Видео

What an insightful lecture! As a student I really enjoyed how you explained depicting space-time variability!

6:18

I am dedicated to a oceanography project with a friend who studies this area and I came here to learn more about her field of study. Cheers from Maranhão.

Very helpful, thank you!

hahahahahahaha y'all stupid

Monitoring the ice wall you mean.

melting sea ice will only trigger an ice age do you not do any research the bueafort gyer cold water bomb is about to be released and when it does it will speed along the next ice age by shutting down the amoc

It’s very similar to what’s happening with El Niño this year.

wow

There is no man made climate change. Anyone with half a brain can check out the history of climate and co2. Back during the dinosaurs there was 4 times the CO2 then today. What car did T-rex drive?

I guess this is a video for young people who are thinking about getting a research degree in climate science in their life. My experience bringing up new researchers was that whether a new comer was good at coding for scientific purposes well predict whether they could graduate. Just get to intermediate level Python or NCL plus basic command of Linux OS before becoming a research student. Physics and Mathematics are absolutely critical but you can pick them up during your study. Coding, though... I was lucky i started drinking from hoses a year before i worked as a researcher student.

This was very informative. It’s sad that so many people fool themselves into thinking they know more than climate scientists, rejecting climate action - when the vast majority of them probably don’t even know about this basic phenomenon that she described (see, Dunning-Kruger).

Go whines bux2gnuERluMITstoneAirBalENchaiENjabawok0

what is the modification in Teten's formula for calculating qs?

Dear ARC people. I hope you know this scientist. Dr. Kerry Emanuel | Using Physics to Estimate Current and Future Flood Risk ruclips.net/video/HQaG222IeOg/видео.html

Great lecture Graham!

Accurate in your example is only wet suit

I totally trust that accent he must be correct.

Umm feedback loops? ➿For every increment of warming caused by our greenhouse gas emission alone, evaporation from the extra warming generates enough water vapour to double that warming. ➿Reduction in sea ice and snow cover (albedo)is, from the Arctic alone, responsible for ~25% of the current warming ➿Global terrestrial photosynthesis is in decline. less CO2 is absorbed ➿ Thawing permafrost, the warmer it gets, the more it thaws ➿ There are many more positive ↗ feedback ➿like marine cloud layer decline, wamer oceans absorb less CO2 (and less O2)... We have triggered an avalanche and we want to believe we can stop it before it hits our little global village on a pale blue dot... The warming signal came out of the background noise in 1984, was that the tipping point?

Any comment on the Coral Reef cover 2022 ? Is Peter Ridd correct after all ? Over to you Alice and Jonathan. Start spinning.

Xpi

Xx

Xx

X

Hi

𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚖𝚘𝚜𝚖

Cause it rains up the wa zoo.. in the Pacific Northwest, best crabs in the world

Wash away the anger

It's not only temperature, try some of these searches: photosynthesis decline, phytoplankton decline, krill decline... CO2 and other greenhouse gases we emit are just the trigger. Most of the warming comes from feedback loop like increase in water vapour (another greenhouse gas) 50% of the extra warming, and albedo decline accounts for another 25% of the extra warming. Yes, this looks a lot like an avalanche.

What software to use for spatial downscaling

Is there a way to get these presentations to download? It would be nice to have the links and such to click on.

Amazing presentation, can I get a copy of the ppt?

please also provide with the ppt.

The video sound is pretty good, beyond my imagination

LEN is for strings, SIZE if for arrays xx

By reflecting away 30% of the incoming solar energy the albedo/atmosphere/GHGs make the Earth cooler than it would be without the atmosphere much like that reflective panel behind a car’s windshield. The non-radiative heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmospheric molecules render “extra” energy upwelling from the surface radiating as a LWIR black body impossible. For example, the 396 W/m^2 upwelling from the surface is a “What if?” theoretical calculation without physical reality. (refer to: TFK_bams09) Without the 396 W/m^2 upwelling there is no 333 W/m^2 GHG energy up/down/”back” LWIR greenhouse gas loop to not “warm” the terrestrial surface. The greenhouse theory and man caused climate change are negated by any one of these three points. Hysterical speculations over sea levels, ice caps, glaciers, extreme weather, etc. are irrelevant noise. Zero greenhouse effect, Zero CO2 global warming and Zero man caused climate change. Version 1.0 090121

I always have this question in my mind: models cannot well predict what the weather is like, say, in a week or two. Why do we use models to make climate projection which goes on for a couple of decades? I have a rough idea of the difference between weather and climate but what makes climate predictable on centennial time scale but it is of synoptic time for the weather?

Thank you's. Would be nice if we could closely monitor and analyze risk specially in agricultural areas. I'm quite worried, as we all should, about food production and not just our little homes and neighbourhoods. We will eventually need a food-watch system... of some sort.

Amazing talk! :')

please upload more, or put some links for the course material

Australia will be hit hard if temperatures are not stabilized, thank you.

Rcp8.5 is a worse case (impossible) scenario. If you was a scientist you would not advocate using this models data

Hi, I wonder if there are any omits in the derivation of APE?

at 15:43 she says "you have 7 coupled equations and 7 unknowns" but I can only see 6 equations. Where/what is the 7th equation?

can we enter monthly data in Rlimdex, instead of daily data? if yes, what should we enter in "day" column?

Thank you..............www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2011-08/su-acy082011.php

Thank you.

Woah!!!

I didn't see, in the science section, a direct comparison between the IPCC AR5 RCP 8.5 temperature predictions, and the avg CMIP6 prediction, which has the stronger ECS=~5C. That would have been a much more impacting graph on public perceptions of what we're facing. Maybe it was buried in the many curves on each of those related graphs?

Great about study of Convection👌👌