) in blitz chess

@ I mean that no one can beat the highest level of stock fish

@ it’s physically impossible and even Magnus Carlson only achieves about 98 percent accuracy

@@liamtornhagen9014 I'm not beating the highest level of stockfish, I'm beating 1 - 5 and have beaten 6 but not 7 or 8. And I'm not sure Magnus is much better than me against stockfish because I've been restricted to only playing bots for years. For proof I'm not cheating, refer to the 6 videos on my channel or demand I provide more evidence that I'm not cheating, I agree to anything you demand in advance because I'm not cheating nor have I ever been cheating, nor do lichess or Chesscom claim I cheated privately or publicly

I have one I need a usb a to usb c adapter or usb c dock which you can help me get by subscribing!

@chesswithjokes alright I gotcha back

@@AverageBishop- it has been done

I only delete comments that I think are ai

I’m accusing chesscom of using an algorithm to automatically restrict accounts that play even one extremely high accuracy game. my evidence is 17 consecutive wins on a new account followed by all 50 move bullet games against 1200s while I beat a Fide master on my public lichess account on possibly the same day (definitely within a week). so you tell me who’s making the outrageous claim. seems like you if you’re saying I am a 1200 who beats professionals

check out my chesscom main account despacho69 - I played a 2000 rated player 18 times in one night and won 12. I beat a 2700 rated player and have dozens of games against titled players. it’s up to everyone to decide for themselves if it makes sense that I’m hard stuck at 1200 and beat professional players on lichess a few hours later

Lichess restricts accounts and matches people against bots that are beatable on purpose to prevent "cheaters" from making new accounts. You can look on their forums or even post on there, they will tell you that this is 100% true. Since I've beaten their stockfish bot up through level 6 (estimated 2500 ELO I think) I do have quite a lot of experience through which I can compare and that footage is available in its entirety on this channel under the live tab

Can you link to the account? Sorry if I misunderstood and you’re trying to be abrasive, the tone suggests you are but all of the details are wrong or use semantics to shift the focus to suggest that the person who is wrongly banned is somehow in the wrong.

this would be the perfect ironic twist

thanks to people or bots like you, I’m finally getting help for my dunning Krueger disease. my last few streams have been a very vulnerable few hours and if my delusions have impacted you in any way may they provide some well deserved relief

ask your friends and family if your farts smells weird to them too

write a Shakespearean sonnet about the smell while shaving your head and learning a language while playing a Fide master in chess and then read 1,000 comments about how you are delusional for thinking you can smell a fart.

I have an open challenge to anyone in the world to beat me x10 for $1k. gl

Fun fact- if any modern browser-based engine you play on purpose or because of restrictions your opponent will often prolong mate as long as there is a sustained unstoppable mate threat. Tell chesscom to hire me!

That’s a great possible fact, but I don’t understand why that move Qh7 wasn’t played. It was a forced mate in 1. There was nothing you could do to stop it.

To put it in human terms it was trolling me. In coding, it’s 50% that it’s coded to troll especially at 70-80% strength like I’m getting on all new accounts- or new with the same IP. 50% it plays random moves that don’t lose (mainly or exclusively tabelebase)

I don’t understand this if it’s a joke but it’s also important for comprehension that I’m supposed to think my opponents are human. What is I’m this video IS chesscom anti-cheating. So, according to chesscom that was your average 1100 player taking a few seconds from their infinite time to troll as most 1100 players don’t require time to do. aI is too good

I think all constructive criticism is welcome and I’ll try to be more proactive with king moves as opposed to reactive. In my defense I have to play to some degree knowing what my opponents moves will be - a torch ai top 3 move - and I’m still trying to combat it with unorthodox tactics like I used to beat Stockfish level 6 (very aggressive uncompromising and very human)

mustachiola is my public account that is restricted and was seen by otb competitors

​@@chesswithjokeswhy did you turn off comments for rainbolt video ?

Because three people are paid to spam Rainbolt ads and pro-Rainbolt talking points. I’m not even sure Rainbolt isn’t AI his management is simply insane

@@chesswithjokeshow do you know this? Because to me, it seems you completely made it up

@@French_Fries9 canadagraphs. look him up. 1973 cg on reddit. Spends all day spamming rainbolt content. my reinbult video had 200 thumbs down before it had 100 views and my thread on reddit received 4,000 downvotes and was viewed 200 times