Видео

Nerds

We need the rest of the video! 😊

Cant be more wrong

Yeah, I got 7 mins of you fixing your mic and nothing else

I think I lost some brain cells listening to Nathan. 😂😂😂

I’m gen z and yes, the slangs are fucking dumb and we have gone down shits creek. I’m thinking about hooking up with millennials

Poor little snow flakes. They have a hard road ahead.

Christian mental gymnastics per usual lol

RUclips been recomending me small channels...Well good podcast dudes

God have mercy on we who pridefully place ourselves in your full realm of understanding. Forgive us sinners.

Amish tranny says what?!

What a clown take

I DO BELIEVE, BIBLICALLY SPEAKING, YOU DON'T KNOW YOUR ASS FROM A HOLE IN THE GROUND! LOOK AT THE GRAND CANYON, THE LAYERS LINES ARE STRAIGHT AS A ARROW, WHICH PROVES THERE WAS NO EROSION OF THE LAYERS, WHICH MEANS THE LAYERS WERE LAID ONE AFTER ANOTHER IN A CONTINUOUS FASHION. IT IS ALL SEDIMENTARY ROCK, GRAB A CLUE!!!

This women is far from correct. There is massive demographic evidence of not one but multiple world floods.

You hit the nail on the head buddy.... Keep researching.

Can't folks resist their fog machines long enough to do a podcast??? Nevermind....dumb question.

Genesis 7:17-23 17 “And the flood was forty days upon the earth; and the waters increased, and bare up the ark, and it was lift up above the earth. 18 And the waters prevailed, and were increased greatly upon the earth; and the ark went upon the face of the waters. 19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered. 20 Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered. 21 And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man: 22 All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died. 23 And every living substance was destroyed which was upon the face of the ground, both man, and cattle, and the creeping things, and the fowl of the heaven; and they were destroyed from the earth: and Noah only remained alive, and they that were with him in the ark.”

Wrong.

False nope he’s an idiot

If you also do some research the wood that the ark was made of gopher wood is only native to one part of the world which is Florida

To begin with the white Jesus is the false prophet , and he and christianity have never served God and never will. All bibles are corrupted , yet they still have truth in them. Truth man does not agree with Jeremiah 8:8 How can you say we are wise because we have the law of the Lord when actually the lying pen of the scribes have handled it falsely. The wise will be out to Shane they will be trapped and dismayed , since they rejected the law of the Lord what kind of wisdom could they have. The scriptures were never inspired to the white men. And no where in the scriptures does god appoint the European heathen to teach the law of god.

it is the greatest historical document so much of human laws, ways and stories based off that. Archeologists have found locations based off it. it stopped ancient civilizations from contracting diseases from selfish and pork. the safety and health instructions were ahead of its time by millennia. it told ancient man the world was round and it documented a great flood that every civilization scattered across the planet speak of. but it’s easier to watch videos so never mind

In what way is it remotely historically accurate. We have better records of cleopatra than Jesus

Actually it isn't. Most of its stories have been plagiarized from even older books. And,it's not a document. It is an assortment of passages from many different books combined together. And the vast majority of the things written in it have no contemporary corroboration with actual historical events. There ARE mentions of historical events within the Bible. But that doesn't make the whole thing a historical account. And there are many suspicious things about it as well. For example, Jesus does not appear in any other contemporary writings. And the things that have been written about him and added to the original Jewish Bible,were written many years after his death. Now,if his miracles were real why wouldn't more people be talking about it? Why are they only written about after he dies? If there was someone performing miracles for real,it would have been a momentous,historical,event and would have been written about, by people other than his cult members. Yes,a group of people following around a self proclaimed prophet and cutting ties to their friends and family at this "prophets" urging is exactly what a cult is. We still have Jesus types popping up today. And many of them have followers that will swear that their leader can perform miracles. And it's never the truth. People back then weren't very different when it comes to spirituality. There is literally no reason to believe that Jesus was anything other than street preacher. Absolutely none. And when you realize how much of the Bible was copied from the Epic of Gilgamesh,which was written long before the Bible,and you learn what the Bible says in its original language,and you see all of the mistranslations,and misinterpretations,your thoughts on it may change.

The greatest compendium of fairy tales and legend inaccurately translated and re- translated by people who would exploit faith to control an ignorant population* FTFY

Love cannot be only the time commitment to something. Love is not the same as devotion, obligation, or imprisonment. Your time is not always spent freely, and those you love may be far away. Love is partnership and unity with another, a conscious commitment to someone to be by their side in one way or another. There are many different kinds of love, and what we think of when we say the *word* love in normal conversation we really only mean romantic, sexual, and familial love.

More discussion on the topic would have been nice. I just heard about this one dude's difficulty getting papers published in scientific journals. He didn't even mention the subject of those papers or what reasons they wouldn't publish. I'm just a little bit skeptical because I have found that often times when an ex-scientist becomes a vocal critic of "how science is done these days" they're almost always into some pseudoscientific shit like race realism or creationism (AKA "intelligent design"). And then they try to turn it into some vague political agenda on the part of the academic institution, accusing them of intentionally stifling a genuine pursuit of knowledge in order to maintain the status quo. That's why more discussion would have been nice, so one could draw a conclusion as to whether your guest was just disillusioned by the peer review process or if he has his own ulterior agenda. The only reason I'm saying all of this is because science denialism and pseudoscience are so rampant here in the states. Not trying to accuse anyone of anything.

Get rid of him

Dude in the middle is annoying

Hail!

Love the Mead Talks. Hate this one cut off during the discussion about burning the crop fields.