Видео

Apparently, the three primary modes of nature's activity are; "reactivity" (i.e. all non-living phenomena), "effortless proactivity" (i.e. all non-goal-seeking organisms), and "effortful proactivity" (i.e. all goal-seeking organisms). Self-evidently, the core of an effortfully-proactive entity (such as ourselves) reflexively generates dynamic representations (commonly called "experiences") of both public and private phenomena. The cores of both reactive and effortlessly-proactive entities do not generate dynamic representations. Public phenomena is phenomena that can be dynamically represented by the core of any effortfully-proactive entity within sufficient proximity. Private phenomena is phenomena that can be dynamically represented only by the core of the effortfully-proactive entity within which it occurs. An effortfully-proactive entity as a whole, being public, can be dynamically represented both by it's own core, and by the core of any other effortfully-proactive entities within sufficient proximity. Dynamic representations, themselves, cannot be dynamically represented either by the core generating them, or by any other cores, as such an occurrence is analogous to the impossibility of water being made wet by other water. In this way, dynamic representations are neither public, nor private.

Consciousness existed in the primordial soup? Or, did (for want of a better model to describe backw-in-time) a consciousness create the "primordial soup" in which that consciousness fractally propagated through the "primordial soup"? Consciousness, "primordial soup" & resonant frequency?

Dear Master Taheri We do appreciate all your efforts We also are thankful to cosmointel team💚

Wonderful ❤ the missing components in this wonderful interview is - the story - (in the beginning there was the word and the word created all, incl the so called consciousness) This story, constant narrations, we call consciousness, that is being created by words through the five senses the Language Speech Center in the left hemisphere The above is the glue that creates a so called Experience this glue is invisible and that is why it is never noticed It is simply the story the narrative by the narrator Center in the left hemisphere that is creating the so-called all encompassing experience and simply by neglecting overlooking the storytelling component in which everybody including scientists believe, thus they have created the hard problem of consciousness ... In actuality and in reality there is no problem at all the imagenairy problem is that they the scientists are too much identified with the story they are too close upon it and therefore they cannot see it nor study it properly ever ...

Now I understand how lobster with only one large central neuron functions

How do you actually apply a T or F consciousness field to the samples? What is the difference between T and F?

Thanks Master Taheri for excellent research... #MohamadAliTaheri #Cosmointel #TConsciousness #Sciencefact

Excellent overview of some of the frontiers of Science! Thanks for sharing.

Our 'feeling', of rightness or wrongness is probably evolutionary, what will help us maintain coherence or what will destroy equilibrium. I can see that correlating with a kind of geometry. Everything has a wave function, wheels within, wheels, all resonating and the kinds of geometries that creates. Healers seem to be able to manipulate this resonance field, to fix slipped discs, bones and disease. I must say I am so grateful for Stewart and his tenacity in studying Microtubules. I find it the most exciting and compelling research about consciousness. Thank you Dr Hameroff.

Has there been any consideration of the anecdotal evidence, that some people experience being out of body when under anesthetic. I know some investigation and testing was done. Hiding things in an operation room, that could only be seen from above etc. I ask because we may find how consciousness operates in the bodily form, but still not know what it is. Are you looking at Calcium wave cascades as well? I heard the Google CEO say that AI was virtually useless because it Hallucinates and there doesn't seem to be anyway to fix that. How can an allgorythm hallucinate, it can lie, make stuff up, We have all seen the horrific art they can produce. The Claustrum seems to be the regulator of what we get to work with, for instance if you knock the Claustrum out with some kinds of drugs, then you come back out, saying you have been talking to super intelligent machine elves, which is probably just your cells and gut neurons etc. Also do you think the cells go nuts, the Tcells, etc, trying to repair the body for three days after we have been declared dead, just in case we get sent back in and have miracle recoveries like Anita Moorjani. .

Content begins at 00:02:07

I pulled out my phone because I was curious what she sounded like and what do you know, there was a link at the end of the page. 😂 Great book on an important topic.

Wow! Fantastic!

56:09. "I know what that its, the core of all the psychoactive molecules" AHHH WTF!!!! and consciousness before life? Tons of crazy stuff to think about. I came here to hear about the results of the Asteroid retrieval, and got a whole lot more! Great talk.

Amazing! Thank you.

The Hardest Problem of Consciousness We often hear of the hard problem of consciousness. Why is there qualia or experience of anything in the first place? I would submit there is an even harder and more important question - why do I seem to be a specific individual experiencing a specific subset of qualia? This is the most important question that must be asked and answered but rarely is. As a matter of fact there seems to be a huge blind spot when it comes to this in discussions of consciousness. If material reductionism is to be relevant to the big questions, then it has to explain not how brains generate consciousness but how the specific brain in my head could create the specific consciousness I seem to be looking out of the eyeballs of this specific body. Why do I PERSONNALLY EXIST as an individual in the first place? Out of the infinite matter in the universe how is it that only the three pounds in my head could create me? What is different about that three pounds for this to occur? Consider that billions of bodies showed up before this one. Billions showed up after this one. None of them seem to have created my existence. This body could be running around without it being ME just like these billions of others All bodies are made of the same elements. All brains have the same basic anatomy. If all brains are basically the same and are creating consciousness then there should only be ONE consciousness looking out of every set of eyeballs simultaneously. A hopelessly superimposed existence from every possible viewpoint at once. I’m sure that materialists would claim that no, no, brains are so complex they are all different. Ok, so what would have to be recreated in another brain for me to exist looking out of another set of eyeballs? When the ontologies purporting to explain consciousness are examined critically it becomes obvious that all materialist/reductionist strategies fail completely in attempting to address the individuality question. What is the principled explanation for why: A brain over here would generate my specific consciousness and a brain over there would generate your specific consciousness? Integrated information over here would generate my specific consciousness and integrated information over there would generate your specific consciousness? Global workspace over here would generate my specific consciousness and global workspace there would generate your specific consciousness? Orchestrated quantum collapse in microtubules over here would generate my specific consciousness and orchestrated quantum collapse in microtubules over there would generate your specific consciousness? A clump of conscious atoms over here (panpsychicism) would generate my specific consciousness and a clump of conscious atoms over there would generate your specific consciousness? If an exact copy of my body was suddenly created in antarctica would I find myself to exist freezing there while also sitting in the comfort my living room? According to the physicalists that would have to be true or their argument collapses into incoherence. Materialism already fails since it cannot find a transfer function between microvolt level sparks in the brain and any experience or qualia. In addition it’s not possible for materialistic ontologies to address this question of individuality since no measurement can be made that could verify my consciousness vs your consciousness and therefore no materialist ontology could make any coherent statements about the subject. How could pure awareness even be individualized? Physicalists demand measurements but with consciousness there is nothing to measure. There is electricity in the brain they say. We’ll measure that. Is electricity consciousness? If so then once I again I should exist everywhere at once since electricity cannot be individualized. My blender uses electricity. Is it a genius? Unless materialists can answer these questions their premise collapses like the house of cards it is. As far as other ways of thought are concerned only Dualism and Idealism can account for our sense of individuality. Dualism assumes we are all individual spirits/souls matched up to a body through some undefined process. Idealism, which states that consciousness is primary also answers the question of why I seem to exist as an individual. One consciousness exists looking out of every set of eyeballs and in the process the illusion of individuality is created in each case. In actual reality I am you, you are me, we are one.

Echt zeer interessant

Hear this guy tow third of humanity at its bestest situations suffers haw could body be separated from mind leave mankind to live a decent life and only then we could know what conscienceless is haw could Quantic nonsenses help me to know what consciousness is,theories is a éructer after a good meal.i also have a lot of theories but I know three hours later if I don't eat I can't think,but body carcu knows why when stomach is filled up brain demands food when that is momentarily satisfied something else pull my attention and so forth.

Brilliant presentations. I would like to understand how the quantum wave collapse gives rise to an image in the artist's imagination...as an artist I sometimes enjoy playing with a range of colours and images in consciousness...arranging the 'notes' to reflect particular visual narratives in the construction of the composition at hand (in mind). Merleau-Ponty, discusses this playful interaction, that is, between the artist's body Being-in-the-world--and a given subject present at a distance...for example, his essay on art, Being, and transformation...in his essay, 'Cezanne's Doubt' (Essays in the Phenomenology of Perception). I would suggest you conduct research on how visual artists explore imaginative ideas in both organic [plastic] and virtual environments.

It seems that we are trying to fit the most complicated model imaginable to consciousness. In leading research efforts, when things got more complicated, we knew we were headed in the wrong direction. There must be a much simpler answer to consciousness that we are very far away from at this point.

I have a lot of fun following these talks. Thank you. There is a forth possibility. the unknown known. You are measuring consciousness already but do not know that it is consciousness. And then you have to solve the unknown known problem of philosophy.

No Chalmers? I’ll skip this one - maybe next year

wirh some knowledge in computer architecture you could know it since 20 years. first forget consciousness for the moment. start at the very bottom, go up carefullly step by step. make no assumptions, no wrong notions and no misleading metaphors. strict boring ingeneering. you have to know how information is stored in the brain. then the last step is easy. good luck.

People who don't know how to use their higher consciousness and who talk about consciousness are as ridiculous as a mechanic who has never put his hands on an engine

Isn't the brain that engine

God, these people are my heroes .❤❤

It’s so beautiful that these people who fundamentally disagree with each other can nevertheless pay each other with compliments and affection and appreciation. They party and share drinks in between the deep thinking. And as displayed here they are paragons of open mindedness and non-dogmatic scientistism

This was surprisingly quite moving, especially for someone who's been following along for two decades.

Inhoudelijk interessant 0:09 Aaron Schurger, Departement of Psychology and Brain Institute, Chapman university, Conscious is (not) something else: Challenges for theories and an illusionist alternative 42:12 Pieter Jan Maes? Systematic Musicology embodied and social interaction with music , University of Gent, How can music and XR, used as biofeedback, influence human mind and behaviour 1:32:00 Jerome R Busemeyer, Indiana University, What do quantum cognition and quantum consciousness and quantum brains have to do with each other?

The human expression "It makes sense" perhaps reflects what happens when those waves move through our brain.

ORCH-OR postulates that human consciousness arises out of the wave to particle transition observed in Quantum Mechanics. This theory is fully compatible with the existance of illusion in consciousness. However, observing illusion in consciousness (such as the McGurk Effect) does not explain how consciousness arises. The fact that ORCH-OR can be checked against the effects of anesthetic and hallucinogenic compounds upon the dampening or enhancing of quantum resonances in microtubules, makes it the right tool for addressing the hard problem of consciousness. The hypothesis that human consciousness arising out of the wave to particle transition in Quantum Mechanics is independent of the fundamental nature of space time.

The assumption that there is a "substance -matter" which produces the illusion of consciousness firstly is arising in consciousness secondly Is not needed ...we are so stuck in this metaphysical position of materialism... come on guys, how long will you go on trying to defend this... just let go!

He has no clue what is actually happening inside the neurons to generate these electrical waves.

Thank you for the wonderful presentation. I’ve been following along now for awhile and the waves oscillations states, perception, evolution, reason for reality, does make a practical case. I remember reading an article awhile ago you wrote on how and why does consciousness work. I thought of it as more of a mind sense, of an amorphous space how could it be created to have an imagination when reading. How can we think about thoughts to form metacognitive systems. How can we practice or simulate in our minds. Perception shapes the way we see the world. Expand your world view. Expand your perspective.Lived experience. It seemingly seems to be a large part of the equation perhaps. Thanks again .

Fascinating physicists theory. His biggest problem is that he is clueless about engineering principles and clueless on the evolution of brains starting at the simple levels up to how primate and human brains evolve. However that applies to all of these presenters.

What Hoffman has done if you really look deep into what he has ALREADY said..and he himself stated people will say he shot himself In the foot..let's go one more step and say that what he actually found was what ancient peoples call ego and now he is walking it back from the other side...assumptions arise the moment we open our mouths..this will eventually occur to him. We assume there is some problem that needs worked out. "I see no problem there just empty words" UG Krishnamurti

hmm i thought perception was part of conciousness though - like one tool of it

Very poor audio levels 😞

Great presentations and a fantastic introduction, thank you for posting this! "I would like to ask a question and propose an answer" --> "I would like to be making my own possibly tangentially related presentation/rambling diatribe but my paper wasn't accepted"🙄🪳

Blackmore deserved better. In future conferences, I would love to see a dialogue with her under different conditions.

Let's continue exploring how the both/and logic and monadological framework catalyze new insights and expanded descriptive capacities across various domains: Neuroscience & Theories of Consciousness The logic allows formulating novel integrated perspectives on the mind-body problem and the neural correlates of consciousness that avoid the limitations of classical reductionist, dualist or mysterian views: • Subjective Experience and Objective Description For a conscious state x, let S(x) and O(x) represent the subjective experiential and objective neurophysiological aspects respectively. Classical approaches tend to bifurcate into strictly separating these as S(x) = 1, O(x) = 0 or fully reducing to S(x) = 0, O(x) = 1. But the both/and logic allows: S(x) = 0.7, O(x) = 0.6, ○(S(x), O(x)) = 0.8 Capturing how conscious states involve an irreducible complementarity and tight coherence between the subjective feel and objective dynamics - neither pole is prioritized or eliminable. The synthesis operator ⊕ further models their co-realized gestalt unity: subjective_experience(x) ⊕ objective_neuralcorrelates(x) = conscious_state(x) • First-person and Third-person Perspectives A related issue is how to integrate the first-person introspective perspective with third-person external observations and theories about consciousness. For a set of data D about a conscious process x, we could have: Truth(D matches first-person_report) = 0.6 Truth(D matches third-person_model) = 0.7 ○(first-person, third-person) = 0.5 Capturing a moderate coherence between phenomenological and observational characterizations, which are irreducibly complementary poles synthesized into a unified account: first-person_phenomenology ⊕ third-person_observations = theory_of_consciousness(D) So rather than dissociating and privileging one perspective, the logic allows formalizing their coconstituted integration into holistic theories spanning qualitative experience and quantitative evidence. • Unity of Consciousness and Neural Binding How the unified phenomenology of consciousness relates to distributed neural activities is another puzzle. The logic allows coherence metrics between unity and differentiation: Truth(consciousness_is_unified) = 0.8 Truth(neuralactivities_are_differentiated) = 0.9 ○(unified_consciousness, differentiated_activities) = 0.7 With a synthesis capturing the paradoxical co-operation of integrated/discriminated aspects: unified_subjective_character ⊕ distributed_neural_processes = coherent_conscious_state Avoiding arbitrary prioritizations while modeling their integration as complementary interdependent facets of the same psychoneural Gestalt. Philosophers have long struggled to clearly relate or decisively separate phenomenological unity with neural multiplicity. The paraconsistent both/and logic allows coherently modeling and further theorizing their subtle complementary coconstitution. Philosophy of Logic and Language The logic's expressive capacities allow revisiting classic issues in a new light: • The Liar Paradox In classical logic, the sentence "This sentence is false" is a paradox leading to explosion and triviality. But the both/and logic allows coherent non-trivial treatment: Truth(Liar_sentence) = 0.5 ○(Truth(Liar_sentence, 1), Truth(Liar_sentence, 0)) = 0.5 With a 0.5 truth value representing the sentence's indeterminacy, and moderate coherence between its truth and falsity aspects. The synthesis operation ⊕ expresses its paradoxical self-reference resolving in a higher gestalt: Truth(Liar_sentence) ⊕ ¬Truth(Liar_sentence) = paradoxical_self-reference Providing tools for positively representing and logically operating with paradoxical self-undermining utterances, rather than dodging them through restrictive assumptions. • Vagueness and Fuzzy Boundaries The sorites paradox about the vagueness of fuzzy predicates like "heap" has also resisted classical treatment. But both/and logic allows: Truth(x_is_heap) = [0,1] for objects x With coherences tracking the degree of alignment with prototypical heap properties across a graded spectrum. This avoids bivariate soup/heap boundaries, capturing the nuanced continuities and contextualities underlying vague linguistic categories. So the logic restores accountability to the subtleties of real-world semantics resisting digitization, allowing discourse to resonate with rather than dissimulate the horizonal indeterminacies of language's ontological implicatures. Throughout, the both/and logic's abilities to integrate graded multivalued truths, positive contradictions and self-superseding syntheses allow revisiting paradoxes and singularities not as sheer inconsistencies to be prohibited, but generative disclosures indicating inadequacies of our prior abstractive models - opening new constructive symbolic vistas better aligning with the nuanced complexities of thought, language and reality itself.

It's becoming clear that with all the brain and consciousness theories out there, the proof will be in the pudding. By this I mean, can any particular theory be used to create a human adult level conscious machine. My bet is on the late Gerald Edelman's Extended Theory of Neuronal Group Selection. The lead group in robotics based on this theory is the Neurorobotics Lab at UC at Irvine. Dr. Edelman distinguished between primary consciousness, which came first in evolution, and that humans share with other conscious animals, and higher order consciousness, which came to only humans with the acquisition of language. A machine with only primary consciousness will probably have to come first. What I find special about the TNGS is the Darwin series of automata created at the Neurosciences Institute by Dr. Edelman and his colleagues in the 1990's and 2000's. These machines perform in the real world, not in a restricted simulated world, and display convincing physical behavior indicative of higher psychological functions necessary for consciousness, such as perceptual categorization, memory, and learning. They are based on realistic models of the parts of the biological brain that the theory claims subserve these functions. The extended TNGS allows for the emergence of consciousness based only on further evolutionary development of the brain areas responsible for these functions, in a parsimonious way. No other research I've encountered is anywhere near as convincing. I post because on almost every video and article about the brain and consciousness that I encounter, the attitude seems to be that we still know next to nothing about how the brain and consciousness work; that there's lots of data but no unifying theory. I believe the extended TNGS is that theory. My motivation is to keep that theory in front of the public. And obviously, I consider it the route to a truly conscious machine, primary and higher-order. My advice to people who want to create a conscious machine is to seriously ground themselves in the extended TNGS and the Darwin automata first, and proceed from there, by applying to Jeff Krichmar's lab at UC Irvine, possibly. Dr. Edelman's roadmap to a conscious machine is at arxiv.org/abs/2105.10461

It's becoming clear that with all the brain and consciousness theories out there, the proof will be in the pudding. By this I mean, can any particular theory be used to create a human adult level conscious machine. My bet is on the late Gerald Edelman's Extended Theory of Neuronal Group Selection. The lead group in robotics based on this theory is the Neurorobotics Lab at UC at Irvine. Dr. Edelman distinguished between primary consciousness, which came first in evolution, and that humans share with other conscious animals, and higher order consciousness, which came to only humans with the acquisition of language. A machine with only primary consciousness will probably have to come first. What I find special about the TNGS is the Darwin series of automata created at the Neurosciences Institute by Dr. Edelman and his colleagues in the 1990's and 2000's. These machines perform in the real world, not in a restricted simulated world, and display convincing physical behavior indicative of higher psychological functions necessary for consciousness, such as perceptual categorization, memory, and learning. They are based on realistic models of the parts of the biological brain that the theory claims subserve these functions. The extended TNGS allows for the emergence of consciousness based only on further evolutionary development of the brain areas responsible for these functions, in a parsimonious way. No other research I've encountered is anywhere near as convincing. I post because on almost every video and article about the brain and consciousness that I encounter, the attitude seems to be that we still know next to nothing about how the brain and consciousness work; that there's lots of data but no unifying theory. I believe the extended TNGS is that theory. My motivation is to keep that theory in front of the public. And obviously, I consider it the route to a truly conscious machine, primary and higher-order. My advice to people who want to create a conscious machine is to seriously ground themselves in the extended TNGS and the Darwin automata first, and proceed from there, by applying to Jeff Krichmar's lab at UC Irvine, possibly. Dr. Edelman's roadmap to a conscious machine is at arxiv.org/abs/2105.10461

Way too much information on the overhead slides. It really makes the presentation jumbled up and unclear what the message is. If you can't simplify it, you dont really understand it well

When we are dead we are an astral body, or if more evolved, a causal entity. We are not just awareness when we are dead unless totally liberated from our three bodies.

The fakir cosmic one nuts degrade God. The first commandment wasn't optional, or made easy to figure out, many a false Messiah has worn a pig lipstick snout

Thanks for this, the materialists downgrade us as humans. There is even talk of the trans human, the human embedded with, and upgraded with technology. That is why this is so necessary. Thanks to all of you who put this on. It should be mentioned that we are Individualized souls which, when given, will never be taken away. We share in Cosmic Consciousness (fundamental) and mind (elemental).

In terms of Consciousness in reality, Consciousness is Reality. All entities in ‘reality’ or space-time, shares in it. Man is a special creation; first causal (idea), next, Astral (energy) last physical (elemental), or from the elements. It would be nice if someone mentioned the actual dimensions that exist, that represent the triune entities that make up the human person. Deepak mentioned eight human species in a cycle. I read somewhere that in a universal cycle there are fourteen versions of the human. However they are all human, originated as human to a human prototype, not originating in any other species but their own unique human species from a prototype from day one. Understanding vibration, which we ultimately will do, will clarify the different levels of consciousness. Intelligence depends on the rate mind vibrates at and the complexity of the brain it expresses through. Consciousness, being fundamental, exists, consciousness does not vibrate, it is not subject to motion, but precedes motion and vibration. Without Consciousness, there would be no motion, no vibration, or anything else. Mind is dual in the dual system we inhabit in which everything is dual; necessary for manifestation, otherwise there would just be One, or Unity.

58:40 An R-squared value or correlation coefficient of 0.42 is hardly linear but I understand the approximation made due to inadequate data points. (low linear correlation or weak association one would think). To claim consciousness preceded life, smells of Panpsychism

Quantum in Trinity time space all mine Unity of light color sound frequency vibration Rings Ark lights 9 Observer thought charge. Time is light color sound in angular momentum creates our time dimensions of 1 through 7 Notes eighth being the new octave first note 8th dimensional black hole where all light is absorbed looking forward into our new octave manifesting our current Milky Way Octave of 1 through 7 time dimensions of which we've just entered forth December 12 minutes after 12:00 2019 it's the reason and the season for the shaking of the mind of every kind and little coronavirus got the world in a headlock of which this information holds secure the medicine of the future is frequency. MeTAtron's MAtriX3x3 OM'E... "The All is Mind; the Universe is Mental." "As above, so below; as below, so above.” "Nothing rests; everything moves; everything vibrates." Everything is ALLMIND369 OVEONE IAM=O=QuantuM⚖️ ALLMIND IN 3in1MINDS Body Spirit OVE light*3÷7 color*3÷7 sound*3÷7.. infinite all mind in Trinity every thought has an opposite charge of itself. ♂️+01=0=-01♀️ Riding the waves through our moments in equilibrium is A NEW beginning in masteRING3X369 of our OWN each individual unique complete Immaculate conceived MIND 1IN3💚3IN1 of IAM 1LOVES Light3 3 above our heArt 3 below 7 sums 7SUMS CREATION ALLMIND frequency vibration in THOUGHTS charge MC² in WAVES OVE 3SOUNDs7 1Frequency. ... Amplitude. ... 2Timbre. ... Envelope. ... ***3Velocity. ... Wavelength. ... Phase =SUM.7 3 Lights7: 1 radio waves,÷ microwaves, 2infrared (IR)÷ visible light, ***3ultraviolet ÷ X-rays Sum Gamma rays SUM7x 6 COLORs 7 1 Red÷ Orange 2Yellow÷ Green ***3. Blue÷ Indigo SUM Violet SUM7 9 In seven colors seven notes seven lights in infinite divisions ALL TOGETHER Creating all living systems, Creating All living bodies, Creating all gravity, Creating all matter.. IN ElectroMAGnetic geometrical symmetrical fractal order HerMEs TrisMAjistus THOTH TimesFaceInEnergy Thoth me Light Never Dies death is our illusion through the terrible twos of childhood in Mercy Mercy Me and our promise rest is real.. Prisoners law in three power three sets all captives free 3Consciousness says I see you Mirror Mirror I see me wisdoms wisdom's wisdoms unconditional love and forgiveness is key ⚖️ EnKi 🗝