N.T. Wright Clips
N.T. Wright Clips
  • Видео 13
  • Просмотров 198 915

Видео

Will the Earth Be Burned Up with Fire!? -J. Richard Middleton
Просмотров 1,6 тыс.Год назад
This is a small clip from Dr. Middleton’s series on Eschatology on Seminary Now seminarynow.com/programs/biblical-eschatology 2 Peter 3:10
N.T. Wright on Atonement Theories
Просмотров 3,1 тыс.2 года назад
This is a clip from a lecture at Wheaton College. Full video below: ruclips.net/video/GGJ7M1CDhBU/видео.html
Tom Wright and Veli-Matti Kärkkäinen on “Supernatural” Acts of the Holy Spirit
Просмотров 2 тыс.3 года назад
This clip was taken from a longer Q&A at Fuller Seminary ruclips.net/video/oWNQiOrcMZE/видео.html
Michael Heiser critiques the “church-age” long doctrine of Original Sin
Просмотров 73 тыс.3 года назад
This clip is taken from the Naked Bible Podcast. It was part of an answer to a question about abortion and what happens to babies who are aborted. Here’s the link Heiser mentions: drmsh.com/romans-512/ This channel is for promoting N.T. Wright and teachings like his from Wright and scholastic colleagues of like-faith. We hope you will enjoy.
The King Jesus Gospel by Scot McKight
Просмотров 1,4 тыс.3 года назад
This is a snippet from McKight’s book, The King Jesus Gospel published by Zondervan. It is the full gospel of King Jesus as explained by McKnight. As a page which exists to spread the Good News of King Jesus, mainly through the teachings of N.T. Wright we want to include this important gospeling in the line of Wright’s teaching (Wright endorsed the book).
N.T. Wright’s Rebuttal Against Historical Criticism of Jesus’ Resurrection
Просмотров 9043 года назад
N.T. Wright’s Rebuttal Against Historical Criticism of Jesus’ Resurrection
Tim Mackie on Revelation - Understanding Armageddon through a different lens
Просмотров 41 тыс.3 года назад
This is from The Bridgetown Church in Portland Oregon podcast. It’s an interview between John Mark Comer and Tim Mackie. This RUclips site is focused on providing clips from N.T. Wight and his teaching. This clip from Mackie fits exactly into Wright’s theology on Revelation, so we thought we’d include it here. Please enjoy.
N.T. Wright’s influence on Tim Keller
Просмотров 8 тыс.3 года назад
Keller describes how influential Wright’s book, The Resurrection of the Son of God was as Keller fought through cancer. Original Video: ruclips.net/video/B4pA-KOUdQE/видео.html
N.T. Wright - Atonement Theology
Просмотров 17 тыс.3 года назад
Full Video: ruclips.net/video/GGJ7M1CDhBU/видео.html The book Tom is referring to is: The Day the Revolution Began: Reconsidering the Meaning of Jesus's Crucifixion
N.T. Wright speaks strongly on Zionism - Is modern Israel a fulfillment of prophecy?
Просмотров 43 тыс.3 года назад
Full Video: ruclips.net/video/ptrsd3hJXNc/видео.html
N.T. Wright, What is the gospel of Jesus Christ?
Просмотров 2,5 тыс.3 года назад
On Russel Moore’s podcast, asking N.T. Wright what is the gospel of Jesus Christ. Full video here: ruclips.net/video/amPE8V4xEEY/видео.html
N.T. Wright on how he has developed theologically over the years.
Просмотров 5 тыс.3 года назад
From an interview at Wheaton College introducing The New Testament In It’s World. Full Video: ruclips.net/video/ccWTtNLs-YA/видео.html

Комментарии

  • @davidh.7138
    @davidh.7138 День назад

    We CAN say Israel is a fulfilment of prophecy. Those that follow a different voice to the prophets of Israel will say nay, but they had better repent for their own sake - and quickly!

  • @douginalabama2845
    @douginalabama2845 10 дней назад

    A well thought out Biblical viewpoint. I just saw a post where someone said this video proved Dr. Heiser was a heretic. Strangely they did not use any BIBLICAL response, just that accusation.

  • @Dogfrommars
    @Dogfrommars 11 дней назад

    Interesting but I don’t see it.

  • @96tolife
    @96tolife 14 дней назад

    Romans 5:12 is about spiritual death. Spiritual death has spread to all men, including children. We all come into the world spiritually dead to God apart from having the indwelling Holy Spirit. The Bible doesn't say anything about what happens to children. We trust a loving God will make the right decision about those children. People go to hell not because they sin. They go to hell because they are spiritually dead to God. No scripture says babies go to heaven because they are "innocent." Heiser complains about people not having scriptures to support their position and then doesn't use scripture to support his belief. SMH ruclips.net/video/rqSTquZGIbs/видео.html

  • @QXr30
    @QXr30 14 дней назад

    The concept of original sin is a vile concept. The idea that you can be guilty of something you didn’t do, that you must accept guilt just because you breathe is simply a vile idea and needs to be erased from mankind.

  • @acem82
    @acem82 15 дней назад

    The concept that we are guilty of another's sin is false, see Deuteronomy 24:16 and Ezekiel 18.

  • @michaeljay4816
    @michaeljay4816 15 дней назад

    I don’t understand why so many thinks this is some new teaching. I believe I’ve heard essentially the same teaching in practice from John MacArthur, R.C. Sproul, John Piper, and Tim Keller. As well as dozens of lesser known reformed and arminian teachers. They may be the minority, but there are plenty of prominent teachers with very similar views to Heiser here.

  • @benmlee
    @benmlee 17 дней назад

    Jesus was not born of man. Mary was a virgin. The "DNA" if you will of Jesus was not that of Mary or Joseph. He came straight from God. Therefore, Jesus had no sin from that point of view.

  • @einsteindavid3774
    @einsteindavid3774 18 дней назад

    " The soul that sins shall die. The son shall not suffer for the iniquity of the father, nor the father suffer for the iniquity of the son; the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon the wicked." Ezekiel 18 v 20-21. " Behold, all souls are mine; the soul of the father as well as the soul of the son is mine: the soul that sins shall die." Ezekiel 18 v 4 " Everyone shall die for his own sin" ( Jer 31 v 30). "The father cannot be put to death for the sin of the children and the children cannot be put to death for the sin of the father, but everyone shall die for his own sin." Deut 24 v 16 " Solomon confirmed Deuteronomy 24 v 16 in llCron 25 v 4" As you can see, Prophets Ezekiel, Jeremiah, Moses and Solomon were all ignorant of the so called ' original sin'. Jesus Christ himself was unaware of the Dogma. He said: " Every male Child the opens the wombs the womb shall be called holy unto the Lord." Lk 2 v 23 " Let the little children come unto me and forbid them not for such is the kingdom of heaven. Verily I say to you, whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child shall not enter therein." Mk 10 v 14-15 and Matt 19 v 14 Listen to the words of Christ, your Redeemer, your Lord and your God. Behold, I came into the world not to call the righteous but sinners to repentance; the whole need no physician, but they that are sick; wherefore, little children are whole, for they are not capable of committing sin; wherefore the curse of Adam is taken from them in me, that it hath no power over them; and the law of circumcision is done away in me. Sin is NOT heredity!!

  • @savage.indios
    @savage.indios 18 дней назад

    Why are ONLY native American indians the only ones who were attacked the most by the Catholic Church???

  • @uiPublic
    @uiPublic 18 дней назад

    Retake Revelation as imminent happenings & warning heeded by 70AD not Prophetic at all!? Wrath as destruction reserved for the Lord alone, Man Jesus single handed against Sinners!

    • @uiPublic
      @uiPublic 18 дней назад

      If then Sweet victory or Honey moon couldn't be waiting after that as God's family increases. ...

    • @uiPublic
      @uiPublic 18 дней назад

      Instant revival for People liken St Paul's spectacle at Happily heaven maybe Retold others‽

  • @IsaacNussbaum
    @IsaacNussbaum 18 дней назад

    @2:56 _"They're gonna go to hell."_ Discussions about the fate of infants are made needlessly complicated because of the spurious notion that some people go to hell. The original Bible manuscripts do not contain the word "hell" or any word that means hell. I conclude from that that there is no such place as hell. ► Sheol is not hell. ► Hades is not hell. ► Gehenna is not hell. ► The Lake of Fire is not hell.

  • @brianlucas7604
    @brianlucas7604 19 дней назад

    "Jesus " is the SON of God No one is in heaven or hell, unless by "hell" you mean the grave.

  • @ScribeAlicious
    @ScribeAlicious 20 дней назад

    Heiser was an interesting fringe scholar whose doctrine of man was certainly not his strong suit

  • @beauchal
    @beauchal 22 дня назад

    Not one mention of the age of accountability and all the verses which back that up?

    • @ScribeAlicious
      @ScribeAlicious 20 дней назад

      Because it isn’t supported by scripture in the least

    • @beauchal
      @beauchal 20 дней назад

      @@ScribeAlicious Deuteronomy 1:39, 2 Samuel 12:22-23, Matthew 18:1-4, Isaiah 7:15…that’s just off the top of my head. All indicate children without the capacity to understand their moral choices go to heaven/promised land in the OT.

  • @johnchristianpreus
    @johnchristianpreus 27 дней назад

    What utter folly! So do some men die innocently without sin? This guy is a false teacher who does violence to the gospel.

  • @Beccaboo739
    @Beccaboo739 29 дней назад

    If it implies that all people will sin if “in sin my mother conceived me,” but we are born uncorrupted because of Jesus’ sacrifice, doesn’t this feel like it would undermine the justness of God?

  • @jasonhallock3773
    @jasonhallock3773 Месяц назад

    Theologians, particularly after Constantine, really mucked up the Bible

  • @jasonhallock3773
    @jasonhallock3773 Месяц назад

    Jesus said the saved are like children I believe. Children are in good standing.

    • @ScribeAlicious
      @ScribeAlicious 20 дней назад

      He didn’t say that believers were like children but that they ought to be. And the point was not that children are innocent (they aren’t) but that believers should be wholly reliant and trusting in their caregiver who is Christ

  • @micahringelberg744
    @micahringelberg744 Месяц назад

    Classic N.T. Wright applying 2 Timothy 3:7

  • @IsaacNussbaum
    @IsaacNussbaum Месяц назад

    @8:18 _"No one goes to heaven on the basis of any merit of their own."_ Not many people know this (even Dr. Heiser) but the Bible nowhere promises heaven to the followers of Christ. Earth is our home both now and forever. ✴ _The highest heavens belong to the LORD, but the earth He has given to mankind._ (Psalm 115: 16, BSB)

    • @ScribeAlicious
      @ScribeAlicious 20 дней назад

      You are a goof. Go read the Bible

    • @IsaacNussbaum
      @IsaacNussbaum 20 дней назад

      @@ScribeAlicious I couldn't help but notice that you did not cite a single Scripture. Do you know any that promise heaven to believers? No, of course not. There aren't any.

    • @IsaacNussbaum
      @IsaacNussbaum 5 дней назад

      @@johnmarkcamenga Thank you for bringing up John 14: 1-3, John Mark. I often use that passage to show people, from the Bible, that Christians never go to heaven.

  • @divinenatureonline
    @divinenatureonline Месяц назад

    I dunno, it doesn't seem that complicated to me. He clearly sinned and by His sin, sin entered the world. "Therefore, just as through one man sin entered into the world..." (LSB) (Federal headship) I've never understood it as "moral guilt" but the fact that as Adam sinned, we wouldn't have done any better.

  • @randyd9805
    @randyd9805 Месяц назад

    I have for most of my Christian life believed that there is an age of accountability as it's usually called meaning a point in time when a person becomes conscious of sin and therefore accountable. I do not believe it is a specific age, but can vary greatly and by that I mean by YEARS, not days. I believe babies and small children who have not come to a point where they know the difference between right and wrong are accountable for their sins. You can question me if you wish, but I remember the very day that my conscience was awakened and I began to know right from wrong. I was 4 years old when it happened and remember it like it was yesterday. I believe some can become conscious of their sins before that while some could be YEARS later. There is a point at which all of us become aware of right and wrong and choose wrong. When we do that knowingly we are beyond question accountable for our sins, but it simply varies from person to person. This could and should give hope to a person who perhaps lost a child, sibling, or close friend at a very early age and it haunts them to this day. Btw, I set our house on fire when I was 4. I was innocent when I struck the FIRST MATCH, but by the time I saw the fire I lost my innocence forever!!! I didn't become an arsonist just FYI.

  • @bridgetgolubinski
    @bridgetgolubinski Месяц назад

    This cleared up sooooo many of my questions. Very grateful!!

    • @Fireking285
      @Fireking285 Месяц назад

      Hey man! May I suggest a few channels that may also help? I've gone through many (I assume similar) questions. @Soteriology101 @Idol killer @TheChurchSplit

    • @ScribeAlicious
      @ScribeAlicious 20 дней назад

      Thats unfortunate. But lies are seductive things

    • @Fireking285
      @Fireking285 20 дней назад

      @ScribeAlicious Original sin being one of them

  • @stephenmcguire7342
    @stephenmcguire7342 Месяц назад

    How unfortunate that a man of such intelligence allowed his preconceived protestant sentimentality to blind him from the significance of the "kecharitomene" in regards to the Mother of God. If he allowed himself to truly understand the significance of the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception, he would never have put this sentimental babble out for public consumption. Please for the love of God do not let this nonsense inform your understanding of true Christianity. The Church never taught his understanding of Original Sin as personal sin. Here is the true understanding as taught by Pope St. Pius X, "Original sin is the sin in which we are all born, and which we contracted by the disobedience of our first parent, Adam. The evil effects of the sin of Adam are: The privation of grace, the loss of Paradise, together with ignorance, inclination to evil, death, and all our other miseries. Original sin is cancelled by holy Baptism. Actual sin is that which man, after coming to the use of reason, commits of his own free will."

    • @ScribeAlicious
      @ScribeAlicious 20 дней назад

      Take yourself and your demonic doctrines elsewhere. Repent and trust in Christ or be damned along with your so called “mother of god”

  • @ClarenceThompkins
    @ClarenceThompkins Месяц назад

    Makes no since

  • @IsabelRodriguez-nv2ue
    @IsabelRodriguez-nv2ue Месяц назад

    Wonderful! Thank you very much for an eloquent clear reading! It is a delight to listen to this reading!

  • @brendaevans1378
    @brendaevans1378 Месяц назад

    The Bible clearly states that all people are responsible for their own sins 😢

    • @ScribeAlicious
      @ScribeAlicious 20 дней назад

      Yes very clearly. Original sin doesn’t mean we are guilty of Adam’s specific sin… it means we sin because of Adam’s sin AKA we inherit a fallen nature that wants nothing but to sin. Scripture says “one man sinned therefore all sinned” saying we aren’t born in this predicament is equally as fallacious as saying “well I didn’t die in the cross so therefore Christ’s righteousness can not be imputed”

  • @Tim.Foster123
    @Tim.Foster123 2 месяца назад

    "That's a theological invention" ...then proceeds to rattle off a number of theological inventions.

  • @tanstaafl5695
    @tanstaafl5695 2 месяца назад

    Heiser should stick to the topics he knows about and is so helpful on. Stuff about the structures and content of the early chapters of Genesis and the insights into the (possible) hierarchy of spiritual beings from clues in the bible. He clearly is willing to subject the clear teachings of scripture to his logical thought frames. This is neither wise nor helpful. It is SUPREME arrogance to assume that the reason the church fathers have held to the solid doctrine of corporate representation by Adam (unmistakably and directly taught in Romans 5) is simply unquestioning subservience to "church leaders." Heiser is neither correct nor helpful in this denial of clear biblical teaching, AND it would be far more honest to interact with the body of that teaching rather than attempt a "refutation" while simultaneously showing you are either a) unfamiliar with it or b) ignoring it. It is FALSE that the doctrine of original sin means all infants dying are going to hell. His point is also very illogical, because the text CLEARLY teaches that all who die ARE sinners. Therefore, any infant who is saved (and I believe there is real grounds to believe they are saved, another topic) is saved FROM THE SIN THAT CAUSED THEIR DEATH by Christ's imputed righteousness, not from some imagined "innocence." Again, Heiser should stick to what he understands.

  • @neiljoseph2330
    @neiljoseph2330 2 месяца назад

    No matter how educated you are IF you do not have the grace of God you will be blinded to what is right before your eyes... There are MANY scriptures that prophecy about Israel's return to the land. For example Ezekiel 11:17. Isaiah 27:6 said that Israel will fill the world with fruit and they are #7 in the world. Also you can calculate the time of the return from Ezekiel's 430 year prophecy. If you take the remaining time of judgement after Babylon ie 360 years from 537BC and multiply by 7 as promised in Levitius 26 because of disobedience in judgement, you get 2520 years. If you use the 360 day calendar you get 907,200 days. If you add those days to 537BC you get the year 1948. Also God has used the 50 year Jubilee to show that He is working to restore Israel. In 1917 Balfour Declaration +50 is 1967 when Israel took back Jerusalem +50 when Jerusalem was named Israel's capital. You also have 1897 with Herzl +50 is 1947 when the UN voted in the Jewish State. I teach this stuff so I just gave you a tip of the iceberg of prophecies that Israel fulfilled.

  • @Tybourne1991
    @Tybourne1991 2 месяца назад

    Hi everyone, in Luke 1:28, the angel Gabriel greets Mary as 'full of grace.' While grace can abound alongside human imperfection, being *full* of grace suggests a complete absence of sin, as grace, like light, supernaturally dispels darkness. This understanding has led the Church to affirm Mary’s sinlessness throughout her life. It’s a perspective that challenges reformist views about Mary but is grounded in authentic readings of scripture. Such debates remind us of the rich and infinite possibilities in interpreting the Bible.

    • @Ninjaskeptic
      @Ninjaskeptic 2 месяца назад

      @Tybourne1991 I love that you recognize that the bible is open to interpretation instead of demanding that your interpretation is the only truth to be had. I am very curious why you think Mary was sinless. Is it simply because she was pregnant with jesus? I can't find anything in the bible supporting this using my own interpretations. Could you provide me with yours? I'm unfamiliar with a lot of catholic traditions and would like to understand better. Thx!

    • @Tybourne1991
      @Tybourne1991 2 месяца назад

      Hi @Ninjaskeptic Thanks for jumping in-I appreciate your thoughtful response! I’ll do my best to wrestle with your questions. First off, let’s start with something foundational: our approach to interpreting Scripture. Do you, like me, hold that the Bible is inspired by the Holy Spirit and that it faithfully communicates the truths God intended to reveal for our salvation? Put another way, do you see Scripture as the pillar and support of truth? Let’s see if we can start from the same page!

  • @mrseph007
    @mrseph007 2 месяца назад

    Tom you are not Wright about this.

  • @Godsaves-sz8pq
    @Godsaves-sz8pq 2 месяца назад

    The proof that Islam was invented by Catholic Church! Catholic believe Mary is sinless like Muslims believe that she was never was touched by devil what means she was sinless! 🤯shocking realization

  • @4me2poop0nU
    @4me2poop0nU 2 месяца назад

    If our Government didnt lie and manipulate into wars than we would never even have to ask ourselves whether or not we should support our Military Civil War was unnesacery. The South had every right to succeed and the war had nothing to do with freeing the slave and everything to do with DC loosing 75% of their income from southern ports collecting Tariffs Spanish american War was a false flag event Wilson purposely sent our ships into water to get attacked by Germany who had every right to engage FDR coerced Japan into attacking and even ignored the nees we had of when the attack was coming We entered Bietnam over the Golf of Tonkin event was admitted by DC to be fake We all know about Iraq wars and tge other recent ones

  • @ounkwon6442
    @ounkwon6442 2 месяца назад

    I sin. You sin. What the heck is sin? What the heck is original sin? a high-quality sin? or sin that gets inherited to every one. Except sinless Jesus and Mary Queen of Heaven?

  • @kh251-g1g
    @kh251-g1g 2 месяца назад

    How can anyone think the Chosen people were European? The Bible is a Hebrew book. Hebrews were black.

  • @1roccia
    @1roccia 2 месяца назад

    John 9:3 Jesus answered, Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents... Luke 1:6 And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments... Luke 5:32 I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance...

  • @paulmulewa6595
    @paulmulewa6595 2 месяца назад

    Me thinks it is not guilt that is inherited, but rather the inclination towards sin that is inherited. That is the spiritual death (depravity, distance from God) that Paul is talking about.

  • @petewalker6321
    @petewalker6321 3 месяца назад

    NTW's smug, self-satisfied confidence in his cloistered theological understanding fails woefully to grasp the depth and complexity of the meanings in biblical prophecy. He may well have some surprises coming as history unfolds!

  • @ThePropriate
    @ThePropriate 3 месяца назад

    I love this, except for the part where everyone is going to sin, it's inevitable kind of thing. There are righteous and perfect people other than Jesus in the Bible and even in the New Testament. The parents of John the Baptist were said to be perfect. So, not everyone automatically sins. That's not what the Psalmist was saying.

  • @DollarStoreGuardian
    @DollarStoreGuardian 3 месяца назад

    Love Dr. Heisers work, rip. However, I think he’s missing something, in that , abortion as a sin, isn’t so heinous because your committing murder. It’s heinous because you’re ALSO damning that soul to hell until the resurrection. THEY ARE IN HELL!!! THATS THE REAL REASON ABORTION IS SUCH AN AWFUL THING. People try so hard to remove the guilt and the punishments of god that they will literally lead themselves astray by their own philosophy. I should add that we’re talking about willful abortion, not a miscarriage. They’re not the same thing.

    • @IsaacNussbaum
      @IsaacNussbaum Месяц назад

      *"THEY ARE IN HELL!!!"* The original Bible manuscripts do not contain the word "hell" or any word that means hell. I conclude from that that there is no such place as hell. *BIBLE TRANSLATIONS WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN THE WORD "HELL"* A Critical Emphatic Paraphrase of the New Testament (1960) Aramaic Peshitta New Testament (2006) Christian Bible (1991) Concordant Literal Version (1983) Emphatic Diaglott, Greek/English Interlinear (1942) Etymological New Testament (2011) Fenton's Holy Bible in Modern English (1903) Hanson's New Covenant (1884) Holy Bible In Its Original Order (2007) Interlinear NASB-NIV Parallel New Testament in Greek and English (1993) Jewish Publication Society Bible Old Testament (1917) Jonathan Mitchell New Testament (2009) MirrorWord New Testament (in progress) New American Bible (1970) New American Bible Revised Edition (NABRE) New Testament, Recovery Version (1991) New Testament of our Lord and Savior Anointed (1958) Original Bible Project (in progress) Orthodox Jewish Brit Chadasha [NT Only] Panin's Numeric English New Testament (1914) Restoration of Original Sacred Name Bible (1976) Rotherham's Emphasized Bible (reprinted, 1902) Scarlett's New Testament (1798) Tanakh, The Holy Scriptures, Old Testament (1985) The New Testament, A Translation (Clementson, 1938) The New Testament (David Bentley Hart) Yale University Press, 2017 The New Testament in Greek and English (Kneeland, 1823) The New Testament, A New Translation (Greber, 1980) The New Testament, Charles B. Williams, 1937 The New Testament, James Moffat, (1917) The People's New Covenant (1925) The Source New Testament (2004, 2007) Tree of Life Version (2016) Twentieth Century New Testament (1900) Victorious Gospel of Jesus Christ, Electronic Version Wesley's New Testament (1755) Western New Testament (1926) Weymouth's New Testament in Modern Speech (1903) World English Bible (in progress) Young's Literal Translation (1891) Zondervan Parallel New Testament in Greek and English (1975)

  • @christianfrommuslim
    @christianfrommuslim 3 месяца назад

    This is sooo important for sharing with MUSLIMS! They think that Jesus died only for original sin. They don't believe in original sin, so they see no sense in Jesus' death. When sharing with them, be sure you emphasize that Jesus died for ALL sin. Muslims need to hear and understand the Bible and gospel. For more on how to share with them, click on our green icon for a 2-minute intro.

  • @sharamadsen3080
    @sharamadsen3080 3 месяца назад

    Reformed Christian here! We don't believe that babies inherit Adam's guilt. We believe that they inherit a sin-nature (in other words, they will sin when able to). With regards to whether or not babies in unbelieving families go to heaven or hell, God's word does not reveal this. God is rich in mercy and just.

  • @Karen19820
    @Karen19820 3 месяца назад

    Well, well, Mr. N.T. Wright, you appear to be dealing with your past and present words and works coming up against God’s actual Word to us through the Bible. His Living Word is actually contradicting your “interpretation” of his Word. Repent, Sir. The Bible is clear. Those that try to talk all around what it says plainly, are endangering themselves. May The Lord capture your heart and mind with his unfailing love.

    • @jlmt6198
      @jlmt6198 3 месяца назад

      What was actually the part that goes against His Word?

  • @brianwilliam1869
    @brianwilliam1869 3 месяца назад

    You are saved because of the Resurrection? You are saved by faith; that Christ died for you. He took your sin on the cross. The Resurrection, is so that we may believe, because we are dense. All the other miracles were not enough for us.

  • @ThereAreAnswers-px8ms
    @ThereAreAnswers-px8ms 3 месяца назад

    This is the Eastern Orthodox view. Rome really messed up things. Lol.

    • @benjamind547
      @benjamind547 2 месяца назад

      Nonsense. It's taught in both the East and West.

  • @chuckabean1
    @chuckabean1 3 месяца назад

    Man’s wisdom twisting scripture and discounting the law and the prophets that Paul said were the foundation of all he taught.

  • @drmanojkumarkhatore4476
    @drmanojkumarkhatore4476 3 месяца назад

    Palestine The term Palestine comes from the name of an idol-worshipping tribe: the Philistines. The word Palestine does not have Israelite or Islamic origin. The Philistines were a tribe of skilled ironworkers known as sea people who enslaved Israel for some time. The Philistines fought with Canaanites and Israelites in the area. King Nebuchadnezzar 2 destroyed them in 604 BC. The Philistines were exiled to Babylon and lost their unique ethnic identity. They vanished from archeological and historical records after the late fifth century B.C. However, the region was still named Palestine after them. The Inhabitants of the Disputed Territory: Palestine 1. Before 1500 B.C.: Canaanites (Idol worshippers) 2. 1500 B.C. to 1000 B.C.: Israelites (under Joshua to Saul). For a brief time, the Philistines ruled the Israelites. Islam was not born until 600 A.D. So who were the Philistines? The Philistines were an idol-worshipping tribe that attacked Israel. They were skilled iron workers and had better weapons than Israel. That's why they could rule that territory. 3. From 1000 B.C. to Jesus' time: Israelites. Different idol-worshipping pagan emperors ruled that region: Assyria, Babylonia, Persia, Greece, and the Romans. They called the territory Palestine. The place was known by the name of a pagan, idol-worshipping tribe: the Philistines. Remember, Islam was not born at the time. 4. Jesus' time - Mohammad's time: Israelites (Jews and Jewish Christians). For the next 600 years or so, the Romans ruled Palestinian Jewish and Christian inhabitants. 5. After Mohammad -World War 2: Israelis and Arabs who invaded Palestine under Mohammad. The Romans conducted many unsuccessful crusades to *Free Palestine* from the Arab Muslim invaders. 6. After World War 2-Present: After winning the war, the Allied forces handed over the leadership of the region to the Israelites. The U.N. created a two-state solution so that Arabs could live peacefully under Arab leadership and Israelites could live under Jewish leadership. All the U.N. members agreed to the solution. Only the Arab Emirates did not accept it. Ever since they have been fighting to reclaim the territory. If you go by history, the original inhabitants of this historical place are Israelites, not Arabs. The Arabs invaded Palestine and exiled many Jewish tribes. (Some of them came to India also). Therefore, it is the Arabs who need to free Palestine so that the Israelites can live there peacefully, not the other way around. To those who want to go 4,000+ years backward, the natural inhabitants of the disputed Palestine region were idol-worshipping Canaanites, not Israel or Islam. Israelites conquered it from idol worshippers. Islam conquered it from the Israelites. Israel reconquered it with the help of their Christian friends. Therefore, when you talk about *Free Palestine*, don't forget that it is the Muslims who invaded the Jewish land (the land God Promised to Abraham's descendants, Israel). The crusaders attempted to recapture their land. They succeeded only after World War 2. Now, it is Israel.

  • @randy.starkey
    @randy.starkey 4 месяца назад

    Dr. Wright is very wrong here. He minimizes the OT prophets and has a made up theology that Jesus is Israel. Entirely fabricated. Israel is Israel. And Peter in his sermon in Acts 3.21 stated "Heaven must receive him until the time comes for God to restore everything, as he promised long ago through his holy prophets." It's what the prophets declared that will be restored. And part of that is Israel saved and in the land, and with Gentile believers we become the "one new man" of Ephesians. But please note, the prophets NEVER called Israel Jesus, and they NEVER faded Israel out into the church. God is not finished with Israel. The prophets DECLARE IT!

    • @jlmt6198
      @jlmt6198 3 месяца назад

      Randy.. Please be humble man. There are enough examples of Christ being portraited as the true Israël. Ever read even other Israelogical perspectives? Come on.. It is not that easy to say as you said it.

    • @krackmusik97224
      @krackmusik97224 3 месяца назад

      ​@@jlmt6198Quote a verse then

    • @krackmusik97224
      @krackmusik97224 3 месяца назад

      Quote a verse then ​@@jlmt6198

    • @jlmt6198
      @jlmt6198 3 месяца назад

      @@krackmusik97224 Gal. 3:16