Видео

🙏

Hi thanks, in case of internal calibration lab how to demonstrate impartiality? Thanks

Thanks! This was very helpful!! I haven't have a chance to explore your channel! It would be very useful to share some records or forms in relation to this and other clauses of iso 17025 (for us, begginers). ❤ Our previous menager left from work (pension) and me and my colleague (only two years of experience in very VERY outdated system, kept from us at all costs) are left to deffend our lab from the almighty Accreditation Body. And when I say outdated I really really mean it 😅. Our laboratory was accredited in early 2000s and not much has changed... piles amog piles of records, SOPs, procedures was added throughout the years without any critical standpoint and now there is only 3 of us working in commercial analysis (and preparation of the documents and in science, 3 in 1 for one pay)... and we are just drowning. 😅 we have 130 records, 20 procedures, 40 SOPs and only 12 accredited methods. Help! Btw. Sorry for the rant, for whoever is reading this....

That was fast 😂

This training is very interesting for proficiency testing provider

Very good

Very Good Information

Thank you

Informative❤

Clause 8.9 does not require a meeting.

Thank you for sharing,

Thank you for sharing,

This is very important topic for us ASINAL laboratory - Bogota, COLOMBIA

I found it informative and enjoyable! The list of references is particularly appreciated.

31:57 it's insane how many scammy "consultants" exist in the cannabis industry. They are awful especially when lab owners dont understand sound scientific principles and trust the consultants over their own analysts!

26:22 no personal opinions, everything is based on the results conducted and following clearly defined methods and procedures. This is crucial.

Thank you, very informative webinar.

Dear Sir, Under "Good Practice for Internal Auditing" slide, you have mentioned the audit criteria as quality management system documents only and not the ISO/IEC 17025-2017 standard. Then the deficiencies of adequacy of quality system documentations with the ISO/IEC 17025-2017 standard can not be detected in internal audit. To my mind most of the deficiencies (NCs) has a root cause related to system documents, or in other way, it is found that the effective corrective action for NCs always leads to changes in system documents, for sustenance. Therefore, is taking system documentation as criteria, good practice enough compared to taking the audit criteria as ISO/IEC 17025-2017 standard and applicable policy and requirement documents of the accreditation agency. Besrt regard. Subhaiss Mallik, Assessor in ISO/IEC 17025-2017. Thanks in advance for your kind advice.

Love your presentations PJLA - the best I've seen so far!!!

How do you know when to stop asking 'Why'?

Hi, What is a method deviation? how the personel can identify method desviations?

What does type identification from clause 6.4.13 mean?

Реально классный канал

Отлично

😮

My main takeaway was that the process is difficult, and ultimately relies on the testing lab honestly&completely reporting&validating their errors and corrective actions. One super easy and free option you have for validating test labs is asking for a copy of their most recent Proficiency Test Results. These proficiency tests are blind (the lab doesn't know the answer while doing the analysis) and are mostly ran by reputable agencies. It might be a good idea for ISO accreditation agencies to build a prearranged "complaint handling fee" into their service agreements. Perhaps they do? At least then they get paid something for the time they're spending investigating complaints. The added cost would also encourage labs to do things right and make use of their internal complaint handling system so that complaints don't have to be elevated to their accreditation agency. A downside would be potential abuse of the complaint reporting system, but there are ways to tell if a complaint is legitimate (ask for data).

Exceptional webinar! PJLA is doing an awesome job. I really appreciate your efforts. Main concepts about bias, random and systematic effects are discussed in this webinar.

What would be the action plan for opportunities and how to make all these points in opportunities. Also is there any sop we need to made for this

Good stuff Thank you Sir

Greetings! I'm having difficulty in understanding the clause 7.10.1 b. I'm trying to set risk levels in the procedure but how can I set a criteria for those levels and the actions. I'm confused and stuck at this point. Need your response it.

Kindly help for uncertainty applied for pharmaceutical RnD

Hello, i have just started a job in a materials lab (concrete, aggregates, etc...). I was assigned to check a bunch of astm materials tests' uncertainty. Would you allow me to reach out by any social media contact info? I got questions about this stuff even though it's beyond my expertise!

Hi sir! please answer how do you ensure impartiality & confidentiality in case of in-house testing facility? at what point in an organizational structure the head can be same as that of production? Does the lab need a separate independent identity for accreditation?

I hate Iso

PJLA have online training ISO/IEC 17025:2017 or not ? I want to learn and download documents like this video.

Laboratory

I am new subscriber. I will follow you with ISO/IEC 17025.

Thank you very much.

Thank you for training online. Point 7.6 and 7.7 is very interesting for laboratory.

good video

Thanks for making this video,very informative

Great to hear long time ))))

Dear sir I not understand what you mean objective evidence that internal audit in 7/12/2021 not recorded ??? You mean that the lab not complete the all interval plan within the year ???

Great content 👍 ThX for the good work

Lab Services Standardization and Quality Management System

No

Laboratory

Good discussion breaking down rapid (PCR) vs traditional culture methods for product release.

Thank you for this informative session. Please i need help , i am looking to build/complete the 17020 : 2012 checklist for a small start up IT Services Consulting Firm and want to ask if you have any guide or extract on the list of documents to be generated internally. The checklist is too broad and may not directly apply to my industry, making it hard to figure which requirements are mandatory or which could be grouped together and fulfilled by one document. Thank you.

one of the best webinars on measurement uncertainty and validity of results