Видео

On the road to Pt. Barrow, before entering the restricted area. Out to Sea along Stevenson's Road to the West.

Why is that stupid? I mean, I understand that when you're in a corner defeated you're going to deliver meaningless insults like this. Thank you.

Eric Glock in any scenario you’ll present people who require life saving treatment and can not afford it are most likely going to die. Your board is way too arbitrary not to mention incorrect with the amount of variables missing to make it even slightly accurate. In a socialist country people who need treatment and can’t have it, die. In a communist country it’s exactly the same thing. The funny part is you actually think I’m the one in the corner here, you provided no information at all here and your responses so far are still yet to provide any.

@@goldgold5209 The Microeconomics that is used to justify free market Economics infamously makes simplifying assumptions--you didn't know that? So you just killed the most popular academic defense of free markets in existence. What is your defense of free markets, anyhow? However, that said, you are the one, my friend, who is engaging in meaningless generalities. You talk about "too many variables" without bringing up even one. You have said nothing. Tell me this "variable" in free market healthcare . Also, who said anything about, "Socislism?" You might want to work on your listening skills. If you mean Socialized medicine in mixed economies (also not mentioned in this video), please provide me with the theoretical evidence to support your claims concerning it. Thank you.

@@goldgold5209 And what are these variables. I challenge you to name one that is not a violation of free markets. You can't do it.

What are what variables? Your question makes no sense. The results given are in a perfectly free market. "violating" free market assumptions would be the only way to change the conclusions of the argument.

An ad hominem attack is a logical fallacy.