Видео

As long as it didn't quite get you to jump out of your skin, we'll be fine! ha!

Try different headphones with a lower ohm rating

As I make and manufacture these, yes, it's an advert!

It's mounted on a 150mm handle, the GoPro is attached on top of the mic via a mounting bar that's about 100mm long, the recorder (sound devices MixPre 6 II) was in a recording bag on my shoulder.

@@sr3d-microphones Ok, thanks. So it's basically on a basic hand grip with a 1/4" male thread. I use something similar to mount a Rode stereo bar and Zoom F3 as a mobile rig. Cheers for the reply.

@@LookingForSounds ping me an email and I’ll send you a pic I just took

It’s something we’re looking into. IP67 is an optimistic rating that we would like to see if testing goes ahead.

Oh, the Cyborg? They get everywhere when recording 😜 Well that's what the shadow reminds me of! Glad you liked the sound! I'll be uploading another park from Southport soon, from the same day, there's a little more going on in that one I think. It was quite a breezy day and the windjammers did a perfect job. There's more of a water feature with the new video, as there's lots of water and bird life!

I was careful to place the microphone as if you are in the playing position, the placement of the rear speakers were random, but they do have an effect on where they are placed. The microphone represents the audience always, so here I placed it where the player would sit. You didn’t mention what you preferred? Both speaker sets? Or the Yamaha own brand only? (In this current setup position).

@@sr3d-microphones i preferred the front yamaha speakers because the 3d immersive effect was really strong with them. Both had an immersive 3d effect nevertheless

@@EQAVOX in front of the keyboard

@@Rkasmr2023 I have a black one available somewhere in the new workshop. Would you like me to find it for you, and list it on our www.Sr3D.co.uk website?

I’m just the videographer and sound recordist showing off my mics (the SR3D brand), Mark has been playing for a while but I’m not sure where he studies.

You got it. 100%

@@sr3d-microphones interesting explanation, i think it makes sense. would there be some utility in comparing waveforms of binaural audio and stereo mics exposed to the same sound source? not sure how easy it would be to analyse however

@@retiredblacksmith7983 I think you just need a recording of one of the binaural mics, say the left ear, and a standard microphone of the same sound, and cancel out the differences, this would leave the binaural information for all to see, though I'm not sure what type of audio software could do the differences between them, but I'm sure there's something out there that can do this already. If you did this for top, bottom back and front, you'd end up with the differences of colouration of tones, that if you were to add to a sound, I think this would give the illusion that the sound was at the point of reference that the colouration tones were. If you had a mega multi-track audio setting, in a game for example, then you could have mono sound samples, over multiple channels with added colouration filters and a stereo field added by the filter so that the same sound over many channels would give you the impression you were at the beach if there were loads of seagulls flying over head, with waves in the distance, perhaps, there must be thousands of other example you could use of course.

ha no! I made the audio recordings with my SR3D binaural microphones that I manufacture, if you feel like having a gander on my videos you'll see that Mark played the organ here, with several of mi=y mics around the church, as its binaural if you wear headphones it should put you were the mic was, as if you were there. Don't have the volume high as it will spoil the illusion otherwise.

I can't see the point in making any comparisons just yet. I need some software that can separate the binaural cues from the audio, so I would need a reference mic, and a binaural mic and cancel out the differences to leave only the binaural cues, once I can see (hear) them, I would probably have a better idea of the colouration notches and tones for up, down, front, and back, plugins for binaural in DAW's are probably well aware of these tones and that's why they have binaural plugin in the first place, but no one (probably for obvious reasons) are talking about them to keep everyone in the dark and lost with misinformation that everyone seems to be using as their bible on what binaural audio is... meh! The image was actual from ChatGPT, as I asked it if it could show an image depicting what it would look like as a colour wheel, so I was surprised that it did it, and at the awesome image it produced for its first creative image, I'm going to delve a little deeper, as ChatGPT got some of the info wrong - regarding frequencies, as it should have been directions, but it's a great start. Nice to hear from you again!

No idea what that means, sry.

If you get me a 3Dio I’ll ask Lawrie to do a comparison- the winner is already known by me though 🎉

Are you one of the people that pronounce it incorrectly? (looking at your spelling) If in doubt, try going to google translate, and simply write “binaural” in the field and click the speaker button for a correct pronunciation, and maybe I'll do a quick hello in my next video 😎

@@sr3d-microphones hehehehe I pronounce it as bye-naural I see I spelled neural I gotta admit I probably did mis pronounce it as the word neural like the nerve, Instead of naural like nautical. I apologise XD, English isn't my first language. Funnily enough in my search history I do tend to write it correctly guess not when trying to do it phonetically. Now I do need the “Hello!”, thanks for responding.

@@jannathepanna1674 you’d be quite surprised that even native British have trouble with that particular word, ha! I’ll be sure to sneak in a ‘hello’ in future uploads 👂👂

@@sr3d-microphones damn haha I feel like a native already!! Im going to pay attention

4 capsuled mic? From your pre-edited comment: you probably have twigged on now that the mic is only a two capsuled mic, so it's stereo, with an ear over each capsule that infuses binaural information to the recorded sound, giving us external perceptions of where the sound is coming from, when the volume is set correctly on playback. I think this version of the new mic sounds pretty epic! Thank you for leaving a comment.

@@钟锐松 I would advise not to do the modification as you would loose the stereo effect due to non unidirectional capsules, simply plugging in EM272 stereo pair as an external microphone would be the very best thing to do here.

@@sr3d-microphones But if it's a pair of single-pointing mics such as the EM164 it will restore the soundstage, right? Also, do I need to dismantle the whole unit to replace the original mic?

@@钟锐松 Yes, they should do it as they are cardioid, and you would have to dismantle the unit, it's quite simple, but be aware of small plastic parts. I wouldn't know if this would be advantageous to do, to be honest. I think I uploaded me dismantling it in another zoom H1E video on my channel somewhere.

@@sr3d-microphones Thanks for the reply.It's been very helpful.

Hi, thank you for your detailed comment. I can agree with you on many levels, binaural is very much down to the shape of the pinna recording equipment and your own pinna, if the shape is off set by too much, it just causes confusion of perception. I also recorded last year's typhoon at Southport with the original mic that has been made since 2013 when I first realised hot to create "analogue" binaural, the new stuff on iPhone I've heard of, but not actually tried it yet, and hands down for the audio on the iPhone 15, which is actually very good, the batteries died on the Zoom F3, so was quite disappointed as they only lasted n hour or so, but shows off it's capability very well in the Red Arrows section, and, as being an obsessed photographer back in the 90's myself, I too thought that a few shots were actually pretty good too, and indeed the texture of the cloud formation sure helped give a sense of movement where I also tried not to always be zoomed in, but to try and show the sense of distance to help bring the binaural aspect into its own, the iPhone sure handled the videography admirably, the hand sake and little movements have been completely eliminated by the phone it'self, no processing of the video apart from fades and cuts were made, the audio side was a direct file transfer from the recorder, and was selected for output as IEEE float, at 32 bit, I have no idea what RUclips does to the audio when it is processed by them, the software was davinci resolve, which I think is a fantastic free software. I am very excited about the results from the new circuits inside the microphone and hope that any comments reflect this, as yours did. I am obsessed with binaural, as I was in the 90's with photography, I had my own darkroom and 3 enlargers and many different format cameras, from 1/4 plate, to 35mm, and I have processed the negatives and prints in both colour and black and white, then in 1995, got given a computer by a very close friend at the time which got me into computing, where the obsession in that took over until RUclips came about, and I eventually found the magic of audio, and the different modes it has, mono, stereo and binaural for the analogue types, am not looking at the digital aspects of it, but understand that maybe one day, I may find someone who can place my ideas for the formulation of algorithms that possibly could add binaural information to mono sound sources.