Видео

Yeah I have one of these…and it’s great!

Should be titled "How to shoot a roll of film in under 4 seconds ?"...

wow super impressionnant ..

toujours une bonne moto de piste, cette cbr 600 (pc35)! bravo

20 years later, the cameras of today will be an old relic like this one. I wonder what we'll have then. 1000 fps raw shooting with 20 stops of clean dynamic range in ISO 100,000, at 3 gigapixels. It might sound crazy but check back in 2038!

this bike is amazing

C'est pas passé loin , t'avais quoi comme pneus ?

Merci @+

Beau spectacle mon ami. Félicitations!

cool!!!

Merci ;o)

Superbe collection Cliclactube!!

Merci. J'essaye de pousser un peu plus mais la marge de progression est encore énoooooooormme ;o) Remarque, c'est stimulant quand tu es débutant. Tu pars de tellement loin que la progression est encourageante lol

Ouais, j'ai deux grosses pustules aux genoux qu'il faut que j'arrive à limer jusqu'au bout :o))

ça frotte les genoux :o)

tu progresse!!!!!!!

Ah ouai quand meme ! Surtout bridé en 34 ... C'est violent la comme conduite !

@itsGeorgeAgain The mirror doesn't flip up and down with this camera.

@GalaticTG 1. ISO 1600 is not 40-50 bucks a roll (more like 4 or 5 bucks) 2. ISO 1600 film is not necessarily required to shoot at 10fps. Good lighting and a wide aperture means 10fps is perfectly plausible at ISO 100.

@qwiksquirrel 35mm film has a maximum advance rate of around 11 fps before jamming and snapping starts to become a problem. Even if the film transport systems of cameras improved (unlikely in the digital age) the frame rate is still limited by the design of the 35mm cassette. With movie cameras, much higher frame rates are possible because A: the film is not stopping and starting for each frame and flows at a fixed rate, and B: the film is mounted on large reels instead of 35mm cassettes.

@cubeproduktion On digital cameras you use an imaging sensor which can NOT be replaced. Thus the shutter speed of a DSLR is limited to what the imaging sensor can handle. Since a film camera uses film as the imaging surface. You are limited by the type of film you are using and to take images at that speed your shelling out 40-50 bucks a roll for ISO 1600 film. Digital SLR's that can go that fast cost about $3000

@MC4506 Merci pour le commentaire Je pense en rajouter quelques unes à l'avenir oui @++

@qwiksquirrel Most of this issue is storage. Flash cards simply can't write 100MB/s (roughly 10FPS @ 14MP). However, this can and is mediated by buffering with large amounts of fast memory, essentially RAM. Shooting at 3FPS, I can get 85 frames @3.5 MP, 35 frames @8MP, 24frames @14.2MP, and 10 frames @ 14.2 RAW, which is pretty good considering that mostly does the job, without having to pay for a bucket full of film. Keep in mind, my camera is entry level. Pro cameras can do even better.

@cubeproduktion Quite simple really. Current digital technology simply is not good enough. The main problem in many DSLR's is that while it may be able to expose each frame at relatively high speed, processing and storing the data, takes quite a bit longer. In film SLR's, the shot is done when the shutter closes, and all it needs to do, is get the next frame into place. As long as the timing is perfect, there is no real limit to the potential speed of film SLR's.

@pixuma hahahahahhaahahha

*clink* KAHPWEEEWEEEWEEEWEEWEWEWEWEWEWEWEWEWE

W-O-W

Merci :o)) C'est vrai que j'abuse, mais c'est dans mes gènes ! Qu'est ce que je peux y faire ??!! lol

Je suis le premier étonné mais j'avais mis le portable dans une petite boite en plastique bricolée ( boite à diapos ) et ça à donné ça !

Merci. Je te souhaite plein de bonheur avec ta future bécane :o)

Terrible ta video au ras du sol. un futur cbfiste :-)

salut, comment fais-tu pour que le vent ne fasse pas saturer le micro ?