Видео

Dropping gems on the real

Thanks for the analysis! I need some advice: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). Could you explain how to move them to Binance?

Climate change has made me hopeless, so there's that. I'm just glad I'm old.

I am pleasantly surprised by this video because I wasn’t expecting so much truth from a Yale university conversation.

This talk is so important. Thank you.

They are still in the process of painting the roofs white. :)

This doctor thinks people are warm-blooded animals

Thanks for this

evil nonsense

evil nonsense

It's marine cloud brightening. You said marine cloud bleaching. Also 19:26 David Keith has spoken about that and apparently that is not true. The sky would appear hasier but would not look hugely different than now.. Apparently

Bridge to this: Globally the ACE index (accumulated cyclone energy) 1980-2021 shows no increasing trend. Global Hurricane Landfalls 1970-2021 (updated from Weinkle et al, 2012) shows no trend. Satellite data since 1980 shows a slight downward global trend for total hurricaine numbers with 2021 being a record low year. The IPCC reports in AR6, chapter 11, "The total global frequency of TC [tropical cyclone] formation will decrease or remain unchanged with increasing global warming (medium confidence)." Not that I really care about what the IPCC says. Multidecadal variability in Atlantic hurricaines is most probably related to the AMO (Vecchi et al, 2021). NOAA data 1851-2021 shows no trend in number of hurricaine landfalls with the record high being 1886. What the data from NOAA SPC shows about tornados: EF1-EF5 (1954-2022) no trend; EF3-EF5 (most destructive) (1954-2022) 50% decline. No EF5s in US since 2013 (a record absence). The Global Land Precipitation Anomaly from AR5 will disappoint with deviations from the average increasing by 0.2% per decade, but if you look at the actual data, it's just very variable over the decades. Drought appears to be decreasing globally (Watts et al, 2018) measured by SPI 1901-2017. For every million people on earth, annual deaths from climate-related causes (extreme temperature, drought, flood, storms, wildfires) declined 98%--from an average of 247 per year during the 1920s to 2.5 in per year during the 2010s. Data on disaster deaths come from (EM-DAT, CRED / UCLouvain, Brussels,Belgium. ) Globally 2000-2019 there was a large decrease in cold-related deaths and a moderate increase in heat-related deaths (Zhao, 2021, Lancet). However, coldwaves are over 9 times more likely to kill than heatwaves, so the overall result is very beneficial. What else? Oh, deserts like the Sahara have shrunk considerably and the Earth has greened by 15% or more in a human lifetime (NASA). On extinction the rate is very low: 900 known lost species for 2.1 million known species in 500 years. At that frequency it will take over 930,000 years to reach 80% extinction of species experienced at the K-T boundary that saw the extinction of the dinosaurs. There is no climate crisis.

CORRUPT policeman

I'm not a statistician but I don't really see a strong correlation between the amount of rainfall and the number of Dengue cases. Look at the massive number of cases in 2020, yet it was the year with the least amount of rainfall. I don't think this was because the lockdown halted vector control measures. The more obvious reason for this is that more people with fever were keen on going to get tested because they were fearful that they had gotten covid. And when it was realized that they didn't have covid, their doctors probably recommended they get a dengue test. So covid vigilance may have inadvertently led to more people being tested for dengue. The real lesson to be learned from the 2020 figure is that there are normally hundreds of undocumented cases of dengue every year in Grenada and most cases are probably relatively mild - maybe even asymptomatic - and so very few people actually go to get tested. To further bolster my point about how dengue is a lot more widespread in the population than is realized, consider how quickly Chikungunya spread through Grenada infecting a very large proportion of the population within a relatively short period of time. This is a mosquito borne disease just like dengue, so how is it we don't see dengue spreaking throughout the country just as Chikingunya did? Maybe it actually does, but we don't see it because most cases are very mild and people don't go to get tested, and hence most cases go undocumented. A large amount of mild to asymptomactic cases could also be occurring due to there being an already high level of immunity to dengue within the population given that it is now endemic here. So I wouldn't put much stock in the reported cases, they don't give an accurate picture of the true prevalence of the disease from year to year. it's only capturing the severe cases. I think there will be more cases of dengue in the rainy season than the dry season. But I don't think the amount of rainfall from year to year will really determine the amount of cases in a direct and consistent way. In other words the pattern only holds in a binary when comparing the dry season to the rainy season. But I don't think it holds up in an analogue way when comparing rainfall amounts between rainy seasons of different years. It only matters that there is rain but it doesn't matter that much how much rain falls in one year vs another. I would even suggest to you that there may be more cases in a year with a particularly dry dry season but an average rainy season. Why? Because during very dry dry seasons more persons store water so there is much more stagnant water island wide for mosquitoes to breed.

Fact 1: Remove the Earth’s atmosphere or even just the GreenHouse Gases and the Earth becomes much like the Moon, no water vapor or clouds, no ice or snow, no oceans, no vegetation, no 30% albedo becoming a barren rock ball, hot^3 (400 K) on the lit side, cold^3 (100 K) on the dark. At our distance from the Sun space is hot (394 K) not cold (5 K). That’s NOT what the Radiative GreenHouse Effect theory says. EVIDENCE: RGHE theory “288 K w - 255 K w/o = a 33 C colder ice ball Earth” 255 K assumes w/o keeps 30% albedo, an assumption akin to criminal fraud. Nikolov “Airless Celestial Bodies” Kramm “Moon as test bed for Earth” UCLA Diviner lunar mission data Int’l Space Station HVAC design for lit side of 250 F. (ISS web site) Astronaut backpack life support w/ AC and cool water tubing underwear. (Space Discovery Center) Fact 2: The GHGs require “extra” energy upwelling from a surface radiating as a black body. EVIDENCE: According to the K-T atmospheric power flux balance, numerous clones and SURFRAD the GHGs must absorb an “extra” 396/333/63 W/m^2 LWIR energy upwelling from the surface allegedly radiating as a black body. These graphics contain egregious arithmetic and thermodynamic errors. See ruclips.net/video/0Jijw7-YG-U/видео.html Fact 3: Because of the significant non-radiative, i.e. kinetic, heat transfer processes of the contiguous participating atmospheric molecules the surface cannot upwell “extra” energy as a black body. EVIDENCE: As demonstrated by experiment, the gold standard of classical science. For the experimental write up see: principia-scientific.org/debunking-the-greenhouse-gas-theory-with-a-boiling-water-pot/ CONCLUSION: No RGHE, no GHG warming, no CAGW or mankind/CO2 driven climate change.

Does seem we're basically in the same place now as we was 10 years ago regarding geoengineering, zero progress has been made. I doubt it'll be used, the elites will save themselves and screw everyone else, that's how I see this going

😕 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘮