Видео

"How can you control thoughts when 'you' are yourself a thought?" This question delves deep into the concept of consciousness and self. You are the awareness observing thoughts, not the thoughts themselves. Thoughts are activities of the mind, but the observer who perceives and understands these thoughts is distinct from them. For example, when you say, "I am angry," the "I" recognizing the anger is separate from the anger itself. You don’t control thoughts; you observe them, understand them, and respond. This awareness is your true power. "Where is your mind exactly?" The brain is physically located in your head, but the "mind" is not a physical entity; it is a manifestation of consciousness. It encompasses thoughts, memories, and emotions expressed through the brain. The mind has no fixed location; it’s more of a state or quality of awareness. "Are you a separate entity from your mind, like using a mobile phone?" You and your brain are interconnected but not entirely the same. The brain is a tool that processes thoughts and controls physical functions, but you are the awareness that understands, questions, and makes decisions. Just as a mobile phone requires a user to operate it, the brain functions under the direction of your consciousness, which is you.

@EckhartTolleYT Awareness, I am etc... They are useful concepts temporarily, but also cul-de-sacs. Life absolutely demands full complete participation. Mindfulness the way it is taught by Eckhart is just one string of the 8 fold path. A kind of sitting on the river bank safely watching stuff float by, the sitter reminding themselves continously that they are that which observes, not the thing itself. When in truth that which observes is that which is observed, any distinctions between here and there are illusory.

@@MassiveLib The Temporary Utility of Eckhart's Philosophy: "You are absolutely right that concepts like 'Awareness' and 'I am' can be temporarily helpful, but life indeed demands complete participation. I believe Eckhart’s message also points in that direction-observation is just the initial step. Once we fully embrace that awareness, only then can we move toward active participation in life." The Unity of Observer and Observed: "The point you emphasized, that 'the observer' and 'the observed' are one, is a profound truth. I think Eckhart’s teachings also eventually guide us toward this realization-that the distinction is merely an illusion. However, this understanding often comes through practice and deeper insight, for which starting with the role of 'the observer' can be essential." Personal Understanding and Practical Application: "Your point is significant-that life isn’t about sitting on the sidelines and merely observing, but demands complete engagement. In my view, mindfulness strengthens this awareness, helping us step into life with greater clarity and involvement." Summary: "You’ve made a very deep and thought-provoking point. Balancing observation and participation is perhaps the greatest lesson, and something we should continue reflecting on."

Yeah

It sounds like it. Sounds creepy to me. Eckart would call this type of teaching as coming from the ego.