Видео

AI is getting so freaking neat the next 20 years are gonna be such a trip

Interesting

Thank you Benz!

For the sake of transparency, please provide how this content was made - did you input the whole book in 3 parts? which Ai model generated the answer?

another great episode ! enjoyed it .

im happy i found this , great summary

Nonsense.

great

These people sound like they're reading a script handed to them from Roger and have no understanding of how bitcoin works.

As you approach a white hole, do distant observers see you speed up? And from your perspective, do distances lengthen?

should of printed it in micro size .with magnifier added as the cover .

so interesting and complex

Very well presented.

Yes sir it is. And its fiiiine. This is fine.

Isn't orthodox scientific approach not sufficient to understand absolute truth about cell. Maybe spirituality knows deeper secrets

An ecological approach to cell biology will inevitably lead us towards terrain biology, where disease doesn't exist, only an imbalance. When we continually destabilize cellular ecosystems with synthetic poisons (drugs, AG biocides, food preservatives, etc) to treat, grow food, or prevent disease, it allows for more disease to occur. If we eliminate this cause of disease, we'll enter a new sustainable medical paradigm, and better overall health and quality of life for all, staring at the cellular level

Is this an AI podcast?

BSV is the true bitcoin

Is this AI? Why are you doing this? It’s weird.

Thanks for posting! I enjoyed listening to this.

Thanks NotebookLM

This video sounds like a Bitcoin Cash chain promotion to fill($) the pockets of the founders

Good explanation of this book

Glad they covered Pettis because, if US policymakers could consult only one economist in the world to guide them through the Trump presidency, Professor Pettis is the right one for sure. He can tell us how the US can intervene in trade in ways that truly benefit the country as a whole. He's a renowned expert on international trade especially as it pertains to China, where he's long taught finance at Peking University. His books are lucid enough for laypeople to understand -- as are his interviews and talks many of which are on RUclips. He's also prolific on his Twitter X blog. Compared to other economists, you can rely more on what he says because it's grounded in history not just theory. A self-described "junkie for economic history," he insists that being versed in economic history is an economist's superpower. Listening to him one soon learns that the details of tariffs -- how they're applied and to whom -- make all the difference. Also, he argues persuasively that the US would benefit if it placed a tax on incoming foreign capital.

Fabulous deep dive.

Ai generated fake conversation, huh? Creepy

Is this AI generated? No offense intended if these are real people, but it really confirms quite well to the pattern or mood other AI podcasts/two people talking that I've heard.

Thanks for the summary

It will be interesting to get more details on the failing of Roman institutions by then. Today I understand the idea of "SALVATION" beyond the mythical aeternal life. It seems to have been salvation from fear of senseless death. The emphasis on HOW they were living instead of how soon they would die... Probably... Thank you

This is Notebook LM, a Google AI Tool. Please put disclaimers on ai content 😊

Don't mix epochs. Spread of christianity was when it became the empire's official religion. Persecution was BEFORE Constantine.

Sorry... It was not convincing people, it was administering privileges.

its a great phrase 😌

And so many amazing experiences!

The video is very interesting! Something I don't understand: I have USDT in my OKX wallet and I have the recovery phrase. 《pride》-《pole》-《obtain》-《together》-《second》-《when》-《future》-《mask》-《review》-《nature》-《potato》-《bulb》: How should I convert them into Bitcoin?

I read this book 30 or so years ago. I've thought about it a lot lately. I didn't think that any body els would even remember this book.

Thank you, a very pleasant and interesting review.

Thank you for your respectful take - I am Bengali and the hosts do a great job of summarizing the cultural dynamics!!! 🙂

The business world, corporations and organizations, is bullsh!# Hiring, promotions, etc. Unfortunately, mom and pop places are also b.s.

7.5 years web developer. Worked in Silicon Valley. Haven’t been able to find another job since the downturn a couple years ago. It sucks

Really interesting stuff Btw please lessen the use of the word “well” 😅

AI podcast?

One of the worst experiences is taking two steps forward and two steps back. Net zero

Not fronting but the voices are AI right?

Thank goodness Bitcoiners stayed with small blocks. Concensus and market forces determined our course.

stop finishing each others sandwiches!

Bigger blocks can only centralize the network in the hands of a very few being able to validate transactions or runnig a full node. Block size need to stay small to keep the network decentralized. We don't need cheap transaction fees on the base layer, we need honest money controlled by noone. We have have cheaper transaction fees on 2 and third layers like lightning and liquid, because we cannot scale the timechain from the base layer.

Good content but was it STRATEGIC to repeat it back and forth? I found it annoying.

Only difference between Genius and Insanity is Success, regardless of the generation and its cute toys.

The World as Fields - Dimensions and their Intersections as a Manifold ____________________________________________________________ When I first heard of manifolds I believed that they were like a cross section but in maths. Why I thought this I am not sure but I am worried that the literature does not support this in a way that would be conducive to treating math as somewhat of a field of science. I say this because I want it to be known that a cube to a 4d hyper-sphere is the same as a square to a cube or a line to a square. I choose these shapes because in a way they have a point and a counterpoint. A positive and a negative. A point is not a line but a positive and negative one are a line. While three points do not make two of the previous... a line. Though four points does, those are two different shapes. A triangle and a square. It is the completeness. Not just in the soundness of a theorem like Godel says but it is(going a bit interpretive here) incompleteness. Each one requires a pair and the first only exists because it does. Almost metaphysical. This is important to understand when I say that the world is fields because I don't know how else to define our existence other than things that interact with other things. I emphasize because you need to know that it is a key part of what I am saying. Enough beating around the bush... what is a manifold? Well... they come in pairs of dimensions and interact with other pairs of dimensions in a manner that still allows individual expression and does not mean that they do not intersect. What I believe is that each dimension matters. That there are 14, seven pairs, & not need for further interpretation beyond the metaphysical. ~Jill P. Johnson PhD