Видео

Not a LaCroix product placement commercial...

Nice talk about TPI - thank you both

Interesting topics guys. Thank you

😂❤❤❤a

35:07 you got any evidence that temporary workers are the cause of this problem? Or is that your default assumption when you want to find someone else to blame?

Why don’t you provide some evidence before you open your pot hole blaming migrant workers. People like you make me sick.

,😂😂

Do the fingers of the swimmer's hand act as vortex generators to improve thrust in the stroke of the arm?

Hgjhxk

😅😅😅😮😮😊

😅😮bio😢cok

तट

read some books you two

🙏❤️🙏❤️🙏❤️🙏❤️🙏❤️🙏❤️🙏❤️

I agree with Joel, we have plenty of surfaces which are more easily covered with solar panels than parts of a wind turbine. Solar panels have become so cheap that the can often be used for roofing car ports and used as balcony balustrades or building cladding at little or no extra cost

Mashallah

T4.

Sany from China claims they've developed test rig for 35MW drivetrain.

Thank u Divine🎉🎉🎉🎉❤

ऋसहृऋसहक्षृृहृृऋहक्षृहहष्हृऋहक्षषसृहहृषृषसृहहृ ईजहार ज्द्धृऋऋऋृृऋऋऋहषृहृ😊

1:03

P

7u

😅😅

😅. Vome namo namaha vome namo naarayanaaya sivaya parabrahmma vaasudevaaya pothana bommera baagvatham balaraamdu sri krusnud vykuntam pryanam yaadava vamsam sarva naasNam krusna bakaramni aakritho krusnavtharam chivara jai sri mannaraayana subham namasthe

❤ 3:57 😊😢😮😊😊😮😢😅😮😮😢😊😊😮😮😢😮😊😢😮😊😊😮😢😮😊😮😊😊😊😢😊😢😊😮😊😊😮🎉😊😢😢😊🎉❤

Frank recruited me out of the military after my retirement as well, into Pearce so we'll see how my Pearce Experience goes.

Would be nice if you put in some time stamps throughout the video

The Osage's want the wind farms gone because they couldn't get any dividends from them to replace their lost revenues from the now virtually nonexistent oil production. Mineral rights have absolutely nothing to do with air. The Osage tribe isn't entitled to any money from Enel.

Long term storage batteries have two big problems, first, if you are storing the energy long term then you can't sell it, and if you don't sell it then you can't make a profit! Short term batteries can sell every peak usage period, they make a profit twice a day, and even if we have plenty of electricity, they are still useful for reducing the required transmission capacity. Second, it is cheaper to build extra offshore wind turbines to supply the same amount of electricity as the storage could provide, but that has the advantage that they also produce electricity at other times, and that electricity can also be sold, maybe only be sold cheaply for hydrogen production, but it can be sold. As the number of wind turbines increases, and we start to use vast amounts for synthetic fuel production, we will start to have enough wind power nearly all the time, and eventually at all times, and the long term storage will become longer and longer term storage, increasingly less profitable, until eventually it will be completely unused. The cheap very long term storage will end up being synthetic liquid fuels, which we normally use for other things, so have anyway, and which only require a cheap basic gas turbine generator to turn them back into electricity, very occasionally when a dunkelflaute occurs.

I'm a regular listener to the show and I usually think you're doing a good job of putting forward truthful and objective analysis of current happenings in the world of renewables. In this episode however you've missed a whole lot regarding CBAM. Rosie is closest to have gotten the facts right. - The purpose is to level the playing field so that companies producing within the EU who are subjected to the carbon emissions "taxes" (EU ETS - it's a market based trading system, not a "taxation" in the traditional way) aren't in a disadvantage to producers outside of EU who has produced with high emissions without paying any price for those emissions. So far I think you've got it, right? What you're missing is that there isn't a single uniform tariff, as is the case with Chinese EVs (to be correct, in EU different companies are getting different percentage depending on how subsidized they are from the Chinese state, in contrast to US 100% tariffs all over the board). The CBAM tariff will vary according to the embedded emissions. If the importer can show that the product is either produced in a "green" way (low emissions) or has been subjected to carbon taxes in their production country, they will get the corresponding deduction in tariff for entering the EU market. In that way the policy is incentivicing low emissions production wherever it takes place. It's true that the cost of goods, especially massive heavy equipment in steel such as WTGs, are becoming more expensive if their true emissions are accounted for and reflected in the price (thanks to CBAM policy), but that's the case just as much for any industry/sector as for renewables. An oil rig will also become more expensive so renewables is not disadvantaged by these tariffs. As for investor confidence, the issue in Europe is national political uncertainty and risk. Especially the beurocracy, long permittering time lines and inflexible fixed electricity sale prices demanded in auctions are hurting the business cases in Europe, rather than unfair EU import duties/tariffs. In general, Europe is much more open to trade and industrial development in line with where competitive advantages are located. US on the other hand seems to move towards closed borders and "everything US made" with enormous costs to the public. It's no coincidence that US still have inflation problems and they won't go away when everyone is fighting for outrageous wage raises (examplified by +70% in the harbours in recent conflict).

no one is leaving a comment?

Kali Raj email address KoviaLpaatti and Tamilnadu India my constituency in Chennai

Kkkkk

Great video!

I would think the centrifugal force at the tip of a blade would prevent any gel or fluid like filling from working. Also, the thickness required for such a construction on the leading edge would be a challenge to end with a neutral AEP effect.

Dont ever say swag again

Appreciate the content !

😮

❤

😊😊😂😂6777 0:32

What does the pay look like ???

As of now they are laying off 900 2 days ago

How I install wind energy plant in my Farm .

Expecting the USA to reach net zero by 2050 now is a bit like now expecting the Boeing Starliner to take crew to the ISS and back by its original target date of 2017! USA needed Denmark/Norway/UK's 20 years experience with offshore wind, and the North Sea's 60 years experience with offshore oil/gas infrastructure. Denmark etc. now knows that they have plenty of better customers, they wont try the USA again at sensible prices. When import taxes start gaining carbon penalties for importing from countries that have failed to achieve net zero, the USA will have to pay the price of the failure over the last few years. There is now insufficient time left to develop the required industry to the required scale in time to build the necessary power generation, whatever the source, while by 2050, other countries will be running on cheap clean wind, with plenty to spare.

Amen

Siemens gamesa are in the worst times now, but the worst time brings the best version to the battle. They pooled the best practise and knowledge from different sectors to make a impact in the future market. Yes they may be in low time, however they could show the real character and their expertise in the upcoming months with the resale of modified 4X turbines and new 5X turbines.

0:13 0:13

9 0:22 😅

Talk about Suzlon’s Hybrid towers