Видео

Most High excellent reasonings 🙏🏼

I believe this is a great short example of Yeshua's real church re-emerging; being nonviolent, including toward animals, is much more important than we've been led to believe by the propaganda matrix (centuries old) called mainstream society. Well done brother.

Thank you very much for all your research. Peace, light and blessings :)

thanks a lot for your efforts. God bless 🙌

Don't you know plants have life too. Why kill plants?

There is only one person that can manipulate a person to choose evil over love and deceive them, they will never know unless they start to show mercy, kindness

Thank you Chapman!! 💚

Vegan Theology Facebook link: facebook.com/groups/1244059309879943

2:05 What could have been the purpose of hiding Jesus's name in these verses?

6. Jesus did not Supply Fish to His Disciples at the Sea of Tiberias Similarly, the report of John 21:1-14 cannot be right and Peter accompanied by several of his fellow disciples could not have been catching fish at the sea of Tiberias (John 21:1) after Jesus’ rise from death. Jesus did not supply fish to his disciples there because that showing up, in accordance with Matthew's and Mark's account, never occurred. (Interestingly, the word in the Greek version for fish as in John 21:13 is ὀψάριον [opsarion], which as mentioned earlier, could refer to a dried Mediterranean seaweed.) Further, John, just like Luke, alleges that Jesus’ foremost showing up occurred in the evening of the first day, while the door was barred where the disciples were grouped together. John asserts that this was the earliest showing up and that Thomas was absent. It's not until seven days after that Jesus purportedly showed up to his disciples again while Thomas was there, too. This fails to concur even with Luke who says that all eleven disciples were there when Jesus manifested himself to them in the Holy City after rising from the dead (cf. Vujicic 2016). Again, as aformentioned, fish (Ichthys) was a well known mystical symbol amidst these early Christians for "Jesus Christ, Son of God, Savior" (Akers 1989; Regenstein 1991). Given how the early Christians employed the term, there is therefore good historical evidence for the argument that all of the "fish stories" that managed to get into the gospels were intended to be taken symbolically rather than literally

5.1. Fishy Story Interpolated to Combat "Heresies" According to Akers (2000:128), this fishy story was interpolated by Luke (Paul the anti-vegan, self-proclaimed apostle's underling) in order to combat veganism as wells as "the idea of the 'docetic Christ' -- the idea, held by certain Gnostics such as Marcion, that Jesus had no real body," being just a phantom or a ghost. The consumption of fish is a particular demonstration by Yeshua that He is no phantom:- "Touch me and see; a ghost does not have flesh and bones, as you see I have” (Luke 24:39 NIV).

5. Jesus Eating Fish after Resurrection is Fake News! Luke's story of Jesus eating fish to prove to the eleven disciples at evening on the day of his Resurrection that he's no ghost is clearly a forgery, for both the date and the venue contradict Mark and Matthew. Luke 24: 39-43 and John 21:1-14 are the only places in the New Testament that mention Jesus eating meat. According to Luke, Jesus ate fish (ἰχθύος/Ichthys) in front of 11 disciples in Jerusalem on the first night of his Resurrection: "Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones... And while they yet believed not for joy, and wondered, he said unto them, Have ye here any meat? And they gave him a piece of a broiled fish, and of an honeycomb. And he took it, and did eat before them." (Luke 24: 39-43 KJV) However, according to the Gospel of Mark 16: 7 and 14:28, Jesus had long told his disciples that he would go to Galilee upon resurrection. According to Mark 16: 9 -19, Jesus revealed himself thrice after resurrection, the first time to Mary Magdalene; the second time to two disciples on the road; the third time to all the 11 disciples, presumably in Galilee. According to Matthew 28:16, the eleven disciples went up a mountain in Galilee as specified by Jesus, where Jesus met them the first time as well as the last time after He rose from the dead. So the Gospel of Luke's claim that Jesus ate fish in front of the disciples in Jerusalem on the very night of his Resurrection is wrong in terms of both date and venue. Apparently, it is fabricated and not to be believed (cf. Vujicic 2016).

4.3. Ichthys = Jesus Christ, Son of God, Savior A noteworthy observation concerning the fish symbol: The Greek word for fish (ἰχθύας/Ichthys) was an acronym or code word for " Ἰησοῦς Χρῑστός Θεοῦ Υἱός Σωτήρ [Jesus Christ, Son of God, Savior]", popular among early Christians for the sake of avoiding persecution (cf. Akers 1989; Regenstein 1991; Altar n.d.). And in the Greek version of Mark 6:41, Matthew 14:19, and Luke 9:16, the word for fish as in "the five loaves and two fish" is none other than ἰχθύας!

4.2. Fish vs Fishweed As put by Raw Matt (2019), "Even IF the manuscript is correct, the translation is erroneous." The "fish" in the miracle concerned is probably a mistranslation of a kind of dried seaweed. As found by the author's own research, in the Greek version of John 6:9, the word for "fish" is ὀψάριον (opsarion), which according to Thayer's Greek Lexicon (STRONGS NT 3795), is a "diminutive from ὄψον [opson] (cf. Curtius, § 630) i.e. whatever is eaten with bread, especially food boiled or roasted"; and according to Strong's Exhaustive Concordance, is "a relish to other food (as if cooked sauce)…(presumably salted and dried as a condiment)". So opsarion is not necessarily real fish, but may be just a relish. In this vein, after going through hundreds of ancient Greek writings, Ryan Hicks (2019:148) noted opsarion employed in many ways, including directly denoting plant life. For instance, 800 years before Jesus, Homer employed opson, the origin of opsarion, in his epic The Illiad, book 11, section 630, putting down: "She first drew before the twain a table, fair, with feet of cyanus, and well-polished, and set thereon a basket of bronze, and therewith an onion, a relish [ὄψον, opson] for their drink, and pale honey, and ground meal of sacred barley..." Hicks (2019:148) argues that "'fish' can refer to any aquatic life, including the fishweed, seaweed, and other aquatic plants that commonly made up the opsarion/relishes.... In Homer's reference it was an onion that made up the bulk of the relish." Similarly, Giron (2013) points out that "dried fishweed would be more likely in a basket with bread, and fishweed remains a popular food among Palestinian peasants like the people to whom Jesus was speaking." Moreover, according to Giron (2013), this helps explain Matthew 4:18-20, where Jesus gets his first disciples by telling some fishermen to give up their profession and follow him. Jesus even says to them "I will make you a fisher of men". Could this be Jesus was having them give up their barbaric line of work to do something more righteous? It may sound absurd, but it starts to make a little more sense when you take it in the same context as the story of feeding five thousand, where the disciples never even considered trying to catch some fish, despite being beside the sea. Why didn't they go fishing? Did Jesus teach it was wrong to eat fish?

4. Jesus did not Distribute Fish In the miracle of "five loaves and two fish," Jesus broke loaves but not fish (Matthew 14). The Greek word for fish (ἰχθύας) was a code word for " Jesus Christ, Son of God, Savior" (Akers 2000); and "fish" may also be a mistranslation of the Greek word for "fishweed" (Hicks 2019; Giron 2013). 4.1. Jesus Broke Loaves but NOT Fish (Matthew 14) In the miracle of "Five loaves and two fish," which is narrated in Matthew 14:13-21, Mark 6:31-44, Luke 9:12-17, and John 6:1-14, Jesus neither condoned the eating of fish nor gave it to the masses (Matthew 14). As pointed out by John Vujicic (2009), if you carefully read the text of Matthew 14, you will see that Jesus only broke the LOAVES and gave ONLY THE LOAVES to the people. Twelve baskets were filled with the broken pieces of BREAD. Subsequently, when Jesus referred back to the feeding of five thousand and of four thousand in the Gospel of Matthew 16:9-10 and the Gospel of Mark 8:19-20, He merely made reference to the LOAVES of BREAD AND THE BASKETS which held the broken pieces of bread, and never mentioned in any way the fishes. Likewise, Irenaes, in his book written in the 2nd century, twice states that Jesus fed the crowd with bread and nothing else (Against Heresies 2.22.3, 2.24.4; see Akers 2020:126). Arnobius narrates the miracle of the feeding of the 5000 in a similar manner, sans referring to fish (Against the Heathen 1, 46). Eusebius, too, talks about this event sans bringing up fish (Proof of the Gospel 3,4). In John’s version even though reference is circuitously made to Jesus’s breaking of the fishes, the twelve baskets contained only the broken pieces of FIVE LOAVES. Obviously Jesus used only five loaves to feed the crowd and the reference to the fishes is a subsequent interpolation

In conclusion, "God is love" (1 John 4:8 KJV); Jesus is compassion (Mark 6:34); Jesus was/is a Vegan Christ. He did not eat fish or any other kind of meat while living as a human being on earth. He even died for the sake of liberating innocent creatures of God. All those biblical stories about Jesus consuming fish, multiplying/distributing fish, and aiding/directing His disciples to catch fish are fishy business, products of "the lying pen of the scribes" (Jeremiah 8:8). Let's all follow Jesus' example of compassion and go vegan.

ππ²π½ = יְהֹוָההוָהֹיְ = dominus in latin. the tetragrammaton is a math book explaining the 72 laws of the natural universe. it is the name yahwah reversed onto itself.

To interpret "dominion" as "servanthood" is not only more accurate but also safer than as "stewardship" and "caretakership" for "servanthood" involves least power and authority. Mind you: “Absolute power corrupts absolutely” (Lord Acton 1887). Many humans tend to abuse whatever power they think they have over others.

To put it in a nutshell, ירדו yirdu, the consonantal ancient pre-Masoretic Hebrew word for "dominion" in Genesis 1:28, could denote either to רָדָה (radah; tread upon) or יָרַד (yarad; to lower oneself) in Masoretic Hebrew. Given its context, including Genesis 1:29 (a vegan diet), Genesis 2:15 (great care for the garden) and Genesis 9:8-17 (God's covenant with all animals), Jesus the Vegan Christ Himself, who came to serve rather than to be served, would interpret "dominion" as servanthood rather than despotism/dictatorship/lordship over God's creatures. To interpret "dominion" as "servanthood" is not only more accurate but also safer than as "stewardship" and "caretakership" for "servanthood" involves least power and authority. Mind you: “Absolute power corrupts absolutely” (Lord Acton 1887). Many humans tend to abuse whatever power they think they have over others. It is high time real followers of Jesus dumped Paul the anti-vegan apostate's stance, adopted the Christly, animal-friendly interpretation of "dominion", and went vegan!

The Hebrew word for “dominion” in Genesis 1:28 actually refers to “value, position and prominence.” In other words, God sees more value and prominence in man than He does in animals. With that said, the big question is “Why?” Well, one reason is because man has the abilities to help animals in ways that animals can’t do for themselves. That is why I find that Hebrew word so fascinating! Since God sees us being more valuable, that means we have a responsibility to be good stewards of what God has given us. Thank you for being such a good steward to the animals that God has created. ❤

Veganism is to be applauded & I admire those who follow it - very healthy & good for spiritual life. However, Jesus was not a vegetarian as he had to end the life of the lamb during the Passover, which He did reluctantly, as there was so much Love in Him. In our New Religion & Order, we do not require this lifestye, but those who follow it will be given special honors & privileges. Bravo to you Sir. Our New Religion - aimed at women & their children - is a combination of Christianity, Buddhism, Wicca & other disciplines. The name is "Woman, Thou Art God." - Refers to the God Within everyone's soul.

It's so good to see you again! I hope you're doing well.

I appreciate your energy. You seem passionate.

Guardian is run by animal abusing carnists who do not want to be reminded about their victims. They just want to keep stuffing their face with dismembered body parts. 🤮🤢

Meatism is Animal Sacrifice Detested by God. Go VEGAN! By Dr. Chapman Chen Summary: In the bible, there are verses claiming that animal sacrifice is a food offering for God's consumption, "an aroma pleasing to the Lord" (e.g. Leviticus 1:9 NIV, Exodus 29:18 NIV). In reality, God never delights in animal sacrifice (Psalm 51:16-17); He is fed up with it (Isaiah 1:11-12); He prefers thanksgiving to it (Psalm 50:7-14, 23). Leviticus 16 claims that animal sacrifice can take away human sins, but Hebrews 10:4-10 stresses that this is impossible. Both God and Jesus Christ have explicitly said, "I desire mercy, not sacrifice" (Hosea 6:6 NIV, Matthew 9:13 NIV, Hebrews 10:8). In expelling from the Holy Temple vendors who sold innocent animals to be slaughtered and sacrificed there, Jesus offended the Pharisees and scribes, who then plotted to have him killed (Mark 11:18). True Prophets protested against the sacrificial cult and offered to God bread instead of burnt animal flesh [Leviticus 21:6, 21-22]. The animal sacrifice ritual must be an evil cult concocted by the "lying pen of the scribes" (Jeremiah 8:8 NIV). Otherwise, how would God, who is LOVE (1 John 4:16), delight to see innocent creatures slaughtered and bled to death, and go on to consume them as His favorite dish? Eating animals is animal sacrifice detested by God. For eating animal flesh means sacrificing innocent animals' lives, a sacrifice to the idol god of the belly (Philippians 3:19), and a sacrifice to gluttony (Proverbs 23:20-21) (cf. Hicks 2018). Thus, go VEGAN! Full Text Link: www.hkbnews.net/post/meatism-is-animal-sacrifice-detested-by-god-by-chapman-chen-hkbnews

Follow the Vegan Christ and Celebrate Easter without Taking Life! By Dr. Chapman Chen Summary: Jesus did not eat lamb on Passover! “I desire mercy, NOT sacrifice,” stressed Jesus. Indeed, He deliberately held the Last Supper before the Passover (John 13:1-2), and during the Last Supper, bread instead of meat was blessed by Him (Luke 2:14-20; Mark 14:22-24; Matthew 26:26-29). Even more importantly, prior to the Last Supper, Jesus, in emptying the Temple of animals about to be slaughtered for sacrifice, and in calling the Temple-turned-butcher-shop "a den of thieves", debunked the business fraud of animal sacrifice and disrupted the chief priests' and scribes' lucrative revenue stream, who immediately afterwards conspired to destroy Him (Mark 11:15-18), eventually leading to His arrest, trial, crucifixion, and resurrection on Easter. In this sense, Jesus was a pioneer and martyr for animal liberation (cf. Akers 2000). So, let's follow Jesus and go vegan, starting from this Easter. Full Article link: www.hkbnews.net/post/proofs-that-jesus-was-vegan-%E6%85%88%E6%84%9B%E8%80%B6%E7%A9%8C%E9%A3%9F%E5%85%A8%E7%B4%A0-by-chapman-chen-hkbnews

If you are not VEGAN, you are Breaking ALL Ten Commandments. By Dr. Chapman Chen Summary: Love of Christ is the underlying reason we are to keep the Ten Commandments. Jesus said, “If you love Me, keep My commandments” (John 14:15 NKJV). Non-vegans violate not just the Sixth Commandment "Thou shalt not kill" but also all the other Commandments. E.g., in regarding humanity as superior to all other creatures of God, non-vegans deify themselves and break the 1st Commandment; in sacrificing animals to one's belly-idol, one breaks the 3rd Commandment; in eating God's creatures, thus failing to recognize that Sabbath is a reminder of creation, non-vegans break the 4th Commandment; in eating animal flesh and damage themselves physically, mentally and spiritually, non-vegans disgrace their parents and break the 5th Commandment; in forcefully and artificially inseminating cows and other female animals in order to get their milk, non-vegans break the 7th Commandment; in robbing animals of their food like honey, their skin, their hair, their feathers, their eggs, etc., non-vegans break the 8th Commandment; in misinterpreting "dominion" in Genesis 1:26 and speaking unjustly about their animal neighbours, non-vegans break the 9th Commandment; in occupying and/or destroying animals' habitat for animal farming, for land development, etc., non-vegans break the 10th Commandment. Full text link: www.hkbnews.net/post/if-you-are-not-vegan-you-break-all-ten-commandments-by-dr-chapman-chen

All those Fishy Stories about Jesus the Vegan Christ. By Dr. Chapman Chen, HKBNews Executive Summary: Instances of Jesus the Vegan Christ eating fish or helping His disciples to catch fish in the gospels are all products of either misinterpretation or later interpolation (cf. Chen 2023, 2022a, 2022b, 2020). I. Jesus miraculously aided Peter and his folk to catch a huge net of fish (Luke 5:1-11)? But Jesus then asked them to FORSAKE their NETS, follow Him and CATCH MEN INSTEAD OF FISH. Matthew 4:18-20 and Mark 1:16-18 also record this story albeit without the first part. II. Jesus directed Peter to go hook a fish and dig a coin from her/his mouth in order to pay a temple tax (Matthew 17:24-27)? This could not be real for, firstly, it was never executed; secondly, it's improbable that Jesus would have performed a complex miracle in order to pay his own tax; thirdly, how could Jesus, who died for animal liberation (Akers 2000), have had the heart to order his disciple to do such a cruel thing to an innocent fish? III. Jesus multiplied "five loaves and two fish" to feed the multitudes (Matthew 14:13-21, Mark 6:31-44, Luke 9:12-17, John 6:1-14)? However, Jesus therein broke and handed out loaves but not fish (Matthew 14). Moreover, the Greek word for fish (ἰχθύας) is a code word for " Jesus Christ, Son of God, Savior" (Akers 2000); and "fish (opsarion)" may also be a mistranslation of the Greek word for "fishweed (opson)" (Hicks 2019; Giron 2013). IV. Luke's story of Jesus helping Peter to catch fish and His eating fish to prove to the eleven disciples on the very night of his Resurrection that he's no ghost is clearly a forgery, for both the date and the venue contradict Mark and Matthew (cf. Vujicic 2016). Full Text Link: www.hkbnews.net/post/all-those-fishy-stories-about-jesus-the-vegan-christ-by-dr-chapman-chen-hkbnews

Interesting!

朱錦富家傳《回龍湯》歌訣 錦富是著名教育家朱熹的第廿三代孫。朱家祖傳喝尿秘方“回龍湯”已有廿一代共七百多年的歷史。朱錦富是從十三歲開始喝尿的。 朱家祖傳的《回龍湯》對尿療的服時、服法、取尿、尿質、對症等都有嚴格要求。《回龍湯》的廿二句口授秘訣是「回龍湯，寅卯嘗。治血證，管拔傷。去隱疾，助成長。補氣血，滋陰陽。冬至服，立春放。戒葷腥，不可忘。除頭尾，要中央。目睹色，欲清澈。竹做引，達病肓。棗作輔，除口障。年年服，益壽疆。」 宋代理學名家朱熹家族秘傳的尿療口訣 【管拔傷】 　　關於尿素被認為是尿液中『有毒有機固體』的研究表明，一旦通過攝入回收，它就會轉化為必需氨基酸，幫助我們的身體更有效地利用蛋白質。 　　尿素也被證明是一種非常有效的抗菌和抗病毒劑，是最好皫天然利尿劑之一，也是迄今為止發現的最有效的皮膚保濕劑之一。尿素實際上通過打開皮膚層進行氫鍵結合來增加皮膚的水結合能力，從而將水分吸引到乾燥的皮膚細胞中。 　　作為一種天然的利尿劑，它是無與倫比的，也被廣泛用於治療腫脹、青光眼、痲癎和腦膜炎，並減少過度的腦和脊髓壓力。 　　尿素是一種經批准的藥物，其顯著而全面的抗腫瘤特性可用於抗癌藥物和治療。

殘疾弱智，癲癇，功能性脊椎側彎。先天免疫系統失調。用两年時間，尿療法配合飲食，按摩。得已改善變好。字幕11:24-13:59 ruclips.net/video/Zt-NSW0JA74/видео.html

Sun Yatsen is actually from Hakka origin, based on interview with Dr. Sun Suifang, his granddaughter. Grown up within Cantonese majority, it became natural for him to speak Cantonese fluently, or most probably his family was from cantonized Hakka background, like Hakka Hongkong people nowadays. It is almost certain for him, it's not beneficial to talk about any sub-ethnic group, as he aimed for the whole nation liberation.

💚💚💚

Okay, fine.

尿療法是否必須要素食，如果有食肉，是否無效？

我以前都嘗試過尿療法，不過，有眩暈感覺就放棄了。

Doctor, would you please consider using English subtitles or English closed captions on your videos? I'm subscribed and really enjoyed your videos that I could understand: the ones I could read along with (in English).

Please add English subtitles

可惜五年後，他們以和勇合一為名再度出賣了香港人

By comparison, Mandarin is such a lazy and awful sounding dialect. The reason manderin exist its because overtime people got lazy and started using less and less tones, first came the hakka dialect and then manderin with the least tones. Just like today we have simplified Chinese writing in mainland China. People just getting more lazy!

I'm actually curious... is there a book somewhere on this? In english hopefully.

"Fish" is a mistranslation.....it was actually "sea weed" according to ancient texts. Also, John the Baptist was known to have eaten locusts in the desert. Another mistranslation.....it was actually leaves from the "locust tree" found in that area. Many mistranslations and lies have been told. Just like the lies that were told of Mary Magdalene.....saying she was a prostitute. In 1965 the Catholic (ever so quietly) came out and denounced the saying......revealing that it had been a lie told against her and that she was never a prostitute and they gave her the title of "Apostle to the Apostles". So, you see, this is the reason that God would never leave our salvation in the pages of a book. Instead.....he wrote his laws on the tablet of our hearts.

今年2021年中國未滅亡,咁究竟作者滅亡未呢?

Wonderful channel and reporting. Thank you so much

I wonder if that last year of 'the hoax' was meant as a big distraction from 'stand with HK'. Many American individual patriots stand with HK freedom from CCP -- with you, brother!

I had a friend growing up who is Cantonese and she always tried to explain this differentiation to me. I feel you. Thanks!

和港毒讲道理有点困难哈

澳門，香港，蘇聯，北韓，越南，新加坡都要用央行數位貨幣+刷臉驗證，可防逃稅，防貪污，防竊取或盜用

Kung Fu language history teacher!! 🤣👍🏻

not Freeview, as this does not show CGTN, SKY and freesat has removed the channel