Видео

Very true but then again we also struggled with gas powered cars in 1886. I am only talking about innovation.

Agreed. Alas theBig Problems wit EV's are not the Vehicles but everything else, Total Life Cost from Birth to Recycleing, Infrastructure, Power plants, and all the useless power sapping Electronic Gadgets. These things are still beta test exparamental Tech Boy toys. Give one to an 80 year old and let's see how it goes.

@@AutoArchive180 We have been struggling with EV cars from the 1870s till this date, Combustion engines have made significant strides with minimal problems despite the significant amount of moving parts.

Combustion engines made it because we have been working on those engines since 1804. The first ever train. So it's been over 200 years

@@AutoArchive180 dude ffs get your facts right. The train was powered by steam engines not combustion engines. The first combustion engine was made during the 1860s. Why don't you spend some time doing actual research instead of making random useless videos.

No range? Cheap ones are coming with 250 to 300 miles range, battery toxicity? Yeah like you are doing a good thing by burning fossil fuel in the air. I am only talking about innovation in this video it's simple as that. We struggled with gas cars when we started in 1886 and now we are struggling with electric cars but we will get through it

@@KenMac-ui2vb now you see what I'm talking about but not for nothing EVs are cool and all of that stuff but it's gonna be a while before gas powered vehicles get totally phased out because they are so reliable, you can't drive a electric vehicle from coast to coast without having trouble finding charging stations in rural America or a qualified EV repair shop should something goes wrong 👍🏾

​@@AutoArchive180 you do know that EV's were around before internal combistion engine?

Not true. The first ever ev was Flocken Elektrowagen made in 1888. Two years later. However, at that time we were far behind in technology compared to where we are right now. Even in 1886 when they released the motor wagon (first even car) it had a 4 stroke gas powered engine. The first ever gas powered engine was produced by Jean Joseph in 1860 which is still 60 years older then the first ever train ever made back in 1804. As far as I remember it took us easily over 50 years to make working cars for consumer class and then another 50 years to perfect the art of making petrol cars. Not to mention the journey began in 1804. That's over 200 years !

@@AutoArchive180 depends on how you count it. EV was invented in 1820's but as you said commercially sold in 1880's. Issues with EV's have stayed quite similar through all these years, nowdays it is option for some, but a long way to go before EV can be considered universal answer some people were hoping it to be

That's your opinion my man if you don't like ev cars then just say it lol.

I completely agree with you

To each their own I suppose.

All car batteries are repurposed to electric banks or recycled. You can recycle 80% of the battery material back.

@@MartinMartinX sure they are but there aren't many battery recycling facilities on every corner but there are lots of cars though especially in big cities so the US is gonna have to start preparing for what's to come with those specific batteries and building manufacturing plants for recycling and resale of those batteries

@@ericscrutchins6350 They are some and there will be more in the future. I see 0 problems with this. It needs some time for market to adjust and it will.

Just like when gas were introduced in 1886

I do agree with your points. Yes it has its own disadvantages like everything else but we won't have the option to stay with fuel cara in future. Also yes the video is short because I am very new to RUclips and script writing. However I am working on a much detailed video on this same topic

​@AutoArchive180 honestly, before writing this kind of script, do proper research. Companies never wanted to switch, they were forced... no business wants to invest billions in a market that is knowingly underdeveloped in terms of infrastructure and end up losing, like Ford, 50.000 dollars per EV produced. Plus the usage of rare metals to produce batteries and all the mess created in underdeveloped countries to get them... I mean, seriously...

I never said they were or they were not forced to switch. Of course marketing costs a lot that is true but our resources are depleting and flowing warming is a big issue as well. We need to refine EV technology like we did with gas powered cars. We started from motor wagon back in 1886 and people hated that thing at the start. Cara killed a lot of people before 1910 because of safety issues but now look where we are. I only spoke about innovation.

True but then again we are already seeing a big change. Who knows where we will be in the next 5years

@@AutoArchive180 It will be exciting to see what comes from all the research.

I am making part 2 of this video and I will make sure it's as detailed as possible. Please do watch that in coming months :)

I am glad you enjoyed the video :) I am a big lexus and nisssan fan boy as well. It's sad to see how they are not able to compete with European car giants as effectively anymore like they did before.

I love the information you gave in your comment. It helps me learn more however... LFP batteries are only found in model 3 and Y standard ranges. 100,000 miles is the lifespan of the battery not the car according to evoconnect. Now that depends upon which xar or specific model it is if course. I have specified coal because as of now we are more reliant on coal power then anything else. I have mentioned the msrp of 40k to 50k as a reference because that's the average cost. Kia makes picanto and it costs 20k aud while the Renault ZOE costs 33k aud which is point. Yes we can demand for more but for "NOW" that's all we have. Yes you can build lighter EV cars but my point of this video is that I am talking about current issues we are facing and how this is just not the answer and we have to do better. I never said we can stop or should stop our research if you go through my entire video you will see that part. So in short... no it's not "old" information. It's cutrent information and I only hope for the improvement.

Trust me i am in the same team as you lol and want them to do better with electric cars haha it's just we are not there yet and I am just addressing that

@@AutoArchive180 To each his own, but "i am in the same team as you" is ingenious, considering knowledge posted by the OP is missing from video (which is readily availabel to anyone researching the EV). When I look at the channel, it looks like astro turfing. All good gas, ev only negative. For anyone else, try "Driving Cleaner How Electric Cars and Pick-Ups Beat Gasoline on Lifetime Global Warming Emissions" by UCS, though that should be only starting point.

I am sorry but maybe you are not really looking into the kind of videos I make where I defend EV cars when it's needed. Take a look at my other videos like "Lamborghini's answer to Tesla: Lamborghini Sian" or even "$770k Electric Rolls-Royce: Worth It?".

good example of that is amsterdam, it was just like american cities in the 1980 but now theres almost no cars in there and it looks a lot prettier too.

Finally, someone gets it, but see, that's just a dream for us, haha. One of my future project is how car manufacturers brainwash people to make them buy cars, which people don't even need. I will do my best to expose them, but I do wish we had more bikes, trains, and trams instead of cars, honestly.

I hope you watched the entire video because this video was only on how EV cars might not be the answer as of now because of our current recourses. I did mention at the start of my video that petrol cars are just as bad, if not worse. So no, it's not biased video. I did mention few good things about ev cars as well. It's hard to please everyone on RUclips haha.

We need less cars and more bikes, trains, trams and roads/tracks to them. It would give a lot more space in the city and reduce noise too. Just imagine how much average persons spends for a car every year and what if we gave that money for public transport and roads for bikes and walking. E-cars maybe are little better than petrol cars but they still arent good and definetly will not fix climate change or polution problems.

@@AutoArchive180 you show people suffering from cobalt extraction as if there was no people harmed for oil extraction over the past 150 years. Not to mention gold, copper, rare earth or any other... whatever... When informing its not a problem to please but not to partialy or.. whatever. Good luck.

You don't get the point of this video do you? I never said that we were saints for the past 150 years. All those mines for gold copper and whatever are not good but I am not talking about them. I am talking about EV cars only and we are also not helping anyone with making them "today"

@@IvandelMuntSoler no need to try to correct such people. They either won't understand the real numbers or just want to ride the wave that is trending.

I would say the Turbo S is way more fun compared to this but then again this one is a GT car

What a load of huge tosh! The numbers of EVs globally that have been destroyed by fire around the world in the past 6 years is not much more than 300, and almost all of those have been unrelated to charging or driving. Most have been destroyed in building fires due to other causes. The risks of an EV catching fire are magnitude of about 20 times LESS than the risk of your ICEV catching fire.

I do get your point for sure. It is danger to cram in all of that energy into small containers we call batteries but well as humans we like to take risk lol. We invented cars back in 1886 and at that time it was the most dangerous thing on road until we made seat belts and other things so.. I would say that they will eventually find a solution to make these batteries last long and not explode hopefully

Nope, You'll just see EV's disappearing because NOBODY WANTS THEM. They aren't realistic to use.

@@wolfpackflt670 You are wrong on multiple accounts and is trying to use the ostrich tactic (sticking your head in the sand and hope the problem disappear). Let me know in ten years how well that was working for ya 😁

I'll have to agree with wertigon on this one. EV cars are the future haha. In just 10 years most major brands are switching to electric only cars.

It's more then just battery on wheels.

Rolls Royce knows more than you

You would be surprised because a lot of people own it. It looks better and drives better while it compromises nothing in quality

Haha I would say it has its own perks

I am currently working on that video too ! It should be out very soon :)

@@AutoArchive180 Fantastic. I look forward to watching it.

I do believe that Lamborghinu will eventually catch up to tesla and Rimac.

Have you heard about lamborghini Lanzador? It's a fully electric Lamborghini super car that will be in production by 2028. So your point is invalid. These brands are switching to electric cars very, very soon. Ferrari will be in the fully electric game by 2025. I still, to this point, stand by my statement. These super car brands are late to the game, and now they have to catch up to the monsters like the rimac nevera, which can beat each one of these current hybrids and shred them to pieces. Now, Nevera is a super car and is fully electric.

​@@AutoArchive180 Yes, I have heard about that disgrace. That's a concept car though, and sitll has the room to get cancelled. My point stands proven that the EU (and all the WEF puppet countries) ate forcing electric cars down people's throats. My point stands still. Electric cars are fine in their own bubble, but not to get forced down people's throats. As for you saying they're late, they're not late for anything, they're just making cars that they want to make, and there's clearly a massive market for it, so they sell. THE ONLY reason car companies are "going electric" is because it's being forced in, and choice is being eliminated. I say, electric cars can exist, but they can't replace ICE vehicles, the experience with these cars are unmatched, no matter the speed. Lamborghini is clearly not CHOOSING to go electric, people need to stop acting like this is the future, because it's not. And yes, the rimac can beat a ICE car on a drag strip or 0-60 or whatever, but is straight line speed the only thing that define supercars? You are forgetting there's driving experience, sound, and outright fun involved, this is something you won't get with your little EVs because a fast 0--60 is only fun a handful of times. Get off your spreadsheets and actually experience the cars, and even if you don't agree, at least you'll understand. People like you who support the push towards EVs is what's completely ruining modern cars. Especially for those of us that just want to hear a damn engine, and feel the rough experience that it gives you ~even if it's slower~. For instance; a tesla plaid might be faster on paper then a huracan, but if you look, people still buy huracans, and they're significantly more expensive. That alone should show speed isn't everything. So you've not proven anything whatsoever. You've only proven that you are another little obedient slave that prefers to do exactly what they're told, and believes what they're told to believe.

Haha, this will be my last comment for this section anyway. First of all.. no, I don't hate V12 or any petrol engines. I own a car that runs on petrol. Secondly, it doesn't matter if someone likes it or not. EV cars are the future. Most of the global track records are under EV cars now instead of petrol cars. I am not saying it doesn't suck. It does suck but people need to accept it. I have provided you with the facts and knowledge I possess, haha. Now it's up to you how you take it. Call me all the names you want, but nor you or anyone is going to change the future. That's EV. On another note, I will continue to make videos on EV to prove its the future. Also, please use facts, not insults ^^ I will remove your comment otherwise. Thank.you :)

We were trying to make a different sort of video lol

Not only that they are also trying to answer other hybrid since porshe, mclaren and ferrai already did with their P1, 918 and La ferrari. Lamborghini is very late to the party.

Yes, he does. This kid is actually crazy.

flavio manzoni not floppio manzoni. Flavio is the chief design officer at Ferrari.

You cared enough to click and comment, so you for one.

Lol

Well it has more flaws then plus points actually

That's true but it doesn't look like jaguar is giving up anytime soon

?

Something that seems to be forgotten by history, and I think omitted from the Ford versus Ferrari movie, is that the Mark 1 GT40 was engineered in England. After their LeMans debut the car was brought stateside and given to Carol Shelby to fix.

Thank you :)

The legendary V8 !

I would say that this was not completely AI voice haha. It's a clone of my own voice.

I did mention the 05 ford gt has a V8 engine at 2:14.

At 2:41 you then say it had a twin turbo V6.

alright I see that now my bad x.x thanks for pointing it out though :)

Lol rolls royce already made specter so... yup fully electric rolls royce.