Видео

Hab nix verstanden

is that how you explain light as a particle and wave to a kid? circle is matter/particle/atoms, and wave is the wave

Stern - Gerlach ? : Glaubt hier jeder gleich einen Bluff ? PORCA MISERA . Hier fehlt doch etwas entscheidendes. Fakt: a) wenn man 2x Ladungsplatten verwendet, kann man einen Elektronenstrahl ablenken nach obe oder unteren oder zur Seite. b) wenn polarisiertes Licht oder polarisierte Mikrowelle bekommt man nach dem Magneten eine Gleichverteilung allerdings man hat oben und unten an der Projektionsfläche vermutlich dann eine unterschiedliche Drehung der Polarisationsebene c) hat man noch einen Scutter für nach oben oder unten polarisiertes Licht so bekommt man an der Projektionsfläche 2 scharf getrennte Polarisationen. Zusammenfassung es ist nur ein Polarisationsexperiment Das andere ist böswilliger Bluff. Man kann natürlich Silberionen durch einen gesonderten Kondensator noch laden. Das ist aber wieder etwas anderes. Silberionen sind doch massenträge ? Man braucht shcon ein getaktetes kleines MRT oder ein echtes funktionierendes Drehspektrometer.

im trippin balls

Ein C-Not-Gate ist eigentlich eine einfache Sache, aber wie ihr das erklärt habt, ist das schwer verständlich

9 For those That prefer a mechanical analog you can look at harmonics of a guitar string and such. The video I present is another mechanical method of quantizing a system. It is one of two methods where structures can actually be produced. ruclips.net/video/wrBsqiE0vG4/видео.htmlsi=waT8lY2iX-wJdjO3 Area under a curve is often equivalent to energy. Buckling of an otherwise flat field shows a very rapid growth of this area. If my model applies, it may show how the universe’s energy naturally developed from the inherent behavior of fields. Under the right conditions, the quantization of a field is easily produced. The ground state energy is induced via Euler’s contain column analysis. Containing the column must come in to play before over buckling, or the effect will not work. The sheet of elastic material “system” response in a quantized manor when force is applied in the perpendicular direction. Bonding at the points of highest probabilities and maximum duration( ie peeks and troughs) of the fields “sheet” produced a stable structure when the undulations are bonded to a flat sheet that is placed above and below the core material.

There are no quantum computers, who the hell is this for?

I do not believe that a better visualization exists on this topic, and we are graced to have access to this free of charge. Thank you!

Do you have research for dynamical behaviour of the earth? Do see oval shapes in objects in space so ...they perhaps can be round/sphere on another time frame. (perhaps in thousand years). Do see a lot of static anal;yses of the earth and also mostly local. Do not see many global analyses of the earth and its shape for instance ....volume changes in relation to volcansim. Earthquakes and how they move along the earth and insde the earth.

Finally someone explained why orbitals looks like those weird shaped blobs!!❤

"atomstrahlofen" !!)) What does this word mean ?!))) Рассказывает на английском, а слова немецкие!)))

While spherical harmonics are the eigenfunctions of the hydrogen atom to describe its state, which are the eigenfunctions for the other 117 chemical elements (helium, etc.)?

So the rydberg formula can be used only on hydrogen atom ? What about other atoms ?

Great explanation with great visualization, thanks

Wie bei mehrprotonigen Elemente, beim Helium usw.?

Wonderful video! 👍

I started thinking about this after watching a singer shatter a wine glass by singing at it using its resonant frequency. Putting more energy into it than it could handle. A bit like a photon escaping. Then I considered how the glass could flex, and how physical limitations would cause any oscillation that wasn't at a resonant frequency to be self canceling, since the ends of the oscillation wouldn't meet. Then I imagined the limitations in 3 dimensions and how with something as small as an atom, unaffected by the macro universe, there would be basically no damping, so this "wine glass" could ring virtually forever.

❤

Здравия всем. *Испытаем* «фонари для гравитационных квантов» *посмотрим* на Вселенную? *Попробуем* квантами гравитации (цифровым способом) измерим Вселенную? Соберём два учебных пособия «ГИБРИДНЫЙ гироскоп и лазерную фиксированную рулетку 1000000» школьникам, студентам, академикам. Вы сможете совершать научные открытия; по астрономии, астрофизике, космологии, высшей теоретической физике,... Обращаюсь к Вам с предложением на совместное изобретения ГИБРИД гироскопа из некруглых, ДВУХ катушек с новым типом оптического волокна с «полой сердцевиной из фотоно-замещенной вакуумной зоной или (NANF)», где - свет в каждом плече проходит по 250000 (в дальномере 1000000) метров при этом, не превышает параметры 84/84/84 см., и вес - 24кг. Предприятия по выпуску "Волоконно-оптических гироскопов" может выпускать ГИБРИД гироскопы и дальномеы, для учебно практического применения в школах и высших учебных заведений. Эйнштейна мечтал измерить скорость поезда, самолёта - через опыт Майкельсона Морли 1881/2024 г., и только тогда, опыт будет выполнен больше чем 70%. Это возможно выполнить с помощью оптоволоконного ГИБРИД гироскопа. Вот исходя из выполненного более 70% опыта Майкельсона, возможно доказать постулаты: Свет - это упорядоченная вибрация гравитационных квантов и доминантные гравитационные поля корректируют скорость света в вакууме. (Мы, не ищем эфир, мы увидим работу квантов гравитации) В итоге *увидите* теорию всего в простых ❤учебных устройствах❤.

It would sure be a lot better to actually describe the experiment. From your picture I'm guessing that two photons are generated from one source (closest to the viewer, black box) which then bounce off mirrors to Alice and Bob. So it's not surprising that they are anti correlated.

Are you Peruvian?

this is one of the most profound videos i've ever seen in years of watching quantum videos

Sehr gutes Video

Muito bom!

Итак автотранспорт или самолёт в нём выполним опыты Майкельсона-Морли, определяя им прямолинейную скорость. - О таком опыте мечтал, Эйнштейн. Но мы, *возможно* будем наблюдать постулаты "Свет это упорядоченная вибрация гравитационных квантов. Доминантные гравитационные поля управляют скоростью света в вакууме". Есть предложение на совместное изобретения ГИБРИД гироскопа из некруглых, ДВУХ катушек с новым типом оптического волокна с «полой сердцевиной из фотоно-замещенной вакуумной зоной или (NANF)», где - свет в каждом плече проходит по 48000 метров при этом, не превышает параметры 40/40/40 см., и вес - 4кг. Предприятия по выпуску "Волоконно-оптических гироскопов" может выпускать ГИБРИД гироскопы, для учебно практического применения в школах и для ВУЗ. Рационализатор из Казахстана.

Hello. Gravity quanta measure the Universe?! With the help of the “HYBRID gyroscope” you can make scientific discoveries; in astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, higher theoretical physics,... I am writing to you with a proposal for the joint invention of a HYBRID gyroscope from non-circular, TWO coils with a new type of optical fiber with a “hollow core photonic-substituted vacuum zone or (NANF)” where - the light travels 48000 meters in each arm, while it does not exceed the parameters 40/40/40 cm, and the weight is 4 kg. Manufacturers of “Fiber Optic Gyroscopes” can produce HYBRID gyroscopes for educational and practical use in schools and higher education institutions. Einstein dreamed of measuring the speed of a train, an airplane - through the Michelson-Morley experiment of 1881/2024, and only then would the experiment be more than 70% complete. This can be done using a fiber optic HYBRID gyroscope. Based on the completion of more than 70% of Michelson's experiment, the following postulates can be proven: Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and dominant gravitational fields adjust the speed of light in a vacuum. (We are not looking for ether, we will see the work of gravitational quanta) The result is a «theory of everything» in a simple teaching device and a new tape measure for measuring the universe.

Hello. Gravity quanta measure the Universe?! With the help of the “HYBRID gyroscope” you can make scientific discoveries; in astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, higher theoretical physics,... I am writing to you with a proposal for the joint invention of a HYBRID gyroscope from non-circular, TWO coils with a new type of optical fiber with a “hollow core photonic-substituted vacuum zone or (NANF)” where - the light travels 48000 meters in each arm, while it does not exceed the parameters 40/40/40 cm, and the weight is 4 kg. Manufacturers of “Fiber Optic Gyroscopes” can produce HYBRID gyroscopes for educational and practical use in schools and higher education institutions. Einstein dreamed of measuring the speed of a train, an airplane - through the Michelson-Morley experiment of 1881/2024, and only then would the experiment be more than 70% complete. This can be done using a fiber optic HYBRID gyroscope. Based on the completion of more than 70% of Michelson's experiment, the following postulates can be proven: Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and dominant gravitational fields adjust the speed of light in a vacuum. (We are not looking for ether, we will see the work of gravitational quanta) The result is a «theory of everything» in a simple teaching device and a new tape measure for measuring the universe.

Thank you so much.

I have never seen the nodal analysis before, and I thought I'd seen *everything* about Y_lm.

😎👉NASA take my photos 😂🧞‍♂️

This simulation is inconsistent. At around 1:30 the spin of the electron flips to one of the eigenstates upon entering the apparatus. At 2:04 the expectation value of the spin "spiral" due the the nonhomogenius magnetic field in contradiction with the above and without any real explanation.

Thank you, this is the best essential visualisation and explanation of the emitted down converted photon cones and the entangled pairs. If you could answer, do you know how many of those down converted photons, not entangled, reach the SPADs, compared to the entangled pairs? Ignoring all other environmental photons, I mean. Just the order of magnitude, for the most common BBO, or PPKTP, crystal set up. I guess it may vary a lot depending on the set up accuracy how many spurious non entangled photons enter the two connected optical fibers. Unfortunately accurate descriptions of these experiments are very rare, I rely mostly on the very few DIY ones on YT, and I can’t afford a qutools for this purpose, unfortunately.

thank you

Chatgpt brought me to you as I tried to learn about what a qubit is and what quantum entaglement was, and now I think I should have paid more attention in physics class in high school. Thank you for making me feel dumb but also super intrigued. I only understood a fraction of this, but I do want to learn more.

Very helpful short video Thank you very much @QuantumVisions

I recently came across your channel and was genuinely impressed by the quality and educational value of your animations. They are remarkably well-done and convey complex concepts with great clarity. I run a RUclips channel myself, focusing on physics education and I believe that featuring some of your animations could greatly enhance the understanding of concepts I discuss in my videos. I am writing to ask if you would permit me to use short segments of your animations in my upcoming videos. I am committed to fully crediting your work during the segments and in my video descriptions, directing my viewers to your channel and encouraging them to explore your extensive content. I understand and respect the effort that goes into creating such detailed animations, and I assure you that my intention is to showcase your work to a broader audience who would appreciate and benefit from it. If there are specific conditions or arrangements you would prefer for such a collaboration, I am open to discussing them to ensure we both benefit from this opportunity. Best Regards, Jacob

I didn’t get it at all

Great...!

So good. Period. Thank you so much.

Thank you for making this video. 🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗

Could you provide link to the paper please?

Best animation on Atomic Spectra.👍👌

i studied mindlin plate theory at uni last year, i wonder if these shapes are dictated by the boundary conditions. i just know this is going to be a rabbit hole for me 😂

This genius is Zeilinger who got Nobel price for this work.

Whoever came up with this experiment is a genius

Die Relation Kern zu Hülle ist ja sehr vereinfacht dargestellt. Sowohl Kern als auch Atom variieren ja gewaltig. Sei das H-Proton stecknadelgroß = 3 mm, dann hat das H-Atom ca 50 Meter Durchmesser. Bei dieser Größenordnung wäre aber z.B. ein Cäsiumkern etwa 5 cm groß. Der Durchmessser des Cäsium-Atoms wäre dann allerdings etwa 7,5 Km. Oder sei der Cäsiumkern ein Stecknadelkopf, dann hätte das Cäsium-Atom einen Durchmesser von ca. 450 Metern. Das Wasserstoffatom wäre dann aber nur noch eine Kugel von etwa 3,75 m und der Kern nur noch unter einem Mikroskop zu sehen. Mindblowing ist also nicht nur der Größenunterschied von Kern zur Hülle, sondern auch der Unterschied der Atome zueinander (wobei Cäsium ja noch nicht mal das größte Atom ist). Und spätestens in der Quantenphysik gibt es keine fest umrissene "Größe" mehr, das sind dann allenfalls Aufenthaltswahrscheinlichkeiten der Elektronen (die auch noch entscheidend von chemischer Verbindung etc. der Atome abhängen).

wow

How does the BBO work?

I really love your videos ... Thanks for making videos for students like us ❤❤

And what about f orbital? How could be? Can you make a video showing?