Видео

Yeah no, this is not the climate solution it cost way too much energy.

Do you know exactly how much carbon dioxide it takes to keep the plants alive.... Apparently you don't because the plants are dying off everywhere all over the world and under the oceans and seas... Soon there will be a food shortage over this all because of your stupidity and arrogance. ... I like living and you're cutting it short too short

<3

We need like a million of these

Mr. Wurzbacher, I believe we must have the carbon pools volume known of at all times. Please, I would love to assist protect and stabilize our environment. I can work for free remotely until I can prove I can be an asset. I also just sent a message to ClimeWorks humbly requesting to assist with Direct Air Capture of CO2. I agree, there was a recent time that if we would’ve stopped emission, strategies wouldn’t be needed to filter carbon from our atmosphere. I believe our planet would’ve been able to recover by itself.

I like that. I hope the entire process was documented for emission let-off, in particular the construction to create the machine.

I like that. The more we support each other, the sooner we will be able to more control CO2 within our atmosphere. I just hope going forward, we will be better stewards to our environment in terms of implementing strategies that account for our affection. Such as Direct Air Capture for CO2, we insert the carbon in the ground. Are we certain the carbon doesn’t move? If we don’t have real time sensors documenting this information, we don’t know. Calculating it later if increased carbon deposits is known to affect that local environment will be much harder on determining all the reactions. I would like to research what goes on from the carbon deposits from Direct Air Capture of CO2.

עברית: ruclips.net/video/pahJFBG0yD0/видео.html

Are we sure that removing large amounts of CO₂ will benefit the Earth, humans, and nature? CO₂ levels in the atmosphere are already relatively low at 0.03%. Plants rely on CO₂ for photosynthesis to produce the food we depend on, naturally removing megatons of it from the air. Wouldn’t planting more trees be a better solution?

Listen to me! This might be one of the most valuable free bits of information anyone gives out! OTEC ocean Thermal Energy Conversion CAN BE USED TO STOP HURRICANES!!!! The way you do it is to convert the thermal energy into a SYNTHETIC FUEL!!! install OTEC on an oil tanker, install Direct Air Capture CO2 equipment as well as Fischer Tropsch Reactors or Sabatier reactors as well, reverse osmosis system to create pure water, renewable energy eloctrolyzes the Hydrogen for methanation and or Hydrogenation of carbon. ALL RESOURCES ARE AVAILABLE AT SEA!! INCLUDING WIND AND WAVE RENEWAVLES!!!! IF OTEC IS USED, the temp of the ocean surface can be reduced along with the potential energy for fueling hurricanes!!! Countless lives and peoperty will be saved.... THIS IS TOO IMPORTANT AN IDEA TO BE KEPT TO ONES SELF!!!!

Excelente.

Spoiler it doesn t

Plant more trees Not Business ‼️

It is scientifically impossible for greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. All the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth is completely absorbed in earth's greenhouse effect by greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor. This video has the United Nations Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. The cause of global warming is not known as of 2024. The back of the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. The overall average temperature gain to the earth from the earth’s greenhouse effect is 5.55°C (10°F). Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

It is scientifically impossible for greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. All the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth is completely absorbed in earth's greenhouse effect by greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor. This video has the United Nations Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. The cause of global warming is not known as of 2024. The back of the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. The overall average temperature gain to the earth from the earth’s greenhouse effect is 5.55°C (10°F). Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.

Hallo, ich habe eine Bitte: wäre es möglich mir das Video ohne Untertitel zu Verfügung zu stellen? Ich würde gerne das Video im Fach Englisch im Unterricht anwenden. Liebe Grüße Vera

The Climeworks factory could only exist by dint of government power. Converting the exquisitely life-giving CO2 molecule into inert stone, the Climeworks process depletes information, knowledge, and wealth. Based on a model of scarcity, it sucks resources from around the world and turns them into rocks and waste.

Capitalism is what brought us to the current climate crisis. Due to neoliberalism and excessive consumption of meat and unnecessary goods, incentivized from governments complicit with the private sector, we are where we are . Degrowth is the only answer.

The only thing he can talk about is climate change - and it's not even a crisis. And no, climate change doesn't cause wildfires, droughts, or desertification. WHAT AN IDIOT

I want to use electronics in that project

Pure, unadulterated poppycock. Intended for those who flunked high school math and physics.

This gives me hope again.

Date of IPO Plz

Can DAC be used on ocean water for co2 extraction since it carries “the lion share?”

I have a question since there is problem with cost and efficiency of DAC: there are so many single-family homes out there that probably can contribute by having some sort of solar powered direct air capture. One small unit of DAC powered by solar i imagine would be less burdensome on the costs of one company. DAC should be tax deductible with tax rebate. Ex florida has 10 million residential homes There are 8 billion of us that potentially can be used

It's actually easier to capture CO2 from sea water because it's 197 times more concentrated.

bravo brilliance and perserverance

Can you use the gen three sorbent in Mammoth and Orca to make those plants work better than designed originally?

Possibly we don't put the CO2 in? US in particular can easily cut emissions 45%.

Looking forward to hearing more about Project Cypress, I hope you break ground soon!

Good job. ❤

Nice !

How does this compare with the, already in the advanced building phase, plants from Carbon Engineering and Carbon Capture? Not to talk about Captura as well?

As long as it captures more co2 than it produces by using energy its nice....and as long as it doesnt use alot of resources

Hallo :D Was kostet denn so eine Anlage? Werdet Ihr Anlage für KMU vertreiben?

Amazing.

Terrible terrible idea 😱

ruclips.net/video/eiX8RUkqplo/видео.htmlsi=ARIYS1sWaItBIlUZ

ruclips.net/video/eiX8RUkqplo/видео.htmlsi=ARIYS1sWaItBIlUZ

ruclips.net/video/iKhv5pzvLW0/видео.htmlsi=xLFJm3o4qx4mZPNJ

ruclips.net/video/IUDoOiK3Qmk/видео.htmlsi=kBqjeFD45T_orcur

ruclips.net/video/ho8mqgp26c8/видео.htmlsi=_Pn3QdOmGdt0PdSR

Plane form Autodesk.

This is si good, and will try it in my home place😊

How are the machines of this facility operated? If it runs on electricity, is it produced by renewable source? If No, then its a matter of concern

Do they use the CO2 for the greenhouses? How do they store it?

What......where is there in paradise Bring it in athens. You had to make it in Mars

What is all this for? By removing carbon from the atmosphere, you will end up with no carbon remaining in the biosphere! All living things are made of carbon.